GPT Academic, a tool designed to enhance academic interactions with large language models, has seen significant user engagement but is currently experiencing development stagnation with no recent commits or pull requests.
The repository for GPT Academic is bustling with user activity, evidenced by 308 open issues. Many of these issues are feature requests and bug reports, particularly concerning API key configurations and model integrations. This indicates a strong demand for improvements and new features, such as support for additional models and enhanced translation functionalities. However, the development team has not made any recent commits or opened new pull requests, suggesting a pause in active development.
Recent issues highlight critical bugs related to API key recognition (#1929) and translation errors (#1935), which are high priority but remain unresolved. Feature requests like support for Mistral AI (#1940) and IP2Location.io API (#1944) reflect user interest in expanding the tool's capabilities. Despite this, the lack of recent pull requests or commits indicates that these user needs are not being addressed promptly.
High User Engagement vs. Development Stagnation: Despite a high number of open issues indicating active user engagement, there have been no recent commits or pull requests from the development team.
Critical Bugs Unresolved: High-priority bugs related to API key configurations and translation errors remain open without recent progress.
Demand for New Features: Users are actively requesting new features and model support, yet these demands are unmet due to the current lack of development activity.
Leadership Role of binary-husky: The primary contributor appears to play a leadership role but has not contributed recently.
Potential Impact on User Satisfaction: The stagnation in addressing critical bugs and feature requests could negatively impact user satisfaction if not addressed soon.
This analysis highlights a disconnect between user demand and development activity within the GPT Academic project, which may require strategic intervention to realign efforts with community needs.
| Developer | Avatar | Branches | PRs | Commits | Files | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| binary-husky |  |
2 | 0/0/0 | 12 | 22 | 497 |
| Menghuan1918 |  |
1 | 0/1/0 | 1 | 3 | 267 |
| FatShibaInu |  |
1 | 2/1/1 | 1 | 4 | 119 |
| Keldos |  |
1 | 1/1/0 | 1 | 5 | 89 |
| hongyi-zhao |  |
1 | 1/1/0 | 1 | 2 | 14 |
| jiangfy-ihep |  |
1 | 1/1/0 | 1 | 2 | 13 |
| moetayuko |  |
1 | 2/1/0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| None (AnjiaYe) | 0 | 0/0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Robin An (ruianlc) | 0 | 1/0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Sarath Chandra Sai Kavuru (sarath59) | 0 | 1/0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| None (zhuhuahua168) | 0 | 1/0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period
| Timespan | Opened | Closed | Comments | Labeled | Milestones |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Days | 8 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 1 |
| 30 Days | 32 | 6 | 32 | 32 | 1 |
| 90 Days | 100 | 19 | 119 | 98 | 1 |
| All Time | 1551 | 1243 | - | - | - |
Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.
The GitHub repository for the project GPT Academic has seen significant recent activity, with a total of 308 open issues. The latest issues reflect a mix of feature requests and bug reports, indicating ongoing development and user engagement. Notably, there are recurring themes around API key configurations, model integration, and translation functionalities.
Several issues highlight critical bugs related to API key recognition and model compatibility, particularly with third-party services. This suggests potential challenges in maintaining seamless integrations as the project evolves. Additionally, there is a noticeable demand for enhanced features, such as support for new models and improved user interface elements.
Issue #1944: [Feature]: 支持使用 IP2Location.io API
Issue #1943: [Feature]: OpenAI 接口兼容
Issue #1941: [Feature]: 联网搜索报错
Issue #1940: [Feature]: Add support for Mistral AI
Issue #1939: [Feature]: Dalle3 如何根据上传的图片生成指定内容的图片
Issue #1935: [Bug]: multi_language.py translate error
Issue #1934: [Bug]: Traceback (most recent call last): ...
Issue #1929: [Bug]: API KEY不满足任何一种已知的密钥格式
Issue #1928: [Bug]: 由于最为关键的转化PDF编译失败...
Issue #1925: [Bug]: openai key无法识别报错
The ongoing activity within the GPT Academic repository reflects a vibrant community engaged in both identifying issues and proposing enhancements. The focus on API integrations and translation functionalities suggests that these areas are crucial for the project's future development and user satisfaction.
The analysis focuses on the recent pull requests (PRs) for the binary-husky/gpt_academic repository, which currently has 13 open PRs and 280 closed PRs. The PRs reflect ongoing enhancements, bug fixes, and feature additions aimed at improving the functionality of the tool designed for academic interactions with large language models.
PR #1942: Create v2ray
PR #1937: fix loading chatglm3
PR #1918: Update Latex_Function.py
PR #1814: 添加qwen系列，groq，yi_vision的支持
PR #1765: add deepseek online models
PR #1936: fix enabling sparkv4
PR #1926: Add Support for Gemini 1.5 Pro & Gemini 1.5 Flash
PR #1905: AgentOps
PR #1900: Update submit button dropdown style
The pull requests in the binary-husky/gpt_academic repository reveal several themes and trends that are critical to understanding the project's evolution:
Feature Expansion: Many recent PRs focus on expanding the capabilities of the tool by integrating new models and functionalities. For instance, PRs like #1937 and #1814 introduce significant model support enhancements, indicating a strategic direction towards accommodating a wider array of language models. This aligns with the project's objective of being a versatile tool for academic users who require diverse querying options.
Bug Fixes and Compatibility: A notable number of PRs are dedicated to fixing bugs or ensuring compatibility with updated libraries or APIs, such as PR #1937 addressing issues with loading chatglm3 due to upstream changes. This reflects an active maintenance approach, ensuring that users can rely on stable functionality as external dependencies evolve.
User Interface Improvements: There is a clear emphasis on enhancing user experience through UI updates (e.g., PR #1900). These improvements are essential in making the tool more accessible and user-friendly, particularly given its complex functionalities that cater to academic users.
Community Engagement: The comments within PR discussions often highlight community involvement, where contributors seek feedback or clarification from maintainers. This collaborative environment fosters innovation and ensures that contributions align with user needs and project goals.
Security Concerns: Some closed PRs indicate attention to security issues (e.g., PR #1863), which is crucial given the increasing scrutiny around software vulnerabilities in open-source projects. Addressing these concerns proactively helps maintain trust within the user community.
Anomalies in Contributions: Several PRs have been closed without merging, often due to insufficient clarity or unresolved issues (e.g., PR #1905). This suggests that while contributions are welcomed, there may be challenges in aligning them with project standards or requirements.
In conclusion, the ongoing development reflected in these pull requests showcases a robust commitment to enhancing functionality, maintaining compatibility, and improving user experience within the gpt_academic project. The active engagement from contributors indicates a healthy community dynamic that is essential for sustained growth and innovation in this academic toolset.
binary-husky
moetayuko
wl223600
hongyi-zhao
Menghuan1918
jiangfy-ihep
Keldos-Li
zhuhuahua168, ruianlc, sarath59, AnjiaYe
Summary
Quantified Reports
Detailed Reports