‹ Reports
The Dispatch

GitHub Repo Analysis: udecode/plate

Executive Summary

The "udecode/plate" project is an open-source AI-powered rich-text editor framework developed primarily in TypeScript. It is designed for simplicity and efficiency, offering a plugin system, unstyled components, and pre-built UI elements. The project is actively maintained with significant community engagement, as evidenced by its 11,251 stars and 686 forks. The trajectory of the project is positive, with ongoing development and feature enhancements.

Recent Activity

Team Members and Activities (Reverse Chronological)

  1. Ziad Beyens (zbeyens)

    • Merged PRs related to documentation and feature updates.
    • Updated registry and removed icons.

  2. Felix Feng (felixfeng33)

    • Fixed AI integration issues.
    • Enhanced code robustness.

  3. Lenghak Hok (Lenghak)

    • Updated emoji and color picker components.
    • Collaborated on style fixes.

  4. TomMorane

    • Updated documentation in registry UI.

  5. natamox

    • Added test cases for markdown deserialization.

  6. kualta

    • Fixed collaboration markdown code example.

  7. dependabot[bot]

    • Updated @excalidraw/excalidraw dependency.

Patterns and Themes

Risks

Of Note

Quantified Reports

Quantify issues



Recent GitHub Issues Activity

Timespan Opened Closed Comments Labeled Milestones
7 Days 5 7 2 0 1
30 Days 12 35 12 0 1
90 Days 39 76 33 0 1
1 Year 186 162 312 3 1
All Time 800 726 - - -

Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.

Rate pull requests



2/5
The pull request is a draft and lacks completeness, as indicated by the author's own comments. It introduces a new plugin for mark affinity but is still in the early stages of development, with many aspects needing refinement and further discussion. The code changes are significant but not yet polished, and there are several areas highlighted by reviewers that require updates or rethinking. Additionally, the PR has been open for a long time without substantial progress towards merging, suggesting it might be stalled or not prioritized. Overall, it needs more work before it can be considered a solid contribution.
[+] Read More
2/5
The pull request is in draft state and lacks clarity and completeness. The author expresses uncertainty about key implementation decisions, such as caching in 'editor.apply' and passing DOM nodes, indicating a lack of confidence in the current solution. Additionally, there are unresolved review comments suggesting alternative approaches and naming conventions. The absence of test cases and a changeset further highlights its incompleteness. Overall, the PR requires significant work before it can be considered for merging.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request addresses a specific issue with the floating toolbar in Safari by adding functionality to calculate the absolute position of selections. It introduces new imports and utilizes hooks like useCallback and useMemo to optimize performance. However, it lacks a changeset, which is necessary for version control and tracking changes. The PR is labeled as 'small', indicating limited impact, and has been in draft status for a long time without updates. While the code changes seem functional, the lack of documentation or tests makes it average.
[+] Read More
3/5
This pull request addresses a specific issue with list numbering when parsing markdown content, which is a relevant and necessary fix. The change is minor, involving a small code modification to correctly set the list start index. While the fix is functional and improves the software, it is not particularly complex or significant in scope. The PR lacks additional documentation or tests that could enhance its value. Overall, it's an average contribution, effectively solving the problem but without any exceptional aspects.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request addresses a specific issue by adding a wrapper for the 'readOnly' property to prevent image resizing in preview mode. This change is functional and solves the problem at hand, making it a useful contribution. However, the PR lacks detailed documentation or examples demonstrating the impact of the changes, and it doesn't include any tests to ensure the new behavior works as expected. Additionally, the absence of a changeset indicates that the change might not be significant enough to warrant a version bump. Overall, it's an average contribution that effectively solves a problem but lacks thoroughness in documentation and testing.
[+] Read More
3/5
This pull request introduces a new feature to serialize the
HTML element in markdown, which is a useful addition for users needing this functionality. However, the implementation has sparked a debate about the best way to handle line breaks, indicating that there may be unresolved issues or better approaches. The PR has undergone multiple updates and fixes, showing responsiveness to feedback but also suggesting initial incompleteness. Overall, it is a functional but not exceptional contribution, meriting an average rating.
[+] Read More
3/5
This pull request addresses a specific bug where subscript and superscript labels were mixed up in the code. The fix is straightforward, involving simple swaps of key-value pairs in the toggleMark function. While the change is necessary and corrects a clear issue, it is relatively minor in scope and complexity. The PR does not introduce new features or significant improvements beyond fixing the existing bug. Additionally, there are no changesets included, which might be necessary for version tracking. Overall, this PR is functional but unremarkable, warranting an average rating of 3.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request introduces a feature to store a mention key, which is a minor but useful enhancement. The changes are well-documented and include necessary updates to the changelog and type definitions. However, the impact of the change is relatively small, focusing on a specific functionality within a plugin. The PR follows best practices with successful checks for type, lint, and tests, but it lacks broader significance or complexity to warrant a higher rating.
[+] Read More
3/5
This pull request is a straightforward dependency update from version 0.16.4 to 0.17.6 of @excalidraw/excalidraw, managed by Dependabot. It includes several bug fixes and new features, which are beneficial for maintaining the software's functionality and security. However, it lacks any additional context or testing information specific to this repository, which would have been helpful to ensure compatibility and stability. As such, it is an average PR that performs a necessary update but does not go beyond the basic requirements.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request introduces a new feature to preserve line breaks during markdown deserialization, which is a useful addition. The code changes are well-structured and include comprehensive test cases to ensure the new functionality works as expected. However, there are some concerns raised in the review comments regarding the naming of options and type safety, which indicate areas for improvement. Additionally, the PR lacks a changeset, which is necessary for version management. These issues prevent it from being rated higher than average.
[+] Read More

Quantify commits



Quantified Commit Activity Over 14 Days

Developer Avatar Branches PRs Commits Files Changes
Ziad Beyens 1 3/3/0 54 560 37745
Felix Feng 1 9/10/0 56 266 17526
github-actions[bot] 1 22/21/1 20 106 1018
TomMorane 1 0/0/0 3 35 1008
Lenghak Hok 1 1/1/0 6 11 466
natamox (natamox) 1 1/0/0 6 7 307
None (dependabot[bot]) 1 1/0/1 1 2 12
kualta 1 1/1/0 1 1 8
Chris Amirani 1 1/1/0 1 1 2
零下6度 (hongnny) 0 0/0/1 0 0 0
Beeant (beeant0512) 0 1/0/0 0 0 0

PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period

Quantify risks



Project Risk Ratings

Risk Level (1-5) Rationale
Delivery 3 The project faces moderate delivery risks due to unresolved issues in critical areas such as serialization and plugin functionality, as highlighted in issues #3689, #3660, and #3651. The lack of structured prioritization or categorization, as indicated by the absence of labels and milestones, further complicates tracking progress against goals. However, the active community involvement and recent closure of several issues suggest ongoing efforts to address these challenges.
Velocity 3 The project's velocity appears satisfactory with significant contributions from key developers like Ziad Beyens and Felix Feng. However, the concentration of workload on a few individuals poses a risk of bottlenecks and potential burnout. Additionally, prolonged open statuses of certain pull requests, such as PRs #3236 and #3223, indicate potential delays in development processes.
Dependency 4 Dependency risks are notable due to reliance on external libraries and platforms, as seen in issues like #3509 involving security concerns with 'eval'. The project's integration with Vercel for deployment also introduces external service dependency risks. Additionally, plugin malfunctions reported in issues #3660 and #3651 highlight potential vulnerabilities related to third-party tools.
Team 3 The team shows strong individual contributions but limited collaboration is suggested by the low number of comments per issue. This might indicate communication challenges that could affect team dynamics. The heavy reliance on a few key contributors also poses risks related to workload distribution and potential burnout.
Code Quality 3 Code quality is moderately at risk due to the absence of changesets in several pull requests and recurring bugs in critical functionalities like serialization (#3689). While some PRs demonstrate adherence to best practices, others lack comprehensive documentation and testing, which could affect maintainability.
Technical Debt 4 Technical debt is a concern due to rapid development pace without adequate changeset documentation, potentially leading to integration issues over time. Issues like memory leaks (#3511) further indicate areas where refactoring is needed to prevent long-term maintenance challenges.
Test Coverage 4 Test coverage is insufficiently addressed, as indicated by the lack of test cases in several pull requests (e.g., PRs #3147 and #3221). This gap increases the risk of undetected bugs and regressions affecting project stability.
Error Handling 4 Error handling is at risk due to recurring unresolved issues that suggest inadequate mechanisms for catching and reporting errors. The persistence of serialization errors (#3689) indicates a need for more robust error handling strategies.

Detailed Reports

Report On: Fetch issues



Recent Activity Analysis

The recent GitHub issue activity for the "udecode/plate" project indicates a steady stream of bug reports and feature requests, reflecting active engagement from the community. The issues span a range of topics, including plugin functionality, UI/UX concerns, and integration challenges with other technologies.

Notable anomalies include recurring issues with serialization, particularly with HTML and Markdown formats (#3296, #3308), which may suggest underlying complexities in handling different content types. Another significant theme is the interaction between plugins and external systems, such as IME (Input Method Editor) support for non-Latin scripts (#3250) and mobile device compatibility (#2607). These issues highlight the challenges of ensuring cross-platform consistency and accessibility.

Several issues also point to performance concerns, such as the block selection performance optimization (#3449), indicating areas where efficiency improvements could be beneficial. Additionally, there are reports of unexpected behavior when using certain plugins together, like the reset node plugin affecting list behavior (#3328).

Issue Details

Most Recently Created Issues

  • #3689: Links inside blockquotes are not preserved when deserializing Markdown. Priority: High. Status: Open. Created 1 day ago.
  • #3660: Text actions (bold, italic, code) don't work properly inside a table cell. Priority: Medium. Status: Open. Created 7 days ago.

Most Recently Updated Issues

  • #3687: HTMLReact Serializer does not work. Priority: High. Status: Closed. Updated 1 day ago.
  • #3659: Columns bug related to list conversion. Priority: Medium. Status: Closed. Updated 7 days ago.

Key Issues

  • #3296: HTML Serializer's stripClassNames removes legitimate content, affecting code blocks. Priority: High.
  • #3250: Placeholder remains visible when composing using an IME, affecting non-Latin script users. Priority: High.
  • #3449: Block selection performance optimization needed due to menu dependency on selection state. Priority: Medium.

These issues highlight ongoing challenges in maintaining robust serialization processes and ensuring seamless integration across different platforms and input methods. The project's active community involvement is evident in the frequent updates and resolutions of reported issues.

Report On: Fetch pull requests



Analysis of Pull Requests for "udecode/plate"

Open Pull Requests

  1. #3679: preserve line breaks during markdown deserialization

    • State: Open
    • Created: 3 days ago
    • Notable Points:
    • The PR aims to preserve line breaks during markdown deserialization.
    • There are several review comments suggesting improvements, such as renaming options for clarity and ensuring type safety.
    • The PR is actively being discussed, with the author responding to feedback.
    • Action Needed: Address the remaining review comments and ensure the changeset is added if necessary.

  2. #3671: Bump @excalidraw/excalidraw from 0.16.4 to 0.17.6

    • State: Open
    • Created: 5 days ago
    • Notable Points:
    • This is a dependency update by Dependabot.
    • The update has failed CI checks, indicating potential issues with compatibility or integration.
    • Action Needed: Investigate and resolve the CI failures before merging.

  3. #3649: feat: store mention key

    • State: Open
    • Created: 10 days ago
    • Notable Points:
    • The PR introduces a feature to store mention keys.
    • A changeset has been detected, indicating readiness for version bump upon merge.
    • Action Needed: Ensure all checks pass and address any remaining feedback.

  4. #3236: fix: subscript and superscript were mixed up

    • State: Open
    • Created: 153 days ago
    • Notable Points:
    • This PR addresses a bug where subscript and superscript labels were mixed up.
    • It is marked as a draft and has not been updated recently.
    • Action Needed: Determine if this PR is still relevant and either progress it or close it if obsolete.

  5. #3223: [md-serializer] add br html element rule for md serialize

    • State: Open
    • Created: 156 days ago
    • Notable Points:
    • The PR adds serialization rules for <br> elements in markdown.
    • It has been inactive for some time, with pending review comments.
    • Action Needed: Revive the discussion or close if no longer needed.

Recently Closed Pull Requests

  1. #3695: Update Registry

    • State: Closed
    • Merged by: Ziad Beyens (zbeyens)
    • Notable Points:
    • This was an automated update to the registry, merged without issues.

  2. #3694: Remove icons

    • State: Closed
    • Merged by: Ziad Beyens (zbeyens)
    • Notable Points:
    • The PR involved removing icons from the project.
    • It was merged successfully without any notable issues.

  3. #3693: fix collaboration.mdx code example

    • State: Closed
    • Merged by: Ziad Beyens (zbeyens)
    • Notable Points:
    • This PR fixed a code example in the documentation.
    • It was quickly merged, indicating a straightforward fix.

Notable Issues

  • Several open PRs have been inactive for extended periods (#3236, #3223), which could indicate stalled development or low priority. It's important to periodically review these to decide on their status.
  • Dependency updates like #3671 failing CI tests need prompt attention to prevent security vulnerabilities or outdated dependencies from affecting the project.

Recommendations

  • Prioritize resolving CI issues in dependency update PRs to maintain project stability.
  • Regularly review older open PRs to assess their relevance and progress or close them if they are no longer needed.
  • Encourage contributors to address feedback promptly to facilitate smoother merges and reduce backlog.

Report On: Fetch Files For Assessment



Source Code Assessment

File: apps/www/content/docs/collaboration.mdx

Structure and Quality Analysis:

  • Documentation Structure: The file is structured with clear sections for features, installation, usage, and API documentation. This organization makes it easy for developers to understand the purpose and usage of the collaboration features.
  • Content Clarity: The documentation is concise and provides essential information about the collaboration feature using slate-yjs and Hocuspocus. It includes installation instructions and a code example for usage, which is beneficial for users implementing this feature.
  • Code Example: The TypeScript code snippet is well-formatted and demonstrates how to configure the YjsPlugin with options for hocuspocusProviderOptions. This practical example aids in understanding the implementation process.
  • Links to External Resources: The file includes links to external documentation (e.g., slate-yjs and Hocuspocus), which are useful for users seeking more detailed information.
  • API Documentation: The API section is detailed, describing various configuration options and their purposes. This thoroughness helps developers customize the plugin according to their needs.

Overall Impression: The file is well-organized and provides comprehensive documentation for the collaboration feature. It effectively uses examples and links to external resources to enhance understanding.

File: apps/www/public/r/styles/default/align-dropdown-menu.json

Structure and Quality Analysis:

  • JSON Structure: The JSON file is structured to include dependencies, documentation metadata, file content, and registry dependencies. This structure is typical for configuration files intended for UI components.
  • Content Description: The description provided in the "doc" section clearly states the purpose of the dropdown menu as a control for text alignment. This clarity is helpful for developers looking to implement or modify this component.
  • Code Content: The "files" section contains TypeScript code that defines a React component for an alignment dropdown menu. The code is well-organized, with imports at the top followed by component logic.
  • Component Logic: The component uses hooks like useAlignDropdownMenuState and useOpenState, indicating a stateful design suitable for interactive UI elements. It also maps icons to alignment values, which enhances usability.

Overall Impression: The JSON file effectively encapsulates both configuration metadata and component logic. It provides a clear overview of dependencies and usage, making it easy to integrate into larger projects.

File: apps/www/src/components/icons.tsx

Structure and Quality Analysis:

  • Component Organization: The file consists of multiple icon components defined as React functional components. Each icon is encapsulated within its own function, promoting modularity.
  • Icon Definitions: Icons are defined using SVG elements with customizable properties via props. This approach allows for flexible styling and integration into various parts of an application.
  • Exported Icons Object: An object named Icons exports all defined icons, providing a centralized access point. This pattern simplifies importing icons across different components.
  • Code Length: At 329 lines, the file is relatively long but remains manageable due to its consistent structure. Each icon definition follows a similar pattern, aiding readability.

Overall Impression: The file is well-structured, with each icon neatly encapsulated in its own function. This modular approach facilitates easy maintenance and reuse across different parts of an application.

File: packages/ai/src/react/copilot/utils/getNextWord.spec.ts

Structure and Quality Analysis:

  • Test Structure: The test file uses Jest framework conventions with describe blocks organizing tests into categories such as "English text," "CJK characters," and "mixed content." This organization improves readability and maintenance.
  • Test Coverage: The tests cover various scenarios, including handling spaces, single words, CJK characters, punctuation marks, and mixed language content. Such comprehensive coverage ensures robustness in handling diverse input cases.
  • Assertions: Each test uses straightforward assertions (expect) to verify that the function getNextWord behaves as expected. These assertions are clear and easy to understand.
  • Descriptive Test Names: Test names are descriptive, indicating precisely what each test case aims to verify. This descriptiveness aids in quickly identifying test purposes during debugging.

Overall Impression: The test file is well-organized with comprehensive coverage of different input scenarios. It adheres to best practices in testing by using descriptive names and clear assertions.

File: packages/markdown/src/lib/deserializer/utils/deserializeMdKeepLineBreak.spec.tsx

Structure and Quality Analysis:

  • Test Structure: Similar to other test files, this one uses Jest conventions with organized describe blocks. However, without seeing specific content within this truncated view, detailed analysis on individual tests cannot be provided.
  • Purpose Indication: As a newly added test file for markdown deserialization, it indicates ongoing development efforts towards improving or adding new features related to markdown processing.

Overall Impression: While specific details of the tests are not visible here, the presence of this test file suggests a focus on ensuring reliability in markdown deserialization functionality through unit testing.

Report On: Fetch commits



Repo Commits Analysis

Development Team and Recent Activity

Team Members and Activities

Ziad Beyens (zbeyens)

  • Commits: 54
  • Recent Activities:
    • Merged multiple pull requests related to documentation, refactoring, and feature updates.
    • Worked on updating the registry and removing icons.
    • Made significant changes across various files, including documentation and component updates.
    • Collaborated with other team members like Lenghak Hok and Felix Feng.

Felix Feng (felixfeng33)

  • Commits: 56
  • Recent Activities:
    • Focused on fixing issues related to AI integration and copilot functionalities.
    • Contributed to version package releases and documentation updates.
    • Worked on enhancing the robustness of code and fixing color-related issues.
    • Engaged in syncing templates and updating playground templates.

Lenghak Hok (Lenghak)

  • Commits: 6
  • Recent Activities:
    • Updated registry for emoji and color picker components.
    • Fixed styling issues related to emoji and color picker.
    • Collaborated with Ziad Beyens on style fixes.

TomMorane

  • Commits: 3
  • Recent Activities:
    • Worked on documentation updates, specifically in the registry UI.
    • Made changes to dependencies and pro features.

natamox

  • Commits: 6
  • Recent Activities:
    • Added test cases for markdown deserialization.
    • Improved code robustness and fixed line break issues in markdown processing.

kualta

  • Commits: 1
  • Recent Activities:
    • Fixed a collaboration markdown code example.

dependabot[bot]

  • Commits: 1
  • Recent Activities:
    • Updated @excalidraw/excalidraw dependency in the npm_and_yarn group.

Patterns, Themes, and Conclusions

  1. Active Development: The repository shows a high level of activity with frequent commits from core team members like Ziad Beyens and Felix Feng. This indicates ongoing development, maintenance, and enhancement of features.

  2. Collaboration: There is evidence of collaboration among developers, especially in merging branches and resolving issues related to documentation, styling, and functionality enhancements.

  3. Focus Areas:

    • Documentation: Significant efforts are being made to update and maintain comprehensive documentation across various components.
    • Refactoring: Continuous refactoring efforts are observed to improve code quality and remove redundant elements like icons.
    • Feature Enhancements: New features are being added, particularly around AI integration and markdown processing capabilities.

  4. Version Management: Regular updates to version packages suggest a structured approach to release management, ensuring that new features and fixes are systematically integrated into the main branch.

  5. Bot Contributions: Automated bots like dependabot are actively used for dependency management, ensuring that libraries are up-to-date with minimal manual intervention.

Overall, the development team is engaged in active maintenance, feature enhancement, and collaborative efforts to ensure the project's progress aligns with its goals of providing a robust rich-text editor framework.