Quantify issues

Recent GitHub Issues Activity

_{Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.}

Rate pull requests

PR#1082 - Adding llm provider to set when is checked to not repeat the same checkopen

2_/5

Federico Scheu (fscheu)Created: 2024-08-11

The pull request addresses a minor bug by adding a single line of code to ensure LLM providers are added to a set after being checked, preventing redundant checks. While this change is necessary for correctness, it is trivial in scope and impact, involving only the addition of one line without any additional tests or documentation. The PR lacks complexity and significance, thus warranting a rating of 2.

[+] Read More

PR#1100 - Create Kinsleyopen

2_/5

lucas12-cloudCreated: 2024-10-02

The pull request is notably flawed as it lacks any substantial code or implementation details. It only adds an empty file named 'Kinsley' without any content, which does not contribute to the project in a meaningful way. The description outlines ambitious goals for a new AI program but fails to provide any actual code, documentation, or evidence of progress towards these goals. This PR is incomplete and requires significant work to be considered valuable.

[+] Read More

PR#1104 - chore: update example_project.pyopen

2_/5

Ikko Eltociear Ashimine (eltociear)Created: 2024-10-03

The pull request corrects a minor typographical error by changing 'Boostrap' to 'Bootstrap' in two instances within a single file. While this change is technically correct and improves clarity, it is insignificant in terms of impact on the overall project. The change does not introduce any new functionality, fix critical bugs, or enhance performance. As such, it is a routine maintenance task that does not warrant a higher rating.

[+] Read More

Quantify commits

Quantified Commit Activity Over 14 Days

Developer	Avatar	Branches	PRs	Commits	Files	Changes
Matija Ilijaš		1	0/0/0	11	11	140
Zvonimir Sabljic		1	0/0/0	5	9	135
LeonOstrez		1	0/0/0	8	7	84
Ikko Eltociear Ashimine (eltociear)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
None (lucas12-cloud)		0	2/0/1	0	0	0
Carlos Antonio Reyes Peña (CarlosReyesPena)		0	1/0/1	0	0	0

_{PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period}

Quantify risks

Project Risk Ratings

Report On: Fetch issues

Recent Activity Analysis

Recent GitHub issue activity for the Pythagora-io/gpt-pilot project shows a diverse range of issues being reported, from technical bugs to enhancement requests. Notably, there are recurring concerns about integration with local LLMs, token limits, and API errors, which suggest ongoing challenges in ensuring seamless operation across different environments and configurations. The issues also reflect a strong user interest in expanding the tool's capabilities, such as supporting additional programming languages and frameworks.

A significant anomaly is the frequent occurrence of errors related to token limits and API connectivity, particularly when using non-OpenAI models or local deployments. This indicates a potential gap in the tool's adaptability to various LLMs and highlights the need for improved error handling and configuration flexibility. Additionally, several users have reported issues with the VSCode extension, including installation failures and unexpected crashes, pointing to possible stability concerns with this integration.

Common themes among the issues include requests for enhanced support for open-source models, better handling of rate limits, and more intuitive user interactions during development processes. These suggest that while GPT Pilot is highly valued for its innovative approach to AI-assisted development, users are seeking greater reliability and ease of use.

Issue Details

Most Recently Created Issues

1. #1103: [Bug]: GPT-Pilot crashes when I try to run an existing project again

   • Priority: High
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • Updated: Today

2. #1102: [Enhancement]: Support Installation Via Pinokio

   • Priority: Medium
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago

3. #1101: [Howto]: Instructions mention Docker/Docker Compose...but where is it? 😂

   • Priority: Low
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago

Most Recently Updated Issues

1. #1103: [Bug]: GPT-Pilot crashes when I try to run an existing project again

   • Priority: High
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • Updated: Today

2. #1094: GPT Pilot's future plans

   • Priority: Medium
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 14 days ago
   • Updated: 1 day ago

3. #1060: [Howto]: Instructions mention Docker/Docker Compose...but where is it? 😂

   • Priority: Low
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 67 days ago
   • Updated: 1 day ago

These issues highlight ongoing efforts to address both technical bugs and feature enhancements, reflecting active community engagement in improving GPT Pilot's functionality and user experience.

Report On: Fetch pull requests

Analysis of Pull Requests for Pythagora-io/gpt-pilot

Open Pull Requests

PR #1104: chore: update example_project.py

• State: Open
• Created by: Ikko Eltociear Ashimine (eltociear)
• Created: 0 days ago
• Summary: This PR corrects a typo in example_project.py from "Boostrap" to "Bootstrap".
• Comments: All committers have signed the CLA.
• Analysis: This is a minor change focused on correcting a typographical error. It is straightforward and should not pose any issues for merging.

PR #1100: Create Kinsley

• State: Open
• Created by: lucas12-cloud
• Created: 1 day ago, edited 0 days ago
• Summary: Proposes the development of a new AI program similar to Inflection AI, focusing on personalized features and adaptability.
• Comments: The creator commented "Cool".
• Analysis: This PR seems ambitious but lacks detailed implementation specifics. It appears more like a proposal or idea rather than a concrete code change. It might require further discussion or breakdown into actionable tasks.

PR #1082: Adding llm provider to set when is checked to not repeat the same check

• State: Open
• Created by: Federico Scheu (fscheu)
• Created: 53 days ago, edited 16 days ago
• Summary: This PR adds functionality to prevent repeated checks of the same LLM provider in llm_api_check.
• Analysis: This change seems necessary for optimizing checks within the codebase. However, it has been open for quite some time, suggesting it might need review or testing before it can be merged.

Notable Closed Pull Requests

PR #1099: Create Kinsley

• State: Closed (Not merged)
• Created by: lucas12-cloud
• Created/Closed: 1 day ago
• Summary: Similar to #1100, this PR was closed without merging. It proposed creating an AI program akin to Inflection AI.
• Analysis: The quick closure suggests that the proposal may not have been aligned with current project goals or lacked sufficient detail for implementation.

PR #1098: Update spec_writer.py

• State: Closed (Not merged)
• Created by: Carlos Antonio Reyes Peña (CarlosReyesPena)
• Summary: Attempted to fix an import issue in spec_writer.py.
• Analysis: The closure without merging indicates that either the problem was resolved differently or the solution was not suitable.

PR #1079: Template fixes

• State: Closed (Merged)
• Created by: Senko Rašić (senko)
• Summary: Modified the React+Express template for better integration of authentication headers and fixed a bug in SpecWriter.
• Analysis: This is a significant improvement as it enhances template reliability and fixes a blocking bug, indicating active maintenance and enhancement of core functionalities.

Observations and Recommendations

1. Open PRs Review Needed:

   • PR #1082 has been open for over 50 days and might benefit from a review to either merge or close it if no longer relevant.
   • PR #1100 requires clarification and possibly breaking down into smaller tasks or discussions to assess feasibility.

2. Closed Without Merge Insights:

   • Several PRs were closed without merging, such as #1099 and #1098. Understanding why these were closed could provide insights into project priorities or common pitfalls in contributions.

3. Active Maintenance Evidence:

   • The project shows evidence of active maintenance with recent merges like #1079, which improve existing templates and fix bugs.

4. Community Engagement and Contributions:

   • The project benefits from community contributions, but there might be room for improving how proposals are evaluated and communicated back to contributors, especially for ambitious ideas like those in #1100.

Overall, Pythagora-io/gpt-pilot appears to be actively developed with community engagement, although there is room for improvement in managing open pull requests and ensuring contributors receive feedback on their submissions.

Report On: Fetch Files For Assessment

Analysis of Source Code Files

1. .gitignore

• Purpose: This file specifies intentionally untracked files to ignore in a Git repository.
• Content Review:
  • It includes common directories and files that should be ignored, such as virtual environments (.venv/, venv/), IDE configurations (.vscode/, .idea/), and Python cache files (__pycache__/, *.pyc).
  • Other entries include coverage reports (htmlcov/), distribution files (dist/), and specific file types like logs (*.log) and databases (*.db).
• Quality: The file is well-structured and covers a broad range of common patterns, ensuring that unnecessary files are not tracked in the repository.

2. core/agents/architect.py

• Purpose: This file defines the Architect agent responsible for planning the architecture of projects.
• Structure:
  • Uses Pydantic models for data validation, which is a good practice for ensuring data integrity.
  • Contains enums for application types and system dependencies, enhancing code readability and maintainability.
  • Implements asynchronous methods for selecting templates, planning architecture, and checking dependencies.
• Quality:
  • The code is modular with clear separation of concerns.
  • Logging is used effectively to track the agent's actions.
  • There are some TODOs and FIXMEs indicating areas for improvement or further development.

3. core/agents/base.py

• Purpose: Provides a base class for all agents, defining common functionalities such as messaging and error handling.
• Structure:
  • Defines properties for accessing current and next project states.
  • Includes methods for interacting with users (e.g., send_message, ask_question) and handling errors from LLM interactions.
• Quality:
  • The use of async functions allows for non-blocking operations, which is suitable for I/O-bound tasks.
  • The class is well-documented with docstrings explaining the purpose of each method.
  • Error handling is robust, offering retry mechanisms for certain types of errors.

4. core/agents/bug_hunter.py

• Purpose: Implements the BugHunter agent, which identifies and suggests fixes for bugs in the codebase.
• Structure:
  • Utilizes Pydantic models to define structured data for bug hunting conclusions and important logs.
  • Contains methods to guide users through bug reproduction and testing processes.
• Quality:
  • The code is complex but well-organized, with clear logical flows for different bug-hunting scenarios.
  • Asynchronous programming is used effectively to manage potentially long-running tasks without blocking execution.
  • The file contains TODO comments suggesting areas where functionality can be expanded or refined.

5. core/agents/code_monkey.py

• Purpose: Manages code implementation tasks based on instructions from other agents or user feedback.
• Structure:
  • Contains logic for implementing changes, describing files, and conducting code reviews using LLMs.
  • Uses Pydantic models to structure data related to code reviews and file descriptions.
• Quality:
  • The file is lengthy but maintains a clear structure with distinct sections for different functionalities (e.g., implementation, review).
  • Implements retry logic to handle review failures gracefully, ensuring robustness in code changes.
  • Some FIXMEs indicate potential improvements or unresolved issues.

6. core/config/__init__.py

• Purpose: Centralizes configuration settings for the application, including LLM providers, logging, database connections, etc.
• Structure:
  • Utilizes Pydantic models to enforce strict type checking and validation of configuration data.
  • Defines constants and default values for various configuration parameters.
• Quality:
  • The use of Pydantic enhances reliability by ensuring configurations are valid before use.
  • The file is comprehensive, covering a wide range of configuration aspects necessary for the application's operation.

7. core/db/models/project_state.py

• Purpose: Defines the ProjectState model representing the state of a project within the database context.
• Structure:
  • Uses SQLAlchemy ORM to map Python classes to database tables, facilitating database interactions.
  • Includes properties and methods to manage project tasks, steps, iterations, and file states.
• Quality:
  • The model is well-designed with clear relationships between different entities (e.g., branches, specifications).
  • Methods are provided to manipulate project states efficiently, supporting complex workflows within the application.

8. pyproject.toml

• Purpose: Configures project metadata and dependencies using Poetry, a dependency management tool for Python projects.
• Content Review:
  • Specifies project details such as name, version, description, authorship, license, etc.
  • Lists dependencies required by the project along with their versions or constraints.
• Quality: The file is concise yet comprehensive, providing all necessary information to build and manage the project environment effectively.

Overall, the source code demonstrates a high level of organization and adherence to best practices in software development. Each file serves a distinct purpose within the application architecture, contributing to the overall functionality of GPT Pilot as an AI-driven development tool.

Report On: Fetch commits

Development Team and Recent Activity

Team Members and Their Recent Activities

LeonOstrez

• Recent Commits: 8 commits with 84 changes across 7 files.
• Activities:
  • Merged branches and updated configurations.
  • Made significant modifications to the core/agents directory, particularly in files like architect.py, bug_hunter.py, and code_monkey.py.
  • Worked on enabling features such as bedrock support and UI enhancements.
  • Collaborated with Matija Ilijaš on several merges and updates.

Matija Ilijaš (matija-ilijas)

• Recent Commits: 11 commits with 140 changes across 11 files.
• Activities:
  • Focused on UI improvements, bug fixes, and enhancements in the core/agents directory.
  • Removed unnecessary UI elements and improved status messages in bug_hunter.py and troubleshooter.py.
  • Collaborated with LeonOstrez on merging pull requests and implementing new features.

Zvonimir Sabljic

• Recent Commits: 5 commits with 135 changes across 9 files.
• Activities:
  • Worked on template improvements, including the mongoose_express template.
  • Implemented prompt improvements and fixed various UI issues.
  • Engaged in collaborative efforts with other team members for merging branches.

eltociear

• Recent Activity: No commits or changes reported.

lucas12-cloud

• Recent Activity: No commits or changes reported. One pull request open but not merged.

CarlosReyesPena

• Recent Activity: No commits or changes reported. One pull request open but not merged.

Patterns, Themes, and Conclusions

• Active Contributors: LeonOstrez, Matija Ilijaš, and Zvonimir Sabljic are the most active contributors, focusing on core functionality enhancements, bug fixes, and UI improvements.

• Collaboration: There is a strong collaborative effort among the active contributors, particularly between LeonOstrez and Matija Ilijaš, as seen in their joint work on merging branches and implementing features.

• Focus Areas: Recent activities have concentrated on refining the user interface, enhancing templates, and improving the overall functionality of core agents within the project. This indicates a focus on usability and performance optimization.

• Stability Improvements: The removal of redundant code and UI elements suggests an ongoing effort to streamline the codebase for better maintainability and performance.

• Pending Contributions: Some team members have pending contributions that are yet to be merged, indicating potential upcoming updates or features once these are reviewed and integrated.

Overall, the development team is actively engaged in enhancing the GPT Pilot project through collaborative efforts focused on both backend improvements and frontend user experience refinements.