The "smartcomponents" project, an experimental initiative to integrate AI features into .NET applications, has been archived and moved to a new repository, indicating a strategic shift in development focus.
The project aimed to provide comprehensive tools and examples for incorporating AI into .NET applications, with a particular focus on Blazor and MVC Razor Pages. Despite its archival, the repository had significant community engagement, suggesting ongoing interest in its objectives.
Recent issues and pull requests indicate persistent challenges with AI integration, such as technical errors and configuration difficulties. Notable issues include missing or inaccessible source code (#20, #13) and requests for enhanced documentation (#11, #10). The unresolved status of these issues suggests areas needing further attention in the new repository.
Summary
Quantified Reports
Detailed ReportsREADME.md to reflect project relocation.TailwindIntegration.targets for path handling.The recent activity primarily involved documentation updates, with no active development in the last 30 days, indicating a transition phase as the project moves to its new location.
| Timespan | Opened | Closed | Comments | Labeled | Milestones |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Days | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 90 Days | 12 | 2 | 7 | 12 | 1 |
| All Time | 62 | 34 | - | - | - |
Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.
| Developer | Avatar | Branches | PRs | Commits | Files | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Sanderson |  |
1 | 0/0/0 | 1 | 1 | 115 |
PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period
Recent GitHub issue activity for the "smartcomponents" project indicates a steady stream of user engagement, with issues being opened and closed regularly. The issues cover a wide range of topics, from technical problems and feature requests to questions about usage and integration. Notably, there are several issues related to the integration of AI models, compatibility with different frameworks, and customization options for smart components.
A significant anomaly is the recurring mention of missing or inaccessible source code, which has been a point of frustration for some users (#20, #13). Another notable theme is the interest in using local embeddings and integrating with various AI services, as seen in issues #40 and #27. Additionally, there are multiple requests for support with specific configurations or environments, such as running in Docker containers (#26) or using different language models (#35).
Several issues highlight the need for better documentation or examples, particularly regarding configuration and customization options (#11, #10). There is also a recurring interest in expanding the functionality of smart components to support more complex use cases or additional data types (#18, #48).
#75: Missing Method Exception using .AddLocalTextEmbeddingsGeneration()
#74: Smart Paste with Ollama and mistral
#72: Component Reference for SmartPasteButton
#71: Add Using Statement to Imports File
#69: Typos in Smart TextArea phrases
The most recent issues reflect ongoing challenges with integrating AI features into .NET applications, including technical errors, configuration difficulties, and usability improvements. The presence of open issues suggests that while there is active interest in the project, some areas require further attention or clarification.
The dataset provides information on pull requests (PRs) from the "dotnet-smartcomponents/smartcomponents" repository, which was an experimental project focused on integrating AI features into .NET applications. The repository has been archived and moved to a new location, indicating that it is no longer actively maintained.
PR #73: Open for 45 days, this PR addresses an issue with the Smart ComboBox component by correctly passing the similarity threshold value. It partially addresses issue #64 but requires further internal fixes.
PR #70: Open for 57 days, this PR corrects typos in documentation and sample code, improving readability and professionalism.
PR #51: Closed without merging on the same day it was created. It involved setting up API files but was not integrated into the main branch.
PR #49: Merged 146 days ago, this PR added quotation marks to a command in TailwindIntegration.targets to handle paths with spaces, improving build script robustness.
PR #23: Merged 179 days ago, this PR corrected a minor typographical error in documentation by changing "HuggingFace" to "Hugging Face".
PR #6: Closed on the same day it was created, this PR aimed to improve the smart textarea sample by adding a simpler variant.
PR #4: Closed on the same day it was created, focused on improving samples within the repository.
PR #3: Closed on the same day it was created, involved updates to the README file.
PR #2: Closed on the same day it was created, introduced initial samples for the project.
PR #1: Closed shortly after creation, involved initial documentation efforts for the project.
The pull requests for the "dotnet-smartcomponents/smartcomponents" repository reflect a typical pattern for an experimental project that was later archived. The open PRs (#73 and #70) indicate ongoing issues that were not resolved before archiving, suggesting either a lack of resources or prioritization towards finalizing these changes before transitioning to a new repository.
The closed PRs show a rapid development cycle with several initial setup and improvement tasks being completed quickly. This suggests a focus on establishing a foundational codebase and documentation early in the project's life cycle. Notably, many of these PRs were closed without merging or were merged quickly after creation, indicating either straightforward changes or decisions not to proceed with certain developments at that time.
The presence of minor typo corrections (#70) and documentation updates (#23) highlights an attention to detail and commitment to maintaining high-quality documentation and code readability. However, the lack of recent merge activity on open PRs suggests that unresolved issues may have been deprioritized due to the project's transition to a new repository location.
Overall, while there is evidence of community engagement and interest in contributing (as seen in PRs from external contributors), the project's archiving indicates a strategic shift towards consolidating efforts in a new repository. This move likely aims to streamline development and support under a more unified or updated framework, potentially addressing some of the unresolved tasks from this archived repository.
README.md 28 days ago, reducing its content significantly by removing 112 lines and adding 3 lines.TailwindIntegration.targets 146 days ago to add quotation marks for paths with spaces.Documentation Focus: A significant portion of the recent activity has been centered around improving documentation, as evidenced by Steve Sanderson's multiple commits focusing on README updates, documentation enhancements, and sample improvements.
Project Transition: The repository was archived, indicating a transition to a new location. This is reflected in the minimal README content primarily serving as a relocation notice.
Limited Recent Activity: The most recent commit was made 28 days ago, with no active branches or pull requests in the last 30 days, suggesting that active development has ceased in this repository.
Community Engagement: Despite being archived, the repository had moderate community engagement, indicating interest in the project's objectives.
Overall, the development activity reflects a winding down of efforts in this repository as focus shifts to its new location.