Terraform, developed by HashiCorp, is a tool for managing infrastructure as code. It allows users to define and provision data center infrastructure using a declarative configuration language. The project is actively maintained and shows a strong trajectory of continuous improvement, with significant community engagement and frequent updates.
James Bardin (jbardin)
main
and TF-18617
.Radek Simko (radeksimko)
main
.Rose M Koron (rkoron007)
Liam Cervante (liamcervante)
Daniel Schmidt (DanielMSchmidt)
tbz2
module archives and improved ephemeral resource handling.Manu Chandrasekhar (quixoticmonk)
Bruno Schaatsbergen (bschaatsbergen)
Craig Wright (crw)
Corsin Ragettli (corsin-ragettli)
Timespan | Opened | Closed | Comments | Labeled | Milestones |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7 Days | 24 | 16 | 37 | 0 | 1 |
30 Days | 61 | 42 | 123 | 0 | 2 |
90 Days | 176 | 133 | 470 | 1 | 2 |
All Time | 21114 | 19307 | - | - | - |
Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.
Developer | Avatar | Branches | PRs | Commits | Files | Changes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Daniel Schmidt | 4 | 4/1/0 | 17 | 40 | 3961 | |
trujillo-adam | 4 | 3/1/0 | 7 | 44 | 1593 | |
James Bardin | 5 | 9/6/0 | 30 | 35 | 1448 | |
Team Terraform | 3 | 0/0/0 | 3 | 105 | 1314 | |
github-actions[bot] | 7 | 43/28/15 | 12 | 119 | 1108 | |
Liam Cervante | 2 | 11/11/2 | 14 | 24 | 917 | |
Mark DeCrane (Maed223) | 1 | 1/0/0 | 3 | 14 | 433 | |
Radek Simko | 2 | 4/3/0 | 4 | 5 | 85 | |
Jared Baker | 2 | 1/1/0 | 2 | 1 | 82 | |
Brian McClain (BrianMMcClain) | 1 | 1/0/0 | 1 | 1 | 61 | |
Bruno Schaatsbergen | 1 | 2/3/0 | 8 | 4 | 58 | |
Anteneh Metaferia | 1 | 0/1/0 | 1 | 1 | 56 | |
None (hc-github-team-tf-core) | 5 | 3/3/0 | 6 | 3 | 40 | |
nimzo6689 | 1 | 1/1/0 | 1 | 6 | 22 | |
Rose M Koron | 1 | 1/1/0 | 1 | 9 | 19 | |
Corsin Ragettli | 2 | 0/1/0 | 6 | 1 | 14 | |
Nara Kasbergen Kwon | 1 | 0/1/0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | |
Manu Chandrasekhar | 1 | 1/1/0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |
Craig Wright | 0 | 0/0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Daniel Banck (dbanck) | 0 | 1/0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
None (rfalke) | 0 | 0/1/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Naresh Reddy (reddynn) | 0 | 1/0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Hiroaki Sano (hiroakis) | 0 | 1/0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Pietro De Nicolao (pietrodn) | 0 | 1/0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
None (kazuyainoue0124) | 0 | 0/1/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period
Risk | Level (1-5) | Rationale |
---|---|---|
Delivery | 3 | The project shows a net increase in unresolved issues over various timespans, indicating potential backlog and delivery risks. The absence of labeling activity and minimal milestone assignments suggest deficiencies in project management practices, impacting delivery. Additionally, critical issues like #36129 and #36123 highlight bugs that could disrupt delivery if not addressed. |
Velocity | 3 | While there is significant commit activity from key contributors, the increasing number of unresolved issues suggests that velocity may not be keeping pace with the project's needs. The reliance on a few developers and automation also poses risks if these resources become unavailable. |
Dependency | 4 | The project relies heavily on external systems like AWS S3 and DynamoDB, as highlighted by issues such as #36129. These dependencies pose risks if configurations are not handled correctly, potentially affecting delivery and functionality. |
Team | 2 | The diversity in contributors suggests a healthy team dynamic, though varying levels of contribution could indicate workload disparities. There is no immediate evidence of burnout or conflict, but reliance on key individuals could pose future risks. |
Code Quality | 3 | The high volume of changes and ongoing bug fixes indicate efforts to maintain code quality. However, the presence of critical bugs and documentation inaccuracies suggests room for improvement in ensuring robust code quality. |
Technical Debt | 3 | The project is actively addressing bugs and enhancing features, but the complexity of some solutions and ongoing discussions about performance improvements suggest potential technical debt accumulation if not carefully managed. |
Test Coverage | 4 | Efforts to improve test coverage are evident, but the lack of detailed information on test results limits the ability to fully assess coverage. Critical bugs related to error handling highlight areas where testing may be insufficient. |
Error Handling | 3 | There are ongoing efforts to enhance error handling, particularly with fixes like PR #36127. However, critical bugs in recent versions suggest that error handling mechanisms may still have gaps that need addressing. |
The Terraform GitHub repository has seen a flurry of activity with numerous issues being reported and addressed. The project maintains a high level of engagement from both users and contributors, reflecting its widespread use and the complexity of infrastructure management it supports.
Version Upgrades and Compatibility: A significant number of issues relate to problems encountered after upgrading to newer versions of Terraform or its providers. For instance, issues like #36130 and #36124 highlight challenges with environment variable handling and AWS provider role assumptions in version 1.10.0.
Backend Configuration Challenges: Several issues, such as #35910 and #35915, discuss difficulties with backend configurations, particularly with Azure and PostgreSQL backends. These issues often involve authentication challenges or configuration nuances that require careful attention.
Feature Requests for Enhanced Functionality: There is a strong demand for new features or enhancements, such as improved test frameworks (#34759), better handling of sensitive data (#34860), and support for additional backend configurations (#35057).
Documentation and Usability Concerns: Issues like #35344 emphasize the need for clearer documentation, especially around complex features like plugin caching or backend configurations.
Testing and Validation Improvements: The community is actively seeking improvements in testing capabilities (#34850) and validation mechanisms (#34693), indicating a desire for more robust CI/CD integration and error handling.
State Management Complexity: Managing state files remains a complex task, with requests for better tools to handle state migrations (#35085) and resource refactoring (#34548).
terraform plan --generate-config-out
. Created 0 days ago.Overall, the recent activity reflects Terraform's dynamic development environment, where user feedback directly influences ongoing improvements and feature additions. The community's active participation ensures that Terraform continues to evolve in response to real-world infrastructure management challenges.
#36128: Update conditionals.mdx
#36127: templatefile
variables need to be unmarked for TypeFunc
templatefile
panics when given sensitive or ephemeral collections of variables. It addresses an issue with unmarking variables for TypeFunc.#36121: Fully parse input variables from TF_VAR_
when validating during apply
#36120: s3: fix S3 Object Lock header issue for lock file writes
#36119: relax import for_each validation
for_each
, addressing mismatches that exist in production configurations.#36104: command/views: Fix flaky hook tests
time.Sleep
.#36102: Remove a broken link
copy_file.go
.#36095: cleanup after v1.10.0-rc3
#36085: Concurrency-safe unpacking of TF providers
#36122 & #36118 (Backport): template variables may be entirely unknown
#36117 & #36116 (Release Preparation): Prepare and cleanup for 1.11.0-alpha20241127 release
#36099 & #36098 (Documentation Updates): Add changelog and version scripts; update region references in stacks documentation
#36096 (Backport): Add hint for difference of tuples and lists into types documentation
#36094 (Version Update): Prepare for 1.10.0-rc3 release
Overall, the project appears actively maintained with regular updates addressing both functionality and documentation improvements, reflecting its importance in infrastructure management workflows.
internal/lang/funcs/filesystem.go
fmt.Errorf
for error messages is good practice.github.com/bmatcuk/doublestar
and github.com/mitchellh/go-homedir
is justified for specific functionalities.internal/lang/funcs/filesystem_test.go
.github/workflows/checks.yml
scripts/changelog.sh
sed
with an empty string argument for in-place editing, which may not be portable across different Unix-like systems without GNU extensions.scripts/version-bump.sh
internal/getmodules/getter.go
tbz2
.internal/terraform/context_apply2_test.go
internal/terraform/node_resource_abstract.go
internal/terraform/transform_reference.go
GraphNodeReferenceable
..github/actions/equivalence-test/action.yml
James Bardin (jbardin)
main
, TF-18617
, jbardin/templatefile-marks
, and more.Radek Simko (radeksimko)
main
and t-fix-flaky-hooks-tests
.Rose M Koron (rkoron007)
Liam Cervante (liamcervante)
main
, liamcervante/release-testing
, and others.Daniel Schmidt (DanielMSchmidt)
tbz2
module archives, handled write-only attributes for ephemeral values, and improved ephemeral resource handling.TF-18617
and input-deprecation
.Manu Chandrasekhar (quixoticmonk)
Bruno Schaatsbergen (bschaatsbergen)
Craig Wright (crw)
Corsin Ragettli (corsin-ragettli)
Focus on Ephemeral Values: There is significant activity around handling ephemeral values, including their documentation, testing, and implementation. Multiple team members are involved in refining this feature.
Documentation Updates: Continuous updates are being made to the documentation to improve clarity and remove deprecated elements. This indicates a strong emphasis on maintaining accurate and up-to-date information for users.
Testing Enhancements: Several commits relate to improving test coverage and fixing flaky tests, highlighting a focus on ensuring code reliability and stability.
Collaboration Across Features: Team members frequently collaborate across different features such as template handling, module support, and backend improvements. This suggests a cohesive approach to development where multiple aspects of the project are addressed simultaneously.
Release Management: The team is actively preparing for releases by updating changelogs, managing version scripts, and ensuring that all changes are well-documented before deployment. This structured approach ensures smooth transitions between versions.
Overall, the development team is actively engaged in enhancing Terraform's functionality while maintaining robust documentation and testing practices. The focus on ephemeral values suggests ongoing efforts to introduce new capabilities or refine existing ones within the tool.