Quantify commits

Quantified Commit Activity Over 30 Days

Developer	Avatar	Branches	PRs	Commits	Files	Changes
Shilpa Kancharla		8	7/7/0	19	10	6505
Mark Daoust		3	3/3/0	5	7	492
Mark McDonald		1	1/1/0	3	2	32
Josh Gordon		1	0/0/0	1	1	5
Van Woods (vdubya)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Ashwani (SYNAX07)		0	0/0/1	0	0	0
None (emgeiger)		0	0/0/1	0	0	0
TechTress9.8 (iKn0wH0w)		0	1/0/1	0	0	0
Cachiman Inc (WontonSam)		0	1/0/1	0	0	0
Robin Roy (robinroy03)		0	1/0/1	0	0	0
Krish Dholakia (krrishdholakia)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0

_{PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period}

Quantify Issues

Recent GitHub Issues Activity

_{Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.}

Report On: Fetch issues

Recent Activity Analysis

The Google Gemini Cookbook repository currently has 28 open issues, with recent activity indicating a mix of feature requests and bug reports. Notably, several issues are marked as stale, suggesting a lack of engagement or resolution, particularly those awaiting responses from maintainers. Common themes include requests for enhanced documentation, clarification on API functionalities, and specific bug reports related to file uploads and model behaviors.

Several issues stand out due to their implications for user experience and project functionality. For instance, the issue regarding the difference in output between PDF and DOC file upload methods (#233) highlights potential inconsistencies in API behavior that could confuse users. Additionally, the issue about the model generating repetitive sequences of tokens (#220) raises concerns about the reliability of the model's output, which could impact user trust and satisfaction.

Issue Details

Most Recently Created Issues

1. Issue #241: Cook book - responseSchema

   • Priority: Feature Request
   • Status: Triaged
   • Created: 37 days ago
   • Updated: 2 days ago

2. Issue #233: Difference in Output Between PDF and DOC File Upload Methods

   • Priority: Bug
   • Status: Awaiting Response
   • Created: 41 days ago
   • Updated: 2 days ago

3. Issue #221: "response_schema" results in KeyError

   • Priority: Bug
   • Status: Awaiting Response
   • Created: 52 days ago
   • Updated: 2 days ago

4. Issue #220: Bug Report the model often starts creating repetitive sequences of tokens

   • Priority: Bug
   • Status: Awaiting Response
   • Created: 53 days ago
   • Updated: 2 days ago

5. Issue #201: Run on Multiple Images

   • Priority: Feature Request
   • Status: Awaiting Response
   • Created: 71 days ago
   • Updated: 2 days ago

Most Recently Updated Issues

1. Issue #241: Cook book - responseSchema

   • Updated recently with comments indicating a need for more examples.

2. Issue #220: Bug Report the model often starts creating repetitive sequences of tokens

   • Recent comments suggest multiple users are experiencing this issue, indicating a broader concern.

3. Issue #221: "response_schema" results in KeyError

   • Users are discussing potential resolutions and workarounds, but no definitive fix has been provided yet.

4. Issue #233: Difference in Output Between PDF and DOC File Upload Methods

   • The issue remains unresolved with no further input from maintainers.

5. Issue #201: Run on Multiple Images

   • Awaiting further information from the user who reported it.

Summary of Themes and Commonalities

• A significant number of issues revolve around bugs related to file handling (PDF vs DOC uploads) and model output consistency (repetitive sequences).
• There is a strong demand for improved documentation and examples to help users navigate API functionalities effectively.
• Several issues remain stagnant or marked as stale, indicating potential disengagement from maintainers or a backlog of unresolved queries.
• The community appears active in reporting issues but may require more responsive engagement from project maintainers to foster resolution and improvement.

This analysis underscores the importance of addressing user-reported issues promptly to enhance user experience and maintain trust in the Gemini API's capabilities.

Report On: Fetch pull requests

Overview

The Google Gemini Cookbook repository currently has 18 open pull requests (PRs) that focus on enhancing documentation, adding new examples, and improving existing functionalities related to the Gemini API. This report analyzes these PRs to identify trends, common themes, and notable contributions.

Summary of Pull Requests

1. PR #253: Add evaluate RAG with LlamaIndex
   Created 5 days ago, this PR introduces a new notebook for evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) using LlamaIndex. It has received positive feedback but also several suggestions for improvements, particularly regarding code clarity and version pinning.

2. PR #250: Update README.md
   This PR, created 15 days ago, addresses a minor typo in the README file. It highlights the importance of maintaining documentation accuracy.

3. PR #245: Call Gemini in OpenAI format (via LiteLLM)
   Created 27 days ago, this PR adds documentation on how to call the Gemini API using the LiteLLM SDK. The reviewer requested a more structured format and detailed examples.

4. PR #139: Change official SDKs URL
   This PR was created 95 days ago to update URLs in the documentation but is currently stalled due to a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) issue.

5. PR #124: langchain and gemini
   Created 100 days ago, this PR provides an example of using LangChain with Gemini. The reviewer requested clarity on the guide's objectives.

6. PR #76: Generate personalized product descriptions using the Gemini API and Weaviate
   This PR, created 123 days ago, demonstrates integration with Weaviate for generating product descriptions. It has received extensive feedback focusing on usability improvements.

7. PR #71: add litellm example (OpenAI-Compatible Endpoint)
   Created 123 days ago, this PR aims to provide a tutorial for using LiteLLM with the Gemini API but is awaiting CLA resolution.

8. PR #7: LlamaIndex and Gemini Quickstart
   This PR was created 148 days ago and serves as a quickstart guide for LlamaIndex with Gemini. It faced issues related to image licensing and module imports.

9. PR #247: Update Streaming_REST.ipynb
   Created 26 days ago, this PR updates an existing notebook but lacks detailed context about its changes.

10. PR #240: Improving object detection colab
    Created 38 days ago, this PR refines an object detection example by simplifying code and addressing safety features.

11. PR #230: Update primes example and re-run
    This PR updates a quickstart example related to prime numbers and was created 47 days ago.

12. PR #227: Update Code_Execution.ipynb
    Created 51 days ago, this PR improves prompt samples in a code execution notebook.

13. PR #197: Point to the wrapper, not the proto
    This draft PR aims to correct documentation references but lacks clarity on its objectives.

14. PR #187: Add a notebook test script
    Created 79 days ago, this PR introduces a testing script for notebooks but still requires refinement before merging.

15. PR #98: switch from openai to gemini
    This PR adds a guide for using the Gemini API in an OpenAI-compatible manner but is awaiting CLA resolution.

16. PR #89: Create Internet_Access_Function_Calling.py
    Created 119 days ago, this PR adds functionality for internet access via the Function Calling API but has received user feedback regarding its effectiveness.

17. PR #86: Add RAG implementation using Gemini LLM and Embedding using BeyondLLM
    This PR focuses on implementing RAG experiments and was created 121 days ago.

18. PR #82: Update Embeddings.ipynb to show output_dimenstionality parameter
    Created 122 days ago, this PR aims to clarify usage of a new parameter in embedding functions but requires additional context for users.

Analysis of Pull Requests

The current set of open pull requests indicates a strong focus on enhancing both documentation and practical examples within the Google Gemini Cookbook repository. A significant number of these contributions are aimed at improving user experience through clearer instructions or more comprehensive guides on utilizing the Gemini API effectively.

Common Themes

1. Documentation Improvements: Many pull requests are dedicated to updating README files or specific notebooks to correct typos or improve clarity (e.g., PRs #250, #139). This reflects an ongoing commitment to maintaining high-quality documentation as part of the project’s lifecycle.

2. Integration Examples: Several pull requests focus on integrating various tools or libraries with the Gemini API (e.g., LiteLLM in PR #245 and Weaviate in PR #76). These integrations are crucial as they demonstrate practical applications of the API and broaden its usability across different contexts.

3. User Feedback Incorporation: The review comments on many pull requests show active engagement from maintainers who provide constructive feedback aimed at refining contributions before merging them into the main branch (e.g., detailed suggestions in PRs like #253 and #76).

Notable Anomalies

• Some pull requests have stalled due to Contributor License Agreement issues (#250, #139), indicating potential barriers for new contributors that could be addressed by streamlining onboarding processes.
• There are instances where contributions have been marked as stale due to inactivity (#71), suggesting that some contributors may need reminders or support to complete their submissions.
• A few pull requests (#197, #187) appear less focused or lack sufficient context about their intended changes, which could hinder their acceptance without further clarification from contributors.

Conclusion

The Google Gemini Cookbook is actively evolving through community contributions that enhance its functionality and usability. The focus on documentation quality and integration examples is commendable; however, attention should be paid to resolving CLA issues promptly and providing clearer guidelines for contributors to ensure smoother collaboration moving forward. Overall, these efforts will significantly benefit developers looking to leverage the capabilities of the Gemini API effectively in their projects.

Report On: Fetch commits

Repo Commits Analysis

Development Team and Recent Activity

Team Members and Their Recent Activities

1. Shilpa Kancharla (shilpakancharla)

   • Recent Commits: 19 commits in the last 30 days.
   • Key Contributions:
   • Updated PDF quickstart to demonstrate image capabilities.
   • Added multiple examples related to video analysis, including classification and summarization.
   • Contributed to entity extraction and added a new example for analyzing historical events.
   • Engaged in reformatting and updating documentation across various notebooks.
   • Collaborations: Worked closely with Mark Daoust on several commits, including co-authored changes.

2. Mark Daoust (MarkDaoust)

   • Recent Commits: 5 commits in the last 30 days.
   • Key Contributions:
   • Fixed issues related to PDF token counts and made updates to PDF examples.
   • Collaborated with Shilpa Kancharla on various projects, including reformatting notebooks and fixing bugs.
   • Collaborations: Co-authored multiple commits with Shilpa Kancharla.

3. Mark McDonald (markmcd)

   • Recent Commits: 3 commits in the last 30 days.
   • Key Contributions:
   • Made adjustments to workflows for stale issues and fixed label issues in the GitHub actions.
   • Collaborations: Worked alongside Shilpa Kancharla on various documentation updates.

4. Josh Gordon (random-forests)

   • Recent Commits: 1 commit in the last 30 days.
   • Key Contributions:
   • Updated README.md files across the repository.

5. Guillaume Vernade (Giom-V)

   • Recent Activity: Contributed to fixing links and improving documentation but did not have recent commits listed.

Patterns, Themes, and Conclusions

• Active Development Focus: The team is actively enhancing the Gemini Cookbook with new examples, particularly around video analysis and entity extraction. Shilpa Kancharla is leading this effort, indicating a strong focus on expanding functionality related to multimedia processing.

• Collaboration: There is a notable trend of collaboration among team members, especially between Shilpa Kancharla and Mark Daoust, who frequently co-author commits. This suggests a cooperative work environment that fosters shared ownership of code quality and feature development.

• Documentation Improvements: A significant amount of recent activity has been dedicated to updating documentation, which is crucial for user engagement and understanding of the API's capabilities. This aligns with the project's goal of being a comprehensive resource for developers.

• Branch Management: The team is managing multiple active branches effectively, indicating ongoing parallel development efforts for various features or fixes.

Overall, the development team is engaged in a productive cycle of adding features, fixing bugs, and enhancing documentation within the Google Gemini Cookbook project.