Quantify Issues

Recent GitHub Issues Activity

_{Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.}

Quantify commits

Quantified Commit Activity Over 30 Days

Developer	Avatar	Branches	PRs	Commits	Files	Changes
Azure SDK Bot		1	44/26/9	40	2500	431963
Josh Harrington		1	5/4/1	5	82	72395
Yalin Li		1	3/3/0	5	92	36293
Han Chiang (Han-msft)		1	1/0/0	7	52	29072
Lazar		1	2/2/0	6	127	27141
koen-mertens		2	1/0/0	15	57	20902
zhz0704		1	1/1/0	1	72	12367
Neehar Duvvuri		1	2/2/0	2	84	8242
cqnguy23		1	1/1/0	3	26	3074
Darren Cohen		2	1/1/0	3	55	2706
Peter Wu		2	17/10/2	8	55	1817
Yuchao Yan		3	10/10/0	19	16	1723
vincenttran-msft		1	2/2/0	7	88	1676
Krista Pratico		2	11/8/0	11	71	1610
Catalina Peralta		4	0/0/0	14	10	1004
catalinaperalta		1	10/4/2	7	7	868
Matthew Metcalf		1	2/0/1	1	6	781
McCoy Patiño		1	7/3/0	6	17	765
Xiang Yan		2	2/1/0	10	53	759
Libba Lawrence		2	7/2/0	4	9	730
ChenxiJiang333		1	0/0/0	2	218	439
Paul Van Eck		1	5/3/0	7	30	398
Kashif Khan		1	1/1/0	3	19	387
Durgesh Suryawanshi (v-durgeshs)		1	1/0/0	3	6	341
swathipil		1	13/9/1	10	32	334
Jinlong Shi (MSFT)		1	0/0/0	1	14	280
Theo van Kraay		1	0/0/0	1	2	278
James Suplizio		1	2/2/0	3	5	269
Diondra		1	0/0/0	2	2	157
Leighton Chen		1	1/1/0	2	6	155
Scott Beddall		4	8/7/0	18	23	152
Simon Moreno (simorenoh)		1	1/0/0	2	4	96
Amit Chauhan		2	2/1/0	5	17	72
hamshavathimunibyraiah		1	1/1/0	1	9	49
Jayesh Tanna		2	2/2/0	4	5	45
TravisCragg-MSFT (TravisCragg-MSFT)		2	2/0/0	2	1	26
Wes Haggard		1	3/3/0	4	4	24
Laurent Mazuel		2	2/1/0	4	7	17
Vinothini Dharmaraj		1	0/0/0	3	2	12
Jacob Lauzon		1	5/4/0	1	1	12
Alejandra Rico		1	0/0/0	1	2	11
Aarni Koskela		1	0/0/0	1	1	6
Julian Meder		1	1/1/0	1	2	6
Jeremy Voss		1	2/1/0	1	2	6
iscai-msft		1	0/0/0	1	1	4
None (shail2208)		1	1/0/0	1	1	2
Kushagra Thapar		1	0/0/0	1	1	2
rdondera-microsoft		1	1/1/0	1	1	2
Jonathan Gangi (JAVGan)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Rena (cRui861)		0	1/1/0	0	0	0
Irina Gossmann (margold)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Tomas Varon (tvaron3)		0	3/0/0	0	0	0
Karolien Gellynck (KarolGel)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Abhijeet Mohanty (jeet1995)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Vijay Soni (vs4vijay)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
None (M-Hietala)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Annie Liang (xinlian12)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Eric Scott Freeman (ericnorway)		0	1/0/1	0	0	0
Paul Dorsch (pauld-msft)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Brandon Miller		0	0/0/0	0	0	0
Nick Brady (nicholasdbrady)		0	1/0/1	0	0	0
Nate Kimball (natekimball-msft)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Kshitij Chawla (kshitij-microsoft)		0	2/0/1	0	0	0

_{PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period}

Report On: Fetch issues

Recent Activity Analysis

The Azure SDK for Python repository has shown significant recent activity, with a total of 908 open issues. Notably, there is a surge in issues related to documentation errors, feature requests, and bugs across various packages. A recurring theme is the need for better error handling and user guidance, particularly concerning authentication and configuration issues. Additionally, there are multiple requests for enhancements in existing functionalities, indicating active engagement from the community.

Several issues stand out due to their implications on user experience and functionality. For instance, the issue regarding the AzureMachineLearningFileSystem not working with user Entra authentication (#37089) highlights a critical integration problem that affects users' ability to access data assets securely. Similarly, the issue concerning SSL verification errors when using ContentSafetyClient (#36880) points to potential security vulnerabilities that could deter users from adopting the SDK.

Issue Details

Here are some of the most recently created and updated issues:

1. Issue #37167: Azure Credentials seem to be extremely flaky

   • Priority: Needs Triage
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 0 days ago
   • Updated: N/A

2. Issue #37160: Make it possible for azure-eventhub to work through an HTTP tunnel

   • Priority: Needs Team Attention
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • Updated: N/A

3. Issue #37158: Attestation Content Validation Issue for github.io website

   • Priority: Service Attention
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • Updated: N/A

4. Issue #37157: API Management Content Validation Issue for github.io website

   • Priority: Service Attention
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • Updated: N/A

5. Issue #37156: Alerts Management Content Validation Issue for learn.microsoft website

   • Priority: Service Attention
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • Updated: N/A

6. Issue #37155: Advisor Content Validation Issue for learn.microsoft website

   • Priority: Service Attention
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • Updated: N/A

7. Issue #37154: Custom Image Search Content Validation Issue for github.io website

   • Priority: Service Attention
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • Updated: N/A

8. Issue #37153: Custom Providers Content Validation Issue for github.io website

   • Priority: Service Attention
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • Updated: N/A

9. Issue #37152: Custom Search Content Validation Issue for github.io website

   • Priority: Service Attention
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • Updated: N/A

10. Issue #37151: Data Box Content Validation Issue for github.io website

    • Priority: Service Attention
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 1 day ago
    • Updated: N/A

These issues reflect a mix of documentation errors, feature requests, and validation problems that require attention from the development team. The presence of multiple validation issues suggests a potential need for improved quality assurance processes before releases.

Summary of Themes and Commonalities

• There is a strong emphasis on improving documentation accuracy and clarity, particularly around configuration settings and error messages.
• Users are actively reporting integration problems with authentication mechanisms, indicating a need for clearer guidelines on using managed identities and other credentials.
• Feature requests are prevalent, especially regarding enhancements to existing functionalities like data asset management and API integrations.
• The community is engaged in addressing bugs and providing feedback on usability issues within the SDK.

This analysis highlights critical areas where user experience can be improved through better documentation, enhanced error handling, and more robust features in future releases of the Azure SDK for Python.

Report On: Fetch pull requests

Report on Pull Requests

Overview

The Azure SDK for Python repository currently has a total of 126 open pull requests (PRs). This report analyzes the most recent PRs, focusing on their significance, themes, and any notable anomalies or trends.

Summary of Pull Requests

1. PR #37166: [SchemaRegistry] handle unknown content types

   • State: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • Description: Implements a mechanism to return content type strings for unknown formats in SchemaProperties. A draft with a test pending.
   • Significance: Enhances error handling and documentation clarity.

2. PR #37165: azure-stage-blob: Add "list" permission for Blob

   • State: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • Description: Introduces a new permission for listing blob versions.
   • Significance: Expands functionality in blob storage, responding to user needs.

3. PR #37163: add health report pipeline

   • State: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • Description: Adds a YAML configuration for a health report pipeline.
   • Significance: Improves monitoring and maintenance capabilities.

4. PR #37102: [Storage] [STG 96] Added BlobAccessTierNotSupportedForAccountType to BlobErrorCode

   • State: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • Description: Updates error codes related to blob storage access tiers.
   • Significance: Addresses potential user confusion regarding account type limitations.

5. PR #37101: [AutoRelease] t2-desktopvirtualization-2024-08-30-66197

   • State: Open
   • Created: 2 days ago
   • Description: Records test success for an auto-release request related to desktop virtualization.
   • Significance: Ensures that the release process is functioning correctly.

6. PR #37100: [bct] Support versioned modules

   • State: Open
   • Created: 2 days ago
   • Description: Implements support for versioned modules in the SDK.
   • Significance: Enhances flexibility in module management.

7. PR #37099: [ServiceBus] fix failing uamqp tests

   • State: Open
   • Created: 2 days ago
   • Description: Fixes issues in unit tests related to uamqp connections.
   • Significance: Improves reliability of the Service Bus library.

8. PR #37095: [pyAMQP] Align pyAMQP

   • State: Open
   • Created: 2 days ago
   • Description: Aligns pyAMQP with other components in the SDK.
   • Significance: Ensures consistency across libraries.

9. PR #37082: [AutoRelease] t2-fabric-2024-08-29-35332

   • State: Open
   • Created: 2 days ago
   • Description: Records test success for an auto-release request related to fabric services.
   • Significance: Validates the release process for fabric services.

10. PR #37080: [Storage] Add crc64 support for substream uploads

    • State: Open
    • Created: 3 days ago
    • Description: Adds support for CRC64 checksums in substream uploads, enhancing data integrity checks during uploads.
    • Significance: Improves reliability and performance of storage operations.

Analysis of Pull Requests

The recent activity in the Azure SDK for Python repository indicates a strong focus on enhancing functionality, improving error handling, and ensuring robust testing practices across various components of the SDK.

Themes and Commonalities

1. Feature Enhancements and Bug Fixes: Many PRs are aimed at adding new features or fixing existing bugs, particularly in storage and service bus components (e.g., PRs #37165, #37099). This reflects an ongoing commitment to improving user experience and addressing community feedback.

2. Testing Improvements: A significant number of PRs focus on refining testing processes (e.g., PRs #37163, #37099). This includes adding new tests, fixing failing tests, and ensuring that changes do not introduce regressions, which is critical for maintaining the stability of the SDK.

3. Documentation and Clarity: Several PRs aim to enhance documentation (e.g., PRs #37166, #37064). Clear documentation is essential for users to understand how to effectively use the SDK and its various features.

4. API Changes: There are multiple instances where API changes are introduced (e.g., PRs #37102, #37080). This indicates an evolving API landscape within the SDK as new features are added or existing ones are modified based on user needs.

Notable Anomalies

1. The presence of numerous open PRs (126) suggests that while there is active development, there may also be bottlenecks in review processes or resource allocation for merging these contributions.

2. Some PRs remain as drafts or have pending tasks (e.g., PRs #37166, #37163), indicating that contributors may be awaiting feedback or additional work before finalizing their submissions.

3. A few PRs have been closed without merging (e.g., PRs #37060, #37067), which could indicate shifting priorities or decisions made during the review process that led contributors to withdraw their changes.

Lack of Recent Merge Activity

While there is a high volume of open PRs, it would be beneficial to analyze merge activity over time to ensure that contributions are being integrated into the main codebase efficiently. Delays in merging can lead to contributor frustration and may impact project momentum.

Conclusion

The Azure SDK for Python repository demonstrates a vibrant development environment with active contributions aimed at enhancing functionality and user experience across various Azure services. However, attention should be given to managing open PRs effectively to maintain contributor engagement and project momentum moving forward.

Report On: Fetch commits

Repo Commits Analysis

Development Team and Recent Activity

Team Members and Recent Activities

1. Krista Pratico (kristapratico)

   • Recent Commits: 11 commits in the last 30 days.
   • Key Contributions:
   • Added health report pipeline and scripts for repo health status reporting.
   • Updated various documentation files related to repo health and automation.
   • Collaborations: Worked with multiple members on health report features.

2. Catalina Peralta (caperal@microsoft.com)

   • Recent Commits: 7 commits in the last 30 days.
   • Key Contributions:
   • Focused on breaking changes detection, including improvements to changelog tracking and tests.
   • Collaborated on various updates across multiple branches, including merging changes from the main branch.
   • Collaborations: Co-authored several commits with Krista Pratico and others.

3. Neehar Duvvuri (needuv)

   • Recent Commits: 2 commits in the last 30 days.
   • Key Contributions:
   • Added new package azure-ai-evaluation, including extensive documentation and code structure.
   • Collaborations: Worked independently on the new package.

4. Darren Cohen (dargilco)

   • Recent Commits: 3 commits in the last 30 days.
   • Key Contributions:
   • Fixed typos and updated documentation for azure-ai-inference.
   • Collaborations: Minimal collaboration noted.

5. Josh Harrington (joharrington@microsoft.com)

   • Recent Commits: 5 commits in the last 30 days.
   • Key Contributions:
   • Worked on simplifying cloud setup and supporting new features in machine learning SDKs.
   • Collaborated with other developers on enhancements to existing functionalities.

6. Wes Haggard (weshaggard)

   • Recent Commits: 4 commits in the last 30 days.
   • Key Contributions:
   • Focused on CI/CD improvements, including turning off warnings from SDL disablement.

7. Amit Chauhan (achauhan-scc)

   • Recent Commits: 5 commits in the last 30 days.
   • Key Contributions:
   • Addressed issues related to compute instance validation and made updates to ML operations.

8. Vincent Tran (vincenttran-msft)

   • Recent Commits: 7 commits in the last 30 days.
   • Key Contributions:
   • Made significant updates to storage SDKs, including fixing batch APIs and ensuring compatibility with Azurite.

9. Scott Beddall (scbedd)

   • Recent Commits: 18 commits in the last 30 days.
   • Key Contributions:
   • Engaged heavily in CI/CD processes, optimizing scripts, and maintaining common resources across projects.

10. McCoy Patiño (mccoyp)

    • Recent Commits: 6 commits in the last 30 days.
    • Key Contributions:
    • Worked on enhancing Key Vault tests and ensuring compliance with security protocols.

Patterns, Themes, and Conclusions

• The development team is actively engaged in improving various aspects of the Azure SDK for Python, focusing on both feature development (e.g., new packages like azure-ai-evaluation) and maintenance tasks (e.g., fixing typos, updating documentation).
• There is a strong emphasis on collaboration among team members, particularly around breaking changes detection and health reporting features, indicating a collective approach to quality assurance.
• The recent activities reflect a balance between introducing new functionalities and addressing technical debt through documentation updates and bug fixes.
• The involvement of multiple team members across different branches suggests an organized effort to manage contributions effectively while maintaining high code quality standards through reviews and collaborative coding practices.

Overall, the Azure SDK for Python repository demonstrates a robust development culture characterized by active contributions, collaborative efforts, and a focus on continuous improvement.