Quantify Issues

Recent GitHub Issues Activity

_{Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.}

Quantify commits

Quantified Commit Activity Over 30 Days

Developer	Avatar	Branches	PRs	Commits	Files	Changes
Protobuf Team Bot		5	0/0/0	41	73	48407
Protobuf GitHub		30	0/0/0	117	274	20806
None (zhangskz)		6	1/1/0	31	34	5606
Joshua Haberman		4	0/0/0	16	174	5492
Mike Kruskal		7	2/1/0	17	71	5145
Hong Shin		4	0/0/0	44	45	2310
Yamil Morales		1	0/0/0	3	18	1263
Evan Brown		2	0/0/0	3	5	906
Mark Hansen		1	0/0/0	12	14	846
Adam Cozzette		5	1/1/0	14	52	827
Tony Liao		2	1/1/0	3	13	665
Deanna Garcia		2	0/0/0	16	18	654
Thomas Van Lenten		3	0/0/0	12	61	542
Brent Shaffer		1	0/0/0	1	3	312
Derek Benson		1	0/0/0	8	15	255
Jie Luo		2	0/0/0	2	5	110
Eric Salo		2	0/0/0	3	3	15
serge-sans-paille		1	0/0/0	1	6	10
Sven Mikael Persson		1	0/0/0	1	2	8
liqipeng		1	1/0/1	1	1	6
Zoey Greer		1	29/0/2	1	1	4
David Smith		1	0/0/0	1	1	4
Jin		1	0/0/0	1	1	3
y-yagi		1	0/0/0	1	2	3
Cong Liu		1	0/0/0	1	2	3
Bo Anderson		1	0/0/0	1	1	2
Ilya Tocar		1	0/0/0	1	1	2
Hood Chatham		1	0/0/0	1	1	2
tony		1	0/0/0	1	1	2
dependabot[bot]		1	0/0/0	1	1	2
Jakub (jagub2)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Thomas Portelange (lekoala)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
reito (reihoyo)		0	1/0/1	0	0	0
reito (reitowo)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Matteo (Delcaran)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Yibo Cai (cyb70289)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Marat Reymers (maratori)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Yusu(Cosmo) Zhao (CosmoMaaya)		0	1/0/1	0	0	0
Jerry Berg		0	0/0/0	0	0	0
Richard Cole (imrichardcole)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
None (copybara-service[bot])		0	156/86/33	0	0	0

_{PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period}

Report On: Fetch issues

Recent Activity Analysis

The protocolbuffers/protobuf repository currently has 233 open issues, indicating ongoing engagement and activity within the community. Recent issues reflect a variety of concerns, including build failures across different platforms, compatibility issues with specific versions, and requests for enhancements in functionality. Notably, there are several issues related to the integration of Protobuf with other languages and frameworks, suggesting a need for better documentation and support for cross-language compatibility.

Several issues exhibit patterns of commonality, particularly around build errors on Windows and MacOS, as well as challenges with specific language bindings (e.g., Python, Ruby). This may indicate underlying problems with how Protobuf interacts with different development environments or how it handles certain data types and structures.

Issue Details

Most Recently Created Issues

1. Issue #18307: libupb is hard bounded in cmake builds

   • Priority: Untriaged
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 0 days ago

2. Issue #18305: Json Parser for Protobuf Java Lite

   • Priority: Untriaged
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 0 days ago

3. Issue #18232: Bogus timestamp in latest protoc for linux arch64

   • Priority: Untriaged
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 2 days ago

4. Issue #18228: Large Proto File Failing Java Compilation with Variable Assignment Error

   • Priority: Wontfix
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 2 days ago

5. Issue #18205: Deprecating 'enum' field inside a 'message' causes compiler warning 'deprecated-declarations' in generated C++ header

   • Priority: Help wanted
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 3 days ago

Most Recently Updated Issues

1. Issue #18155: Plugin killed by signal 9. when generating Python code from Ads protos

   • Priority: Untriaged
   • Status: Open
   • Updated: 4 days ago

2. Issue #18128: Why is rules_ruby needed in 3.23.0? Is there a way to skip it?

   • Priority: Wontfix
   • Status: Open
   • Updated: 1 day ago

3. Issue #18097: protobuf::message using protobuf::map across dlls leads to crashes

   • Priority: Untriaged
   • Status: Open
   • Updated: 9 days ago

4. Issue #18096: Excessive new warning in Python protobuf runtime

   • Priority: Python
   • Status: Open
   • Updated: 9 days ago

5. Issue #18063: Cannot override OneOf method names to avoid collision with imported proto

   • Priority: Untriaged
   • Status: Open
   • Updated: 11 days ago

Analysis of Notable Issues

• The issue regarding libupb being hard bounded in CMake builds (#18307) highlights potential configuration problems that could affect users attempting to build from source across different platforms.
• The request for a JSON parser for Protobuf Java Lite (#18305) indicates a gap in functionality that could hinder developers migrating from full Java Protobuf implementations.
• The bogus timestamp issue (#18232) reflects concerns about the integrity of binaries distributed for specific architectures, which could lead to significant user frustration if not addressed promptly.
• The compilation failure due to large proto files (#18228) suggests that users may be encountering limitations when working with complex message definitions, which could impact their ability to utilize Protobuf effectively.
• The deprecation warning related to enum fields (#18205) raises questions about backward compatibility and the handling of deprecated features in generated code.

Overall, these issues reveal a mix of critical bugs, feature requests, and usability concerns that need attention from the maintainers to ensure continued satisfaction among users of the Protobuf library.

Report On: Fetch pull requests

Overview

The analysis of the pull requests (PRs) for the Protocol Buffers (protobuf) project reveals a significant volume of ongoing development activity, with 136 open PRs and a variety of changes addressing both feature enhancements and bug fixes. The recent PRs reflect a focus on improving compatibility, optimizing performance, and refining the codebase across multiple programming languages.

Summary of Pull Requests

1. PR #18309: Enable workspace in .bazelrc
   Created to adapt to Bazel's upcoming changes, this PR enables workspace configurations in .bazelrc. It addresses an issue related to dependency management as Bazel transitions away from using WORKSPACE files.

2. PR #18308: Support --incompatible_enable_proto_toolchain_resolution
   This PR introduces support for a new flag that enhances toolchain resolution for protocol buffers, indicating ongoing improvements in build configuration.

3. PR #18306: Move unittest targets to be colocated with .proto files
   Aiming for better organization, this PR relocates unit test targets to align with their respective .proto definitions, enhancing maintainability.

4. PR #18304: Move ProtoInfo and ProtoLangToolchainInfo from Bazel
   This change is a preparatory step for future compatibility with Bazel versions, ensuring that protobuf remains functional as Bazel evolves.

5. PR #18303: Make C++ proto library work over non-proto_library targets
   This enhancement broadens the applicability of the C++ proto library, allowing it to integrate with various target types beyond just proto_library.

6. PR #18297: Add nebius.ai custom options to registry
   This PR reserves custom options for the nebius.ai API, reflecting an effort to expand protobuf's capabilities for specific use cases.

7. PR #18296: Change MapKey::GetStringValue to return absl::string_view
   A minor but important change aimed at improving performance by utilizing absl::string_view instead of returning a full string copy.

8. PR #18295: Automated rollback of commit 46eaf53920ab20325706dc22923b449054284845
   This automated rollback indicates issues with a previous commit that necessitated reverting changes to maintain stability.

9. PR #18294: Disable tracking during feature resolution
   A critical fix aimed at preventing potential deadlocks during feature resolution processes within protobuf.

10. PR #18293: Automated rollback of commit 9a9e5cf7ffe32cc4f9944d38fd0908af7e186264
    Another rollback indicating ongoing adjustments to stabilize the codebase.

Analysis of Pull Requests

The current landscape of open pull requests in the Protocol Buffers repository showcases several key themes and areas of focus:

Ongoing Adaptation to Tooling Changes

A notable number of PRs are aimed at adapting the project to changes in build tooling, particularly in relation to Bazel. For instance, PRs like #18309 and #18308 reflect proactive measures taken by contributors to ensure compatibility with upcoming versions of Bazel and its evolving features. This indicates a forward-thinking approach by the development team, ensuring that users can leverage the latest improvements in their build systems without disruption.

Code Organization and Maintenance

Several recent PRs emphasize improving code organization and maintainability. The move of unit test targets (#18306) and the consolidation of logic related to element creation in RepeatedPtrField (#18299) demonstrate an ongoing effort to streamline the codebase. Such changes not only enhance readability but also reduce complexity, making it easier for future contributors to navigate and understand the code.

Performance Enhancements

Performance optimization is another recurring theme. Changes like those in PR #18296, which modifies how string values are returned from map keys, highlight a continuous drive towards efficiency within the library. These enhancements are critical given that Protocol Buffers is often used in performance-sensitive applications where serialization speed can significantly impact overall system performance.

Community Engagement and Customization

The introduction of custom options for specific APIs (e.g., nebius.ai in PR #18297) illustrates how the project is accommodating diverse user needs through extensibility. This flexibility is essential for maintaining relevance across various application domains as users increasingly seek tailored solutions that fit their unique requirements.

Rollbacks Indicating Stability Concerns

The presence of multiple automated rollbacks (e.g., PRs #18295, #18293) suggests that while active development is robust, there may be stability concerns arising from recent changes. These rollbacks serve as a reminder of the challenges inherent in maintaining a large codebase where new features must be balanced against existing functionality without introducing regressions.

Internal Changes and Version Management

Numerous internal changes (e.g., PRs #18276, #18200) indicate ongoing efforts to manage versioning effectively within the repository. These updates are crucial for ensuring that all components remain compatible and function correctly as new features are integrated into the main branch.

Overall, the current state of pull requests in the Protocol Buffers project reflects a dynamic environment characterized by active development aimed at enhancing functionality, performance, and usability while addressing stability concerns through careful management practices. The community's engagement in customizing features further underscores Protocol Buffers' commitment to meeting diverse user needs across various programming environments.

Report On: Fetch commits

Repo Commits Analysis

Development Team and Recent Activity

Team Members and Recent Contributions

1. protobuf-team-bot

   • Activity: 41 commits, primarily focused on auto-generating files and minor updates across various files.
   • Collaborations: Engaged in multiple branches, contributing to overall maintenance and updates.

2. mkruskal-google

   • Activity: 17 commits, including internal changes and bug fixes.
   • Notable Work: Addressed issues related to memory management and compatibility, with a focus on internal APIs.

3. protobuf-github-bot

   • Activity: 117 commits, extensive contributions across numerous files.
   • Focus Areas: Maintained the repository with a mix of auto-generated updates and internal changes.

4. honglooker

   • Activity: 44 commits, involved in significant refactoring and migration tasks.
   • Key Changes: Migrated various functionalities from protos to hpb, enhancing code organization.

5. dbenson24

   • Activity: 8 commits, focused on Rust-related enhancements.
   • Contributions: Worked on improving the Rust bindings and integration with C++ components.

6. acozzette

   • Activity: 14 commits, contributed to bug fixes and optimizations.
   • Notable Fixes: Addressed performance issues in the Java implementation.

7. tempoz

   • Activity: 1 commit, minor changes related to Kotlin testing.

8. mhansen

   • Activity: 12 commits, focused on optimizations and cleanup tasks.
   • Key Contributions: Improved code efficiency in various components.

9. liqipeng

   • Activity: 1 commit, addressed a specific bug related to method naming conventions.

10. haberman

    • Activity: 16 commits, involved in restructuring code for better maintainability.

11. tonyliaoss

    • Activity: 3 commits, contributed to minor cleanups and documentation updates.

12. ericsalo

    • Activity: 3 commits related to fixing potential memory issues in Ruby bindings.

13. congliuthu

    • Activity: 1 commit focused on minor adjustments.

14. Other contributors (e.g., Bo98, y-yagi) made smaller contributions primarily related to specific issues or maintenance tasks.

Summary of Recent Activities

• The development team has been actively engaged in both feature development and bug fixing across multiple programming languages supported by Protocol Buffers (C++, Java, Python, etc.).
• There is a notable emphasis on refactoring existing code to improve performance and maintainability, particularly with the migration from protos to hpb.
• Auto-generation of files has been a recurring theme, indicating ongoing efforts to keep generated code up-to-date with changes in the underlying protocol definitions.
• Several contributors have focused on enhancing Rust support within the project, reflecting an expanding interest in that ecosystem.
• Internal changes have been frequent, suggesting a commitment to improving the codebase's structure and performance while addressing technical debt.

Patterns and Themes

• The team exhibits a collaborative approach with multiple contributors working across different branches simultaneously.
• There is a clear focus on maintaining backward compatibility while introducing new features or refactoring existing ones.
• The project is characterized by its high volume of automated processes (e.g., file generation), which streamlines development but also necessitates careful oversight to ensure quality.
• The diversity of contributions across programming languages highlights the project's broad applicability and relevance in various development environments.

Conclusions

The recent activities within the Protocol Buffers repository indicate a robust development cycle characterized by active contributions from a diverse team. The focus on refactoring, performance optimization, and maintaining compatibility suggests a mature project that is evolving while addressing both current needs and future scalability.