Quantify Issues

Recent GitHub Issues Activity

_{Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.}

Quantify commits

Quantified Commit Activity Over 30 Days

Developer	Avatar	Branches	PRs	Commits	Files	Changes
Alaister Young		6	3/2/0	37	85	77346
Ivan Vasilov		7	10/5/0	26	789	23541
Jonathan Summers-Muir		3	0/0/0	9	190	14628
Joshen Lim		4	30/28/1	36	134	10290
Francesco Sansalvadore		5	13/8/2	30	253	8783
Charis		11	32/22/1	48	202	8693
Terry Sutton		12	12/9/1	42	57	2721
Jordi Enric		3	6/5/1	9	55	2308
Thor 雷神 Schaeff		3	1/0/0	10	20	2298
Brian Brennglass		1	0/0/0	9	20	1791
Andrew Smith		1	2/2/0	2	4	1729
Tyler		3	5/4/0	8	21	1480
Oliver Rice		1	2/2/0	2	3	815
Guilherme Souza (grdsdev)		2	1/0/0	2	17	797
None (Ziinc)		1	1/0/0	4	15	645
Kevin Grüneberg		4	2/2/0	8	36	622
Joel Lee		4	9/6/0	16	20	610
TheOtherBrian1		3	2/0/0	16	19	524
Copple		3	2/1/0	7	13	424
Kang Ming		4	2/0/0	5	6	358
Han Qiao		2	2/1/0	2	4	329
Monica Khoury		3	4/2/1	8	8	225
Samuel Seng		1	1/1/0	1	2	212
Ethan Steininger		1	1/1/0	1	2	184
Lakshan Perera		2	3/2/0	3	6	183
None (dependabot[bot])		1	7/0/6	1	2	143
Thomas		1	2/2/0	2	4	131
Fabrizio (fenos)		1	1/0/0	4	5	112
github-actions[bot]		1	1/1/0	2	2	89
Div Arora		3	0/0/0	5	10	81
Kamil Ogórek		2	4/4/0	5	9	76
Stojan Dimitrovski		2	3/2/0	4	6	70
Andrew Valleteau		1	4/3/1	3	4	47
hallidayo		1	3/2/0	3	5	45
Jan Tennert		1	0/0/0	1	2	45
Long Hoang		1	2/2/0	2	4	39
Chris Gwilliams		1	0/0/0	1	1	29
Masum Gökyüz		1	0/0/0	1	1	27
Tristan Rhodes		1	0/0/0	1	1	19
Myungwoo Song		1	1/1/0	1	1	18
Rodrigo Mansueli		3	4/3/0	5	5	18
Bobbie Soedirgo		1	0/0/0	1	2	18
Chase Granberry		1	0/0/0	1	1	16
Brice Suazo		1	0/0/0	1	1	16
Etienne Stalmans		1	3/3/0	4	4	16
Zafranudin Zafrin		1	1/1/0	1	1	14
Peter		1	0/0/0	1	1	13
Preet 🚀		1	0/0/0	1	1	12
Mark Burggraf		1	0/0/0	1	1	9
Steve Xu		1	0/0/0	1	1	8
Chris Caruso		1	1/1/0	1	1	6
Crispy (Crispy1975)		1	1/0/0	1	1	6
Bulut Yerli		1	0/0/0	1	1	6
Inian		1	2/2/0	2	2	4
Sonu Kumar		1	1/1/0	1	1	3
Paul Cioanca		1	0/0/0	1	1	2
Alireza Zamani		1	0/0/0	1	1	2
jingsam		1	0/0/0	1	1	2
0xflotus		1	0/0/0	1	1	2
Dag-Inge Aas		1	2/1/0	1	1	2
Stef Ki		1	0/0/0	1	1	2
hamzah syed		1	1/1/0	1	1	2
Dmytro Dobrovolskyi		1	1/1/0	1	1	2
Thomas Vollstädt		1	0/0/0	1	1	2
Jon Meyers		1	0/0/0	1	1	2
Filipe Cabaço		1	1/1/0	1	1	2
Sarthak Gupta		1	1/1/0	1	1	2
Ryunosuke Hayashi		1	0/0/0	1	1	2
420coupe		1	0/0/0	1	1	1
yuki		1	0/0/0	1	1	1
Chris Stockton		1	0/0/0	1	1	1
Alex Tasioulis		1	0/0/0	1	1	1
Artur Zakirov (za-arthur)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Jonathan Wondrusch (jwondrusch)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Damian Mikoláš		1	0/0/0	1	0	0
Jason Chu (major-winter)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Aryan Mehrabi (aryan-mehrabi)		0	2/0/1	0	0	0
Hedges Digital (hedgesdigital)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Kaarthikeya (KAARTHIKEYAPAVANAKUMAAR)		0	1/0/1	0	0	0

_{PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period}

Report On: Fetch issues

Recent Activity Analysis

The Supabase GitHub repository has seen a surge in issue activity, with 245 open issues currently reported. Notably, many recent issues revolve around bugs related to user authentication, CSV imports, and UI inconsistencies, indicating a potential need for improved stability and user experience. A common theme is the challenge of integrating various features, such as real-time updates and authentication flows, which may not function consistently across different environments (local vs. cloud).

Several issues highlight significant problems, including the failure of the email verification process when using localhost, which could hinder user onboarding. Additionally, there are multiple reports of UI bugs that affect usability in the Supabase Studio, particularly concerning table management and foreign key constraints.

Issue Details

Here are some of the most recently created and updated issues:

1. Issue #29352: Row Level Security policy query error with camel Case in supabase studio self-hosted

   • Priority: Bug
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 2 days ago
   • Update: N/A

2. Issue #29348: Cannot display images on Supabase storage

   • Priority: Bug
   • Status: Awaiting details
   • Created: 0 days ago
   • Update: N/A

3. Issue #29347: Unconfirmed signup user when again signing up password not getting overridden

   • Priority: Security vulnerability
   • Status: Awaiting details
   • Created: 2 days ago
   • Update: 1 day ago

4. Issue #29332: auth.uid() always returns null in local dev DB due to old(?) implementation compared to cloud

   • Priority: Bug
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 3 days ago
   • Update: N/A

5. Issue #29329: Importing CSVs on Supabase Studio to populate table rows sometimes have missing jsonb column values

   • Priority: Bug
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 3 days ago
   • Update: N/A

6. Issue #29328: Safari not closing automatically after OAuth success

   • Priority: Bug
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 3 days ago
   • Update: N/A

7. Issue #29323: Example from docs is not possible

   • Priority: Documentation improvement
   • Status: Awaiting details
   • Created: 4 days ago
   • Update: N/A

8. Issue #29312: Error when pulling from remote Database URL in setup

   • Priority: Awaiting details
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 4 days ago
   • Update: N/A

Themes and Commonalities

• A significant number of issues relate to authentication processes, particularly around email verification and session management.
• UI-related bugs are prevalent, especially concerning the Supabase Studio's table management features.
• Many users report discrepancies between local development environments and cloud deployments, indicating potential inconsistencies in feature implementation or documentation.
• There is a recurring request for better documentation regarding error handling and expected behaviors for various functions within the Supabase ecosystem.

This analysis suggests that while Supabase offers robust features for developers, ongoing issues with authentication flows and UI functionality may impact user satisfaction and adoption rates.

Report On: Fetch pull requests

Overview

The analysis of the provided pull request (PR) data for the Supabase project reveals a robust and active development environment. The project is characterized by a diverse range of contributions, including feature additions, bug fixes, documentation updates, and dependency management. The PRs are well-structured, with clear descriptions of changes, associated issues, and relevant context. This indicates a mature development process with a focus on quality and community engagement.

Summary of Pull Requests

Recent Merged PRs

• #29399: Fixed code block padding for better UI consistency.
• #29398: Corrected error handling in email templates to provide clearer feedback.
• #29397: Resolved input field issues in the AI assistant component.
• #29395: Adjusted robots meta tag settings to prevent indexing of preview sites by search engines.
• #29394: Updated documentation diagrams for clarity and modernity.

Notable Closed PRs

• #29389: Attempted integration of Metabase with self-hosted Supabase for enhanced data visualization but was closed without merging.
• #29387: Added an example for querying nested foreign tables through a join table using supabase-js.

Themes and Commonalities

1. UI/UX Improvements: Several PRs focus on enhancing user experience through UI adjustments and bug fixes (e.g., padding fixes, input field behavior).
2. Documentation Enhancements: There's a strong emphasis on improving documentation clarity and accuracy, as seen in PRs updating guides and correcting examples.
3. Community Contributions: The project actively encourages community involvement, evident from contributions addressing specific needs or improvements suggested by users.

Analysis of Pull Requests

The Supabase project exhibits a healthy mix of feature development, bug fixing, and documentation efforts. The recent activity suggests a proactive approach to both enhancing existing functionalities and expanding the project's capabilities.

Feature Development vs. Bug Fixing

While there is a steady stream of new features being added (e.g., enhancements to the AI assistant), bug fixing remains a significant focus. This balance is crucial for maintaining user trust and satisfaction as it ensures that new features do not compromise the stability or usability of the platform.

Documentation as a Priority

The frequent updates to documentation indicate an awareness of its importance in user onboarding and ongoing support. Clear, accurate documentation helps reduce support queries and empowers users to make the most of the platform's features.

Community Engagement

The presence of PRs from various contributors highlights an active community around Supabase. This not only helps in gathering diverse inputs for improvement but also fosters a sense of ownership among users.

Challenges and Considerations

• The attempt to integrate Metabase suggests an interest in expanding Supabase's ecosystem through third-party tools. However, such integrations can introduce complexity and require careful consideration regarding support and maintenance.
• The closure of PRs like #29389 without merging could indicate challenges in aligning community contributions with project goals or technical feasibility.

In conclusion, Supabase's development activity reflects a well-managed project with active community involvement, a strong focus on user experience, and an ongoing commitment to improving both functionality and documentation. The balance between adding new features and addressing bugs is well-maintained, ensuring that the platform continues to evolve while remaining reliable for its users.

Report On: Fetch commits

Repo Commits Analysis

Development Team and Recent Activity

Team Members and Their Recent Activities

1. Terry Sutton (saltcod)

   • Recent Commits: 42 commits
   • Key Contributions:
   • Fixed UI issues in the SQL Editor, including padding and layout adjustments.
   • Added new features to the AI assistant panel, including a replace code button.
   • Worked on various minor fixes and enhancements across different components.

2. Charis (charislam)

   • Recent Commits: 48 commits
   • Key Contributions:
   • Implemented new documentation architecture and enhanced troubleshooting pages.
   • Addressed various bug fixes in the documentation, particularly around markdown rendering.
   • Contributed to the AI functionality, including error handling in the revalidation API.

3. Joshen Lim (joshenlim)

   • Recent Commits: 36 commits
   • Key Contributions:
   • Focused on UI improvements in the SQL Editor and billing settings.
   • Implemented features for downloading storage objects during project paused states.
   • Fixed various bugs related to user interface components and data management.

4. Francesco Sansalvadore (fsansalvadore)

   • Recent Commits: 30 commits
   • Key Contributions:
   • Made significant updates to documentation, including diagrams and images.
   • Improved UI elements across various components, ensuring better user experience.

5. Alaister Young (Hallidayo)

   • Recent Commits: 3 commits
   • Key Contributions:
   • Updated user interface components related to authentication processes.

6. Samuel Seng (djsamseng)

   • Recent Commits: 1 commit
   • Key Contributions:
   • Added examples to documentation for querying nested foreign tables.

7. Kevin Grüneberg (kevcodez)

   • Recent Commits: 8 commits
   • Key Contributions:
   • Worked on pricing details and improvements related to disk management.

8. Andrew Valleteau (avallete)

   • Recent Commits: 3 commits
   • Key Contributions:
   • Documented configuration flags for CLI tools.

9. Inian (inian)

   • Recent Commits: 2 commits
   • Key Contributions:
   • Updated various documentation files.

10. Joel Lee (J0)

    • Recent Commits: 16 commits
    • Key Contributions:
    • Addressed multiple bugs in authentication processes and updated documentation for third-party integrations.

11. Others (including contributors like Jordi Enric, Monica Khoury, etc.)

    • Various contributions focused on bug fixes, documentation updates, and feature enhancements across different components.

Patterns and Themes

• The team is actively engaged in both feature development and maintenance tasks, with a strong focus on improving user experience through UI enhancements and bug fixes.
• Documentation updates are a recurring theme, indicating a commitment to keeping resources current for users.
• Collaboration among team members is evident, with multiple co-authored commits reflecting teamwork in addressing larger tasks or features.
• The recent activities show a balanced distribution of work across different areas such as UI/UX improvements, backend functionalities, and documentation enhancements.

Conclusions

The development team is demonstrating robust activity with a clear focus on both enhancing existing features and addressing user feedback through bug fixes. The collaborative nature of their work suggests a cohesive team dynamic that is effectively managing the complexities of an evolving software project like Supabase.