Quantify issues

Recent GitHub Issues Activity

_{Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.}

Rate pull requests

PR#935 - Added .gitattributesopen

2_/5

Jacques Verré (jverre)Created: 2024-12-19

The pull request adds a .gitattributes file to the repository, which is a minor change affecting language detection by GitHub's linguist tool. While it might be useful for specific repository management purposes, the change is insignificant in terms of code functionality or project enhancement. It does not introduce any new features, fix bugs, or improve performance. The PR is straightforward and lacks complexity, making it unremarkable and possibly unnecessary for most users. Thus, it deserves a rating of 2 as it is notably insignificant.

[+] Read More

PR#935 - Added .gitattributesopen

2_/5

Jacques Verré (jverre)Created: 2024-12-19

The pull request adds a .gitattributes file with three lines to exclude certain file types from linguist detection. While this might be useful for specific repository management purposes, the change is minor, affecting only configuration without any impact on functionality or code quality. The PR lacks significant contribution or complexity, and could have been part of a larger update. Thus, it is rated as needing work due to its limited scope and impact.

[+] Read More

PR#894 - [OPIK-287] Add project level aggregationsopen

3_/5

Thiago dos Santos Hora (thiagohora)Created: 2024-12-14

The pull request introduces project-level aggregations, which is a moderately significant change. However, it has several nontrivial flaws as highlighted by the reviewers. There are concerns about in-memory sorting, redundancy, and code organization. Additionally, some parts of the code are considered unnecessary or could be optimized. The PR includes a substantial amount of code changes, but the issues raised suggest that it is not yet polished or optimal. Therefore, it is rated as average.

[+] Read More

PR#919 - [OPIK-558] Typescript SDK - basic clientopen

3_/5

Fernando Carril (ferc)Created: 2024-12-18

This pull request introduces a basic setup for a TypeScript SDK, which is a significant addition to the project. It includes customization options for API key, host, and project name, and adds classes for logging traces and spans. However, it is clearly marked as a first draft, with the author indicating that further iterations and changes are expected. The PR also involves updates to code generation configurations and global headers. While these changes are foundational, they lack thorough documentation and testing details, and some minor issues were pointed out by reviewers. Overall, it is an average contribution that lays groundwork but requires further refinement.

[+] Read More

PR#934 - [OPIK-633] sdk add support for metadata field in prompt version resourceopen

4_/5

Aliaksandr Kuzmik (alexkuzmik)Created: 2024-12-19

The pull request adds a significant feature by introducing a 'metadata' parameter to the prompts API, which enhances the functionality of the SDK. The implementation is thorough, including updates to multiple files and comprehensive testing with both e2e and manual tests. The code changes are well-organized and address potential issues like circular imports. However, the PR could benefit from more detailed documentation or comments explaining the broader impact of this change on existing systems.

[+] Read More

Quantify commits

Quantified Commit Activity Over 14 Days

Developer	Avatar	Branches	PRs	Commits	Files	Changes
Jacques Verré		3	15/14/1	17	150	10532
Andres Cruz		1	4/4/0	4	267	7225
sasha		1	3/2/1	2	59	5143
Sasha		3	0/0/0	12	56	4915
andrii.dudar		1	20/20/0	20	105	4834
BorisTkachenko		1	14/15/0	15	114	3481
Thiago dos Santos Hora		2	6/7/0	15	42	3170
AndreiCautisanu		1	4/4/0	4	41	2108
Fernando Carril		2	4/3/0	9	39	1660
GitHub Actions		1	0/0/0	9	10	1611
Aliaksandr Kuzmik		2	11/10/0	15	56	1596
Alexander Barannikov		1	5/5/0	5	40	1290
Ido Berkovich		2	3/3/0	14	28	967
Boris Feld		1	7/7/0	7	17	567
Liya Katz		1	2/2/0	2	4	17
github-actions		1	0/0/0	8	1	16
518miker92		1	1/1/0	1	1	4
dependabot[bot]		1	1/1/0	1	1	2

_{PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period}

Quantify risks

Project Risk Ratings

Report On: Fetch issues

Recent Activity Analysis

Recent GitHub issue activity for the Opik project shows a diverse range of enhancements, bug reports, and feature requests. There is a notable focus on improving integrations with other frameworks like LangChain and OpenAI, as well as enhancing the user experience through UI improvements and additional functionalities. Several issues have been closed recently, indicating active maintenance and development.

Notable Issues and Themes

1. Integration Enhancements: Issues like #914 and #850 highlight ongoing efforts to integrate with popular tools such as Haystack and Neo4j, reflecting a trend towards expanding Opik's compatibility with other platforms.

2. User Experience Improvements: Multiple issues (#875, #862, #551) focus on enhancing the user interface and usability, such as adding new tags for prompts or improving filtering capabilities.

3. Bug Fixes: Several bug reports (#886, #834) indicate active debugging efforts, particularly around API key validation and data handling in local deployments.

4. Feature Expansion: Requests for new features like support for additional media formats (#567) and improved prompt handling (#866) suggest a community-driven push for broader functionality.

5. Performance Monitoring: Issues related to performance metrics (#673) and trace logging (#524) highlight the importance of monitoring and evaluating LLM applications effectively.

6. Community Engagement: The presence of detailed comments and discussions on issues like #861 and #836 indicates strong community involvement in shaping the project's direction.

Issue Details

• #914: Request for feedback on agent support enhancements; priority not specified; created 1 day ago.
• #905: Feature request to change experiment names; priority not specified; created 2 days ago.
• #886: Bug report on authentication error with Gemini model; priority not specified; created 6 days ago, updated 2 days ago.
• #876: Proposal for a Javascript SDK; priority not specified; created 7 days ago.
• #875: Feature request for production/staging tags; priority not specified; created 7 days ago.
• #871: Proposal for UI loop improvements; priority not specified; created 8 days ago, updated 7 days ago.
• #866: Feature request for output format fields in prompts; priority not specified; created 8 days ago, updated 3 days ago.
• #862: Feature request for prompt update descriptions; priority not specified; created 8 days ago.
• #858: Feature request to annotate traces with text comments; priority not specified; created 8 days ago.
• #602: Request for Dify integration support; priority not specified; created 38 days ago, updated 10 days ago.

Overall, Opik's issue activity reflects a dynamic project with ongoing enhancements and community engagement aimed at broadening its capabilities and improving user experience.

Report On: Fetch pull requests

Pull Request Analysis

Open Pull Requests

PR #935: Added .gitattributes

• State: Open
• Created by: Jacques Verré (jverre)
• Details: This pull request adds a .gitattributes file to the repository, which is used to control how Git interprets certain files. The file specifies that .java, .md, and .mdx files should not be detectable by linguist, which is a tool used by GitHub to determine the language of a repository.
• Notable Points: This PR is very recent (created 0 days ago) and seems straightforward with no apparent issues.

PR #934: [OPIK-633] SDK Add Support for Metadata Field in Prompt Version Resource

• State: Open
• Created by: Aliaksandr Kuzmik (alexkuzmik)
• Details: This PR introduces a metadata parameter to the prompts API and updates end-to-end tests. Manual tests were performed to verify UI visibility.
• Notable Points: The PR lacks assigned reviewers and assignees, which could delay the review process. It involves significant changes with 93 lines added and 28 removed across multiple files.

PR #919: [OPIK-558] Typescript SDK - Basic Client

• State: Open
• Created by: Fernando Carril (ferc)
• Details: This PR sets up an initial TypeScript/JavaScript SDK, including basic client functionality and support for different JS runtimes. It has been in development for 21 days, indicating ongoing work.
• Notable Points: There are several review comments suggesting improvements, such as maintaining a single .gitignore file and updating Fern to the latest version. The PR is still in draft form, with plans for further iterations.

PR #894: [OPIK-287] Add Project Level Aggregations

• State: Open
• Created by: Thiago dos Santos Hora (thiagohora)
• Details: This PR adds project-level aggregations. It has received several review comments suggesting code improvements and optimizations.
• Notable Points: The PR has been open for 5 days and involves complex logic changes, including sorting and aggregation functions. Reviewers have suggested using BigDecimal for monetary calculations to avoid precision issues.

Closed Pull Requests

PR #935: Added .gitattributes

• State: Closed
• Merged by: Jacques Verré (jverre)
• Details: Same as the open PR #935, but this one was closed after being merged. It was created and merged on the same day, indicating a quick review process.

PR #933: [OPIK-579] Change Component to Present Metadata

• State: Closed
• Merged by: Andrii Dudar (andriidudar)
• Details: This PR modifies a component to present metadata correctly. It was created and merged on the same day, suggesting it was a minor change or fix.

PR #932 & #931 & #930 & #929 & #928 & #927 & #926 & #925 & #924 & #923 & #922 & #921 & #920 & #918 & #917 & #916 & #915 & #913 & #912 & #911 & #910 & #909 & #908 & #907 & #906 & #904 & #903 & #902 & #901 & #900 & #899 & #898 & #897 & #896 & #895:

These pull requests were all closed within the last few days. They cover various improvements, bug fixes, and feature additions across the Opik project. Notably: - Several PRs (#933, #932, etc.) were related to UI enhancements or bug fixes. - Some (#930, etc.) involved documentation updates or minor configuration changes. - A few (#921, etc.) introduced new features or significant backend changes.

Notable Issues

1. Closed Without Merge:

   • PRs like #920 were closed without being merged. This might indicate that changes were either not needed anymore or incorporated through another branch/PR.

2. Review Comments and Suggestions:

   • Several open PRs have pending review comments that need addressing before they can be merged. For instance, suggestions for code optimization in PRs like #894 should be considered to ensure code quality.

3. Lack of Assignees/Reviewers:

   • Some open PRs lack assignees or reviewers (e.g., PRs like #934), which could delay their progress through the review pipeline.

Overall, while there are active developments and improvements being made in the Opik project, attention should be given to addressing review comments promptly and ensuring all open pull requests have designated reviewers to facilitate smoother integration into the main codebase.

Report On: Fetch Files For Assessment

Source Code Assessment

1. exception_analyzer.py

• Purpose: This file provides a utility function to determine if an exception is related to rate limiting from LLM providers.
• Structure: The file is concise, with a single function is_llm_provider_rate_limit_error.
• Quality:
  • The function uses isinstance checks and attribute access to identify rate limit errors.
  • It handles exceptions from both OpenAI and LiteLLM, indicating awareness of multiple LLM providers.
  • The code is clear and well-commented, making it easy to understand the intent.
• Improvements: None needed for such a simple utility function.

2. litellm_chat_model.py

• Purpose: Implements a chat model using LiteLLM, wrapping around the litellm.completion function.
• Structure:
  • Inherits from a base model class and initializes with model-specific parameters.
  • Provides synchronous and asynchronous methods for generating responses.
• Quality:
  • Uses Python's cached_property for efficient parameter retrieval.
  • Includes detailed docstrings explaining method purposes and arguments.
  • Handles unsupported parameters gracefully with logging.
  • Contains version checks for compatibility, showing robustness in handling different provider versions.
• Improvements:
  • Consider adding more detailed error handling or logging in async methods for consistency.

3. scorer.py

• Purpose: Handles scoring of test cases using various metrics, potentially in parallel.
• Structure:
  • Defines functions for processing items and scoring tasks/test cases.
  • Uses concurrency for performance optimization.
• Quality:
  • Well-organized with clear separation between task processing and scoring logic.
  • Utilizes logging effectively to trace metric calculations and errors.
  • Incorporates exception handling with specific checks for rate limit errors.
• Improvements:
  • Ensure all exceptions are logged at appropriate levels (e.g., warning vs. error).
  • Consider modularizing further if additional functionality is added.

4. PromptTab.tsx

• Purpose: A React component managing the display and interaction of prompt versions on the frontend.
• Structure:
  • Uses hooks for state management and side effects (e.g., useEffect).
  • Integrates with APIs to fetch prompt versions and manage dialog states.
• Quality:
  • Code is well-organized with clear separation of UI logic and data fetching.
  • Utilizes TypeScript interfaces for type safety, enhancing maintainability.
• Improvements:
  • Consider refactoring repeated logic into custom hooks or utility functions for reusability.

5. test_dataset_items_crud_operations.py

• Purpose: End-to-end tests for CRUD operations on dataset items using Playwright and Pytest.
• Structure:
  • Tests are parameterized to cover multiple scenarios (e.g., UI vs. SDK operations).
  • Includes utility functions for common operations like waiting for dataset visibility.
• Quality:
  • Comprehensive coverage of CRUD operations, ensuring robustness of dataset management features.
  • Uses assertions effectively to validate expected outcomes across different interfaces (UI/SDK).
• Improvements:
  • Ensure test descriptions are updated as functionality evolves to maintain clarity.

6. PromptVersion.java

• Purpose: Java record representing a version of a prompt in the backend API.
• Structure:
  • Uses annotations extensively for JSON serialization/deserialization and validation constraints.
• Quality:
  • Leverages Java's record feature for concise data representation with immutability benefits.
  • Annotations provide clear documentation of field purposes and constraints (e.g., validation patterns).
• Improvements:
  • None apparent; the use of records and annotations is appropriate for this context.

7. ProjectMetricsDAO.java

• Purpose: DAO class responsible for retrieving project metrics from the database asynchronously.
• Structure:
  • Defines multiple SQL queries as constants, executed via reactive programming constructs (Reactor).
• Quality:
  • Efficient use of reactive streams (Mono) for non-blocking database interactions.
  • SQL queries are parameterized and utilize templates for flexibility across different time intervals.
• Improvements:
  • Consider abstracting common query logic into helper methods to reduce duplication.

8. PromptWrite.d.ts

• Purpose: TypeScript interface defining the structure of a prompt write request in the API client SDK.
• Structure:
  • Simple interface with optional fields, providing flexibility in API requests.
• Quality:
  • Clearly documents expected fields with optionality where applicable, aiding in API integration efforts.
• Improvements:
  • None needed; serves its purpose as a type definition effectively.

Overall, the code across these files demonstrates good practices in terms of structure, clarity, and maintainability. Minor improvements could be made in some areas to enhance modularity or consistency in error handling/logging.

Report On: Fetch commits

Development Team and Recent Activity

Team Members and Recent Activities

1. Aliaksandr Kuzmik (alexkuzmik)

   • Worked on improving UX for SDK, adding support for metadata in prompt version resources, and error tracking in evaluate calls.
   • Collaborated with Andrei Căutișanu on prompts CRUD tests.
   • Engaged in multiple branches with a focus on enhancing SDK functionalities and fixing lint errors.

2. Andrii Dudar (andriidudar)

   • Focused on frontend improvements such as adding duration charts, sorting dynamic columns, and UX enhancements.
   • Worked on prompts library features and experiments page improvements.
   • Active in multiple branches with significant contributions to UI components.

3. Andrei Căutișanu

   • Contributed to end-to-end tests for datasets and experiments.
   • Collaborated with Aliaksandr Kuzmik on prompts CRUD tests.
   • Engaged in test automation and linting activities.

4. Boris Tkachenko (BorisTkachenko)

   • Worked on backend enhancements like adding new fields to prompt versions and updating API key endpoints.
   • Involved in autogenerated code updates and SDK improvements.
   • Contributed to multiple branches focusing on backend services.

5. Boris Feld (Lothiraldan)

   • Added documentation for various integrations like aisuite and Dify.
   • Worked on cost tracking documentation and other doc updates.
   • Primarily focused on enhancing documentation.

6. Fernando Carril (ferc)

   • Upgraded versions, improved project name management, and worked on TypeScript SDK enhancements.
   • Engaged in frontend dependency upgrades and minor version increments.

7. Sasha (aadereiko)

   • Worked on playground UI improvements, proxy support, and configuration pages.
   • Focused on frontend enhancements related to playground functionalities.

8. Jacques Verré (jverre)

   • Updated documentation extensively, including changelogs and roadmap updates.
   • Worked on performance tests and error logging improvements.
   • Actively involved in documentation updates across multiple branches.

9. Alexander Barannikov (japdubengsub)

   • Implemented error tracking for decorators and added new evaluation metrics.
   • Contributed to SDK enhancements related to evaluation metrics.

10. Thiago dos Santos Hora (thiagohora)

    • Added project-level aggregations, fixed Redis lock keys leak, and enhanced project metrics.
    • Focused on backend services with significant contributions to metrics and resource tests.

11. Ido Berkovich (idoberko2)

    • Worked on project metrics, sorting enhancements, and batch actions for prompts.
    • Engaged in backend service improvements related to project metrics.

12. Jacques Verré (jverre)

    • Updated documentation extensively, including changelogs and roadmap updates.
    • Worked on performance tests and error logging improvements.

Patterns, Themes, and Conclusions

• The development team is actively engaged in both frontend and backend enhancements with a strong focus on improving user experience, adding new features, and maintaining robust documentation.
• Collaboration is evident among team members, especially in areas like testing, SDK development, and feature implementation across different branches.
• There is a consistent effort towards integrating new technologies and frameworks into the platform while ensuring existing functionalities are refined through bug fixes and UX improvements.
• Documentation is a key focus area, with regular updates to ensure users have access to the latest information regarding platform capabilities and usage guidelines.