The Google Gemini Cookbook, a repository offering guides and examples for utilizing Google's multimodal API, is experiencing development stagnation with unresolved issues and documentation deficiencies impacting user satisfaction.
Despite active engagement with the project, significant gaps in support and documentation are evident. Users frequently request clearer guidance on file uploads and API functionalities, as seen in issues like #274 and #261. The backlog of stale issues, such as #220 and #233, suggests a need for more responsive maintenance to prevent user frustration.
Recent issues highlight recurring themes of documentation inadequacy and technical challenges. Issues like #274 (TypeError) and #261 (Missing OpenAPI spec) remain unresolved, indicating persistent user difficulties. The development team has been slow to respond, with many issues marked as "awaiting response" or "stale," reflecting a potential backlog in addressing user concerns.
| Timespan | Opened | Closed | Comments | Labeled | Milestones |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Days | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Days | 3 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| 90 Days | 8 | 18 | 31 | 0 | 1 |
| All Time | 73 | 55 | - | - | - |
Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.
| Developer | Avatar | Branches | PRs | Commits | Files | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shilpa Kancharla (shilpakancharla) | 1 | 1/0/1 | 4 | 2 | 3714 | |
| Mark Daoust |  |
3 | 8/9/0 | 11 | 82 | 3229 |
| Erika Cardenas |  |
1 | 0/1/0 | 1 | 3 | 1194 |
| Guillaume Vernade |  |
1 | 11/8/0 | 9 | 11 | 872 |
| Mark McDonald |  |
6 | 7/4/0 | 11 | 10 | 826 |
| CSK |  |
1 | 1/1/0 | 1 | 2 | 23 |
| Ray Tien (Ray0907) | 0 | 0/0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| None (mistakenideas) | 0 | 1/0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Krish Dholakia (krrishdholakia) | 0 | 0/0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Pablo Sanchez (pablosanchez84) | 0 | 0/0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period
The Google Gemini Cookbook repository has 18 open issues, indicating ongoing user engagement and potential challenges faced by developers. Notably, several issues are marked as "awaiting response," suggesting that users are seeking assistance but may not be receiving timely feedback. A recurring theme is the request for clearer documentation and examples, particularly regarding the handling of specific file types and API functionalities.
Several issues exhibit signs of being unresolved for extended periods, which could lead to frustration among users. For example, issues related to uploading files (PDFs and images) and obtaining JSON responses from models are prevalent, indicating a need for better support in these areas. The presence of stale issues also suggests that some users may have abandoned their inquiries due to a lack of responses.
Issue #274: TypeError: argument of type 'Part' is not iterable
Issue #265: Add logo in HTML
Issue #261: Missing OpenAPI spec
Issue #241: Cookbook - responseSchema
Issue #220: Bug Report the model often starts creating repetitive sequences of tokens
Issue #93: OpenAPI files for AI Models
Issue #66: File upload example for JavaScript returns No file found in request
Issue #54: TimeoutError in File_API.ipynb
Issue #233: Difference in Output Between PDF and DOC File Upload Methods
Issue #221: "response_schema" results in KeyError
The data indicates that while there is active engagement with the project, there are significant gaps in support and documentation that could hinder user experience. The repeated requests for help with file uploads and API specifications suggest that users may struggle to implement features effectively without clearer guidance.
Additionally, the presence of multiple stale issues highlights a potential backlog in addressing user concerns, which could lead to decreased satisfaction and increased reliance on alternative solutions or platforms.
The repository maintainers may need to prioritize responding to these inquiries and enhancing documentation to improve overall usability and developer experience with the Gemini API.
The Google Gemini Cookbook repository has a total of 19 open pull requests (PRs) and 190 closed PRs, indicating ongoing development and community engagement. The recent activity reflects a focus on enhancing examples, improving documentation, and addressing user feedback.
PR #292: Add Data Commons example
Created by Mark Daoust, this PR adds a new Jupyter Notebook example demonstrating the use of Data Commons. It is currently awaiting review.
PR #291: Add multimodal RAG tutorial
Submitted by Shilpa Kancharla, this PR introduces a tutorial for multimodal retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). It includes multiple commits for refinement and is also awaiting review.
PR #289: Remove markdown in codespace welcome.txt
Created by Mark McDonald, this PR aims to correct markdown usage in the welcome text for Codespaces. It is awaiting review.
PR #287: Code analysis using Gemini, LangChain and DeepLake example
This PR by Guillaume Vernade provides an example of code analysis using several technologies. It is currently blocked by another PR (#288).
PR #285: Improving caching notebooks
Another contribution from Guillaume Vernade focusing on enhancing the caching notebooks. Awaiting review.
PR #279: Use path.join for File API JS sample
Mark McDonald submitted this PR to improve file path handling in a JavaScript sample. It is awaiting review.
PR #278: Function calling improvements
This PR includes various enhancements to function calling examples, submitted by Guillaume Vernade. It has received some review comments regarding formatting and link validity.
PR #275: Fix environment variable for API key used in cURL example
This PR addresses a mismatch in the environment variable name used in a cURL example, created by a first-time contributor. Awaiting response due to CLA requirements.
PR #272: Add issue-metrics workflow
Mark McDonald added a workflow to analyze issues monthly. Awaiting review.
PR #253: Add evaluate RAG with LlamaIndex
Shilpa Kancharla's PR focuses on evaluation techniques for RAG using LlamaIndex. Awaiting response.
The closed pull requests include various improvements and fixes, such as:
PR #290: Internal links as relative ones
Merged by Mark McDonald, this PR improved internal linking across notebooks.
PR #288: Accept if a file is linked in its folder's README
This PR enhanced the linking mechanism for files within subfolders and was merged shortly after submission.
PR #286: Structured output improvements
This PR added sections to improve structured output examples and was merged successfully.
PR #284: Improving Audio notebook
Focused on enhancing the audio notebook's usability and clarity, this PR was also merged successfully.
The recent activity within the Google Gemini Cookbook repository illustrates several key themes:
Focus on Examples and Tutorials: A significant number of open pull requests are dedicated to adding new examples and tutorials that leverage the Gemini API's capabilities. This indicates an ongoing effort to expand the educational resources available to users, making it easier for developers to adopt the API in their projects. Notably, PRs like #291 (multimodal RAG tutorial) and #292 (Data Commons example) highlight this trend.
Community Engagement: The presence of contributions from various developers, including first-time contributors, suggests that the project is fostering an inclusive environment for community involvement. The requirement for contributors to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) before their contributions can be reviewed (as seen in PR #275) reflects standard practices in open-source projects but may also slow down the process for new contributors.
Continuous Improvement: Many closed pull requests focus on refining existing notebooks by fixing typos, improving documentation clarity, or enhancing functionality (e.g., PRs #290 and #286). This continuous improvement cycle shows a commitment to maintaining high-quality resources that are user-friendly and informative.
Technical Challenges: Some pull requests face technical challenges or are blocked by other issues (e.g., PR #287 being blocked by #288). This highlights potential bottlenecks in the development process that could delay progress if not addressed promptly.
Diversity of Contributions: The variety of topics covered in both open and closed pull requests—from fixing markdown issues (#289) to adding complex functionalities like caching (#285)—demonstrates the diverse interests of contributors and the multifaceted nature of the Gemini API itself.
Review Process Dynamics: The active discussions around specific pull requests indicate a collaborative review process where contributors engage with each other constructively (as seen in discussions on PR #278). However, there are also instances where contributions remain stagnant due to lack of responses or required actions from contributors (e.g., CLA signing).
In conclusion, the Google Gemini Cookbook repository is actively evolving with a strong emphasis on community contributions, educational resources, and continuous improvement of its offerings. However, attention should be given to streamlining the contribution process for newcomers and ensuring timely reviews to maintain momentum in development activities.
Guillaume Vernade (Giom-V)
Mark Daoust (MarkDaoust)
Mark McDonald (markmcd)
Shilpa Kancharla (shilpakancharla)
CSK (cr2007)
Erika Cardenas (erika-cardenas)
The development team is actively engaged in refining the Google Gemini Cookbook by focusing on documentation quality, feature enhancements, and collaborative improvements. Their recent activities reflect a commitment to maintaining an accessible and informative resource for developers utilizing the Gemini API.
Summary
Quantified Reports
Detailed Reports