BunkerWeb, an open-source Web Application Firewall by Bunkerity, continues to advance its security features and integration capabilities for web services, with a particular emphasis on SSL/TLS configurations and dependency updates.
Recent issues and pull requests indicate a concentrated effort on refining SSL/TLS handling and improving user experience. Issues #1202 and #1175 highlight persistent challenges with SSL certificate configurations, signaling a need for more intuitive setup processes or enhanced documentation. Additionally, issues like #693 and #685 suggest complexities in reverse proxy setups, indicating potential areas for improvement in configuration clarity.
Théophile Diot (TheophileDiot)
Florian Pitance (fl0ppy-d1sk)
Jordan Blasenhauer (syrk4web)
dependabot[bot]
Snyk bot (snyk-bot)
SSL/TLS Configuration Challenges: Recurring issues with SSL certificate handling suggest a need for improved configuration guidance or automated solutions.
Reverse Proxy Complexity: Users report difficulties in setting up reverse proxies, indicating potential areas for enhanced documentation or configuration tools.
UI/UX Focus: Significant efforts are directed towards improving the web UI, reflecting a commitment to enhancing user interaction and experience.
Proactive Dependency Management: The team actively uses tools like Dependabot and Snyk to manage dependencies, ensuring security and compatibility.
Kubernetes Integration: The addition of a Helm chart (#1340) highlights ongoing efforts to streamline deployment in Kubernetes environments, catering to modern application infrastructures.
Timespan | Opened | Closed | Comments | Labeled | Milestones |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7 Days | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
30 Days | 10 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
90 Days | 22 | 15 | 25 | 2 | 1 |
1 Year | 102 | 87 | 384 | 5 | 1 |
All Time | 415 | 365 | - | - | - |
Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.
Developer | Avatar | Branches | PRs | Commits | Files | Changes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jordan Blasenhauer | 4 | 0/0/0 | 61 | 579 | 245270 | |
Théophile Diot | 6 | 0/0/0 | 52 | 153 | 5777 | |
None (dependabot[bot]) | 8 | 38/12/28 | 13 | 17 | 110 | |
Bernardo Bandos (jbbandos) | 0 | 1/0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Ikko Eltociear Ashimine (eltociear) | 0 | 1/0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period
Recent GitHub issue activity for the BunkerWeb project shows a mix of bug reports, feature requests, and user support inquiries. Notably, there is a focus on enhancing existing features such as reverse proxy configurations, custom SSL certificate handling, and improving the user interface for configuration management. Some issues highlight challenges with specific integrations like Docker and Kubernetes, while others address security-related functionalities such as ModSecurity and Let's Encrypt automation.
SSL Certificate Handling: Several issues (#1202, #1175) relate to problems with SSL certificates, including custom certificate application and Let's Encrypt challenges. This indicates a recurring theme where users face difficulties in configuring SSL/TLS settings correctly.
Reverse Proxy Configurations: Issues like #693 and #685 highlight complexities in setting up reverse proxies, especially when dealing with multiple services or external IPs. This suggests a need for clearer documentation or more intuitive configuration options.
Web UI Challenges: The Web UI has been a focal point for several issues (#1174, #1131), with users reporting errors or unexpected behavior when managing services. This points to potential usability improvements needed in the UI.
Integration-Specific Problems: There are multiple reports of issues specific to Docker and Kubernetes environments (#1125, #1093). These include connectivity problems between containers and challenges with environment-specific configurations.
Security Features: Some issues (#401, #379) discuss the effectiveness of security features like ModSecurity and error interception, indicating ongoing efforts to fine-tune these capabilities for better protection without hindering legitimate traffic.
These issues reflect ongoing development efforts to enhance feature support, address bugs related to SSL/TLS configurations, and improve user experience through the Web UI.
The dataset provides information about open and closed pull requests (PRs) for the BunkerWeb project, an open-source Web Application Firewall (WAF) developed by Bunkerity. The data includes details on recent PRs, their purpose, and their current status.
github/codeql-action
from 3.26.3 to 3.26.5 to fix issues on MacOS ARM machines.werkzeug
from 3.0.3 to 3.0.4, addressing bugs without changing behavior.redhat/ubi9-init
from 9.4-12 to a newer version in Linux tests.redhat/ubi8-init
from 8.10-5 to a newer version in Linux tests.setuptools
from 73.0.0 to 73.0.1, fixing metaclass conflicts.hashicorp/kubernetes
from 2.31.0 to 2.32.0, adding new features and enhancements.gunicorn[gthread]
from 22.0.0 to 23.0.0, improving HTTP 1.1 support and security.github/codeql-action
.hashicorp/setup-terraform
from 3.1.1 to 3.1.2.github/codeql-action
from 3.25.15 to 3.26.3./src/bw
.github/codeql-action
.docker/build-push-action
from 6.5.0 to 6.7.0.github/codeql-action
.
9-11: Various dependency updates that were either merged or closed due to being superseded or unnecessary.The pull requests for BunkerWeb reveal a strong focus on maintaining up-to-date dependencies and addressing security vulnerabilities, which is critical for a project centered around web security like BunkerWeb.
A significant number of PRs involve updating dependencies, indicating an active effort to keep the codebase secure and compatible with the latest versions of libraries and tools used within the project (e.g., updates to github/codeql-action
, werkzeug
, and Docker images). This is crucial for maintaining the integrity and performance of BunkerWeb as a security-focused application.
There are ongoing efforts to enhance the functionality of BunkerWeb through new features like the Helm chart addition (#1340), which aims to improve deployment capabilities within Kubernetes environments—a key infrastructure for many modern applications.
Several PRs focus on improving documentation (#1394, #1375), which is vital for user adoption and ease of use, especially given BunkerWeb's emphasis on being user-friendly.
There are no significant disputes evident in the dataset; however, some PRs were closed without merging due to being superseded by newer updates or because they were deemed unnecessary after further review (e.g., #1430, #1418).
While there is consistent activity in terms of opening PRs, not all are merged promptly, possibly due to prioritization or awaiting further testing and validation (e.g., dependency updates that were closed or superseded).
Overall, the pull request activity reflects a proactive approach towards maintaining software quality and security while also expanding its feature set and improving usability through better documentation and deployment options like Helm charts for Kubernetes integration.
Théophile Diot (TheophileDiot)
Florian Pitance (fl0ppy-d1sk)
Jordan Blasenhauer (syrk4web)
dependabot[bot]
Snyk bot (snyk-bot)
The BunkerWeb development team is actively engaged in maintaining and enhancing the project with a focus on security, usability, and reliability. The use of automated tools for dependency management indicates a proactive approach to security. The team's efforts in refining the UI suggest a commitment to improving user interaction with the software. Overall, the project appears well-maintained with active contributions from multiple team members.