Quantify Issues

Recent GitHub Issues Activity

_{Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.}

Quantify commits

Quantified Commit Activity Over 30 Days

Developer	Avatar	Branches	PRs	Commits	Files	Changes
nashtech-tuannguyenhuu1		1	7/8/0	8	110	18596
nashtech-huyphamphu		2	3/2/1	11	130	10746
hnd14		3	8/7/1	30	76	8310
VanCongBang		1	5/5/1	5	125	6190
Khanh Du		2	6/6/0	14	35	6018
nguyenvanhadncntt		2	8/7/0	8	88	4722
Phuoc Nguyen		1	0/0/0	5	46	2743
atuan21		1	6/7/0	7	23	2562
NhatTranMinh15		2	2/2/0	12	24	2547
Nguyễn Trí Hải		4	5/5/0	11	74	2404
Minh Tran		1	2/2/0	2	24	2246
Duy Le Van		1	0/0/0	11	71	2223
DinhThaiVV		1	2/2/0	2	19	1181
Phuoc Nguyen Ba		1	1/1/0	1	20	1036
Chinh Duong		1	0/0/0	3	28	866
nashtech-hieunguyenchi5		3	3/2/1	25	33	749
Vu Hoang Viet		1	0/0/0	8	14	712
None (dependabot[bot])		1	2/0/1	1	2	427
Thien Nguyen Le Quynh		3	10/4/1	10	16	314
khanhtranduy		1	0/0/0	11	6	244
Hoàng Lâm		1	1/1/0	1	2	15
Snyk bot		4	0/0/0	4	3	12
Ikko Eltociear Ashimine		1	1/1/0	1	1	6
None (khanhtrand)		0	2/0/2	0	0	0
None (RahulBudhraj)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0

_{PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period}

Report On: Fetch issues

Recent Activity Analysis

The YAS project has seen a notable increase in recent GitHub issue activity, with 37 open issues currently reported. A significant number of these issues are related to bugs in the product variations and backoffice functionalities, indicating potential instability in critical areas of the application. Common themes include problems with product management, such as incorrect display of product variations and issues with product creation workflows.

Several issues have been created or updated recently, highlighting ongoing challenges in the user experience, particularly in the backoffice where users are encountering difficulties with product templates and category management. The presence of multiple issues regarding duplicate entries and inconsistent data handling suggests a need for improved validation and error handling mechanisms.

Issue Details

Most Recently Created Issues

1. Issue #1064: [BACKOFFICE] [Bugs] Product Variations

   • Priority: High
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • Description: Product variations added with images are not displaying correctly in the Storefront, and removed variations still appear.

2. Issue #1061: [Backoffice] [Product] Model mismatch between backoffice and product service when creating new product

   • Priority: High
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • Description: Issues with duplicated option values being sent from the backoffice, leading to inconsistencies with the product service model.

3. Issue #1060: [Promotion] Implement delete promotion and add some UTs

   • Priority: Medium
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago

4. Issue #1059: [Customer] Create Page Create Customer

   • Priority: Low
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago

5. Issue #1043: Update stock quantity API should be in inventory service

   • Priority: Medium
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 7 days ago

Most Recently Updated Issues

1. Issue #1016: [Order/Checkout] Update Create Checkout feature to use MapStruct

   • Priority: Medium
   • Status: Closed
   • Updated: 11 days ago

2. Issue #1014: [Product] Unable to remove images while creating or editing the product, category

   • Priority: High
   • Status: Closed
   • Updated: 13 days ago

3. Issue #1008: [Orders] Review Order Flow

   • Priority: Medium
   • Status: Closed
   • Updated: 14 days ago

4. Issue #1003: [Payment] Embedded Payment-Paypal project into Payment project like a dependency

   • Priority: Low
   • Status: Closed
   • Updated: 14 days ago

5. Issue #982: Add product recommendation (AI powered)

   • Priority: Low
   • Status: Edited (last edited 12 days ago)

Summary of Notable Themes

• A recurring issue is the improper handling of product variations, which affects both display and data integrity.
• There is a significant focus on improving the backoffice user experience, particularly regarding product management tasks.
• The presence of several issues related to data validation indicates that better checks could enhance overall system robustness.
• Continuous integration efforts are evident from the number of closed issues related to testing and code quality improvements.

This analysis reflects ongoing challenges within the YAS project that require immediate attention to ensure stability and improve user satisfaction.

Report On: Fetch pull requests

Overview

The analysis of the pull requests (PRs) for the YAS (Yet Another Shop) project reveals a dynamic and active development environment. The project has a mix of open and closed PRs, with a focus on enhancing features, fixing bugs, and improving test coverage across various modules. The integration of tools like Snyk for security vulnerability management and SonarCloud for code quality checks is evident from the PR comments and statuses.

Summary of Pull Requests

Open Pull Requests

• PR #1065: Implements deletion of promotions and adds unit tests. It shows active development in the promotion module with a focus on enhancing functionality and ensuring code quality through testing.
• PR #1063: Automated security fix PR created by Snyk to address vulnerabilities in Maven dependencies. This highlights the project's commitment to maintaining security standards.
• PR #1062: Another automated security fix PR by Snyk, focusing on upgrading dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
• PR #1060: Addresses issues related to product templates in the backoffice, indicating ongoing efforts to improve the user interface and experience.

Closed Pull Requests

• PR #1058: Fixes issues related to product templates in the backoffice, demonstrating responsiveness to bug reports and user feedback.
• PR #1056: A minor fix in the shared project configuration, showing attention to detail in project setup.
• PR #1055: Updates the promotion page as part of feature enhancement efforts, reflecting active development on promotional features.
• PR #1054: Addresses issues in creating shared projects, indicating ongoing improvements in project infrastructure.

Analysis of Pull Requests

The PRs reflect a healthy mix of feature development, bug fixing, security enhancements, and infrastructure improvements. The use of automated tools like Snyk for vulnerability management and SonarCloud for code quality checks is commendable and suggests a strong emphasis on maintaining high standards of security and code quality.

Themes and Commonalities

1. Security Focus: The presence of multiple PRs created by Snyk for automated security fixes indicates an active effort to manage dependencies securely and address vulnerabilities promptly.

2. Feature Enhancements: Several PRs are focused on enhancing existing features or adding new ones, such as improvements in the promotion module (#1065) and updates to the backoffice interface (#1060). This shows a commitment to continuous improvement based on user needs and feedback.

3. Bug Fixes: The quick turnaround on bug fixes (#1058, #1056) suggests an agile response to issues reported by users or identified through testing.

4. Testing and Quality Assurance: The addition of unit tests (#1047) and integration tests (#984) reflects a strong focus on ensuring code quality through thorough testing practices.

5. Infrastructure Improvements: PRs addressing project configuration issues (#1054) or enhancing CI/CD processes (#1041) indicate ongoing efforts to improve the development workflow and project infrastructure.

Notable Anomalies

• The quick closure of PRs without merging (e.g., #1041) could suggest either changes in priorities or issues with the proposed changes that were identified after initial review.
• Some PRs have significant changes in line counts but are marked as minor fixes or updates (e.g., #1055), which could indicate either an underestimation of the impact of changes or an effective use of automated tools that streamline certain aspects of development.

Conclusion

The YAS project demonstrates a robust development process characterized by active feature enhancement, diligent bug fixing, proactive security management, and a strong emphasis on code quality through testing. The integration of modern tools for automation in testing and security is evident and contributes positively to the project's health and sustainability.

Report On: Fetch commits

Repo Commits Analysis

Development Team and Recent Activity

Team Members and Recent Contributions

1. Nguyen Van Had

   • Recent Activity:
   • Updated promotion page (#1034), including significant changes to the promotion management interface.
   • Implemented create promotion page (#1050) with extensive modifications across multiple files.
   • Collaborations: Worked closely with other team members on promotion features.

2. Tuan Nguyen Huu

   • Recent Activity:
   • Addressed bugs in product templates (#1051) and increased test coverage (#1049).
   • Contributed to automation testing efforts (#1044).
   • Collaborations: Collaborated with Phuoc Nguyen on automation tests.

3. Huy Pham Phu

   • Recent Activity:
   • Created a shared project (#882) with numerous updates across CI workflows and library configurations.
   • Collaborations: Coordinated with other team members for CI/CD improvements.

4. HnKnA (Hoàng Lâm)

   • Recent Activity:
   • Added tests for webhook functionality (#1047) and contributed to automation testing (#1044).
   • Collaborations: Worked alongside Tuan Nguyen Huu on test coverage improvements.

5. Phuoc Nguyen

   • Recent Activity:
   • Developed automation tests for user registration and cart removal.
   • Contributed significantly to the automation framework setup.
   • Collaborations: Collaborated with Duy Le Van on various automation scenarios.

6. Khanh Du

   • Recent Activity:
   • Focused on integration tests for various modules, including product and media services.
   • Fixed issues related to product variations and category integration tests.
   • Collaborations: Regularly collaborates with Tuan Nguyen Huu and others on testing efforts.

7. Minh Tran

   • Recent Activity:
   • Worked on webhook module tests and contributed to payment processing improvements.
   • Collaborations: Engaged in collaborative efforts for improving payment flows.

8. Van Cong Bang

   • Recent Activity:
   • Improved file upload validation in the media module and added unit tests.
   • Collaborations: Collaborated with other developers on media-related features.

9. Thien Nguyen Le Quynh

   • Recent Activity:
   • Enhanced CI workflows and documentation, focusing on observability tools integration.
   • Collaborations: Involved in cross-team discussions regarding CI/CD practices.

10. Nhat Tran Minh

    • Recent Activity:
    • Focused on unit tests for various services, ensuring code quality through extensive testing.
    • Collaborations: Worked alongside Khanh Du on service testing.

11. Dinh Thai VV

    • Recent Activity:
    • Addressed errors in order processing and improved error handling across services.
    • Collaborations: Engaged in discussions around error handling best practices.

12. Dependabot Bot

    • Recent Activity:
    • Managed dependency updates across multiple branches, ensuring security vulnerabilities are addressed.

Patterns, Themes, and Conclusions

• The team is actively engaged in both feature development and bug fixing, particularly around the promotion management system, which has seen significant updates recently.
• There is a strong emphasis on improving test coverage across various modules, indicating a commitment to quality assurance.
• Collaboration is evident among team members, especially in areas related to automation testing and CI/CD improvements, showcasing a cohesive team dynamic focused on enhancing project stability and performance.
• The integration of observability tools reflects an ongoing effort to maintain high standards of monitoring within the microservices architecture of the project.
• The recent activity indicates a balanced focus between new feature implementation (e.g., promotions) and maintaining existing functionality through bug fixes and testing enhancements.

Overall, the development team demonstrates a proactive approach to both innovation and quality control within the YAS project framework.