Quantify Issues

Recent GitHub Issues Activity

_{Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.}

Quantify commits

Quantified Commit Activity Over 30 Days

Developer	Avatar	Branches	PRs	Commits	Files	Changes
release-please[bot]		3	7/8/1	28	2355	137049
dependabot[bot]		1	28/22/9	22	20	8390
Alex Rudenko		2	12/12/0	16	31	828
Nikolay Vitkov		1	5/6/0	6	12	186
browser-automation-bot		1	8/8/0	8	7	157
Matthias Rohmer		1	1/1/0	1	3	117
Hangyeol Jeong		1	1/1/0	1	5	84
Julian Descottes		1	1/4/0	4	3	66
Aleksandr Guidrevitch		1	1/1/0	1	1	14
John Cognetti		1	1/1/0	1	5	10
KlausBai		1	1/1/0	1	1	9
Jack Chi (Magiccwl)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Tusar Imran Anik (tusarimrananik)		0	1/0/1	0	0	0

_{PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period}

Report On: Fetch issues

Recent Activity Analysis

The Puppeteer GitHub repository currently has 271 open issues, indicating active engagement from the community. Recent activity shows a mix of bug reports, feature requests, and discussions around existing functionality, particularly concerning PDF generation and browser behavior.

Notable themes include issues related to PDF rendering inconsistencies, challenges with request interception, and the need for better handling of network events. A significant number of issues are marked as needing feedback or confirmation, suggesting that some problems may not be fully understood or reproducible.

Issue Details

Most Recently Created Issues

1. Issue #13098: [Bug]: Unable to render page

   • Priority: Bug
   • Status: Closed
   • Created: 2 days ago
   • Updated: 2 days ago

2. Issue #13093: [Bug]: Can't import puppeteer into a jest test

   • Priority: Bug
   • Status: Closed
   • Created: 3 days ago
   • Updated: 3 days ago

3. Issue #13089: [Bug]: Page.frames() returns only main frame in chrome extension

   • Priority: Bug
   • Status: Closed
   • Created: 4 days ago
   • Updated: 4 days ago

Most Recently Updated Issues

1. Issue #13098: [Bug]: Unable to render page

   • Priority: Bug
   • Status: Closed
   • Last Updated: 2 days ago

2. Issue #13093: [Bug]: Can't import puppeteer into a jest test

   • Priority: Bug
   • Status: Closed
   • Last Updated: 3 days ago

3. Issue #13089: [Bug]: Page.frames() returns only main frame in chrome extension

   • Priority: Bug
   • Status: Closed
   • Last Updated: 4 days ago

Notable Anomalies and Complications

• The issue regarding the inability to render pages (#13098) suggests potential problems with Puppeteer's handling of certain web content or browser configurations.
• The Jest import issue (#13093) indicates possible compatibility problems with Puppeteer's ESM support in testing environments.
• The frames issue (#13089) highlights limitations in Puppeteer's ability to interact with Chrome extensions, which may affect users relying on Puppeteer for testing such extensions.

Common Themes Among Issues

1. PDF Generation Issues: Several recent issues focus on inconsistencies in PDF rendering, particularly with headers, footers, and images when using different headless modes.

2. Request Interception Challenges: There are multiple reports of difficulties in intercepting requests, especially when dealing with complex web applications that utilize various network strategies (e.g., WebSockets).

3. Browser Compatibility and Behavior: Issues related to how Puppeteer interacts with Chrome and Firefox highlight the need for better handling of specific browser features and behaviors.

4. Testing Framework Integration Problems: Compatibility issues with Jest and other testing frameworks indicate that users are facing challenges when trying to integrate Puppeteer into their testing workflows.

This analysis provides insights into the current state of the Puppeteer project based on recent GitHub issue activity, highlighting key areas of concern and ongoing discussions within the community.

Report On: Fetch pull requests

Overview

The Puppeteer project has been actively maintained with a series of recent pull requests (PRs) addressing various aspects such as feature enhancements, bug fixes, and dependency updates. The project continues to evolve, reflecting its importance in the realm of browser automation and testing.

Summary of Pull Requests

Open Pull Requests

• PR #13103: Updates documentation for running Puppeteer in Chrome extensions. This PR is significant as it enhances the clarity and usability of Puppeteer's documentation for developers working with Chrome extensions.
• PR #12941: Adds an example of an Immediately Invoked Function Expression (IIFE) build down-compiled to ES5. This PR is notable for providing developers with practical examples of using Puppeteer in different JavaScript environments.
• PR #12922: Unskips a previously skipped click test, indicating progress in resolving issues that affected test reliability across different platforms.
• PR #12920: Implements a browser-level cookies API, which is a significant feature enhancement allowing more granular control over cookies at the browser level.
• PR #12895: Updates the main example in the README, reflecting changes in Puppeteer's capabilities or usage patterns.
• PR #12776: Implements an improved waitForNavigation method, enhancing Puppeteer's navigation handling capabilities.
• PR #12735: Exposes a variable for screencast quality, allowing users to adjust video quality settings according to their needs.
• PR #12705: Updates network authentication cache tests, indicating ongoing efforts to improve test coverage and reliability.
• PR #12579: Includes iframes in accessibility snapshots, enhancing Puppeteer's accessibility testing capabilities.
• PR #12482: Sets content test improvements, contributing to more robust testing practices within the project.
• PR #11929: Another instance of improving waitForNavigation, showcasing continuous enhancements in Puppeteer's navigation features.

Closed Pull Requests

• PR #13102: A routine dependency update by dependabot, ensuring that development dependencies are kept up-to-date.
• PR #13099: Rolls Puppeteer to Chrome version 129.0.6668.58, keeping the project aligned with the latest browser features and security updates.
• PR #13097: Another routine update for Chromium binaries used by Puppeteer, ensuring compatibility with the latest browser versions.

Analysis of Pull Requests

The recent activity in Puppeteer's repository indicates a healthy and active development process. The open PRs reflect a mix of documentation improvements, feature enhancements, and bug fixes, showcasing the team's commitment to both usability and functionality. Notably:

1. Feature Enhancements: PRs like #12920 (browser-level cookies API) and #12579 (inclusion of iframes in accessibility snapshots) highlight ongoing efforts to expand Puppeteer's capabilities.

2. Documentation Improvements: PRs such as #13103 and #12895 emphasize the importance of clear and up-to-date documentation in facilitating developer adoption and effective usage of the library.

3. Continuous Improvement: The repeated focus on refining existing features (e.g., improved waitForNavigation in PRs #12776 and #11929) demonstrates an iterative approach to development where feedback and testing lead to tangible enhancements.

4. Dependency Management: Routine updates from dependabot (#13102, #13099) ensure that Puppeteer remains compatible with the latest tools and libraries it depends on, which is crucial for maintaining security and performance standards.

5. Community Engagement: The variety of contributions from different developers suggests an engaged community that actively participates in Puppeteer's development, which is vital for open-source projects.

In conclusion, Puppeteer's development process is characterized by a balanced focus on adding new features, improving existing functionalities, maintaining high-quality documentation, and managing dependencies effectively. This approach not only enhances the library's capabilities but also ensures its reliability and ease of use for developers worldwide.

Report On: Fetch commits

Repo Commits Analysis

Development Team and Recent Activity

Team Members

• Alex Rudenko (OrKoN): Active in multiple recent commits, focusing on bug fixes, feature enhancements, and documentation updates. Notably worked on handling the attachToTarget command and updating Firefox nightly expectations.

• release-please[bot]: Automated bot managing releases and versioning. Recently made several releases to the main branch.

• browser-automation-bot: Focused on updating browser versions for Chrome and Firefox, ensuring compatibility with the latest releases.

• dependabot[bot]: Managed dependency updates across various directories, significantly impacting package-lock files.

• Hangyeol Jeong (hangyeol0531): Contributed a fix related to paper sizes in the documentation.

• John Cognetti (cognettings): Made minor documentation edits.

• Nikolay Vitkov (Lightning00Blade): Active in CI/CD improvements and documentation fixes, particularly for browser testing.

• Julian Descottes (juliandescottes): Contributed to documentation updates and test expectations.

• KlausBai: Made a minor fix related to browser launch errors.

• Matthias Rohmer (matthiasrohmer): Updated documentation regarding example resources.

• Aleksandr Guidrevitch (aguidrevitch): Improved performance for encoding utilities.

Recent Activity Summary

1. Release Management:

   • Multiple releases were made by release-please[bot], indicating regular updates to the main branch.
   • Significant changes were made to versioning files and changelogs across multiple packages.

2. Feature Development:

   • Alex Rudenko implemented features such as browser-level cookies API and improvements to existing functionalities.
   • The bot also rolled out updates for Chrome and Firefox versions, ensuring compatibility with the latest browser features.

3. Bug Fixes:

   • Alex Rudenko addressed issues with attachToTarget commands and improved precision for paper sizes.
   • Other team members contributed fixes for various bugs, including error messages during browser launches.

4. Documentation Updates:

   • Several contributors focused on enhancing the documentation, including fixing typos and improving clarity in installation guides.
   • Notable contributions included updating examples and clarifying browser support details.

5. Dependency Management:

   • Dependabot made numerous updates to dependencies, reflecting a proactive approach to maintaining package integrity.
   • The bot's contributions included significant changes to package-lock files across various directories.

6. Testing Enhancements:

   • Tests were updated to accommodate new features and ensure compatibility with recent changes in browsers.
   • Alex Rudenko unskipped tests that were previously disabled, indicating an ongoing effort to maintain test coverage.

Patterns and Themes

• Active Collaboration: The team shows strong collaboration between automated bots handling routine tasks (like dependency management) and developers focusing on feature enhancements and bug fixes.

• Continuous Improvement: The project is characterized by continuous integration practices, with frequent releases and updates ensuring that the library remains current with browser developments.

• Documentation Focus: There is a consistent effort to improve documentation alongside code changes, which enhances usability for developers using Puppeteer.

• Diverse Contributions: Contributions come from various team members, indicating a healthy collaborative environment where both automated tools and human developers play critical roles in project maintenance.

Conclusion

The Puppeteer development team is actively engaged in improving the library through regular feature enhancements, bug fixes, dependency management, and thorough documentation updates. This collaborative effort ensures that Puppeteer remains a robust tool for web automation.