Byedpi, a tool for bypassing Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) via a local SOCKS proxy server, has seen active user engagement and development efforts but faces challenges with platform-specific functionality, particularly on Android and WebOS.
The project is designed to help users evade network restrictions by manipulating network packets. It supports both Linux and Windows platforms, offering extensive command-line options for fine-tuning packet handling. Recent activities highlight ongoing user issues with specific functionalities, such as accessing YouTube on certain devices and using the fake traffic feature on Android.
Recent issues reflect user challenges in using Byedpi across different platforms. Notably, #113 reports failures on Android with the fake traffic feature, while #112 discusses difficulties accessing YouTube on LG WebOS devices. These issues indicate a need for improved platform-specific support and configuration guidance.
ruti
Summary
Quantified Reports
Detailed Reports--fake option for Windows (9 days ago).Kirill (dartvader316)
hufrea
vladiscripts
eltociear
The development team shows strong collaboration, with ruti leading significant changes. Recent efforts focus on bug fixing, documentation updates, and enhancing DPI bypass techniques.
| Timespan | Opened | Closed | Comments | Labeled | Milestones |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Days | 5 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 1 |
| 30 Days | 44 | 30 | 140 | 44 | 1 |
| 90 Days | 56 | 38 | 219 | 56 | 1 |
| 1 Year | 60 | 41 | 276 | 59 | 1 |
| All Time | 62 | 43 | - | - | - |
Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.
| Developer | Avatar | Branches | PRs | Commits | Files | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ruti |  |
2 | 0/0/0 | 22 | 19 | 705 |
| Kirill |  |
1 | 5/5/0 | 11 | 20 | 270 |
| vladiscripts |  |
1 | 1/1/0 | 1 | 1 | 134 |
| hufrea |  |
1 | 1/1/0 | 1 | 1 | 21 |
| Ikko Eltociear Ashimine |  |
1 | 1/1/0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Er2 (er2off) | 0 | 1/0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Vladimir Davidovich (ringoz) | 0 | 1/0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| None (Viktor45) | 0 | 1/0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Nikolay Raspopov (raspopov) | 0 | 1/0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| None (loviglass) | 0 | 1/0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period
The GitHub repository for Byedpi currently has 19 open issues, with recent activity indicating a steady stream of user inquiries and bug reports. Notably, several issues have been created or updated in the past week, suggesting active engagement from users seeking support or reporting problems.
A recurring theme among the issues is related to specific functionalities of the software, particularly concerning the performance of the proxy in bypassing restrictions on popular platforms like YouTube. Issues such as connection failures, packet manipulation strategies, and configuration difficulties are prevalent. Additionally, there are discussions about compatibility with various operating systems and hardware configurations, indicating a diverse user base with differing needs.
Issue #113: Error using fake. Android.
Issue #112: Не работает youtube.com на WebOS
Issue #111: Wireguard
Issue #109: Помогите разобраться с настройками
Issue #108: Идея по устранению полной ретрансмиссии
Issue #102: Use memory instead of temp files for (fake) packets, please
Issue #100: Сделать hosts нечувствительным к регистру
Issue #99: Возможность задать данные для авторизации
Issue #88: Пайплайны
Issue #87: Packet mark
The recent activity in the Byedpi GitHub repository reflects a vibrant community actively engaging with the project, highlighting both its utility and areas needing improvement. The focus on specific platforms and features suggests that users are seeking tailored solutions for their unique environments, which could guide future development priorities.
The repository hufrea/byedpi currently has 4 open pull requests and 15 closed pull requests, reflecting ongoing development efforts to enhance the software's capabilities, particularly in supporting various platforms and containerization.
PR #72: Docker support
Created 23 days ago, this PR introduces a simple Dockerfile to facilitate containerization. The discussion highlights the need for a self-contained Dockerfile that does not require cloning the entire repository. Review comments suggest improvements in how the Dockerfile handles code fetching.
PR #45: Initial CMake support
Created 28 days ago, this PR aims to provide initial CMake support for building distributions on Windows and creating Debian packages. It has sparked discussions about usability for Windows users and whether CMake should be integrated into the project.
PR #74: FreeBSD support
Created 23 days ago, this PR attempts to add FreeBSD support but faces criticism regarding its implementation details. Review comments indicate that certain arguments are misconfigured, and it may conflict with another pending PR.
PR #64: Added the ability to run in docker
Created 24 days ago, this PR allows the application to run in a Docker environment. Comments suggest optimizing the final image by only including necessary binaries instead of the entire directory.
PR #30: macOS support
Closed without merging due to technical issues related to address structure size compatibility with AF_INET6.
PR #84: Update and rename readme.txt to README.md
Merged successfully, enhancing documentation clarity.
PR #78: Some fixes for BSD support
Merged after addressing specific issues related to FreeBSD compatibility.
PR #75: NetBSD Support / Portability fixes
Merged with significant changes aimed at improving portability across different Unix-like systems.
PR #46: Improve Makefile
Merged to enhance build efficiency by optimizing the Makefile for parallel builds and recompilation of changed files.
The current state of pull requests in the hufrea/byedpi repository reveals several key themes and areas of focus.
A significant number of recent pull requests (e.g., PRs #45, #74, and #75) are centered around enhancing platform compatibility. The push for CMake support indicates an intention to streamline builds across different operating systems, particularly Windows and various Unix-like systems. This is particularly relevant given the project's goal of providing a flexible tool for bypassing DPI across diverse environments. However, there appears to be contention regarding the necessity and implementation of these changes, as seen in PR #45 where usability concerns were raised about complex command-line operations for typical Windows users.
The introduction of Docker support through PRs #72 and #64 reflects a modern approach to software deployment, allowing users to run byedpi in isolated environments easily. The discussions around these PRs emphasize best practices in containerization, such as minimizing image size and ensuring that necessary dependencies are included without bloating the final product. This is crucial for user experience and adoption in cloud or CI/CD environments.
Several closed PRs focus on improving code quality (e.g., PRs #47 and #46), which is essential for maintaining a robust codebase as new features are introduced. The emphasis on fixing headers, improving Makefile efficiency, and addressing misaligned pointers indicates a proactive approach to technical debt management. Such improvements not only enhance performance but also reduce potential bugs that could arise from poor coding practices.
The review comments on several open PRs highlight ongoing disputes regarding implementation details (e.g., in PR #74). There is a clear need for better communication among contributors regarding design decisions, especially when multiple PRs may conflict with one another. The suggestion to wait for other PRs (like #75) before making further changes indicates a cautious approach that could benefit from clearer guidelines on prioritizing contributions.
While there is a healthy number of open pull requests indicating active development, some older PRs remain unmerged or unresolved. This could signal potential bottlenecks in the review process or indicate that contributors are awaiting specific conditions before proceeding with their changes. It would be beneficial for maintainers to establish clearer timelines or criteria for merging contributions to keep momentum in development.
In conclusion, while hufrea/byedpi shows promising growth through its active pull request landscape, attention must be paid to resolving conflicts, enhancing communication among contributors, and ensuring that platform support efforts align with user needs. Addressing these areas will help solidify the project's standing as a valuable tool for network privacy and evasion techniques.
ruti
--fake option for Windows (9 days ago).Kirill (dartvader316)
hufrea
vladiscripts
eltociear
The development team is actively engaged in enhancing the byedpi project, with ruti leading the charge on most changes. The collaborative nature among team members suggests a healthy development environment focused on improving functionality and addressing issues promptly.