Quantify issues

Recent GitHub Issues Activity

_{Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.}

Rate pull requests

PR#116 - keep consistent with 'ner.py' to avoid errors when language='zh'open

2_/5

thundax (thundax-lyp)Created: 2024-12-10

The pull request addresses a minor inconsistency in language handling by aligning the 'zh' template with the 'en' template. The change is trivial, involving only a few lines of code, and does not introduce any significant new functionality or improvements. The PR lacks thoroughness, as it does not provide tests or documentation updates to ensure the changes work as intended. Additionally, merging branches multiple times without substantial changes suggests a lack of focus on impactful development. Overall, the PR is insignificant and requires more substantial contributions to be rated higher.

[+] Read More

PR#64 - Update Readmeopen

3_/5

luzizhuoCreated: 2024-11-21

This pull request updates the README file by restructuring its content and adding a logo image. The changes improve the visual appeal and organization of the document, making it easier to navigate and understand. However, the modifications are primarily cosmetic and do not introduce any significant new information or functionality to the project. The technical content remains largely unchanged, and while the reorganization is beneficial, it does not warrant a higher rating due to its limited impact on the overall project. Therefore, this PR is rated as average.

[+] Read More

PR#118 - fix(solver): fix graph p zh nameopen

3_/5

royzhaoCreated: 2024-12-12

This pull request involves a moderate number of changes across several files, primarily focusing on bug fixes and improvements in logic handling. The changes include updates to similarity evaluation, logic execution, and entity handling. While these changes are necessary and improve the functionality, they do not introduce significant new features or optimizations that would warrant a higher rating. Additionally, the PR lacks detailed documentation or comments explaining the rationale behind some changes, which could aid future maintenance. Overall, it is an average PR with necessary but unremarkable improvements.

[+] Read More

PR#141 - feat(builder): update outline splitteropen

3_/5

Xinhong Zhang (northmachine)Created: 2024-12-18

This pull request introduces significant changes to the markdown parser, including refactoring and enhancements like improved chunk handling and table parsing. The code is fairly well-structured with clear method definitions and logical flow. However, it lacks sufficient documentation for some new methods, which could hinder understanding for future maintainers. Additionally, while the changes are substantial, they do not introduce groundbreaking functionality or optimizations that would warrant a higher rating.

[+] Read More

PR#177 - update(kag) update kag_config.yaml for examplesopen

3_/5

田常@蚂蚁 (caszkgui)Created: 2024-12-27

The pull request primarily involves updates to YAML configuration files and minor code changes across multiple files. While it touches a significant number of files, the changes are mostly related to renaming and updating configuration settings rather than introducing new features or fixing critical bugs. The modifications seem to be part of a broader refactoring or standardization effort, which is useful but not particularly innovative or complex. Therefore, this PR is average in its impact and complexity.

[+] Read More

PR#71 - feat(builder): add namespace for extracted subgraphsopen

4_/5

zhuzhongshu123Created: 2024-11-25

The pull request introduces a significant feature by adding namespaces to extracted subgraphs, which enhances the clarity and organization of graph nodes. The changes are well-structured, with clear implementation of the new functionality across multiple files. The code modifications are substantial, with 73 lines added and 25 removed, indicating a thorough update. However, the PR lacks detailed documentation or comments explaining the changes, which could aid future maintenance and understanding. Overall, it's a solid improvement with minor areas for enhancement.

[+] Read More

PR#88 - feat(solver): support math opeatoropen

4_/5

royzhaoCreated: 2024-11-29

The pull request introduces a significant feature by adding support for mathematical operations using SymPy, which enhances the solver's capabilities. It includes comprehensive changes with new files and modifications across several modules, demonstrating a well-thought-out implementation. The addition of tests indicates attention to quality assurance. However, the PR could benefit from more detailed documentation or comments within the code to improve maintainability and understanding for future developers.

[+] Read More

PR#174 - refactor(all): kag v0.6open

4_/5

zhuzhongshu123Created: 2024-12-26

This pull request represents a significant refactor and enhancement of the KAG project, introducing numerous improvements and new features over a substantial period. The changes are extensive, involving multiple components, test cases, and documentation updates, indicating thoroughness and attention to detail. However, the lack of a diff makes it challenging to assess the quality of individual code changes in terms of coding standards and potential bugs. While the PR is quite good and impactful, the absence of visible code diffs prevents a perfect score.

[+] Read More

Quantify commits

Quantified Commit Activity Over 14 Days

Developer	Avatar	Branches	PRs	Commits	Files	Changes
None (zhuzhongshu123)		6	33/32/0	37	88	174978
Xinhong Zhang (northmachine)		7	1/0/0	37	456	84222
Donghai (youdonghai)		2	1/0/1	14	64	8850
royzhao		4	0/0/0	32	130	8517
田常@蚂蚁		5	3/2/0	17	51	1411
None (xionghuaidong)		1	1/1/0	2	10	285
FishJoy		2	0/0/0	6	1	80
quanqing		1	0/0/0	1	1	13
matthewhyx		1	0/0/0	1	1	9
Chasing		1	2/1/1	1	1	6

_{PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period}

Quantify risks

Project Risk Ratings

Report On: Fetch issues

Recent Activity Analysis

Recent GitHub issue activity for the OpenSPG/KAG project shows a mix of feature requests, bug reports, and user inquiries, indicating active engagement from both the development team and the community. Notably, several issues have been closed recently, suggesting ongoing maintenance and resolution efforts.

Notable Issues and Themes

1. Feature Requests and Enhancements: Several issues (#171, #152, #130) focus on enhancing user experience and functionality, such as integrating a visual query builder and syntax highlighting for schemas. These suggest a focus on improving accessibility and usability for non-technical users.

2. Technical Challenges: Issues like #143 and #104 highlight technical challenges users face, such as integration failures with specific data formats or models, and context limit errors during processing. These indicate areas where the system's robustness could be improved.

3. Schema and Model Integration: There are multiple discussions (#126, #93) around schema definitions and model performance, reflecting ongoing efforts to refine how KAG integrates with various data structures and machine learning models.

4. System Performance and Errors: Issues like #151 and #100 point to performance bottlenecks and inconsistencies in query results across different projects, suggesting a need for optimization in handling large datasets or complex queries.

5. Community Engagement: The presence of detailed user feedback and collaborative problem-solving (e.g., comments on #94, #53) indicates a strong community involvement in the project's development process.

Issue Details

• #171: Created 2 days ago; focuses on enhancing user experience with a visual query builder.
• #170: Created 2 days ago; lacks detailed description.
• #162: Created 3 days ago; discusses alternative approaches to current logic form plans.
• #161: Created 3 days ago; inquires about KAG's performance compared to Microsoft's Lazy GraphRAG.
• #152: Created 4 days ago; proposes integrating VSCode syntax highlighting for schemas.
• #143: Created 9 days ago; reports issues with document processing using medical templates in financial domains.
• #130: Created 11 days ago; requests additional metadata in Q&A results.
• #126: Created 14 days ago; seeks guidance on schema mapping for entity relationships.

These issues reflect a blend of strategic enhancements, technical troubleshooting, and user-driven feature requests that collectively shape the project's roadmap.

Report On: Fetch pull requests

Analysis of Pull Requests for OpenSPG/KAG

Open Pull Requests

1. #177: update(kag) update kag_config.yaml for examples

   • State: Open
   • Created: 0 days ago
   • Details: This PR involves updates to kag_config.yaml for various examples, with significant line changes across multiple files. The frequent updates and merges from the base branch suggest active development. However, the high number of line changes (+665, -506) could introduce potential integration issues that need careful review.

2. #174: refactor(all): kag v0.6

   • State: Open
   • Created: 2 days ago
   • Details: A major refactor targeting version 0.6, involving extensive changes (+57062, -14450). This PR includes numerous commits over a long period (51 days), indicating a comprehensive overhaul. The large scope and duration may lead to complex merge conflicts or integration challenges.

3. #141: feat(builder): update outline splitter

   • State: Open
   • Created: 9 days ago
   • Details: Focuses on updating the markdown parser with moderate line changes (+274, -126). The recent edits suggest ongoing adjustments, which may require thorough testing to ensure stability.

4. #88: feat(solver): support math operator

   • State: Open
   • Created: 28 days ago
   • Details: Introduces support for math operations using sympy, with several new files added. The inclusion of tests is a positive sign, but the lack of recent activity might indicate stalled progress or pending reviews.

5. #118: fix(solver): fix graph p zh name

   • State: Open
   • Created: 15 days ago
   • Details: Addresses a naming issue in graph processing with moderate line changes (+93, -61). The focus on bug fixes suggests this PR is critical for resolving specific functional issues.

6. #116: keep consistent with 'ner.py' to avoid errors when language='zh'

   • State: Open
   • Created: 17 days ago
   • Details: Ensures consistency in language handling to prevent errors, with minimal line changes (+3, -1). This PR seems straightforward but essential for maintaining language support integrity.

7. #71: feat(builder): add namespace for extracted subgraphs

   • State: Open
   • Created: 32 days ago
   • Details: Adds namespace handling for subgraphs, which could enhance data organization and retrieval efficiency. However, the prolonged open status suggests possible dependency on other changes or pending reviews.

8. #64: Update Readme

   • State: Open
   • Created: 36 days ago
   • Details: Updates the README structure and adds a logo, reflecting efforts to improve documentation and project presentation.

Recently Closed Pull Requests

1. #176: feat(common): remove config key check

   • State: Closed (Merged)
   • Created & Closed: 0 days ago
   • Significance: This quick merge indicates an urgent change to remove configuration key checks, potentially addressing immediate usability or compatibility issues.

2. #173: chore(kag): merge master

   • State: Closed (Merged)
   • Created & Closed: 2 days ago
   • Significance: A routine merge from master into a development branch, likely aimed at synchronizing recent updates and ensuring alignment with ongoing work.

3. #172 & #169 & #168 & #167 & #166 & #165 & #164 & #163 & #159 & #158 & #157 & #156 & #155 & #154 & #153 & #149 & #148 & #147 & #146 & #145 & #144 & #142 & #140 & #139 & #138 & #137 & #136 & #135 & #134 & #133 & #132 & #131 & #128

   • These PRs were closed within the last few days and cover a range of bug fixes, feature additions, and refactoring efforts.
   • Notably, several PRs involve updates to components like vectorizers and checkpointers (#127), indicating ongoing enhancements to core functionalities.
   • The closure of multiple PRs in quick succession suggests an active release cycle or preparation for a significant version update.

Notable Observations

• The project is undergoing substantial development with major refactoring (#174) and feature additions (#88).
• Several open PRs have been stagnant for extended periods (#71), highlighting potential bottlenecks that may need attention.
• Recent closed PRs indicate a focus on improving stability and functionality through bug fixes and minor enhancements.
• Documentation improvements (#64) reflect an emphasis on accessibility and user engagement.

Overall, the OpenSPG/KAG project shows signs of active development with a mix of strategic enhancements and routine maintenance tasks being addressed through its pull requests.

Report On: Fetch Files For Assessment

Analysis of Source Code Files

1. logic_node_parser.py

• Structure and Organization: The file is well-organized into classes representing different types of logic nodes (GetSPONode, FilterNode, CountNode, etc.). Each class encapsulates the logic for parsing and handling specific operations, which is a good practice for maintainability and readability.

• Code Quality:

  • The use of static methods for parsing (parse_node, parse_node_spo, etc.) is appropriate as these methods do not rely on instance-specific data.
  • The code uses type hints, which improves readability and helps with static analysis tools.
  • There are multiple NotImplementedError exceptions for methods like to_dsl(), indicating that subclasses should implement these methods. This is a good design choice to enforce implementation in derived classes.

• Error Handling: The code raises RuntimeError when parsing fails, which is clear and provides useful error messages. However, using custom exception classes could provide more context-specific error handling.

• Potential Improvements:

  • The file could benefit from more comments or docstrings explaining the purpose of each class and method, especially for complex parsing logic.
  • Consider refactoring repeated logic (e.g., parsing patterns) into utility functions to reduce code duplication.

2. kag_retriever.py

• Structure and Organization: The file defines the DefaultRetriever class, which extends ChunkRetrieverABC. It is well-structured with methods clearly separated by functionality (e.g., entity recognition, score calculation).

• Code Quality:

  • The use of decorators like @retry from the tenacity library is a robust way to handle transient errors in network calls.
  • Type hints are used extensively, which aids in understanding the expected input and output types.

• Error Handling: The code logs errors using Python's logging module, which is a good practice for tracking issues without interrupting execution flow. However, more granular logging levels (e.g., info, warning) could be used to differentiate between types of log messages.

• Potential Improvements:

  • Some methods like calculate_combined_scores could benefit from additional inline comments explaining the logic behind calculations.
  • Consider breaking down large methods into smaller helper functions to improve readability and testability.

3. main_solver.py

• Structure and Organization: This file serves as an entry point for invoking the solver pipeline. It is concise and straightforward.

• Code Quality:

  • The use of descriptive variable names (project_id, task_id, etc.) makes the code easy to follow.
  • The main method (invoke) orchestrates various components effectively but lacks detailed comments or docstrings.

• Error Handling: There is no explicit error handling in this file. It would be beneficial to add try-except blocks around critical operations to handle potential failures gracefully.

• Potential Improvements:

  • Adding docstrings to describe the purpose of the invoke method and its parameters would enhance clarity.
  • Consider adding logging statements to track the progress and outcome of the invocation process.

4. kag_extractor.py

• Structure and Organization: The file defines the KAGExtractor class with methods for named entity recognition, standardization, and triple extraction. It follows a logical flow from initialization to extraction processes.

• Code Quality:

  • The use of properties (input_types, output_types) provides a clear interface for expected input/output formats.
  • Methods are decorated with @retry, indicating resilience against transient failures during remote service calls.

• Error Handling: Exceptions are logged, but there is room for improvement by categorizing different types of exceptions (e.g., network vs. processing errors).

• Potential Improvements:

  • More detailed comments or docstrings would help explain complex operations like subgraph assembly.
  • Refactoring long methods into smaller units could improve readability and maintainability.

5. kag_config.yaml

• Structure and Organization: As a configuration file, it likely contains key-value pairs setting up parameters for various components. It should be organized logically with sections clearly delineated.

• Code Quality:

  • Ensure that keys are descriptive and values are appropriately formatted (e.g., strings, numbers).

• Potential Improvements:

  • Comments explaining the purpose of each configuration setting would be beneficial for users modifying this file.

Overall, the source code files demonstrate good practices in terms of structure and organization but could benefit from enhanced documentation and error handling strategies.

Report On: Fetch commits

Repo Commits Analysis

Development Team and Recent Activity

Team Members and Activities

1. 田常@蚂蚁 (caszkgui)

   • Recent work includes renaming testset files, updating documentation, and modifying YAML configurations for examples.
   • Active in multiple branches, with significant contributions to issue templates and configuration updates.

2. Chasing (zzzcccxx)

   • Made a minor fix in the solver logic related to parameter adjustments.

3. zhuzhongshu123

   • Extensive activity across multiple branches, focusing on merging master changes, fixing bugs, and refining the builder components.
   • Involved in significant code refactoring and configuration updates.

4. huaidong.xhd (xionghuaidong)

   • Contributed to benchmarking utilities and updated response generation prompts.

5. Xinhong Zhang (northmachine)

   • Engaged in extensive code refactoring, merging branches, and enhancing the markdown reader.
   • Significant involvement in integrating knext features into the project.

6. Donghai (youdonghai)

   • Focused on solver enhancements and table reasoner implementations.
   • Active in updating configuration files and merging branch changes.

7. royzhao

   • Contributed to solver improvements, including SPO retrieval enhancements and chunk retrieval logic.
   • Engaged in debugging and refining retrieval algorithms.

8. FishJoy (fishjoy)

   • Minor updates to the main solver logic with demo-related changes.

9. matthewhyx

   • Made a small update to the main solver file.

10. quanqing (sjnn12138)

    • Added custom functions related to mathematical operations in the solver logic.

Patterns, Themes, and Conclusions

• The development team is actively engaged in enhancing the KAG framework's capabilities, focusing on logical reasoning and retrieval improvements.
• There is a strong emphasis on refining existing features, fixing bugs, and improving documentation across various branches.
• Collaboration among team members is evident through frequent merges and updates across multiple branches.
• The project exhibits a structured approach towards integrating new features while maintaining existing functionalities.
• Recent activities indicate ongoing efforts to optimize performance, enhance user experience, and expand the framework's applicability in professional domains.