CopilotKit is a software project under the CopilotKit organization on GitHub, designed to provide a comprehensive React UI and infrastructure for integrating AI assistants into applications. It supports functionalities like chatbots and AI-powered text areas, primarily using TypeScript. The project is open-source under the MIT License. Currently, CopilotKit is in an active development phase with a strong focus on documentation, community engagement, and feature expansion.
Tyler Slaton (tylerslaton)
coagents-v0.3
.Ariel Weinberger (arielweinberger)
Csaba Toth (MrCsabaToth)
Ran Shemtov (ranst91)
Markus Ecker (mme)
Nathan Tarbert (NathanTarbert)
Atai Barkai (ataibarkai)
Suhas Deshpande (suhasdeshpande)
Renovate Bot (renovate[bot])
Timespan | Opened | Closed | Comments | Labeled | Milestones |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7 Days | 5 | 17 | 12 | 1 | 1 |
30 Days | 17 | 32 | 42 | 1 | 1 |
90 Days | 61 | 91 | 215 | 2 | 1 |
1 Year | 202 | 147 | 832 | 14 | 1 |
All Time | 228 | 154 | - | - | - |
Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.
Developer | Avatar | Branches | PRs | Commits | Files | Changes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
renovate[bot] | 2 | 0/0/0 | 2 | 8 | 8919 | |
Markus Ecker | 4 | 2/1/1 | 18 | 109 | 5265 | |
Ran Shemtov | 3 | 4/1/1 | 8 | 40 | 1147 | |
Tyler Slaton | 2 | 8/7/1 | 8 | 17 | 963 | |
Suhas Deshpande | 4 | 5/2/2 | 6 | 9 | 138 | |
Csaba Toth | 1 | 1/1/0 | 1 | 2 | 41 | |
Ariel Weinberger | 1 | 1/1/0 | 5 | 3 | 20 | |
Atai Barkai | 1 | 0/0/0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Nathan Tarbert | 1 | 0/0/1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
None (github-actions[bot]) | 0 | 0/0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period
Risk | Level (1-5) | Rationale |
---|---|---|
Delivery | 3 | The project faces moderate delivery risks due to a backlog of unresolved issues, with 74 open issues indicating ongoing challenges. The lack of structured issue tracking and prioritization further complicates delivery timelines. However, the recent improvement in issue resolution velocity and active pull request management suggest efforts to mitigate these risks. |
Velocity | 3 | The project's velocity shows signs of improvement, with more issues being closed than opened in the last 90 days. However, the presence of 33 open pull requests and the draft status of significant updates like React 19 integration indicate potential bottlenecks that could slow progress if not addressed promptly. |
Dependency | 3 | Dependency risks are moderate, with automated dependency updates by Renovate[bot] helping manage these risks. However, the ongoing draft status of updates like React 19 integration suggests potential delays in managing dependencies effectively. The reliance on external frameworks for feature requests also poses risks if not integrated smoothly. |
Team | 3 | Team-related risks are present but manageable. The high volume of comments on issues suggests active communication but also potential disagreements or misunderstandings. The involvement of multiple contributors indicates good collaboration, yet uneven workload distribution could lead to burnout or dissatisfaction if not managed properly. |
Code Quality | 2 | Code quality appears strong, with recent pull requests showing robust implementations and thorough documentation. However, the lack of detailed peer reviews on some commits raises concerns about overlooked issues or missed opportunities for further enhancement. |
Technical Debt | 3 | Technical debt is a concern due to unresolved bugs and feature requests indicating potential code quality issues. While efforts are being made to address these through active development and documentation improvements, the volume of open issues suggests ongoing challenges in managing technical debt effectively. |
Test Coverage | 3 | Test coverage is generally good, with several pull requests passing all tests with a 100% success rate. However, the lack of detailed peer reviews and changesets in some updates could lead to gaps in test coverage, particularly for edge cases or error scenarios. |
Error Handling | 2 | Error handling is robust in recent updates, with successful test pass rates indicating effective error management. However, the absence of comprehensive peer reviews might leave some error scenarios unaddressed, posing minor risks if not thoroughly tested. |
Recent GitHub issue activity for the CopilotKit project shows a mix of feature requests, bug reports, and documentation improvements. The project is actively maintained, with a variety of contributors engaging in discussions and submitting pull requests. Notably, there is a strong focus on enhancing documentation and improving user experience through UI adjustments and new feature integrations.
Overall, the CopilotKit project is actively evolving with community-driven enhancements and bug fixes, alongside a strong push for improved documentation to support its growing user base.
#1168: fix: rename py sdk class
#1165: fix: use react 19 for all cpk packages
#1160: feat: allow dynamic runtime actions via async ActionsConfiguration
#1156: [CPK-1034] adds useCopilotAuthenticatedAction
#1154: Tyler/athena changes
#1112: fix(deps): update core dependencies (major)
#1175: docs(v0.3): add image documenting changes visually
#1174: Update CODEOWNERS
#1172: docs(tabs): add new tabs component with more custom styling
#1166: fix: change button and add docs faq link
#1158: Implementing Empty Service Adapter
The CopilotKit project demonstrates active development with a focus on both feature enhancement and maintenance through dependency updates. However, attention should be given to the inclusion of changesets in open PRs to facilitate proper version management and integration processes. The recently closed PRs highlight continuous improvements in documentation and UI components, contributing positively to the project's usability and developer experience.
docs/components/react/tabs.tsx
Tabs
and Tab
components.TabProps
, TabItem
, TabsProps
) enhances type safety and code readability.localStorage
is implemented correctly, with consideration for browser environments.tabGroups
is functional but could be improved for scalability and maintainability.localStorage
to prevent potential issues in environments where it might be disabled.CopilotKit/packages/runtime/src/service-adapters/experimental/empty/empty-adapter.ts
ExperimentalEmptyAdapter
correctly implements the CopilotServiceAdapter
interface.process
method returns a minimal response, fulfilling its purpose as a no-op adapter.CopilotKit/packages/runtime/src/lib/logger.ts
createLogger
allows customization of log levels and component tagging, enhancing flexibility.LOG_LEVEL
) provides configurability based on deployment settings.examples/coagents-research-canvas/agent/research_canvas/chat.py
chat_node
for handling chat interactions in a research context.SystemMessage
to improve readability, possibly by extracting it into a separate template or configuration file.CopilotKit/packages/react-core/src/hooks/use-coagent-state-render.ts
.github/workflows/preview-envs-deploy.yml
build_images
, cdk_deploy
) with clear conditional steps based on matrix configurations.cancel-in-progress: true
) to optimize resource usage during frequent pull request updates.This assessment provides a detailed analysis of each file, highlighting strengths and areas for potential improvement. Overall, the codebase demonstrates good practices in terms of structure, organization, and documentation.
Tyler Slaton (tylerslaton)
coagents-v0.3
branch.Ariel Weinberger (arielweinberger)
Csaba Toth (MrCsabaToth)
Ran Shemtov (ranst91)
Markus Ecker (mme)
coagents-v0.3
.Nathan Tarbert (NathanTarbert)
Atai Barkai (ataibarkai)
Suhas Deshpande (suhasdeshpande)
Renovate Bot (renovate[bot])
Overall, the team is actively engaged in both feature development and maintenance tasks, with a strong emphasis on documentation and CI/CD improvements.