‹ Reports
The Dispatch

GitHub Repo Analysis: langgenius/dify


Executive Summary

Dify, developed by langgenius, is an open-source platform designed to facilitate the development of applications using Large Language Models (LLMs). It integrates various AI functionalities, supporting a range of LLMs and inference providers, making it a versatile tool for developers transitioning from prototyping to production. The project is well-maintained with a vibrant community and robust support channels, indicating a healthy and progressive trajectory.

Recent Activity

Recent developments in the Dify project showcase a dynamic team actively addressing both enhancements and maintenance issues.

Team Members and Contributions

Recent Issues and PRs

These activities indicate a focus on expanding compatibility with external APIs, refining existing features, and improving the robustness of application workflows.

Risks

Several issues pose potential risks to the project's stability and user satisfaction:

  1. Compatibility Issues (#8324): Failure to update to the latest Firecrawl API version could lead to significant functionality problems as external dependencies evolve.
  2. Model Integration Bugs (#8316): Crashes due to model integration errors can severely impact user trust and product reliability.
  3. Configuration Discrepancies (#8315): Mismatches in tool configurations can lead to user frustration and decreased productivity.

Addressing these risks promptly is crucial to maintaining the integrity and usability of the platform.

Of Note

Three notable aspects of the project include:

  1. Extensive Internationalization: Support for numerous languages, including less common ones like Klingon, highlights the project's commitment to global accessibility.
  2. Diverse Deployment Options: The availability of cloud-based services alongside self-hosting options caters to a wide spectrum of user preferences and security needs.
  3. Active Community Engagement: The vibrant community involvement in issue reporting and feature suggestions plays a critical role in the project's continuous improvement cycle.

Quantified Reports

Quantify issues



Recent GitHub Issues Activity

Timespan Opened Closed Comments Labeled Milestones
7 Days 177 118 531 12 1
14 Days 287 185 841 18 1
30 Days 361 187 1041 18 1
All Time 3691 3448 - - -

Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.

Rate pull requests



2/5
The pull request introduces a significant upgrade to the anthropic package, which is a positive change. However, it lacks a linked issue, which is crucial for tracking the purpose and discussion around changes, especially for such a substantial update. The PR is also still in draft state and does not include comprehensive testing details, which are essential for ensuring the stability and compatibility of the upgrade. These oversights indicate a need for further refinement before it can be considered a solid contribution.
[+] Read More
2/5
The pull request introduces a new feature, ComfyUI tool for Stable Diffusion, which is a positive aspect. However, it has several issues that significantly detract from its quality. Firstly, there is no linked issue for the PR, which is against the stated checklist requirements. Secondly, the PR includes incomplete tasks such as unperformed linting checks and missing tests. Additionally, there are multiple commits for minor fixes like 'for E501 in Ruff check,' which could have been combined or handled more efficiently. The PR also lacks detailed testing instructions and does not address all the review comments effectively, indicating poor attention to detail and project standards.
[+] Read More
2/5
The pull request introduces a new feature which adds functionality to the service API for workflow logs. However, it lacks a corresponding issue link, which is a required step in the checklist but not completed. Additionally, the PR does not include any documentation updates or tests, which are crucial for maintaining code quality and ensuring that new features work as expected. The lack of thorough testing and documentation significantly undermines the quality of the PR.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request introduces a useful feature for token caching using Redis, which can enhance efficiency in API calls by reducing the need for repeated token requests. However, there are several concerns regarding security and implementation details, such as potential brute force attacks on Redis passwords and the visibility of sensitive data. The discussion in the comments highlights these issues without fully resolving them, suggesting that while the feature adds value, it also introduces risks that are not adequately mitigated. Additionally, the PR seems to lack comprehensive testing instructions and does not fully address all reviewer comments regarding code quality and security practices.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request updates the ElasticSearch dependency from version 8.14.x to 8.15.x, including updates to the client and Docker images. This is a routine maintenance task that ensures the project stays up-to-date with the latest stable releases of its dependencies, which is good practice but not particularly noteworthy or innovative. The PR appears well-documented and follows best practices in terms of self-review and code commenting. However, it lacks a corresponding issue link, which is typically expected for tracking purposes. Overall, this PR represents a typical dependency update with no significant flaws but also no exceptional features.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request introduces a small, yet potentially useful feature by adding a copy button for workspace information, which can enhance user experience in corporate environments where workspace details are frequently needed. The code changes are minimal and well-contained within the existing structure, showing good adherence to coding standards and self-review practices. However, the PR lacks a corresponding issue link, which is generally expected to track the necessity and discussion around new features. Additionally, the feature's impact is limited to a very specific user interaction and does not introduce any significant improvements or innovations. Therefore, it receives an average rating.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request effectively addresses a specific bug related to variable updates in a workflow application, showing a clear understanding of the issue and providing a targeted solution. However, the PR lacks comprehensive testing details, which is crucial for ensuring the fix works across all expected scenarios. Additionally, the changes are relatively minor and localized to specific components, suggesting an average impact rather than a significant improvement to the overall project. The code modifications are clean and follow existing patterns, but the absence of broader testing or more innovative solutions keeps this PR at an average rating.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request makes a consistent update across multiple configuration files to standardize the capitalization of a label, which improves readability and consistency in the codebase. However, it's a minor change affecting only text labels without any significant impact on functionality or performance. The PR is well-documented and follows proper coding standards, but its scope and impact are limited, making it an average contribution.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request #8322 focuses on code quality improvements by applying Pylint linter rules to the Python codebase. It includes changes like using set literals for membership tests and avoiding unnecessary dunder method calls, which are good practices for Python development. However, the PR is essentially a collection of minor code quality enhancements without any significant new features or performance improvements. While these changes are beneficial for maintaining the codebase, they do not introduce any new functionality or significant optimizations that would merit a higher rating.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request addresses a specific improvement by removing unnecessary string concatenations, which contributes to cleaner code and potentially better performance. However, the changes are relatively minor and mostly stylistic, impacting only string handling across various files without introducing new features or significant performance improvements. The PR is well-documented and follows good coding practices but does not make substantial changes to the functionality or architecture of the project.
[+] Read More

Quantify commits



Quantified Commit Activity Over 14 Days

Developer Avatar Branches PRs Commits Files Changes
Bowen Liang 1 10/8/0 10 497 46948
takatost 1 7/7/0 7 158 17091
-LAN- 3 7/6/0 9 198 5937
github-actions[bot] 1 3/3/0 3 155 4635
Alex 1 1/1/0 1 24 3330
ybalbert001 1 2/2/0 2 25 2761
NFish 3 2/2/0 12 27 2408
tmuife 1 0/1/0 1 23 2110
zhuhao 1 4/4/0 4 11 2033
Nam Vu 1 13/9/1 9 359 1867
Charlie.Wei 1 3/2/0 3 26 1588
非法操作 1 6/3/1 4 16 869
zxhlyh 2 3/3/0 4 22 536
AAEE86 1 5/2/2 2 23 464
Joel 3 3/3/0 9 19 441
Leng Yue 1 1/1/0 1 12 433
Joshua 1 1/1/0 1 6 326
KVOJJJin 1 1/1/0 1 14 284
Leo.Wang 1 1/1/0 1 4 274
kurokobo 1 3/2/1 2 24 218
Yi Xiao 2 4/4/0 5 13 202
Jyong 4 11/11/0 15 16 198
Zhi 1 1/2/0 2 8 197
crazywoola 1 14/14/0 14 37 176
ChengZi 1 1/1/0 1 9 153
Thales Salazar 1 2/2/0 2 1 152
ice yao 1 3/1/0 1 9 133
Yeuoly 1 1/1/0 1 5 112
邹成卓 1 1/1/0 1 1 83
Su Yang 1 1/1/0 1 1 74
Joe 2 1/0/0 11 10 69
yalei 1 1/1/0 1 7 55
sino 1 1/1/0 1 2 53
Seayon 1 2/1/1 1 5 40
orangeclk 1 1/1/0 1 7 40
cr-zhichen 1 1/1/0 1 2 37
legao 1 1/1/0 1 2 31
zhujinle 1 1/1/0 1 1 30
Ethan 1 2/1/0 1 1 27
Vico Chu 1 1/1/0 1 1 20
HowardChan 1 3/2/1 2 1 13
呆萌闷油瓶 1 3/3/0 3 3 13
wochuideng 1 1/1/0 1 1 12
Byeongjin Kang 1 0/1/0 1 3 12
kanoshiou 1 0/1/0 1 4 8
DDDDD12138 1 1/1/0 1 2 8
Sumkor 1 1/1/0 1 1 7
Garfield Dai (GarfieldDai) 1 1/0/0 2 2 7
Jason Tan 1 2/1/0 1 2 6
Hirotaka Miyagi 1 3/2/1 2 2 4
hisir 1 1/1/0 1 1 4
Designerxsh 1 1/1/0 1 2 4
Kevin9703 1 2/1/1 1 1 3
winsonwhe 1 0/1/0 1 1 3
Yuki Oshima 1 1/1/0 1 1 2
omr 1 1/1/0 1 1 2
Fei He 1 1/1/0 1 1 2
Huang YunKun 1 0/1/0 1 1 2
Chenhe Gu 1 1/1/0 1 1 2
陳鈞 1 1/1/0 1 1 2
Benjamin 1 1/1/0 1 1 2
Ikko Eltociear Ashimine 1 1/1/0 1 1 2
Tamer 1 1/1/0 1 1 2
YidaHu 1 1/1/0 1 1 1
Mehdi Abou (Meabo) 0 1/0/1 0 0 0
Qun (QunBB) 0 1/0/0 0 0 0
Weaxs (Weaxs) 0 1/0/0 0 0 0
None (G81192) 0 1/0/0 0 0 0
Mahmoud Soliman (MCobra) 0 1/0/1 0 0 0
None (fanlia) 0 1/0/0 0 0 0
Alter-xyz (alterxyz) 0 0/0/1 0 0 0
Pika (HiChen404) 0 1/0/0 0 0 0
Cling_o3 (ProseGuys) 0 2/0/2 0 0 0
Wu Jiayang (Wu-Jiayang) 0 1/0/0 0 0 0
None (luckylhb90) 0 1/0/0 0 0 0
None (Sbazar-GmbH) 0 1/0/1 0 0 0
Đỗ Hữu Đại (daidh152001) 0 1/0/1 0 0 0
Kenneth (kenneth-bro) 0 1/0/1 0 0 0
None (lucasiavend) 0 1/0/1 0 0 0
None (leichangqing) 0 1/0/1 0 0 0

PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period

Quantify risks



Project Risk Ratings

Risk Level (1-5) Rationale
Delivery 4 The project faces significant delivery risks due to the high number of open issues relative to those closed, as evidenced by the data showing 177 issues opened and only 118 closed in the past 7 days (ID 29090). This trend persists over longer periods, indicating ongoing challenges in resolving issues which could delay project timelines.
Velocity 3 Velocity risk is moderate. Although there is high engagement with many comments on issues suggesting active participation, the high number of open issues and minimal use of labels and milestones for managing them (ID 29090) may slow down effective resolution and implementation.
Dependency 3 Dependency risks are evident with specific issues like #8324 showing reliance on external APIs such as Firecrawl, which if not updated timely, could disrupt project functionality (ID 29094). The project's extensive use of external LLMs and inference providers also introduces potential failure points (ID 29100).
Team 2 Team risk is relatively low. High community engagement and shared workload suggest good mitigation against burnout or conflict (ID 29100). However, the high number of open issues might still pose challenges in managing community feedback effectively.
Code Quality 3 Code quality risk is moderate. While there is a proactive approach to enhancing user experience and improving code quality through PRs like #8322, the need for frequent PRs addressing code quality suggests initial lapses in maintaining high standards during development phases (ID 29102).
Technical Debt 3 Technical debt risk is moderate. Issues like #8316 indicate problems with integration that are not being addressed promptly, leading to accumulated technical debt. Regular merging of PRs addressing code consistency helps manage this debt but indicates ongoing issues (ID 29102).
Test Coverage 3 Test coverage risk is moderate based on feedback from PR assessments indicating a lack of comprehensive testing and clear documentation for features like token caching using Redis (ID 29092). This could lead to future bugs or require significant rework.
Error Handling 4 Error handling is a significant risk. Issues such as #8316 with the stable diffusion model integration show that the system does not handle incorrect tool parameters gracefully, potentially leading to operational failures if not improved (ID 29094).

Detailed Reports

Report On: Fetch issues



Recent Activity Analysis

Recent activity on the Dify project from langgenius shows a robust and dynamic development environment. The platform has a high level of engagement with numerous open issues and pull requests, indicating an active community and ongoing enhancements.

Notable Issues with Special Significance

  1. Issue #8324: Firecrawl API updated to v1

    • This issue highlights the need to update the tool in Dify to use the latest version of the Firecrawl API. The discussion reveals that all endpoints in the code are still pointing to version 0, which could lead to future compatibility problems as external dependencies evolve.
  2. Issue #8316: Stable diffusion can't generate correct picture in agent with llama model

    • This issue involves a bug where the stable diffusion model fails to generate the correct pictures, causing program crashes. The problem seems related to incorrect parameter passing within the tool invocation process.
  3. Issue #8315: Image size parameter mismatch in cogvlm tool

    • This enhancement request points out a discrepancy between the image size parameters used in the cogvlm tool and those listed on the official Zhipu website, leading to interface errors.
  4. Issue #8309: Stream API issue with chatbot-workflow

    • A bug where the chatbot-workflow cannot respond with a 'message' event under certain conditions, likely due to configuration issues within node settings in the workflow.

These issues not only highlight specific technical challenges but also illustrate the community's proactive approach in identifying and suggesting improvements. The presence of detailed discussions and bot interactions suggests a structured approach to issue resolution.

Issue Details

Most Recently Created Issues

  • #8324: Firecrawl API updated to v1

    • Priority: High
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 0 days ago
  • #8316: Stable diffusion can't generate correct picture in agent with llama model

    • Priority: High
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 0 days ago
  • #8315: Image size parameter mismatch in cogvlm tool

    • Priority: Medium
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 0 days ago
  • #8309: Stream API issue with chatbot-workflow

    • Priority: High
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 0 days ago

These issues are critical as they impact fundamental functionalities and integration capabilities of Dify, reflecting an urgent need for resolutions to ensure reliability and user satisfaction.

Report On: Fetch pull requests



Analysis of Pull Requests for the Dify Project

Open Pull Requests

  1. PR #8326: fix: response_format label

    • Status: Open
    • Description: This PR addresses a bug fix related to the response_format label across multiple YAML configuration files. It seems to be a straightforward fix with consistent changes across various model providers.
    • Impact: Low, as it's a minor bug fix but essential for ensuring correct configuration settings.
  2. PR #8323: Feature/service api workflow logs

    • Status: Open
    • Description: Introduces new features for service API workflow logs, enhancing the logging capabilities of services.
    • Impact: Medium, as it improves the logging mechanism which is crucial for debugging and monitoring services.
  3. PR #8322: chore: refurish python code by applying Pylint linter rules

    • Status: Open
    • Description: This PR focuses on code quality improvements by applying Pylint linter rules.
    • Impact: Low to medium, primarily affects developers and contributes to maintaining code quality.
  4. PR #8311: chore: fix unnecessary string concatation in single line

    • Status: Open
    • Description: Aims to enhance code readability and performance by fixing unnecessary string concatenations.
    • Impact: Low, improves code quality and readability.
  5. PR #8265: feat: Copy workspace info

    • Status: Open
    • Description: Adds a feature to copy workspace information easily from the UI.
    • Impact: Medium, enhances user experience by simplifying the process of sharing workspace details.

Recently Closed Pull Requests

  1. PR #8326: fix: response_format label

    • Status: Closed (Merged)
    • Outcome: Successfully merged, indicating that the fix was reviewed and accepted.
  2. PR #8307: chore: apply flake8-pytest-style linter rules

    • Status: Closed (Merged)
    • Outcome: Merged, suggesting an emphasis on maintaining code style consistency.
  3. PR #8299: Fix VariableEntityType Bug external-data-tool -> external_data_tool

    • Status: Closed (Merged)
    • Outcome: Quick resolution of a bug related to entity type naming conventions.
  4. PR #8296: chore: refurbish Python code by applying refurb linter rules

    • Status: Closed (Merged)
    • Outcome: Indicates ongoing efforts to improve code quality and adherence to best practices.
  5. PR #8293: docs: update lambda_translate_utils.yaml

    • Status: Closed (Merged)
    • Outcome: Documentation update, crucial for keeping users informed about configurations.

Summary

The Dify project actively manages its pull requests with a focus on improving functionality, enhancing user experience, and maintaining high code quality. The quick turnaround on merging PRs related to bug fixes and documentation updates highlights an efficient project management approach. However, several open PRs suggest ongoing developments that could significantly impact the project's capabilities and user experience. The project's responsiveness to community contributions and emphasis on code quality are evident from the nature of these PRs.

Report On: Fetch Files For Assessment



Analysis of Source Code Files

File: api/core/model_runtime/model_providers/bedrock/llm/llm.py

Structure and Quality:

  1. Imports and Dependencies:

    • The file uses standard Python imports, third-party libraries (boto3, requests), and local imports from within the project. This is typical for a Python module in a larger application.
  2. Constants and Globals:

    • Constants like ANTHROPIC_BLOCK_MODE_PROMPT are defined at the top, which is good practice. However, the constant is quite large and could be externalized to a configuration file or template for better maintainability.
  3. Class Definition:

    • BedrockLargeLanguageModel inherits from LargeLanguageModel, indicating an OOP approach that promotes code reuse and modularity.
    • The class is well-documented with comments explaining the purpose and functionality of methods.
  4. Methods Complexity:

    • Methods such as _invoke, _generate_with_converse, and _handle_converse_response are relatively complex with multiple conditional branches and exception handling blocks. This complexity might warrant breaking down these methods into smaller, more focused methods.
    • Use of detailed logging throughout the methods aids in debugging and operational monitoring.
  5. Error Handling:

    • Comprehensive error handling is implemented using custom exceptions like InvokeAuthorizationError, InvokeBadRequestError, etc., which are mapped from AWS client errors. This enhances the robustness of the model invocation process.
  6. Code Comments and Documentation:

    • The code is well-commented, providing explanations for blocks of code which are not immediately clear. Docstrings are used effectively to describe method functionalities, parameters, and return types.
  7. Potential Improvements:

    • Some hardcoded values (e.g., model prefixes in _find_model_info) could be externalized to configuration files to make the code more dynamic and easier to update.
    • The method _convert_prompt_message_to_dict has a complex logic that could be simplified or broken down for clarity.

File: api/core/app/apps/workflow/generate_task_pipeline.py

Structure and Quality:

  1. Imports and Dependencies:

    • Similar to the previous file, it uses a mix of standard, third-party, and local imports effectively.
  2. Class Definition:

    • WorkflowAppGenerateTaskPipeline inherits from BasedGenerateTaskPipeline and WorkflowCycleManage, suggesting a use of multiple inheritance to leverage functionalities from different aspects of the workflow management system.
  3. Methods Complexity:

    • The method _process_stream_response orchestrates various events like starting, updating, and completing tasks within a workflow. It handles different types of events with a large conditional structure which might benefit from refactoring into smaller handler functions for each event type.
    • The generator pattern used in methods like _wrapper_process_stream_response is appropriate for handling streaming data but adds complexity to the flow control.
  4. Concurrency and Asynchronous Handling:

    • The use of generators suggests an awareness of asynchronous programming needs, especially in I/O operations like streaming responses.
  5. Error Handling:

    • Robust error handling with specific exceptions for different error states in the workflow processing (e.g., QueueErrorEvent). This helps in isolating issues during the execution of workflows.
  6. Potential Improvements:

    • Given the complexity introduced by multiple event types in _process_stream_response, implementing a strategy pattern where each event type is handled by a dedicated class or function could simplify modifications and testing.
    • More extensive use of type hints throughout could enhance readability and maintainability.

Conclusion:

Both files demonstrate a high level of software engineering skill with attention to modularity, error handling, and code documentation. However, both also exhibit areas where complexity could be reduced or managed through further refactoring or design pattern usage. These improvements would aid future maintenance efforts and potential feature expansions.

Report On: Fetch commits



Development Team and Recent Activity

Members and Recent Commit Activity

  1. Ikko Eltociear Ashimine (eltociear)

    • Updated documentation related to AWS lambda translation utilities.
  2. Tamer (GuoNingNing)

    • Fixed a bug related to variable entity type naming inconsistency.
  3. 呆萌闷油瓶 (leslie2046)

    • Added Azure OpenAI API version support for 2024-08-01-preview.
  4. crazywoola

    • Reverted a feature update related to app publish time.
    • Removed redundant code in Azure OpenAI LLM provider.
  5. ybalbert001

    • Enhanced support for Bedrock cross-region inference by adding multiple configurations.
  6. Bowen Liang (bowenliang123)

    • Applied various linting rules across multiple Python files enhancing code quality.
    • Cleaned up Python code by applying different linter rules.
  7. takatost

    • Fixed missing content in the answer node stream output during iterations.
    • Addressed issues in workflow related to shortcuts not working and parallel limits in if-else nodes.
  8. badbye (yalei)

    • Enabled Claude models in Bedrock to support the response_format parameter.
  9. DDDDD12138

    • Improved empty data display for detail panels in the workflow component.
  10. HowardChan (Howe829)

    • Fixed a 500 error with Ollama text embedding and addressed an issue with adding Ollama embedding model.
  11. Leo.Wang (wlrnet)

    • Updated GitLab query fields, adding query by path functionality.
  12. Jason Tan (cuckootan)

    • Implemented functionality allowing editors to create API keys.
  13. 非法操作 (hjlarry)

    • Addressed alignment issues with the upload image icon in chat input area.
    • Fixed truthy value handling in vertex AI LLM provider.
  14. Nam Vu (ZuzooVn)

    • Fixed issues related to environment variables and Docker configuration settings.
  15. Jyong (JohnJyong)

    • Addressed tooltip display issues and added region name to S3 IAM configurations.
    • Managed several fixes and enhancements related to vector database configurations and error handling in tool nodes.
  16. Yi Xiao (YIXIAO0)

    • Addressed overflow issues in chat history components and fixed tooltip size settings.
    • Contributed to enhancements related to workflow node operations and UI elements.
  17. Joel (iamjoel)

    • Fixed issues related to chat input padding and markdown paragraph margins.
    • Addressed i18n typos and improved configuration modal interactions.
  18. StyleZhang (zxhlyh)

    • Managed updates related to markdown rendering and workflow parallel execution settings.
    • Contributed to UI enhancements and fixed issues related to document extraction nodes.
  19. Charlie.Wei (charli117)

    • Enhanced support for more model types and built-in tools on AWS/Sagemaker.
    • Managed updates related to model configurations and deployment settings.
  20. Thales Salazar (thalessalazar)

    • Translated billing information into PT-BR and addressed regionalization improvements for translations.
  21. Su Yang (soulteary)

    • Ensured consistency in Docker compose file formats, contributing to deployment configuration improvements.
  22. ice yao (yaoice)

    • Added Volcengine TOS storage support, enhancing storage configuration options within the project environment.
  23. Chenhe Gu (guchenhe)

    • Updated licensing terms, specifically removing 'SaaS' from restriction term definitions, reflecting changes in usage policies.
  24. cr-zhichen

    • Implemented health checks for dify-sandbox in Docker compose configurations, improving deployment robustness.
  25. 邹成卓 (zouchengzhuo)

    • Fixed issues related to Tongyi code wrapper stability, enhancing the reliability of model interactions.
  26. ybalbert001

    • Supported more model types and built-in tools on AWS/Sagemaker, expanding the platform's capabilities on AWS environments.

Patterns, Themes, and Conclusions

  • The development team is actively involved in enhancing the platform's compatibility with various external services like AWS, Azure, and Volcengine, indicating a focus on broadening user accessibility and integration options.
  • There is a significant emphasis on code quality and maintainability, as evidenced by multiple commits from different developers focusing on applying linting rules and cleaning up the codebase.
  • The team is responsive to community feedback and bug reports, quickly addressing issues that affect user experience and system functionality.
  • Collaboration among team members is evident from co-authored commits and merged branches, suggesting a cohesive team environment.
  • The project's documentation is actively maintained, ensuring that users have access to up-to-date information about features, configurations, and deployment options.
  • Security considerations are taken seriously, with specific protocols for handling security disclosures responsibly without exposing sensitive information publicly.