Quantify Issues

Recent GitHub Issues Activity

_{Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.}

Quantify commits

Quantified Commit Activity Over 30 Days

Developer	Avatar	Branches	PRs	Commits	Files	Changes
Tana M Berry		4	0/0/0	17	573	966062
Jens L.		15	34/27/0	100	800	559904
dependabot[bot]		3	105/93/12	128	32	32361
Ken Sternberg		5	4/0/0	13	121	19331
Marc 'risson' Schmitt		4	4/2/0	11	24	5505
authentik-automation[bot]		3	10/10/0	17	22	1600
None (gcp-cherry-pick-bot[bot])		1	20/20/0	29	62	907
transifex-integration[bot]		1	8/8/0	11	7	350
Tana M Berry		2	5/1/0	4	7	57
Simonyi Gergő		2	0/0/0	4	5	18
Fletcher Heisler		1	0/0/0	1	1	8
Gonçalo Pereira		1	1/1/0	1	1	7
Aterfax		2	0/0/0	2	1	6
Anthony Rabbito		1	1/1/0	1	1	6
N4v41		1	1/1/0	1	1	2
Jonathan Lai		1	0/0/0	1	1	2
Hicks-99		1	1/1/0	1	1	2
Diego Monti		1	0/0/0	1	1	2
Andre Brait		1	0/0/0	1	1	2
Jennings Zhang		1	1/1/0	1	1	1
Bastouf (bastouf)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
itsmesid (arevindh)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
TheGuyDanish (TheGuyDanish)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Diogo Andrade (dandrade-wave)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Kaiwalya Koparkar (kaiwalyakoparkar)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0

_{PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period}

Report On: Fetch issues

Recent Activity Analysis

The recent activity in the GitHub repository for authentik indicates a high volume of open issues, totaling 540. This suggests ongoing engagement from users, but it also highlights potential challenges in the project's stability or usability. Noteworthy is the variety of issues being reported, ranging from bugs and feature requests to questions about configuration and integrations.

Several issues exhibit recurring themes, particularly around authentication failures, LDAP integration problems, and user management challenges. The presence of multiple reports related to user experience, such as difficulties with MFA and session handling, points to a need for enhanced documentation and potentially more robust error handling in the application.

Issue Details

Recent Issues

1. Issue #11466

   • Priority: Low
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • Labels: Hackathon
   • Description: Proposal for a new feature implementation.

2. Issue #11465

   • Priority: Medium
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • Labels: Enhancement
   • Description: Feature request related to UI improvements.

3. Issue #11464

   • Priority: High
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • Labels: Bug
   • Description: LDAP client unable to connect to outpost due to configuration issues.

4. Issue #11463

   • Priority: High
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • Labels: Bug
   • Description: Misconfiguration of OIDC source endpoints upon user deletion.

5. Issue #11461

   • Priority: Medium
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 2 days ago
   • Labels: Bug
   • Description: Race condition encountered when using PG read replicas.

6. Issue #11454

   • Priority: Low
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 2 days ago
   • Labels: Question
   • Description: Configuration issue with Kubernetes standalone outpost resulting in access errors.

7. Issue #11453

   • Priority: High
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 2 days ago
   • Labels: Bug
   • Description: Nginx proxy manager configuration causing host to go offline.

8. Issue #11443

   • Priority: High
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 2 days ago
   • Labels: Bug
   • Description: Duplicate user error during OAuth2 login process.

Summary of Themes

• Many issues revolve around LDAP integration and authentication failures, indicating potential weaknesses in these areas.
• There are several enhancement requests focused on UI improvements and better user experience.
• Bugs related to specific features (e.g., OAuth2, MFA) suggest that while the application is feature-rich, it may require further refinement for stability.
• A notable number of questions indicate users may need more guidance on configuration and usage best practices.

Important Observations

• The frequent mention of LDAP-related issues suggests that this component may be critical for many users and could benefit from additional testing or documentation.
• The variety of labels (bug, enhancement, question) across recent issues indicates a diverse user base with varying needs, which could inform future development priorities.
• The high number of open issues (540) may suggest that while the community is active, there could be challenges in addressing all concerns promptly, potentially impacting user satisfaction.

Report On: Fetch pull requests

Overview

The analysis of the provided pull requests (PRs) for the goauthentik/authentik repository reveals a vibrant and active development environment. The project is continuously evolving with contributions that enhance its functionality, address bugs, and improve documentation. The PRs range from feature additions, such as support for new authentication methods and enhancements to existing features, to infrastructure improvements like refactoring code for better maintainability.

Summary of Pull Requests

1. PR #11462: Web/policy wizard 3

   • Significance: Introduces a new policy wizard interface.
   • Notable: Draft status indicates ongoing work; includes extensive changes across multiple files.

2. PR #11460: fix: proxy provider - docker traefik label

   • Significance: Fixes an issue with Docker Traefik labels in the proxy provider.
   • Notable: Directly addresses a bug reported in an issue.

3. PR #11458: sources: extract object matching from flow manager

   • Significance: Refactors code to make it reusable across different sources.
   • Notable: Extracted from a previous PR (#10815), indicating iterative development.

4. PR #11442: sources/ldap: fix mapping check, fix debug endpoint

   • Significance: Fixes issues in LDAP source mappings and debug endpoint.
   • Notable: Related to a specific milestone (Release 2024.8.3).

5. PR #11441: website/integrations add GHEC EMU and fix-up GHES

   • Significance: Updates integration documentation for GitHub Enterprise Cloud EMU and fixes for GHES.
   • Notable: Enhances documentation accuracy and completeness.

6. PR #11438: website/integrations: Glitchtip: update redirect URL

   • Significance: Corrects the redirect URL in Glitchtip documentation.
   • Notable: Simple documentation fix but important for user guidance.

7. PR #11437: providers/scim: add option to ignore SCIM server cert

   • Significance: Adds flexibility in SCIM provider configuration by allowing certificate validation to be ignored.
   • Notable: Potentially significant impact on security/configuration flexibility.

8. PR #11434: feat: Added Elestio as one-click deploy option

   • Significance: Expands deployment options by adding Elestio as a one-click deploy option.
   • Notable: Enhances accessibility of authentik deployment.

9. PR #11419: website: the requirements for Go and Node required updating.

   • Significance: Updates system requirements for Go and Node.js in documentation.
   • Notable: Ensures users have up-to-date information for installation.

10. PR #11414: providers/scim: add comparison with existing group on update and delta update users

    • Significance: Improves SCIM provider functionality by adding group comparison during updates.
    • Notable: Enhances data synchronization capabilities.

Analysis of Pull Requests

The pull requests reflect a diverse set of contributions that enhance both the functionality and usability of authentik:

• Feature Enhancements and Bug Fixes: Many PRs focus on adding new features or fixing bugs, such as PRs #11460, #11458, and #11437. This indicates an active effort to improve the software's reliability and capabilities.

• Documentation Improvements: Several PRs, including #11441, #11438, and #11419, aim at improving documentation. This is crucial for user adoption and satisfaction as it helps users understand how to effectively use the software.

• Refactoring and Code Quality: PRs like #11458 show efforts towards code quality improvements through refactoring. This is important for maintainability as the project grows.

• Community Contributions: The variety of contributors (e.g., Ken Sternberg, Jens L., Diogo Andrade) suggests a healthy community involvement which is vital for open-source projects.

• Active Development: The frequency of PRs being opened and merged indicates that the project is actively developed with ongoing enhancements and maintenance efforts.

In conclusion, the goauthentik/authentik project demonstrates robust activity in terms of feature development, bug fixing, documentation enhancement, and community engagement. The diverse nature of contributions reflects a well-rounded approach to software development that prioritizes both functionality and user experience.

Report On: Fetch commits

Repo Commits Analysis

Development Team and Recent Activity

Team Members

• Marc 'risson' Schmitt (rissson)

  • Recent contributions include updating the security policy, managing rollup updates, and working on the kerberos source rework.

• Jens Langhammer (jens@goauthentik.io)

  • Active in various bug fixes and feature enhancements, including fixing panic issues in proxy providers, improving error handling, and updating translations.

• Jennings Zhang (jennydaman)

  • Focused on documentation updates, specifically removing outdated configurations and enhancing clarity in examples.

• Ken Sternberg (kensternberg-authentik)

  • Engaged in enhancing the application wizard functionality, fixing tests, and improving component interactions.

• Tana M Berry (tanberry)

  • Contributed to documentation improvements and added information regarding super-users.

Recent Activities

1. Marc 'risson' Schmitt

   • Updated security policy and managed multiple rollup package updates.
   • Engaged in the kerberos source rework with significant additions to the source code.

2. Jens Langhammer

   • Fixed various bugs including panic issues in proxy connections, improved error handling across multiple components, and updated translations.
   • Worked on SCIM provider enhancements to add options for ignoring server certificates.

3. Jennings Zhang

   • Focused on documentation updates related to user roles and permissions, ensuring clarity in user management processes.

4. Ken Sternberg

   • Enhanced the application wizard with new features and fixed associated tests to ensure functionality.
   • Managed CSS adjustments for UI components to improve user experience.

5. Tana M Berry

   • Contributed to documentation by adding notes about creating super-users and enhancing existing guides.

Patterns and Themes

• Active Collaboration: Multiple team members are collaborating on overlapping features such as SCIM provider improvements and application wizards.
• Focus on Documentation: There is a consistent effort to enhance documentation alongside code changes, indicating a commitment to user support.
• Bug Fixes and Feature Enhancements: The recent commits show a balance between addressing bugs and implementing new features, suggesting an agile development process.
• Frequent Dependency Updates: Regular updates to dependencies indicate a proactive approach to maintaining project health and security.

Conclusions

The development team is actively engaged in both feature development and maintenance tasks. Their collaborative efforts reflect a strong focus on improving the user experience through enhanced documentation and robust functionality. The frequent updates also suggest a commitment to keeping the project up-to-date with current technologies.