Cody, an open-source AI code assistant, is experiencing significant development activity focused on improving functionality and user experience, though stability issues persist, particularly with chat and autocomplete features.
Recent issues and pull requests (PRs) reveal a focus on bug fixes related to chat interface stability and context awareness. Issues like #5633 and #5626 highlight recurring problems with disappearing chat windows and non-functional autocomplete. This indicates ongoing challenges in maintaining a stable user interface.
Quinn Slack (sqs)
Beatrix (abeatrix)
Kalan (kalanchan)
Beyang Liu (beyang)
Hitesh Sagtani (hitesh-1997)
Valery Bugakov (valerybugakov)
High Volume of Open Issues/PRs: With 249 open issues/PRs, managing contributions effectively remains a challenge.
Branching Strategy: The presence of 594 branches suggests extensive experimentation but may complicate project management.
Community Feedback Integration: Active incorporation of user feedback into development efforts is evident.
Focus on Testing and Reliability: Numerous commits address test reliability and performance optimization.
Interface Stability Concerns: Persistent issues with the chat interface indicate a need for focused stability improvements.
| Timespan | Opened | Closed | Comments | Labeled | Milestones |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Days | 24 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 1 |
| 30 Days | 108 | 37 | 88 | 12 | 1 |
| 90 Days | 202 | 148 | 262 | 15 | 1 |
| All Time | 1755 | 1565 | - | - | - |
Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.
| Developer | Avatar | Branches | PRs | Commits | Files | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quinn Slack |  |
7 | 41/35/2 | 53 | 401 | 26721 |
| Rik |  |
3 | 2/0/0 | 23 | 118 | 23194 |
| Beatrix |  |
11 | 27/22/2 | 58 | 333 | 16666 |
| Valery Bugakov |  |
3 | 16/14/1 | 22 | 104 | 10395 |
| Tom Ross |  |
1 | 0/0/0 | 3 | 28 | 8004 |
| Vova Kulikov |  |
2 | 15/14/0 | 30 | 112 | 7997 |
| Kalan |  |
2 | 4/3/1 | 4 | 24 | 6285 |
| Ólafur Páll Geirsson |  |
5 | 12/8/2 | 20 | 97 | 3768 |
| Hitesh Sagtani |  |
3 | 16/13/2 | 24 | 57 | 3035 |
| Beyang Liu |  |
3 | 6/4/1 | 13 | 41 | 2677 |
| None (renovate[bot]) | 2 | 2/0/0 | 2 | 1 | 1728 | |
| Naman Kumar |  |
2 | 6/5/0 | 8 | 46 | 1321 |
| Ara |  |
5 | 5/1/1 | 26 | 30 | 984 |
| James McNamara |  |
2 | 5/4/0 | 9 | 42 | 850 |
| Mikołaj Kondratek |  |
2 | 10/8/1 | 13 | 12 | 559 |
| Piotr Kukiełka |  |
2 | 14/13/1 | 10 | 21 | 434 |
| Dan Adler |  |
1 | 1/1/0 | 1 | 38 | 419 |
| Peter Guy (peterguy) | 2 | 1/0/0 | 3 | 5 | 409 | |
| Filip Haftek |  |
1 | 0/0/0 | 3 | 3 | 340 |
| Rob Rhyne (rrhyne) | 1 | 1/0/1 | 5 | 4 | 317 | |
| Jan Hartman |  |
1 | 1/1/0 | 2 | 6 | 170 |
| Grace Shih |  |
1 | 0/0/0 | 2 | 5 | 158 |
| Taras Yemets |  |
2 | 2/1/0 | 5 | 5 | 137 |
| YK |  |
2 | 4/3/0 | 4 | 9 | 93 |
| Taiyab Raja (taiyab) | 1 | 1/0/0 | 1 | 3 | 63 | |
| Daniel Marques |  |
2 | 1/1/0 | 2 | 3 | 40 |
| Dominic Cooney |  |
2 | 1/0/0 | 3 | 11 | 29 |
| Aditya Kalia |  |
1 | 3/2/0 | 2 | 2 | 17 |
| Simon Waterer |  |
1 | 1/1/0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Martin Amps (martinamps) | 0 | 1/0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| ShalokShalom (ShalokShalom) | 0 | 1/0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period
Recent activity in the Cody GitHub repository indicates a high volume of issues, with 190 currently open. The predominant theme is bugs related to functionality and integration, particularly concerning the chat interface and autocomplete features. Notably, many users report issues with context awareness, where Cody fails to utilize relevant code files or provides incorrect suggestions. This suggests a potential gap in the model's ability to accurately parse and understand project structures.
Several issues highlight user frustration with the interface, including problems with command execution and unexpected behavior during interactions. The frequency of reports regarding the chat window turning gray or disappearing entirely raises concerns about stability and usability.
Issue #5653: bug: nie chce się uruchomić
Issue #5643: bug:
Issue #5642: bug:
Issue #5634: bug: consequent chat with Alt + L doesn't add the selected lines to the context
Issue #5633: bug: in a few cases in the last 2 days the chat window became black and I had to reload VS code to restart it.
Issue #5626: VS Code: Autocomplete is not working.
Issue #5619: bug:
Issue #5611: bug: Ollama yields tiny context and pure hallucination.
Issue #5609: bug: Cody UI crashes occasionally when showing output, however results still displayed in the chat history.
Issue #5606: Cannot Submit Bug Report
This analysis reveals critical areas for improvement in both functionality and user experience within the Cody extension, particularly around context awareness and interface stability.
The analysis of the pull requests (PRs) for the Cody project reveals a dynamic and active development environment. The PRs cover a wide range of enhancements, bug fixes, and feature additions that reflect ongoing efforts to improve the functionality, performance, and user experience of Cody as an AI code assistant. Notable areas of focus include integration with various IDEs, support for multiple language models, and enhancements to interactive features like chat functionality and autocomplete suggestions.
Summary
Quantified Reports
Detailed ReportsClientConfigSingleton, reducing duplicate requests during state changes.LocalEmbeddingsController for non-dotcom instances, eliminating unnecessary error messages for enterprise users.readValuesFrom readonly to prevent misuse in testing code.Cody Context Filters test by addressing timing issues related to background fetches.cody internal bench and added an evaluation strategy for chat context, enhancing benchmarking capabilities.The Cody project actively engages with its community through GitHub issues and pull requests. Recent PRs address community-reported issues such as:
The Cody project's pull requests demonstrate a robust development process characterized by: 1. Continuous Improvement: Regular updates and enhancements are made based on community feedback and internal testing. For instance, PRs addressing UI improvements, such as preventing constant apologies from certain models (#5628), highlight responsiveness to user experience concerns.
Focus on Performance and Reliability: Several PRs aim to enhance performance metrics and reliability. For example, PR #5647 deflaked tests by addressing timing issues, while PR #5608 improved routing efficiency for specific user groups.
Community-Driven Development: The active engagement with the community is evident through PRs that directly address reported issues or suggestions. This collaborative approach not only helps in identifying areas of improvement but also fosters a sense of community ownership over the project.
Experimental Features and Flexibility: The high number of branches and experimental features suggest a willingness to explore new ideas and approaches. This is crucial for innovation but requires careful management to avoid fragmentation or confusion within the codebase.
Technical Challenges and Solutions: The project faces technical challenges such as ensuring consistent behavior across different configurations (#5604) or improving debugging capabilities (#5623). The team's ability to address these challenges effectively is indicative of strong technical expertise.
In conclusion, the Cody project is marked by active development efforts focused on enhancing functionality, performance, and user experience. The team's responsiveness to community feedback, coupled with a willingness to experiment and innovate, positions Cody as a leading tool in integrating AI into software development processes. However, the high number of open issues/PRs and extensive branching also highlight areas where improved management could further streamline development efforts.
ClientConfigSingleton (#5652). This reduces duplicate requests during state changes.LocalEmbeddingsController to prevent instantiation for non-dotcom environments (#5651).Cody Context Filters test (#5647).readValuesFrom readonly to prevent misuse (#5649).ModelsService into its own file with interface changes (#5646).cody internal bench and added evaluation strategy for chat context (#5624).Focus on Testing and Reliability:
Performance Improvements:
Refactoring for Clarity and Maintainability:
Collaboration Across Features:
Community Engagement and Feedback Integration:
The development team is actively engaged in enhancing the Cody project through focused efforts on testing reliability, performance optimization, code refactoring, and community feedback integration. The recent activities reflect a collaborative environment aimed at delivering high-quality software while addressing both technical debt and user needs.