"Search with Lepton" is a TypeScript-based project that aims to create a conversational search engine integrating large language models and popular search engines like Bing and Google. Despite its innovative approach, the project is currently experiencing stagnation, with critical bugs and integration issues hindering progress.
The project has 38 open issues, many of which highlight significant challenges such as API authentication errors (#89) and server configuration problems (#91). These issues suggest users are struggling with initial setup and integration, which could deter adoption. Recent issues like #94, regarding a ModuleNotFoundError
, indicate ongoing critical problems that need urgent resolution.
dependabot[bot]
micromatch
dependency in /web
(8 lines changed).choiking
plainyears
NickN0309
Yangqing Jia
Yadong Xie (vthinkxie)
The team shows limited recent activity, primarily focused on dependency updates by dependabot[bot]. This suggests a potential lack of engagement or resource allocation towards resolving pressing issues.
Timespan | Opened | Closed | Comments | Labeled | Milestones |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7 Days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
30 Days | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
90 Days | 7 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 1 |
All Time | 64 | 26 | - | - | - |
Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.
Developer | Avatar | Branches | PRs | Commits | Files | Changes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
dependabot[bot] | 1 | 1/1/0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | |
None (choiking) | 0 | 1/0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Ethan (plainyears) | 0 | 1/0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period
The GitHub repository for the project "Search with Lepton" has 38 open issues, indicating ongoing user engagement and potential challenges within the project. Notably, several issues reflect critical bugs and integration problems, particularly with API authentication and server configurations. A recurring theme in the issues is related to environment setup and dependency management, suggesting that users may struggle with initial configurations or updates.
Several issues have been created or updated recently, indicating active troubleshooting by users. For instance, Issue #94 regarding a ModuleNotFoundError
was created 16 days ago, highlighting a significant problem that could hinder new users from successfully running the application. Additionally, Issue #89 about an openai.AuthenticationError
was edited recently, pointing to persistent authentication challenges that could affect functionality.
Here are some of the most recent and significant issues:
Issue #94: [BUG] ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'leptonai.api.workspace'
Issue #92: Can not reply in other language
Issue #91: start server failed Invalid URL '/api/v1/kv/namespaces': No scheme supplied
Issue #89: openai.AuthenticationError: Unauthorized
Issue #86: > python3 search_with_lepton.py
These issues highlight several areas of concern for the project, particularly around setup complexity and API integrations. The presence of unresolved high-priority issues suggests that users may face significant hurdles when trying to utilize the software effectively.
The repository leptonai/search_with_lepton
currently has 6 open pull requests (PRs) and 22 closed PRs. The open PRs focus on bug fixes, dependency updates, and feature enhancements, indicating ongoing development and maintenance of the project.
PR #95: fix workspace not found bug: version issue
Created by choiking 16 days ago, this PR addresses a bug related to workspace not being found, potentially linked to versioning issues. It includes minor modifications in search_with_lepton.py
.
PR #77: build(deps): bump next from 14.0.4 to 14.1.1 in /web
Created by dependabot[bot] 128 days ago, this PR updates the Next.js dependency to a newer version. It has been open for a significant amount of time without merge activity.
PR #67: Fix Google search engine
Created by twosee 179 days ago, this PR implements defensive handling for inconsistencies in the data returned by Google and Bing search engines.
PR #49: [Bug] fix issue#47
Created by StevenSu 223 days ago, this PR adds ID, name, and URL fields to Google custom search results. It has garnered positive feedback from other contributors.
PR #37: Update .eslintrc.json
Created by jhfeng 228 days ago, this PR modifies ESLint configuration to prevent build failures on Windows.
PR #32: feat(history): use localstorage for query local result
Created by Horus 229 days ago, this PR introduces local storage functionality for caching query results. It has encountered some issues during testing.
PR #96: build(deps): bump micromatch from 4.0.5 to 4.0.8 in /web
Closed after being merged by Yadong Xie, this PR addressed security vulnerabilities in the micromatch library.
PR #90: fix: some installation and setup issues in the README
This PR improved documentation clarity regarding installation steps and was merged successfully.
PR #87: build(deps): bump braces from 3.0.2 to 3.0.3 in /web
Similar to PR #96, this was a dependency update that also addressed security concerns.
PR #64: Feature/fix search demo
Closed without merging; details on its content are limited.
PR #34: Update new.html
Closed without merging; details on its content are limited.
The current state of pull requests in the leptonai/search_with_lepton
repository reflects a mix of ongoing maintenance efforts and feature enhancements aimed at improving the user experience and functionality of the project.
The open pull requests indicate active engagement from contributors with a focus on both bug fixes and dependency management. For instance, PR #95 addresses a critical bug that could hinder user experience, while PR #77's long-standing status suggests potential issues with merge readiness or prioritization within the team. The presence of multiple dependency updates (e.g., PRs #77 and #87) highlights an awareness of security vulnerabilities and the importance of keeping libraries up-to-date—a crucial aspect for maintaining software health.
Moreover, PR #67 demonstrates an effort to improve compatibility with external APIs (Google and Bing), which is essential for a project centered around search functionalities. The defensive programming approach taken here is commendable as it enhances robustness against varying data formats returned by different services.
The closed pull requests reveal a proactive approach towards documentation and dependency management as well. Notably, PRs like #90 and #96 show that contributors are not only focused on code but also on ensuring that users have clear instructions for setup—an often overlooked aspect that can significantly impact user adoption and satisfaction.
However, there are several older open pull requests (e.g., PRs #49, #37) that have not seen recent activity or merges despite positive feedback or minor changes needed for completion. This could indicate resource constraints or shifting priorities within the development team.
The overall activity level suggests that while there is significant engagement with the project, there may be bottlenecks in merging processes or resource allocation for addressing open issues promptly. The community's involvement through contributions like those seen in PRs indicates a healthy collaborative environment; however, maintaining momentum will be crucial as the project evolves.
In conclusion, while the repository shows promising signs of active development and community engagement, attention should be directed towards resolving older open pull requests to avoid stagnation and ensure continuous improvement of the software project.
dependabot[bot]
micromatch
dependency from version 4.0.5 to 4.0.8 in the /web
directory.web/package-lock.json
, with a total of 8 lines changed (4 added, 4 removed).choiking
plainyears
NickN0309
Yangqing Jia
Yadong Xie (vthinkxie)
dependabot[bot]
, focusing on dependency management, which is crucial for maintaining project health.The recent activities show a blend of maintenance through dependency updates and collaborative feature development. However, the overall lack of frequent contributions from most team members suggests a need for increased engagement or focus on completing existing tasks.