fscan, a robust internal network scanning tool, is experiencing a surge in user-reported issues related to compatibility with the latest POC formats from tools like xray and nuclei. This indicates a pressing need for updates to maintain its relevance in the rapidly evolving cybersecurity landscape.
The recent activity within the fscan project has been marked by numerous user-reported issues, primarily focusing on compatibility challenges with new POC formats (#374) and critical bugs causing crashes during scans (#360, #366). These issues suggest that while the tool remains popular, it requires significant updates to address current user needs and maintain stability.
影舞者 (shadow1ng)
Summary
Quantified Reports
Detailed Reportssmb2.go in common and Plugins directories (+80, -34 lines).Mingyu Li (LI-Mingyu)
Rui (ruishawn)
二仙桥街溜子 (scyxdd)
Andrii Ursulenko (a-urth)
The development team, led by shadow1ng, is actively working on improving the tool's performance and usability. However, the lack of open pull requests suggests that shadow1ng is primarily driving development independently.
POC Compatibility Issues (#374): Highlight a significant challenge for users needing updates to align with current security testing standards.
Critical Stability Concerns (#360, #366): Reports of crashes during scans indicate urgent stability issues that need addressing.
Redis Plugin Behavior (#320): Long-standing issue points to potential improvements in state management during scans.
User Confusion Over Functionality (#375, #370): Suggests a need for enhanced documentation or community support.
Unmerged Pull Requests: Many contributions remain unmerged, potentially discouraging future contributions due to perceived lack of engagement.
| Timespan | Opened | Closed | Comments | Labeled | Milestones |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Days | 7 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 1 |
| 90 Days | 16 | 6 | 13 | 16 | 1 |
| 1 Year | 60 | 23 | 92 | 60 | 1 |
| All Time | 308 | 158 | - | - | - |
Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.
| Developer | Avatar | Branches | PRs | Commits | Files | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 影舞者 |  |
1 | 0/0/0 | 2 | 6 | 173 |
| None (xaitx) | 0 | 0/0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Kuriyama Mirai (liaoxindou) | 0 | 0/0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period
The fscan project has recently seen a surge in activity, with 150 open issues currently logged. Notably, many of these issues revolve around compatibility with various POC (Proof of Concept) formats, particularly the latest versions of xray and nuclei, indicating a potential need for updates to maintain relevance in the evolving security landscape. Additionally, there are several reports of critical bugs leading to crashes, especially during scanning operations, which could hinder user experience and trust in the tool.
A recurring theme among the issues is the difficulty users face when adapting the tool to different environments or configurations, such as running on various operating systems (Windows, Linux, MacOS) and handling specific protocols (like RDP and SSH). The presence of multiple reports regarding memory management issues suggests that performance optimizations may be necessary.
Issue #375: Poc目录里搜索 sleep有例子。 更换了条件 还是检测不到
Issue #374: 不能支持最新的xray的poc语法，请求支持兼容的nuclei和最新版xray的poc语法
Issue #370: 请问关于时间盲注的响应匹配规则要怎么写
Issue #360: something error!
Issue #366: 师傅，求救！我两台笔记本，在扫描大量目标时，电脑就会蓝屏，能帮忙分析下为什么嘛？
Issue #320: 作者好，反馈个redis插件嗅探 /var/spool/cron 目录能写后，在恢复的问题
The issues related to POC compatibility (#374) highlight a significant challenge for users trying to leverage the latest security testing methodologies. This indicates a potential gap in the tool's adaptability to current standards in vulnerability scanning.
Issues such as #375 and #370 reflect user confusion over specific functionalities within the tool, suggesting that documentation or community support may need enhancement to assist users more effectively.
The crash reports (#360 and #366) indicate serious stability concerns that could deter users from relying on fscan for critical assessments. These issues should be prioritized for resolution to improve overall user experience.
The long-standing issue (#320) regarding redis plugin behavior points towards a need for better state management during scans, which could prevent unintended modifications to system configurations.
Overall, while fscan remains a powerful tool for network scanning and vulnerability assessment, addressing these key issues will be crucial for maintaining its utility and user trust in an increasingly complex security environment.
The pull request data from the shadow1ng/fscan repository reveals a mix of open and closed contributions, with one open pull request currently under consideration and 57 closed ones, indicating an active development environment. The most recent contributions focus on enhancing functionality and fixing bugs, while some older pull requests remain unresolved.
PR #335: Update config.go
PR #368: Update rules.go 修正规则字段
PR #367: Update InfoScan.go 指纹识别字段更新
PR #364: 去除冗余部分
Additional closed PRs include various fixes and enhancements across the project, such as bug fixes, documentation updates, and feature enhancements.
The pull requests in the shadow1ng/fscan repository reflect a vibrant yet somewhat fragmented development process. The single open pull request (#82) has been pending for over three years, which raises concerns about the responsiveness of the maintainers to new contributions. This delay may discourage potential contributors who might perceive a lack of engagement or support from the core team.
Among the closed pull requests, many were not merged despite potentially valuable contributions. For instance, PRs like #368 and #367 focused on updating rules and fingerprinting fields but were rejected without clear explanations. This trend suggests either a stringent review process or a misalignment between contributors' intentions and the project's current direction. It would be beneficial for maintainers to provide more constructive feedback to contributors whose submissions do not meet the project's needs or standards.
Notably, PR #341 stands out as it was successfully merged and addressed a critical bug. This indicates that while there may be challenges in merging other contributions, there is still an active effort to resolve significant issues within the codebase. The presence of multiple PRs aimed at optimizing output order (#354 and #348) also highlights an ongoing concern for user experience and usability within the tool's interface.
The overall activity level in terms of closed PRs suggests that while there is a steady stream of contributions, many are being sidelined. This could lead to stagnation in feature development if contributors feel their efforts are not valued or considered. The project could benefit from clearer communication regarding what types of contributions are most needed or desired at any given time.
In conclusion, while fscan remains an active project with substantial community interest (as indicated by its stars and forks), there are underlying issues related to contributor engagement and merge activity that need addressing. Establishing a more transparent review process could enhance collaboration and ultimately lead to a more robust tool for users in cybersecurity.
影舞者 (shadow1ng)
common and Plugins directories, including significant changes to smb2.go (+80, -34 lines).Mingyu Li (LI-Mingyu)
Rui (ruishawn)
二仙桥街溜子 (scyxdd)
Andrii Ursulenko (a-urth)
The development team is primarily driven by shadow1ng, who is actively maintaining and enhancing the fscan project. The collaborative nature of the contributions suggests a responsive approach to community feedback and bug resolution. The focus remains on improving core functionalities while ensuring the tool remains user-friendly for security professionals.