‹ Reports
The Dispatch

LLM Colosseum Development Stagnates Amidst Persistent User Issues

LLM Colosseum, a benchmarking tool for evaluating large language models through Street Fighter III competitions, has seen minimal recent development activity, with significant user issues remaining unresolved.

Recent Activity

The project currently has 15 open issues, primarily concerning model performance and configuration difficulties. Users frequently report challenges with local model setups and environment configurations, suggesting a need for improved documentation or support. Notable issues include #46, where characters fail to approach each other, and #47, which questions the ELO ranking system. These issues indicate potential bugs and ongoing discussions about performance metrics.

Development Team Activity

Of Note

  1. Stagnant Development: No recent merges or significant code changes in the last 30 days.
  2. Persistent User Issues: Critical gameplay bugs like #46 remain unresolved, affecting user experience.
  3. Documentation Gaps: Recurring setup issues suggest the need for clearer guidance.
  4. Community Engagement: Active user queries indicate interest but also highlight support bottlenecks.
  5. Feature Requests Unaddressed: Requests for new models like Google Gemini (#43) remain open, indicating potential expansion opportunities.

Quantified Reports

Quantify Issues



Recent GitHub Issues Activity

Timespan Opened Closed Comments Labeled Milestones
7 Days 0 0 0 0 0
30 Days 0 0 0 0 0
90 Days 4 3 16 4 1
All Time 29 14 - - -

Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.

Detailed Reports

Report On: Fetch issues



Recent Activity Analysis

The OpenGenerativeAI/llm-colosseum repository has seen consistent activity, with 15 open issues currently reported. Notably, many issues revolve around model performance, configuration errors, and user queries about integrating new models. A recurring theme is the struggle with local model setups and the intricacies of the environment configuration, indicating a need for clearer documentation or support.

Several issues highlight critical gaps in user experience, such as difficulties in running local models and obtaining correct ROM files for gameplay. The presence of unresolved technical queries suggests that while the community is engaged, there may be a bottleneck in addressing these concerns effectively.

Issue Details

Recent Issues

  1. Issue #47: ELO ranking score?

    • Priority: Medium
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 183 days ago
    • Updated: 180 days ago
  2. Issue #46: [question] Two characters cannot approach each other after they switch positions.

    • Priority: High
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 183 days ago
    • Updated: 44 days ago
  3. Issue #43: Add Google Gemini model

    • Priority: Low
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 187 days ago
  4. Issue #42: How to use Google gemini model

    • Priority: Low
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 187 days ago
  5. Issue #41: Hello, brother. How to modify the program so that AI can play computer-controlled characters?

    • Priority: Medium
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 189 days ago
    • Updated: 181 days ago
  6. Issue #40: Is there a way to set it to do best 3 of 5?

    • Priority: Medium
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 190 days ago
    • Updated: 189 days ago
  7. Issue #39: Yi 6b, no action

    • Priority: High
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 191 days ago
    • Updated: 189 days ago
  8. Issue #38: how to set show_final=true???

    • Priority: Low
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 191 days ago
  9. Issue #37: suggestion: add blood in log

    • Priority: Low
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 191 days ago
  10. Issue #35: Report Different models fight on the street

    • Priority: Medium
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 193 days ago

Analysis of Notable Issues

  • The issue regarding the ELO ranking system (#47) reflects ongoing discussions about performance metrics and benchmarking methodologies within the community.
  • Technical challenges like characters not approaching each other (#46) highlight potential bugs in game logic or AI behavior, which could affect user experience significantly.
  • Multiple requests for adding new models (e.g., Google Gemini) indicate a desire for expansion and diversity in model testing, which could enhance the project's appeal.
  • Queries on modifying gameplay mechanics (e.g., introducing computer-controlled characters) suggest users are looking for more versatile usage scenarios.

Themes and Commonalities

The issues predominantly reflect a mix of technical inquiries and feature requests, with users actively seeking assistance on configuration and model integration. This indicates a vibrant but potentially overwhelmed community where users are eager to engage but face hurdles in implementation.

The recurring nature of setup-related issues suggests that improving documentation or providing more robust support could alleviate many of these concerns and enhance overall user satisfaction.

Summary of Important Issues

This analysis highlights key areas for improvement within the project, focusing on technical support and user engagement strategies to foster a more collaborative development environment.

Report On: Fetch pull requests



Overview

The analysis of the pull requests (PRs) for the LLM Colosseum project reveals a robust and active development process. The project has seen a total of 38 closed PRs, indicating a healthy level of maintenance and feature enhancement. The PRs cover a range of updates from adding new features and fixing bugs to simplifying code and updating documentation.

Summary of Pull Requests

  • PR #68: Reintroduced support for Mistral, including minor updates to llm.py and requirements.txt. Merged 34 days ago.
  • PR #67: Simplified requirements.txt and made minor adjustments in other files. Merged 34 days ago.
  • PR #66: Added Cerebras API support via llama-index, tested with the benchmark ROM: Street Fighter III. Merged 34 days ago.
  • PR #65: Renamed ollama.py to local.py as part of issue resolution. Merged 44 days ago.
  • PR #64: Introduced Docker support with Dockerfile and docker-compose.yml, enhancing deployment options. Merged 44 days ago.
  • PR #61: Fixed a bug related to Pydantic, ensuring compatibility with newer versions. Merged 51 days ago.
  • PR #59: Added support for Amazon Bedrock, expanding the project's integration with different LLMs. Merged 66 days ago.
  • PR #58: Minor typo fix in dashboard.ipynb. Merged 51 days ago.
  • PR #55: Corrected a typo in the codebase. Merged 76 days ago.
  • PR #51: Fixed an issue with Ollama support. Merged 161 days ago.
  • PR #48 & PR #45: Draft PRs for adding solar implementation; not merged.
  • PR #44: Added support for additional models using Llamaindex's LLM abstraction. Merged 178 days ago.
  • Multiple PRs (#26, #25, #23, #22, #21, #20, #19, #18, #17, #16, #15, #14, #13, #12, #11, #10, #9, #8, #7, #6, #5, #4, #3, #2): Early development PRs focusing on various features and fixes; all closed.

Analysis of Pull Requests

The PRs reflect a strong focus on expanding the functionality and improving the usability of the LLM Colosseum project. Notable trends include:

  1. Feature Expansion: Several PRs (#66 for Cerebras API and #59 for Amazon Bedrock) indicate ongoing efforts to integrate more LLMs into the benchmarking framework. This is crucial for maintaining the project's relevance as new models emerge.

  2. Infrastructure Improvements: The introduction of Docker support (#64) suggests an emphasis on making the setup process easier and more consistent across different environments. This is particularly important for community engagement and contribution.

  3. Code Maintenance and Simplification: PRs like #67 (simplifying requirements) and PR #68 (adding back mistral support) show a commitment to keeping the codebase clean and manageable. This is essential for long-term sustainability.

  4. Bug Fixes and Compatibility Updates: Regular updates to address bugs (#61 fixing Pydantic issues) demonstrate proactive maintenance efforts to ensure compatibility with dependencies.

  5. Community Contributions: The presence of contributions from various developers (e.g., João Galego in PR #59) highlights an active community around the project. However, some draft PRs (#48 & PR #45) remain unmerged for an extended period, which could indicate either pending decisions or potential issues that need resolution.

  6. Documentation and Minor Fixes: Several PRs focus on documentation updates (#58) or minor fixes (#55), which are important for maintaining clarity and accuracy in project documentation.

In conclusion, the LLM Colosseum project exhibits a healthy development lifecycle with a clear focus on feature expansion, infrastructure improvement, code maintenance, and community engagement. The active management of pull requests suggests a well-organized approach to software development that prioritizes both functionality and usability.

Report On: Fetch commits



Development Team and Recent Activity

Team Members

  • Nicolas Oulianov (oulianov)

  • Vithu Thangarasa (vithursant)

  • Stan Girard (StanGirard)

  • Nick Schuetz (nickschuetz)

  • João Galego (JGalego)

  • Pierre-Louis Biojout (Pierre-LouisBJT)

  • PL Venard (Platinn)

  • Sam Pink (SamPink)

  • Ikko Eltociear Ashimine (eltociear)

  • Zedmat (harshkasat)

Recent Activities

Nicolas Oulianov

  • Major contributor with multiple merges and commits focusing on:
    • Adding back support for Mistral.
    • Simplifying requirements and code.
    • Enhancing the project with features like human controls and model provider verification.
    • Collaborated with various team members on pull requests.

Vithu Thangarasa

  • Worked on integrating the Cerebras API.
  • Cleaned up code and updated environment configurations.

Stan Girard

  • Contributed to adding Bedrock support and refactoring code for better functionality.
  • Collaborated with other team members on various features.

Nick Schuetz

  • Focused on ensuring bug fixes, particularly related to Pydantic.

João Galego

  • Contributed to the addition of Bedrock support.

Pierre-Louis Biojout

  • Actively engaged in updating the README and working on dashboard features.
  • Collaborated with others to implement new functionalities.

PL Venard

  • Contributed to special moves, distance handling, and prompt modifications.

Sam Pink

  • Worked on bug fixes and enhancements related to model support.

Ikko Eltociear Ashimine

  • Made minor updates to documentation.

Zedmat

  • Added Docker-related configurations for easier deployment.

Patterns and Conclusions

  1. Active Collaboration: The team demonstrates strong collaboration, with multiple merges involving contributions from various members, indicating a cohesive development environment.
  2. Focus on Features: Recent activities show a clear focus on enhancing functionality, particularly around model support and integration of APIs.
  3. Documentation Improvements: There is an ongoing effort to improve documentation, which is crucial for community engagement and usability.
  4. Bug Fixes: Continuous attention to bug fixing suggests a commitment to maintaining code quality alongside feature development.
  5. Diverse Contributions: The variety of contributions across different areas (features, documentation, bug fixes) reflects a well-rounded team capable of addressing multiple aspects of the project simultaneously.