Quantify issues

Recent GitHub Issues Activity

_{Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.}

Rate pull requests

PR#253 - Add evaluate RAG with LlamaIndexopen

2_/5

Shilpa Kancharla (shilpakancharla)Created: 2024-08-13

The pull request introduces a new example notebook for evaluating RAG with LlamaIndex, which is a potentially useful addition to the repository. However, it suffers from several notable issues. The code contains type errors, such as accessing properties on strings that do not exist, which indicates a lack of thorough testing and review. Additionally, there are suggestions for improvements that have not been addressed, such as linking to relevant resources and pinning package versions to avoid future compatibility issues. The PR has also been marked as stale, suggesting a lack of responsiveness or progress. Overall, while the concept is promising, the execution is flawed and requires significant work before it can be considered a quality contribution.

[+] Read More

PR#322 - docs: update README.mdopen

2_/5

Ikko Eltociear Ashimine (eltociear)Created: 2024-11-14

The pull request addresses a minor typo correction in the README.md file, changing 'runing' to 'running'. While this correction improves the documentation's accuracy, it is an insignificant change with minimal impact on the overall project. Such a small fix does not warrant a higher rating as it neither introduces significant improvements nor affects functionality.

[+] Read More

PR#325 - Remove templates directoryopen

2_/5

Mark Daoust (MarkDaoust)Created: 2024-11-18

The pull request primarily involves removing two Jupyter notebook files from the 'templates' directory, which appears to be a straightforward deletion task. The PR lacks complexity or significant changes, as it does not introduce any new functionality or improvements. Additionally, the PR is still in draft status and is contingent on another PR being submitted first, indicating it might not be ready for final review. Given these factors, the PR is rated as 'Needs work' due to its insignificance and incomplete state.

[+] Read More

PR#339 - Highlighting the new sectionopen

2_/5

Guillaume Vernade (Giom-V)Created: 2024-12-12

The pull request introduces a minor visual change to the README file by highlighting a section title with LaTeX-style formatting. This change is insignificant in terms of functionality, does not improve the content's clarity or accessibility, and might even introduce rendering issues on platforms that do not support such formatting. The PR lacks substantial impact or necessity, thus warranting a low rating.

[+] Read More

PR#351 - Update README.mdopen

2_/5

Logan Kilpatrick (logankilpatrick)Created: 2024-12-14

The pull request makes a minor change to the README.md file, updating a link to the official SDKs. While this change is correct and improves the documentation slightly by providing a more direct link, it is insignificant in terms of overall project impact. The update does not introduce any new features, fix bugs, or enhance functionality. Such changes are routine and do not warrant a high rating as they do not significantly contribute to the project's development.

[+] Read More

PR#245 - Call Gemini in OpenAI format (via LiteLLM) - tool calling, image url's, etc. in docsopen

3_/5

Krish Dholakia (krrishdholakia)Created: 2024-07-22

The pull request adds documentation on using the LiteLLM SDK and proxy for calling Gemini in OpenAI format, which is a useful addition to the project. However, it lacks the requested Python notebook format, which is a significant oversight as per the review comments. The content is informative and covers various aspects like usage tracking and budget setting, but the failure to address the formatting request prevents it from being rated higher. Additionally, the PR has been marked as stale, indicating a lack of recent activity or response to feedback.

[+] Read More

PR#318 - Add Project IDX supportopen

3_/5

Rody Davis (rodydavis)Created: 2024-11-08

The pull request adds support for Project IDX, which is a moderately significant feature addition. It includes several new files and updates to existing ones, enhancing the project's functionality by allowing it to open in IDX as a template. However, there are notable issues raised in the review comments, such as file organization concerns and potential broken links, which indicate nontrivial flaws. The PR is average and unremarkable due to these issues, but it does provide some value with the new integration.

[+] Read More

PR#321 - Portkey AI integration with Geminiopen

3_/5

siddharth Sambharia (siddharthsambharia-portkey)Created: 2024-11-13

This pull request provides comprehensive documentation for integrating Portkey AI with Gemini's LLMs, highlighting key features and offering detailed examples. However, it primarily adds a single documentation file without any code changes or significant enhancements to the functionality of the project. The PR is well-structured and informative, but its impact is limited to documentation, which is why it merits an average rating.

[+] Read More

PR#344 - Use response.text and response.dataopen

3_/5

Mark Daoust (MarkDaoust)Created: 2024-12-12

This pull request introduces several improvements and cleanups, such as using a single output message queue, enhancing exception handling, and fixing color conversions. It also includes minor documentation updates. However, the changes are not particularly significant or groundbreaking, and there are some minor issues like a typo in function naming that could be improved. Overall, it is an average PR with useful but not critical enhancements.

[+] Read More

PR#343 - Minor typo correctionsopen

3_/5

Guillaume Vernade (Giom-V)Created: 2024-12-12

This pull request addresses minor typo corrections and link updates in Jupyter Notebooks within the project. While it improves documentation clarity, the changes are not significant or complex, involving only minor textual adjustments. The PR does not introduce new features or bug fixes, and its impact on the overall project is minimal. Therefore, it is rated as average, reflecting its unremarkable nature but acknowledging the importance of maintaining accurate documentation.

[+] Read More

Quantify commits

Quantified Commit Activity Over 14 Days

Developer	Avatar	Branches	PRs	Commits	Files	Changes
Guillaume Vernade		3	4/1/2	16	15	60294
Mark McDonald		2	7/6/1	9	10	6738
Vruddhi Shah		1	1/1/0	1	1	12
Logan Kilpatrick		3	2/1/0	3	2	8
Mark Daoust (MarkDaoust)		1	1/0/0	1	1	6
RobotLoveHuman		1	1/1/0	1	1	6
JaeHyun KIM (jh941213)		0	1/0/1	0	0	0

_{PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period}

Quantify risks

Project Risk Ratings

Report On: Fetch issues

Recent Activity Analysis

Recent GitHub issue activity for the google-gemini/cookbook project shows a mix of bug reports, feature requests, and help inquiries. Notably, there is a focus on issues related to API functionality, such as file uploads, JSON responses, and model behavior. Several issues highlight discrepancies between expected and actual API behavior, particularly concerning multimodal capabilities and response formats. There's also a notable interest in enhancing documentation and examples to better guide users in leveraging the API's features.

Anomalies and Themes

1. Missing or Incorrect Documentation: Issues like #346 and #140 indicate missing or incorrect documentation links, which can hinder users from accessing necessary information. This suggests a need for regular documentation audits.

2. Functionality Discrepancies: Several issues (#331, #327) report unexpected behavior in API responses, such as blank responses or repeated text generation. These point to potential bugs or misalignments between user expectations and API capabilities.

3. Feature Requests for Enhanced Examples: Requests like #340 and #156 highlight user demand for more comprehensive examples, particularly for complex tasks like parallel function calling and YouTube video analysis.

4. User Onboarding Challenges: Issue #145 underscores the need for a more cohesive onboarding experience to help new users navigate the setup process effectively.

5. Technical Limitations: Issues such as #141 reveal limitations in API usage quotas, impacting users with high-demand applications.

6. Community Contributions: There are suggestions for community-driven enhancements (#147), indicating active user engagement and willingness to contribute to the project.

Issue Details

• #350: Created 0 days ago by ChrisKyle; Status: Open

  • Priority: High due to broken link affecting user access to resources.
  • Description: A link in live_api_starter.ipynb points to a non-existing page, resulting in a 404 error.

• #345: Created 2 days ago by Soclatos; Status: Open

  • Priority: High due to potential bug in bounding box detection.
  • Description: Bounding boxes do not align with letter positions in image recognition tests using Gemini 2.0 API.

• #340: Created 2 days ago by JaeHyun KIM; Status: Open

  • Priority: Medium; Feature request for YouTube video analysis example.
  • Description: Proposal for an example using Gemini API for downloading and analyzing YouTube videos.

• #331: Created 10 days ago by Thomas; Last updated 1 day ago; Status: Open

  • Priority: High due to unexpected blank responses from API.
  • Description: Blank responses returned despite category filtering being turned off via API.

• #327: Created 23 days ago by Kashish; Last updated 12 days ago; Status: Open

  • Priority: Medium; Bug report on repeated text generation.
  • Description: Model generates repeated text until max token limit is reached.

• #320: Created 31 days ago by siddharth Sambharia; Last updated 12 days ago; Status: Open

  • Priority: Low; Feature request for integrating Gemini with Portkey AI.

These issues reflect ongoing challenges and opportunities for improvement within the project, emphasizing the importance of robust documentation, clear communication of API capabilities, and responsive support for user-reported bugs and feature requests.

Report On: Fetch pull requests

Analysis of Pull Requests for the "Gemini API Cookbook"

Open Pull Requests

Recent and Notable Open PRs

1. #351: Update README.md

   • State: Open
   • Created: 0 days ago
   • Description: Minor updates to the README.md, specifically updating links to official SDKs.
   • Concerns: None, as it is a straightforward documentation update.

2. #344: Use response.text and response.data

   • State: Open
   • Created: 2 days ago
   • Description: Significant updates across multiple files, including improvements in error handling and video output mentions.
   • Concerns: The PR involves substantial changes and has ongoing discussions about naming conventions. It requires careful review to ensure no breaking changes are introduced.

3. #343: Minor typo corrections

   • State: Open
   • Created: 2 days ago
   • Description: Fixes typos in several Jupyter Notebooks.
   • Concerns: None, but should be merged promptly to avoid conflicts with other documentation updates.

4. #253: Add evaluate RAG with LlamaIndex

   • State: Open
   • Created: 123 days ago
   • Description: Introduces an evaluation notebook for RAG with LlamaIndex.
   • Concerns: Marked as stale and awaiting response. Needs attention to either progress or close if no longer relevant.

5. #245: Call Gemini in OpenAI format (via LiteLLM)

   • State: Open
   • Created: 145 days ago
   • Description: Adds documentation for using LiteLLM with Gemini.
   • Concerns: Also marked as stale. Requires formatting as a Python notebook before further review.

Older Stale PRs

• PRs like #325 and #250 have been open for a significant time without activity. They are marked as stale and need resolution or closure to maintain repository hygiene.

Closed Pull Requests

Recently Closed and Noteworthy PRs

1. #349: Update live_api_starter.ipynb

   • State: Closed (Merged)
   • Description: Minor update to the live API starter notebook.
   • Significance: Ensures the notebook reflects current SDK capabilities.

2. #338: Fix BGR to RGB color space conversion

   • State: Closed (Merged)
   • Description: Corrected color space conversion in video feeds, fixing a blue tint issue.
   • Significance: Important fix for visual accuracy in video processing applications.

3. #336 & #335: Websocket Examples and Documentation Updates

   • Both PRs added examples and explanations for using websockets with the Gemini API.
   • These additions enhance the understanding of real-time data streaming capabilities.

4. #298 & #297 (Not Merged):

   • These were closed without merging due to inactivity or unresolved issues, highlighting the importance of timely follow-ups on contributions.

General Observations

• The repository is actively maintained, with regular contributions from both internal team members and external contributors.
• There is a clear focus on enhancing documentation, fixing bugs, and adding new features that align with the evolving capabilities of the Gemini API.
• Several PRs remain open due to pending reviews or required changes, indicating a need for more streamlined review processes or additional resources for timely evaluations.

Recommendations

• Prioritize reviewing and merging open PRs that address critical functionality or documentation improvements.
• Close stale PRs that have not seen activity after a reasonable period unless they are deemed critical.
• Encourage contributors to address review comments promptly to avoid their PRs becoming stale.
• Consider implementing automated reminders or a more structured review schedule to manage open PRs effectively.

This analysis provides an overview of current development activities within the "Gemini API Cookbook" repository, highlighting areas of focus and potential improvement in managing contributions.

Report On: Fetch Files For Assessment

Source Code Assessment

File: gemini-2/live_api_starter.ipynb

• Status: The file is 0 lines long and contains no content.
• Analysis: This file appears to be empty, which could indicate an issue with the repository or an oversight. It should be investigated to ensure that it is not missing critical content.

File: gemini-2/live_api_starter.py

• Length: 216 lines, 7114 characters.
• Structure and Quality:
  • The file is well-structured with clear separation of concerns, such as audio handling, video frame processing, and session management.
  • Uses asyncio for asynchronous operations, which is appropriate for handling I/O-bound tasks like audio and video streaming.
  • Contains detailed comments and installation instructions, improving readability and usability.
  • Includes error handling with traceback logging, which is crucial for debugging.
  • The use of Python's asyncio.TaskGroup and asyncio.ExceptionGroup ensures compatibility with older Python versions.
  • Overall, the code quality is high with a clear focus on functionality and maintainability.

File: gemini-2/websockets/live_api_starter.py

• Length: 244 lines, 8159 characters.
• Structure and Quality:
  • Similar structure to the previous Python script but adapted for websocket communication.
  • Includes a fix for color space conversion (BGR to RGB), addressing video color issues.
  • The use of JSON for message formatting and parsing indicates a robust approach to data interchange.
  • Well-documented with comments explaining key sections of the code.
  • Error handling is consistent with best practices, using exception logging and task cleanup callbacks.
  • The script demonstrates good use of asynchronous programming patterns.

File: quickstarts/Search_Grounding.ipynb

• Length: 411 lines, 12247 characters.
• Structure and Quality:
  • The notebook provides a comprehensive walkthrough of using the search grounding feature in the Gemini API.
  • Includes markdown cells for explanations and code cells for practical implementation, making it educational and interactive.
  • Proper use of Colab-specific features like secrets management for API keys enhances security practices.
  • The notebook is well-organized with clear headings and step-by-step instructions, suitable for users new to the API.

File: gemini-2/plotting_and_mapping.ipynb

• Status: The file is 0 lines long and contains no content.
• Analysis: Similar to the first file, this file is empty. It requires attention to determine if content has been mistakenly omitted.

File: gemini-2/spatial_understanding.ipynb

• Status: The file is 0 lines long and contains no content.
• Analysis: Another empty file that should be reviewed to ensure that important information or examples are not missing from the repository.

File: .github/workflows/stale.yml

• Length: 50 lines, 1975 characters.
• Structure and Quality:
  • This YAML configuration sets up a GitHub Actions workflow to manage stale issues and pull requests.
  • It uses the actions/stale action to automatically label and close inactive issues/PRs after a specified period.
  • The configuration includes customizable messages for marking as stale and closing items, which enhances communication with contributors.
  • Overall, the workflow is straightforward and effective for maintaining repository hygiene.

Summary

The repository contains a mix of well-documented code files and some empty Jupyter notebooks that need further investigation. The Python scripts demonstrate high-quality coding practices with asynchronous operations, error handling, and clear documentation. However, the presence of empty files suggests potential issues that should be addressed to ensure all intended content is available to users.

Report On: Fetch commits

Development Team and Recent Activity

Team Members and Recent Contributions

• Logan Kilpatrick (logankilpatrick)

  • Updated live_api_starter.ipynb in the main branch and logankilpatrick-patch-1 branch.
  • Updated README.md in the logankilpatrick-patch-2 branch.

• Mark McDonald (markmcd)

  • Added pip install text to starter Python scripts and fixed internal URLs.
  • Contributed to various files, including live_api_starter.py, websockets/live_api_starter.py, and Search_Grounding.ipynb.
  • Collaborated on the Gemini 2.0 notebooks with multiple co-authors.

• RobotLoveHuman (robotlovehuman)

  • Fixed a BGR to RGB color space conversion issue in live_api_starter.py.

• Guillaume Vernade (Giom-V)

  • Made significant contributions to the Gemini 2.0 notebooks, including adding new notebooks and updating existing ones.
  • Fixed typos and formatting issues across multiple files.

• Vruddhi Shah (Vruddhi18)

  • Proofread and improved formatting of the Gemini API Cookbook.

• Mark Daoust (MarkDaoust)

  • Made minor changes, such as simplifying code prints in notebooks.

Patterns, Themes, and Conclusions

1. Active Development on Gemini 2.0: There is a strong focus on developing and refining the Gemini 2.0 features, as evidenced by the numerous updates and additions to related notebooks and documentation.

2. Collaboration: Several team members have collaborated on significant updates, particularly for the Gemini 2.0 release, indicating a coordinated effort to enhance this major version.

3. Bug Fixes and Improvements: The team is actively addressing bugs (e.g., color space conversion issue) and improving existing resources (e.g., proofreading, formatting).

4. Documentation Enhancements: Updates to README files and introductory comments suggest an emphasis on improving documentation for better user guidance.

5. Incremental Updates: The team is making incremental improvements across various branches, reflecting ongoing maintenance and feature enhancement efforts.

Overall, the development team is actively engaged in enhancing the Gemini API's capabilities, focusing on both new feature development and existing resource improvements.