‹ Reports
The Dispatch

Surge in User-Generated Issues Highlights Ethical Concerns in BlackFriday-GPTs-Prompts Repository

The BlackFriday-GPTs-Prompts project, a repository offering free prompts for GPT models across various domains, has seen a surge in user-generated issues, many of which raise ethical concerns due to requests for hacks and personal information. This indicates potential misuse of the platform and highlights the need for stricter moderation.

Recent Activity

Recent issues predominantly consist of user requests for unethical uses of AI, such as account hacks (#65, #62), reflecting a concerning trend towards misuse. The influx of issues, especially those in Arabic, suggests a diverse but challenging user base for moderation. The development team has been largely inactive, with only Brutal Strike (friuns2) making minor README updates. Other team members, Your a (harsh04081997) and help870, have not contributed recently, indicating possible stagnation in development efforts.

Development Team and Recent Activity

Of Note

Quantified Reports

Quantify Issues



Recent GitHub Issues Activity

Timespan Opened Closed Comments Labeled Milestones
7 Days 3 1 0 3 1
30 Days 9 1 5 9 1
90 Days 27 2 22 27 1
All Time 55 5 - - -

Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.

Quantify commits



Quantified Commit Activity Over 30 Days

Developer Avatar Branches PRs Commits Files Changes
Brutal Strike 1 0/0/0 4 1 8
None (help870) 0 1/0/0 0 0 0

PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period

Detailed Reports

Report On: Fetch issues



Recent Activity Analysis

The recent activity in the GitHub repository friuns2/BlackFriday-GPTs-Prompts shows a total of 50 open issues, with a notable influx of new issues created within the last few days. Many of these issues appear to be requests for assistance or inquiries about specific functionalities, often lacking detailed descriptions or context. A significant theme among the issues is the request for accounts or hacks related to gaming and social media, indicating a potential misuse of the platform.

Several issues, particularly those concerning account hacks or requests for personal information (e.g., #65, #62), raise ethical concerns and suggest that the project may be attracting users interested in exploiting AI capabilities for malicious purposes. The presence of multiple language queries, especially in Arabic, also highlights a diverse user base but may complicate moderation efforts.

Issue Details

Recently Created Issues

  1. Issue #70: /test

    • Priority: Low
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 0 days ago
  2. Issue #69: Chat gpt

    • Priority: Low
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 2 days ago
  3. Issue #67: هل تتكلم العربية

    • Priority: Low
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 10 days ago
  4. Issue #66: وير

    • Priority: Low
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 11 days ago
    • Updated: 3 days ago
  5. Issue #65: عايز لينك ابعته واتس يهكر الموبايل

    • Priority: High
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 15 days ago
    • Updated: 11 days ago
  6. Issue #62: حساب efootball

    • Priority: High
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 27 days ago
    • Updated: 3 days ago

Recently Updated Issues

  1. Issue #66: وير

    • Last updated on 3 days ago.
  2. Issue #65: عايز لينك ابعته واتس يهكر الموبايل

    • Last updated on 11 days ago.
  3. Issue #62: حساب efootball

    • Last updated on 3 days ago.

These issues reflect a mix of low-priority inquiries and high-priority requests that could potentially lead to misuse of the platform, emphasizing the need for careful monitoring and management of community interactions.

Report On: Fetch pull requests



Overview

The analysis of the pull requests (PRs) for the repository friuns2/BlackFriday-GPTs-Prompts reveals a total of 5 open PRs, with a focus on updates to various markdown files containing prompts. The PRs show a mix of minor edits and significant content changes, reflecting ongoing community engagement and contributions.

Summary of Pull Requests

Open Pull Requests

  • PR #64: Update evil-pure-evil.md
    Created 17 days ago, this PR proposes an update to the evil-pure-evil.md file, with equal additions and deletions (25 lines each). The nature of the content change is unspecified but suggests a revision or enhancement of existing material.

  • PR #58: rhrtUpdate chatgpt-tech-interviewer.md
    Submitted 38 days ago, this PR includes a single line modification in chatgpt-tech-interviewer.md, replacing a line with "eat shit 123". This change appears to be informal and could raise concerns about professionalism or appropriateness in content.

  • PR #41: Update gpt-4-for-free.md
    Created 82 days ago, this PR adds a line to gpt-4-for-free.md, stating "10 frase para ganhar dinheiro". This addition seems to introduce new content but lacks context regarding its relevance or utility.

  • PR #18: Update Jailbreaks.md
    Open for 173 days, this PR corrects a spelling error from "capabalities" to "capabilities" in the Jailbreaks.md file. While minor, it reflects attention to detail in documentation.

  • PR #11: Refactor: Cleaned Job Hunting Prompts
    Created 261 days ago, this substantial refactor aims to clean up the job hunting prompts by removing irrelevant entries. Notably, it received positive feedback from another contributor suggesting alternative categorization instead of outright removal.

Closed Pull Requests

  • PR #23: Update sinkholegpt.md
    Closed 161 days ago after being merged, this PR requested that a prompt be made private. It indicates sensitivity around content sharing within the community.

  • PR #14: Update
    Closed 206 days ago without specific details provided in the summary.

Analysis of Pull Requests

The current state of open pull requests in the friuns2/BlackFriday-GPTs-Prompts repository indicates a mix of minor updates and more significant contributions aimed at enhancing the quality and relevance of the prompts. The majority of these PRs are relatively recent, suggesting an active development environment; however, there are notable discrepancies in the nature and quality of contributions.

One concerning aspect is the informal nature of some changes, particularly seen in PR #58 where an inappropriate phrase was introduced. This raises questions about the review process for pull requests and whether there are adequate guidelines for maintaining professionalism within the repository. Such entries could detract from the repository's credibility and utility for users seeking high-quality prompts.

In contrast, PR #11 demonstrates a more constructive approach to content management by cleaning up outdated or irrelevant entries. The feedback received highlights an engaged community willing to discuss improvements rather than simply merging changes without consideration. This collaborative spirit is essential for maintaining the integrity and usefulness of the repository.

Another point of interest is the long duration for some open pull requests, such as PR #18 which has been open for over five months. While it addresses a minor issue, prolonged open states can indicate either a lack of reviewer availability or prioritization issues within the project. This could lead to stagnation in development if not addressed promptly.

Moreover, closed pull requests like PR #23 illustrate sensitivity among contributors regarding content privacy. This suggests that while community engagement is high, there may be underlying tensions related to how shared content is managed and protected within collaborative projects.

Overall, while there are positive signs of community involvement and ongoing updates, there are also critical areas for improvement regarding content quality control, responsiveness to contributions, and adherence to professional standards in documentation. Addressing these issues will be vital for sustaining user trust and ensuring that the repository remains a valuable resource for its intended audience.

Report On: Fetch commits



Repo Commits Analysis

Development Team and Recent Activity

Team Members

  • Brutal Strike (friuns2)

  • Your a (harsh04081997)

  • help870

Recent Activity Summary

Brutal Strike (friuns2)

  • Recent Commits: 4 commits in the last day, all updating the README.md file.
  • Changes Made: Each commit involved minor edits to the README.md, with a total of 8 changes across 1 file.
  • Collaboration: No collaboration noted with other team members in recent commits.
  • In Progress Work: No ongoing work or open pull requests.

Your a (harsh04081997)

  • Recent Commits: No recent commits reported.
  • Previous Contributions: Notable contributions include adding new GPTs and jailbreaks, but no current activity.

help870

  • Recent Commits: No recent commits reported.
  • Pull Requests: 1 open pull request, but no merges or closed-unmerged requests.

Patterns and Themes

  • Activity Concentration: All recent activity is concentrated on minor updates to the README.md by Brutal Strike, indicating a focus on documentation rather than feature development or bug fixes.
  • Lack of Collaboration: There is minimal collaboration among team members in the recent activities, suggesting either independent work or a lack of coordinated efforts.
  • Stagnation in Development: The absence of new features or bug fixes from all team members indicates a potential stagnation in active development, with no significant contributions from other members in the last 30 days.
  • Community Engagement: Despite the low activity from the core team, the repository maintains high community engagement metrics (stars and forks), which may suggest user-driven contributions outside of formal team activities.

Overall, the recent activity reflects a period of low development intensity, primarily focused on documentation updates rather than substantive changes to the project.