Quantify Issues

Recent GitHub Issues Activity

_{Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.}

Quantify commits

Quantified Commit Activity Over 14 Days

Developer	Avatar	Branches	PRs	Commits	Files	Changes
None (skewalramani-oss)		1	2/0/2	2	57	13934
Eric Dong		1	1/1/0	1	10	13578
Holt Skinner		5	9/7/0	19	13	12384
Owl Bot		3	0/0/0	8	30	11465
Kristopher Overholt		1	1/2/0	2	3	4308
Gabriela		1	0/1/1	1	3	2888
Katie Nguyen		1	1/1/0	1	1	1875
Souvik Mukherjee		1	1/1/0	1	1	1850
Laurie White (Annie29)		1	1/0/0	3	1	1559
alan blount		1	0/1/0	1	10	1291
Ariel Jassan		1	0/1/0	1	1	798
Ani		1	0/1/0	1	14	798
Tianli Yu (tianli)		1	1/0/0	6	1	76
Mend Renovate		1	1/1/4	1	2	4
Averi Kitsch		1	1/1/0	1	1	3
dependabot[bot]		1	1/1/0	1	1	2
Vijaylaxmi Lendale (VJlaxmi)		0	2/0/1	0	0	0
None (saaagesh)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
None (Adrian1Acoran1)		0	1/0/1	0	0	0
Megha Agarwal (agarwal22megha)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0

_{PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period}

Report On: Fetch issues

Recent Activity Analysis

The GoogleCloudPlatform/generative-ai repository currently has 29 open issues, with recent activity indicating a mix of bug reports and feature requests. Notably, there are several recurring themes related to authentication issues, documentation gaps, and performance problems with the Gemini model.

Several issues highlight critical bugs affecting functionality, such as the inability to maintain context in multi-turn conversations (#924) and persistent server errors during training (#873). The presence of multiple issues regarding the same functionalities suggests a systemic problem that may require urgent attention from the development team.

Issue Details

Most Recently Created Issues

1. Issue #939: [Bug]: Accessing Gemini models using Vertex AI for WebAPP

   • Priority: High
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 3 days ago
   • Updated: N/A
   • Description: User is facing issues with OAuth token expiration while integrating Gemini models into a web application.

2. Issue #924: [Feat]: How to do multi-turn and add few-shots when chatting with a file

   • Priority: Medium
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 14 days ago
   • Updated: 13 days ago
   • Description: User requests documentation on maintaining context in multi-turn conversations involving files.

3. Issue #873: [Bug]: 500 internal server error on fine-tuning jobs

   • Priority: High
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 30 days ago
   • Updated: 8 days ago
   • Description: Users report failures in fine-tuning jobs, questioning the maturity of the Gemini model.

4. Issue #753: [Bug]: Intro Gemini 1.5 Pro notebook has inaccurate response for timecode

   • Priority: Medium
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 71 days ago
   • Updated: 9 days ago
   • Description: Timecode discrepancies in audio transcription noted by users during workshops.

5. Issue #694: [Bug]: Error occurred when Grounding Tools use DataStore with enable chunking mode.

   • Priority: High
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 91 days ago
   • Updated: 9 days ago
   • Description: Users encounter errors when using Grounding Tools with chunking enabled in DataStore.

Notable Trends and Commonalities

• A significant number of issues revolve around authentication and authorization problems, particularly with service accounts and OAuth tokens.
• Users frequently express frustration over unclear or lacking documentation, especially regarding advanced features like multi-turn conversations and few-shot learning.
• Performance-related complaints are prevalent, particularly concerning the efficiency of fine-tuning jobs and response accuracy from the Gemini model.

This clustering of issues suggests that while the repository is actively developed, there are underlying challenges that could hinder user experience and adoption if not addressed promptly.

Report On: Fetch pull requests

Report on Pull Requests

Overview

The dataset contains a total of 9 open pull requests (PRs) from the GoogleCloudPlatform/generative-ai repository. These PRs cover various features, bug fixes, and enhancements related to generative AI workflows using Google Cloud's Vertex AI and the Gemini model.

Summary of Pull Requests

1. PR #952: feat(search): use vertex search via ootb; customize options grounding/langchain

   • State: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • This PR introduces a feature that utilizes Vertex AI Search with customizable options. The author has combined multiple examples into a single notebook for better usability. Review comments suggest enhancing documentation and merging existing resources for clarity.

2. PR #951: Add Jupytext test

   • State: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • A draft PR aimed at adding tests for Jupytext functionality. It lacks completion in terms of following the contributing guidelines and ensuring tests pass.

3. PR #949: Llamaindex rag

   • State: Open
   • Created: 2 days ago
   • This PR is a follow-up to feedback received on a previous submission regarding a blog post on LlamaIndex and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). The author seeks guidance on whether the changes made are satisfactory.

4. PR #941: chore: Added Google-Employee specific instructions for contribution

   • State: Open
   • Created: 3 days ago
   • This PR updates the CONTRIBUTING.md file to include specific instructions for Google employees, enhancing onboarding for internal contributors.

5. PR #935: feat: Added multi-language prompt feature

   • State: Open
   • Created: 8 days ago
   • Introduces a feature that allows prompts to be generated in multiple languages. Review comments indicate that linter errors need to be resolved before merging.

6. PR #933: fix: allow product_attributes_extraction.ipynb to run on Vertex colab enterprise

   • State: Open
   • Created: 10 days ago
   • Fixes issues related to running a specific notebook in Vertex AI Colab Enterprise by modifying how external URIs are handled.

7. PR #928: feat: add Gemma sampling notebook

   • State: Open
   • Created: 13 days ago
   • Adds a new notebook for sampling with Gemma, but there are suggestions for improving organization within the directory structure.

8. PR #775: feat: Add Gemini Summarize PR

   • State: Open
   • Created: 65 days ago
   • This PR introduces an automated summarization feature for pull requests using the Gemini model, aimed at improving review efficiency.

9. PR #700: feat: Add Customer Search Demo App

   • State: Open
   • Created: 86 days ago
   • A demo application intended to showcase customer search capabilities but requires significant refactoring based on review feedback.

Analysis of Pull Requests

The current set of open pull requests reflects a diverse range of contributions aimed at enhancing the functionality and usability of the generative AI tools provided by Google Cloud Platform. Here are some notable themes and observations:

Feature Enhancements

Several PRs focus on adding new features or improving existing functionalities, such as multi-language support (#935), customizable search options (#952), and automated summarization (#775). These enhancements indicate an ongoing effort to make the tools more versatile and user-friendly, catering to a broader audience.

Documentation and Usability

A recurring theme across multiple PRs is the emphasis on documentation improvements. For instance, PR #941 adds specific instructions for Google employees, while PR #952 suggests merging various resources into a comprehensive guide. This focus on documentation is crucial as it aids users in understanding how to effectively utilize the tools available in the repository.

Code Quality and Maintenance

Several pull requests highlight issues related to code quality, such as linting errors (e.g., PR #935) and requests for simplification or refactoring (e.g., PR #700). The presence of these comments suggests that while new features are being added, there is also an active effort to maintain code quality and ensure that contributions adhere to best practices.

Community Engagement

The discussions in the review comments reflect an engaged community willing to provide constructive feedback. For example, suggestions made by reviewers often include linking to existing documentation or recommending ways to enhance clarity in notebooks (#952). This collaborative environment is essential for fostering continuous improvement within the project.

Challenges with Integration

Some pull requests indicate challenges with integration or compatibility issues, particularly when adapting notebooks for different environments like Vertex AI Colab Enterprise (#933). These challenges underscore the complexities involved in ensuring that various components work seamlessly together across different platforms.

Conclusion

Overall, the current state of open pull requests in the GoogleCloudPlatform/generative-ai repository demonstrates a vibrant development process focused on enhancing functionality, improving documentation, and maintaining code quality. The active engagement from contributors and reviewers alike highlights a commitment to creating robust generative AI solutions that are accessible and effective for users across various domains.

Report On: Fetch commits

Repo Commits Analysis

Development Team and Recent Activity

Team Members and Recent Contributions

1. Holt Skinner

   • Recent Contributions:
   • Updated the Text Embeddings max tokens to 2048.
   • Added spelling check for "Vertex Search".
   • Collaborated on end-to-end supervised fine-tuning for text classification.
   • Made multiple fixes and updates across various notebooks, including Code Vulnerability Detection and web-app README.
   • Contributed to CI/CD improvements, including linter updates and dependency management.
   • Collaborators: Gabriela, Eric Dong, Alan Blount, Owl Bot.

2. Gabriela

   • Recent Contributions:
   • Co-authored the end-to-end supervised fine-tuning for text classification.
   • Collaborators: Holt Skinner, Alan Blount, Mend Renovate, Owl Bot.

3. Souvik Mukherjee

   • Recent Contributions:
   • Fixed updates to the Code Vulnerability Detection Notebook.
   • Collaborators: Holt Skinner.

4. Eric Dong

   • Recent Contributions:
   • Refactored models and updated notebooks with the latest models.
   • Collaborators: Holt Skinner.

5. Ariel Jassan

   • Recent Contributions:
   • Developed a notebook for evaluating prompts at scale with Gemini Batch Prediction API.
   • Collaborators: Holt Skinner, Owl Bot.

6. Kristopher Overholt

   • Recent Contributions:
   • Fixed handling of Gemini parallel function calls in sample notebook.
   • Contributed to various CI/CD improvements and documentation updates.
   • Collaborators: Owl Bot.

7. Mend Renovate (Bot)

   • Recent Contributions:
   • Managed dependency updates across various packages and libraries.

8. Dependabot (Bot)

   • Recent Contributions:
   • Automated dependency updates for security vulnerabilities across multiple libraries.

9. Alan Blount

   • Recent Contributions:
   • Contributed to the finance advisor spanner demo and other enhancements.
   • Collaborators: Holt Skinner, Owl Bot.

10. Katie Nguyen

    • Recent Contributions:
    • Updated various notebooks to use the latest model versions and fixed issues related to document processing.
    • Collaborators: Holt Skinner.

Summary of Recent Activities

• The team has been actively updating notebooks with new features, bug fixes, and enhancements related to the Gemini model on Vertex AI.
• Significant focus has been placed on improving CI/CD processes, including linter configurations and dependency management.
• Collaboration is evident among team members, particularly in co-authoring features and addressing issues collectively.
• The introduction of new features such as batch prediction APIs and enhanced documentation reflects a commitment to improving user experience and educational resources.

Patterns and Themes

• There is a strong emphasis on collaboration among team members, with many contributions co-authored by multiple individuals.
• Continuous integration and deployment practices are being refined to ensure code quality and maintainability.
• The repository shows a proactive approach to addressing security vulnerabilities through automated dependency management tools like Dependabot and Mend Renovate.
• The focus on educational content through Jupyter Notebooks indicates a commitment to making generative AI accessible to a broader audience.

Conclusion

The development team is actively engaged in enhancing the generative-ai repository by implementing new features, fixing bugs, and refining CI/CD processes. Their collaborative efforts are aimed at improving both the functionality of the tools provided and the educational resources available for users interested in generative AI technologies.