Quantify issues

Recent GitHub Issues Activity

_{Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.}

Rate pull requests

PR#53 - nit: typo in personal_shopper exampleopen

2_/5

thanos-wandbCreated: 2024-10-12

This pull request addresses a minor typo correction in a comment within the code, changing 'inforamation' to 'information'. While it improves readability slightly, it is an insignificant change with no impact on functionality or performance. Such minor documentation or syntax changes typically do not warrant a rating higher than 2 as they do not contribute significantly to the project's overall quality or functionality.

[+] Read More

PR#52 - docs: update README.mdopen

2_/5

Ikko Eltociear Ashimine (eltociear)Created: 2024-10-12

The pull request corrects a minor typo in the README.md file, changing 'transfered' to 'transferred'. While this is a valid correction, the change is trivial and does not significantly impact the overall quality or functionality of the project. Such minor documentation updates are common and do not warrant a high rating unless they address critical issues or significantly improve understanding. Therefore, this PR is rated as 'Needs work' due to its insignificance.

[+] Read More

PR#51 - [Nit] Fix a typoopen

2_/5

Will Dembinski (wi-ski)Created: 2024-10-12

This pull request addresses a minor typo correction, changing 'differnt' to 'different' in a single comment line. While correcting typos is beneficial for code clarity and professionalism, the change is trivial and does not impact functionality, performance, or security. Such a minor edit typically warrants a lower rating as it lacks significance or complexity.

[+] Read More

PR#47 - docs: fix typoopen

2_/5

Yuga Sun (yugasun)Created: 2024-10-12

The pull request addresses a minor typo in the README.md file, changing a function name from 'print_hello' to 'greet'. While this correction aligns the documentation with the actual code, the change is trivial and does not significantly impact the project. It lacks depth and scope, making it an insignificant contribution overall.

[+] Read More

PR#43 - Update function example in README call greet instead of print_helloopen

2_/5

METACOGNITIVECreated: 2024-10-12

The pull request addresses a minor typo in the README file, changing a function name from 'print_hello' to 'greet'. While correcting documentation is important, this change is trivial and does not significantly impact the project. The PR lacks complexity, significance, or thoroughness that would warrant a higher rating.

[+] Read More

PR#41 - fix requires openai==1.33open

2_/5

Lutz Roeder (lutzroeder)Created: 2024-10-12

The pull request addresses a minor version constraint change in the setup configuration file, altering the OpenAI package requirement from an exact version to a minimum version. This is a simple and small change, impacting only one line of code. While it may resolve dependency issues or improve flexibility, it lacks significance or complexity. The PR does not introduce any notable features, bug fixes, or improvements beyond this minor adjustment.

[+] Read More

PR#39 - fix: readme typoopen

2_/5

Travis Fischer (transitive-bullshit)Created: 2024-10-12

The pull request addresses a minor typo in the README file, changing 'start' to 'end' in a JSON example. While this correction improves clarity, it is an insignificant change with minimal impact on the overall project. The PR lacks complexity or significance, and such minor documentation fixes are typically rated lower unless they address critical misunderstandings or errors.

[+] Read More

PR#46 - Allow setting client for run_demo_loop()open

3_/5

Pengfei Ni (feiskyer)Created: 2024-10-12

The pull request introduces a minor but useful change by allowing a customized client to be set for the `run_demo_loop()` function. This adds flexibility without altering the core functionality, which is beneficial. However, the change is relatively small, affecting only a few lines of code with no significant impact on the overall project. The implementation is straightforward and does not introduce any apparent flaws or security risks. While it improves usability, the change is not substantial enough to warrant a higher rating.

[+] Read More

PR#44 - adding type hints to functionsopen

3_/5

Derek Deming (derekdeming)Created: 2024-10-12

The pull request adds type hints to several functions across multiple files, improving code readability and maintainability. However, the changes are relatively minor and do not introduce any significant new functionality or bug fixes. The modifications are straightforward and align with existing code standards. While beneficial, the impact of these changes is limited to code clarity rather than substantial enhancement or innovation.

[+] Read More

PR#48 - updated with llama examples including ollama wrapperopen

4_/5

citizenhicks (Arrabonae)Created: 2024-10-12

The pull request introduces a comprehensive set of examples for using the Swarm framework with the Ollama wrapper, demonstrating various functionalities like agent handoff, context variables, function calling, and interactive loops. The code is well-structured and includes detailed README documentation. However, it primarily adds examples rather than core functionality changes, which slightly limits its significance. Overall, it's a valuable contribution that enhances user understanding and application of the framework.

[+] Read More

Quantify commits

Quantified Commit Activity Over 14 Days

Developer	Avatar	Branches	PRs	Commits	Files	Changes
Ilan Bigio		1	1/1/0	6	139	3670
Charu Jaiswal		1	0/0/0	1	150	1832
Shyamal H Anadkat		1	0/0/0	4	6	55
greg-admin		1	0/0/0	3	1	14
nate nowack		1	2/2/0	2	2	13
James Hills		1	0/0/0	1	1	3
Colin Jarvis		1	0/0/0	1	1	3
katia-openai		1	0/0/0	1	1	1
Will Dembinski (wi-ski)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Yuga Sun (yugasun)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Pengfei Ni (feiskyer)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
citizenhicks (Arrabonae)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Ikko Eltociear Ashimine (eltociear)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Lutz Roeder (lutzroeder)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Derek Deming (derekdeming)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
None (thanos-wandb)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
METACOGNITIVE (METACOGNITIVE)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Eric Burke (eburke-openai)		0	0/0/1	0	0	0
Travis Fischer (transitive-bullshit)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0

_{PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period}

Quantify risks

Project Risk Ratings

Report On: Fetch issues

Recent Activity Analysis

Recent GitHub issue activity for the openai/swarm project shows a mix of technical and legal concerns. Notably, issues #50 and #54 highlight non-technical challenges, such as potential legal threats and collaboration opportunities with other groups. Technical issues like #49 and #40 indicate missing components and version conflicts, respectively.

Notable Anomalies and Themes

• Legal and Interoperability Concerns: Issue #50 involves a legal threat over trademark usage, which could potentially disrupt project progress if not addressed. Conversely, issue #54 suggests collaboration with external groups, indicating a positive opportunity for interoperability.

• Technical Gaps: Issue #49 reports a missing class in the codebase, suggesting incomplete implementation. This is critical as it affects functionality in demos.

• Dependency Management: Issue #40 highlights a version downgrade problem during installation, which can lead to compatibility issues.

• Installation Challenges: Issue #36 discusses problems with SSH-based installation, pointing to documentation or access rights issues.

• Related Projects: Issue #42 references a similar project, GPTSwarm, suggesting potential overlaps or opportunities for integration.

Issue Details

Most Recently Created Issues

1. #54: Complementary to the LFAI and Data group's work on Interoperability

   • Priority: Medium
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 2 days ago

2. #50: Notorious namesquatter is threatening legal action

   • Priority: High
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 2 days ago

3. #49: The class create_triage_agent from the swarm.agents module is missing

   • Priority: High
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 2 days ago

Most Recently Updated Issues

1. #35: Hugging face and langchain models support

   • Priority: Low
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 3 days ago
   • Updated: 2 days ago

2. #36: The ssh install command won't work

   • Priority: Medium
   • Status: Open
   • Created: 3 days ago
   • Updated: 3 days ago

These issues reflect both strategic challenges (e.g., legal threats) and operational hurdles (e.g., missing code components), impacting the project's development trajectory.

Report On: Fetch pull requests

Analysis of Pull Requests for openai/swarm

Open Pull Requests

1. #53: nit: typo in personal_shopper example

   • Details: Fixes a minor typo in the personal_shopper example.
   • Significance: Low impact; purely a cosmetic change with no functional implications.

2. #52: docs: update README.md

   • Details: Corrects a typo in the README.
   • Significance: Minor documentation fix, important for clarity but no code changes.

3. #51: [Nit] Fix a typo

   • Details: Corrects a typo in the airline example configuration.
   • Significance: Similar to #53, this is a minor correction with no functional impact.

4. #48: updated with llama examples including ollama wrapper

   • Details: Adds new examples for llama, including an ollama wrapper.
   • Significance: Significant addition as it introduces new examples and expands the framework's capabilities.

5. #47: docs: fix typo

   • Details: Fixes a typo in the README.
   • Significance: Minor documentation correction.

6. #46: Allow setting client for run_demo_loop()

   • Details: Enhances functionality by allowing customization of clients in run_demo_loop().
   • Significance: Functional improvement that increases flexibility for users.

7. #44: adding type hints to functions

   • Details: Adds type hints to several functions.
   • Significance: Improves code readability and maintainability, beneficial for developers.

8. #43: Update function example in README call greet instead of print_hello

   • Details: Corrects an example in the README.
   • Significance: Important for accurate documentation, though it does not affect functionality.

9. #41: fix requires openai==1.33

   • Details: Updates dependency requirements.
   • Significance: Critical for ensuring compatibility and preventing potential issues with dependencies.

10. #39: fix: readme typo

    • Details: Corrects a typo in the README.
    • Significance: Minor but necessary for documentation accuracy.

Recently Closed Pull Requests

1. #38: indicate python 3.10+ required and alternate git install

   • Status: Merged
   • Significance: Important update to installation instructions, ensuring users are aware of Python version requirements.

2. #37: remove mutable default in run_demo_loop

   • Status: Merged
   • Significance: Fixes a common Python pitfall, improving code reliability.

3. #34: Rename all instances of Assistant to Agent

   • Status: Merged
   • Significance: Major refactor to avoid confusion with the Assistants API, aligning terminology across the project.

4. #22: Add post_execute call

   • Status: Closed without merging
   • Significance: Indicates an exploration into extending functionality, though not fully realized or integrated.

Notable Observations

• Several open PRs focus on minor typo corrections (#53, #52, #51, #47, #39), which suggests attention to detail but low immediate impact on functionality.
• The introduction of new examples (#48) and enhancements (#46) indicates ongoing development and expansion of Swarm's capabilities.
• The closed PR #34 reflects significant structural changes aimed at improving clarity and consistency within the project.
• The closure of PR #22 without merging suggests potential areas for future development or reconsideration.

Overall, the project appears active with ongoing improvements and refinements, particularly in terms of documentation accuracy and expanding functionality through new examples and features.

Report On: Fetch Files For Assessment

Source Code Assessment

1. swarm/repl/repl.py

• Structure & Organization: The file is well-organized, with clear separation of functions. The main function run_demo_loop is placed at the end, which is logical as it likely utilizes the helper functions defined above it.
• Functionality:
  • process_and_print_streaming_response and pretty_print_messages handle streaming responses and message formatting, respectively. They use ANSI escape codes for colored terminal output, enhancing readability.
  • run_demo_loop orchestrates the interaction loop, managing user input and agent responses.
• Code Quality:
  • The code uses descriptive variable names and includes inline comments, aiding readability.
  • There is consistent error handling for missing keys in dictionaries.
• Potential Improvements:
  • Consider adding type hints for all functions to enhance clarity and maintainability.
  • The use of hard-coded ANSI codes could be abstracted into a utility function for better reusability.

2. examples/customer_service_streaming/src/swarm/swarm.py

• Structure & Organization: The class Swarm is clearly defined with methods for deploying tasks and managing engines.
• Functionality:
  • Supports two engines (AssistantsEngine and LocalEngine) with conditional logic to initialize and deploy tasks.
  • Task loading from a JSON file is implemented in load_tasks.
• Code Quality:
  • Uses clear method names and comments to explain functionality.
  • The constructor initializes default values effectively.
• Potential Improvements:
  • Type hints could be added for method parameters and return types.
  • Consider handling potential exceptions when reading from files or initializing engines.

3. examples/customer_service_streaming/configs/prompts.py

• Structure & Organization: This file contains a series of string constants used as prompts, organized logically by their purpose (e.g., triage, evaluation).
• Functionality:
  • Provides templates for various system prompts used in the framework.
• Code Quality:
  • Strings are well-formatted and self-explanatory.
  • Consistent naming conventions are used for prompt variables.
• Potential Improvements:
  • Consider using a configuration management library if these prompts need to be dynamically adjusted based on different environments or conditions.

4. swarm/core.py

• Structure & Organization: This core file is extensive but well-organized into classes and methods that encapsulate key functionalities of the Swarm framework.
• Functionality:
  • The Swarm class handles chat completions, tool calls, and agent interactions.
  • Methods like get_chat_completion and handle_tool_calls are central to its operation.
• Code Quality:
  • Uses Python's pattern matching (match-case) effectively for handling different result types.
  • Includes utility functions like debug_print to aid debugging without cluttering output in production mode.
• Potential Improvements:
  • Adding more detailed docstrings to complex methods would improve understandability.
  • Consider breaking down large methods into smaller ones if possible to enhance readability.

5. swarm/util.py

• Structure & Organization: This utility file contains helper functions that support the main operations of the framework.
• Functionality:
  • Functions like debug_print, merge_fields, and function_to_json provide essential utilities such as debugging support, data merging, and function serialization.
• Code Quality:
  • Functions are concise and focused on single responsibilities.
  • Error handling in function_to_json ensures robustness against unexpected function signatures.
• Potential Improvements:
  • Ensure all utility functions have comprehensive docstrings explaining their purpose and usage.

Overall, the codebase demonstrates good practices in terms of structure, readability, and functionality. Adding type hints and improving documentation would further enhance maintainability and developer experience.

Report On: Fetch commits

Development Team and Recent Activity

Team Members and Activities

Katia Gil Guzman (katia-openai)

• Activity: Made a minor update to README.md.
• Collaboration: No direct collaboration noted.
• In Progress: No ongoing work indicated.

Greg Admin (greg-admin)

• Activity: Made multiple updates to README.md involving small changes.
• Collaboration: No direct collaboration noted.
• In Progress: No ongoing work indicated.

Ilan Bigio (ibigio)

• Activity: Added a security policy, clarified educational goals, and made various updates to README.md. Initial commit included significant additions across multiple files.
• Collaboration: Worked alongside Shyamal H Anadkat on README updates.
• In Progress: No ongoing work indicated.

Shyamal H Anadkat (shyamal-anadkat)

• Activity: Updated several files including util.py, core.py, and tool.py. Made multiple changes to README.md.
• Collaboration: Worked with Ilan Bigio on README updates.
• In Progress: No ongoing work indicated.

Nate Nowack (zzstoatzz)

• Activity: Fixed mutable defaults and updated Python version requirements in README.md.
• Collaboration: No direct collaboration noted.
• In Progress: No ongoing work indicated.

Colin Jarvis (colin-openai)

• Activity: Added to contributors in README.md.
• Collaboration: No direct collaboration noted.
• In Progress: No ongoing work indicated.

Charu Jaiswal (charuj)

• Activity: Made extensive additions including logs, configurations, and data files.
• Collaboration: No direct collaboration noted.
• In Progress: No ongoing work indicated.

James Hills (jhills20)

• Activity: Added to contributors in README.md.
• Collaboration: No direct collaboration noted.
• In Progress: No ongoing work indicated.

Patterns, Themes, and Conclusions

1. Frequent README Updates: Several team members focused on updating the README.md, indicating an emphasis on documentation clarity and accuracy.

2. Security and Initial Setup Enhancements: Ilan Bigio's contributions included adding a security policy and initial setup files, suggesting foundational improvements were prioritized recently.

3. Collaborative Documentation Efforts: Ilan Bigio and Shyamal H Anadkat collaborated on README updates, reflecting teamwork in refining project documentation.

4. Codebase Expansion by Charu Jaiswal: Significant additions by Charu Jaiswal expanded the project's examples and configurations, enhancing its educational value.

5. Focus on Minor Fixes and Requirements Updates: Nate Nowack addressed specific technical details like mutable defaults and Python version requirements, ensuring technical precision.

6. Limited Active Branches and PR Activity: Most recent activities occurred on the main branch with minimal pull request activity, indicating a centralized development approach.