‹ Reports
The Dispatch

GitHub Repo Analysis: exo-explore/exo


Executive Summary

The "exo" project by exo-explore is an innovative software solution that enables users to create AI clusters using everyday devices, such as smartphones and computers, without relying on expensive hardware. It features dynamic model partitioning, automatic device discovery, and a ChatGPT-compatible API. The project is experimental, community-driven, and licensed under the GNU GPL v3.0. It has gained significant attention on GitHub with over 19,000 stars.

Recent Activity

Team Members and Their Activities

  1. Alex Cheema (AlexCheema)

    • Merged multiple PRs including animation fixes (#614) and cross-platform operability (#607).
    • Engaged in backend improvements and code optimization.
  2. Sami Khan (samiamjidkhan)

    • Focused on animation-related tasks and collaborated with Alex Cheema on fixes.
  3. Sandesh Bharadwaj (tensorsofthewall)

    • Worked on cross-platform operability improvements and dependency updates.
  4. Carsen Klock (metaspartan)

    • Modified the /v1/models API for OpenAI compatibility.
  5. Pranav (pranav4501)

    • Contributed to inference engine fixes.

Recent Issues and PRs

The team is actively addressing platform-specific issues and enhancing API functionalities, reflecting a trajectory towards broader usability and integration.

Risks

Of Note

Quantified Reports

Quantify issues



Recent GitHub Issues Activity

Timespan Opened Closed Comments Labeled Milestones
7 Days 4 0 28 4 1
30 Days 24 3 63 24 1
90 Days 97 31 256 97 1
All Time 349 114 - - -

Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.

Rate pull requests



2/5
The pull request introduces support for Deepseek V3, adding a new model file and making minor changes to existing files. However, the PR lacks sufficient documentation and explanation of the changes, making it difficult to assess the impact and correctness. The commit message is vague, and the PR description is not informative, merely asking for help with an error without details. This lack of clarity and context significantly detracts from its quality, warranting a rating of 2 as it appears incomplete and poorly communicated.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request introduces significant new features by integrating PyTorch and Hugging Face models, which could enhance the library's capabilities. However, it is plagued by performance issues due to hardware limitations, resulting in slow token generation and unreliable outputs. The lack of comprehensive testing across different architectures and platforms also detracts from its quality. While the effort to generalize model splitting is commendable, the PR is incomplete without addressing these critical issues. Thus, it stands as an average contribution with potential but requires further refinement and validation.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request introduces a Docker setup for the project, which is a significant addition. However, it has several areas that need improvement. The hardcoding of certain values, lack of specific hash for consistent builds, and unresolved issues with module imports indicate nontrivial flaws. The PR also lacks thorough documentation and examples, such as a docker-compose.yml for multi-node setups, which could enhance its utility. While it addresses some issues and adds value, it requires further refinement and cleanup to be considered above average.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request introduces a dynamic TFLOPS calculation feature, which is a valuable addition to the project. However, it has several areas that need improvement. The PR includes multiple merge commits, indicating potential issues with keeping the branch up-to-date. There are also unresolved merge conflicts that need attention. While the implementation addresses some reviewer comments, it still lacks thorough testing and documentation. The use of PyTorch as a fallback, despite not being a dependency yet, raises concerns about future compatibility and maintenance. Overall, the PR is a good effort but requires further refinement before it can be considered excellent.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request introduces a change to collect topology only if peers have changed, which is a sensible optimization. However, the changes are not particularly significant or complex, primarily involving renaming functions and modifying method signatures to handle single tokens instead of lists. While these changes are necessary for the intended optimization, they do not demonstrate exceptional code quality or innovation. The PR is average in its impact and execution, making it a solid 3.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request enhances the README with detailed usage instructions for a CLI tool, which improves clarity and usability. However, it overlaps with existing content, as noted in a comment, suggesting redundancy. While the additional information is useful, the verbosity and duplication reduce its impact. This makes the PR average, as it adds value but also introduces nontrivial flaws.
[+] Read More
4/5
The pull request introduces Docker deployment capabilities, which is a significant enhancement for the project. It includes a well-structured Dockerfile, docker-compose configuration, and updates to the CI/CD pipeline to automate Docker image building and pushing. The documentation in the README is clear and instructive, guiding users on how to build and run the Docker image. However, there is a lack of testing on Apple Silicon, which could be a potential compatibility issue. Overall, it is a well-executed PR that enhances deployment flexibility but needs additional testing for broader compatibility.
[+] Read More
4/5
The pull request introduces a new inference engine, LlamaCppInferenceEngine, which enhances the CPU support in the project. The implementation is thorough, with a complete set of methods for encoding, sampling, decoding, and handling model checkpoints. Additionally, it includes a comprehensive test suite to ensure functionality. However, there is a minor concern raised in the comments about potentially missing files, which slightly detracts from its completeness. Overall, it's a significant and well-executed addition to the project.
[+] Read More
4/5
The pull request introduces a new LLM model, exaone-3.5, and includes unit tests, which is a significant addition to the project. The code changes are substantial, with 80 lines added for the new model implementation and modifications to existing files to integrate the model. The PR also addresses issues from a previous pull request (#573), indicating thoroughness in addressing past feedback. However, the changes are primarily additive and do not involve complex refactoring or optimization of existing code, which keeps it from being exemplary. Overall, it's a well-executed and meaningful contribution that enhances the project's capabilities.
[+] Read More
4/5
The pull request addresses a significant bug related to corrupted downloads, improving the robustness of the download process by checking for active downloads and verifying file integrity. The changes are well-structured, adding comprehensive checks and handling potential errors gracefully. The code includes detailed debug logging, aiding in future troubleshooting. However, the PR could benefit from additional unit tests to ensure all edge cases are covered. Overall, it's a well-executed fix that enhances functionality.
[+] Read More

Quantify commits



Quantified Commit Activity Over 14 Days

Developer Avatar Branches PRs Commits Files Changes
Sandesh Bharadwaj 1 1/1/0 5 7 620
Alex Cheema 2 5/5/0 13 18 339
Sami Khan 1 2/2/0 3 3 92
None (hsoftxl) 0 1/0/0 0 0 0
Pranav (pranav4501) 0 0/1/0 0 0 0
Vincent C (risingsunomi) 0 1/0/1 0 0 0

PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period

Quantify risks



Project Risk Ratings

Risk Level (1-5) Rationale
Delivery 4 The project faces significant delivery risks due to a substantial backlog of unresolved issues (235 open issues), compatibility problems with key platforms like Windows and WSL (#184, #536), and performance optimization challenges on Mac clusters (#553). The absence of support for major platforms such as Windows (#606) and unresolved high-priority issues like 'download model' (#612) further exacerbate these risks. Additionally, the lack of closed milestones over the past three months suggests inadequate planning or goal-setting, which could hinder meeting project deadlines.
Velocity 4 The project's velocity is at risk due to a slow issue resolution rate, with only 31 out of 97 issues closed in the past 90 days, indicating a closure rate of approximately 32%. The presence of long-standing open pull requests, such as PR#297 (108 days) and PR#173 (151 days), highlights integration and testing challenges that could impede progress. Furthermore, the uneven distribution of workload among team members and potential communication gaps may affect team dynamics and overall velocity.
Dependency 3 Dependency risks are moderate due to reliance on external model libraries like PyTorch and Hugging Face, which may pose compatibility issues as seen in PR#139. Additionally, the project's dependency on specific hardware configurations (e.g., NVIDIA GPUs on Linux) and networking setups could introduce challenges if these dependencies are not adequately managed. However, proactive efforts in replacing outdated libraries (e.g., 'netifaces' with 'scapy') suggest some mitigation of these risks.
Team 3 The team faces moderate risks related to workload distribution and communication. While key contributors like Alex Cheema and Sandesh Bharadwaj are actively engaged, the lack of contributions from other team members such as Pranav and Vincent C raises concerns about uneven workload distribution. Potential communication gaps, as indicated by vague commit messages and documentation issues, could also impact team dynamics and morale.
Code Quality 3 Code quality risks are moderate due to ongoing refactoring efforts that aim to improve maintainability but lack immediate impact on addressing critical bugs or introducing new features. Issues like garbled Chinese characters (#605) suggest existing code quality problems. Additionally, insufficient documentation in certain pull requests (e.g., PR#615) may hinder future maintenance efforts.
Technical Debt 4 Technical debt risks are high due to unresolved merge conflicts in PR#297 and hardcoded values in PR#173, which indicate underlying code quality issues. The frequent need for restarts in model downloads (#591) suggests recurring operational problems that contribute to technical debt. The rapid pace of changes without thorough testing also poses risks of accumulating technical debt if not properly managed.
Test Coverage 2 Test coverage risks are relatively low due to the introduction of comprehensive test suites in recent pull requests like PR#580 and PR#567. These efforts enhance test coverage and help ensure robust functionality. However, some areas still require additional testing, such as edge cases in error handling improvements (PR#594).
Error Handling 3 Error handling risks are moderate as recent improvements in handling corrupted downloads (PR#594) enhance robustness but still lack comprehensive unit tests for all edge cases. The absence of detailed error reporting mechanisms in certain areas may hinder effective error management across the project.

Detailed Reports

Report On: Fetch issues



Recent Activity Analysis

Recent GitHub issue activity for the exo project has been robust, with a focus on addressing compatibility and performance issues across various platforms. Notable recent issues include challenges with running the software on Windows, optimizing performance on Mac clusters, and improving model download processes.

Several issues highlight anomalies and complications, such as:

  • Compatibility Issues: Many users report difficulties running exo on Windows and WSL environments (#184, #536). These issues often relate to dependencies and platform-specific limitations.
  • Performance Concerns: Users have noted performance inconsistencies when adding nodes to clusters (#553) and issues with GPU detection on Linux systems (#365).
  • Model Download Challenges: There are reports of inefficient model downloading processes, with models being downloaded sequentially rather than in parallel across nodes (#70).
  • Networking Problems: Some users face challenges with node discovery over VPNs or when using specific network configurations (#363).

A recurring theme is the need for better documentation and support for various platforms, particularly Windows and Linux. Additionally, users express interest in features like multi-GPU support and improved network discovery mechanisms.

Issue Details

Most Recently Created Issues

  1. #612: download model

    • Priority: High
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 1 day ago
    • Updated: Today
  2. #610: exo does not start on Jetson Orin AGX

    • Priority: Medium
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 3 days ago
    • Updated: 1 day ago
  3. #609: support for qemu?

    • Priority: Low
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 4 days ago
    • Updated: Today

Most Recently Updated Issues

  1. #612: download model

    • Priority: High
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 1 day ago
    • Updated: Today
  2. #610: exo does not start on Jetson Orin AGX

    • Priority: Medium
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 3 days ago
    • Updated: 1 day ago
  3. #606: Support for Windows Platform

    • Priority: Medium
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 6 days ago
    • Updated: 1 day ago

These issues reflect ongoing efforts to enhance platform compatibility and address user-reported bugs. The community's active participation in reporting and discussing these issues indicates a strong engagement with the project's development process.

Report On: Fetch pull requests



Analysis of Pull Requests for the "exo" Project

Open Pull Requests

  1. #615: support deepseek v3

    • State: Open
    • Created: 0 days ago
    • Summary: This PR introduces support for DeepSeek v3. The creator is encountering an error and has requested assistance.
    • Notable Issues: The PR appears to be in its early stages, with the creator seeking help. It might require additional attention from the maintainers to guide the contributor.
  2. #580: add exaone-3.5 LLM Model and apply unit test

    • State: Open
    • Created: 24 days ago
    • Summary: Adds a new model, exaone-3.5, and includes unit tests. It addresses issues from a previous PR (#573).
    • Notable Issues: The PR has been open for a while and has undergone multiple merges with the main branch, indicating ongoing development or integration challenges.
  3. #297: Dynamic TFLOPS Calculation

    • State: Open
    • Created: 108 days ago
    • Summary: Implements dynamic TFLOPS calculation as a fallback mechanism.
    • Notable Issues: This PR has been open for a significant amount of time and involves complex changes, including asynchronous operations and caching. It might benefit from additional reviews or testing to ensure stability.
  4. #173: Docker Image

    • State: Open
    • Created: 151 days ago
    • Summary: Introduces Docker support for the project.
    • Notable Issues: The PR has been open for a long time, suggesting potential blockers or lack of resources to finalize it. Docker support could significantly enhance deployment flexibility.
  5. #139: [Bounty] PyTorch & HuggingFace Interface

    • State: Open
    • Created: 165 days ago
    • Summary: Integrates PyTorch and HuggingFace models into the project.
    • Notable Issues: This is a high-impact PR with a bounty attached, indicating its importance. However, it has been open for an extended period, suggesting challenges in integration or testing across different setups.

Recently Closed Pull Requests

  1. #614: animation fix

    • State: Closed
    • Merged by: Alex Cheema
    • Summary: Fixes related to animations within the project.
    • Significance: Quick resolution indicates effective collaboration and responsiveness to minor issues.
  2. #613: image and text mode fix

    • State: Closed
    • Merged by: Alex Cheema
    • Summary: Addresses issues with image and text modes.
    • Significance: Enhances user experience by ensuring correct functionality of visual elements.
  3. #611: fix scripts/build_exo.py

    • State: Closed
    • Merged by: Alex Cheema
    • Summary: Corrects naming in build scripts.
    • Significance: Essential for maintaining consistency in build processes across platforms.
  4. #607: Fixes for cross-platform operability

    • State: Closed
    • Merged by: Alex Cheema
    • Summary: Introduces fixes to enhance cross-platform compatibility, especially for Windows.
    • Significance: Important step towards broadening the project's usability across different operating systems.

Notable Problems with Open PRs

  • Several PRs have been open for extended periods (e.g., #297, #173, #139), indicating potential challenges in integration, testing, or resource allocation.
  • Some contributors are actively seeking assistance (e.g., #615), highlighting areas where maintainers could provide more guidance or resources.
  • The introduction of Docker support (#173) remains unresolved, which could hinder ease of deployment and scalability.

Recommendations

  • Prioritize resolving long-standing PRs that introduce significant features or improvements (e.g., #139 for PyTorch integration).
  • Enhance communication and support for contributors facing challenges (e.g., #615).
  • Consider allocating more resources or reviewers to expedite the completion of critical PRs like Docker support (#173).

Overall, while the project shows active development with numerous contributions, addressing these key areas could improve efficiency and broaden the project's impact.

Report On: Fetch Files For Assessment



Source Code Assessment

File: exo/apputil/anim.py

Structure and Quality

  • Imports: The file imports several modules, including PIL, numpy, and cv2, which are essential for image processing and video creation.
  • Functions: The file contains multiple functions for drawing shapes and text on images, creating animations, and handling image transformations.
  • Code Quality:
    • The code is well-organized with clear function definitions.
    • There is consistent use of parameters and return values.
    • The use of try-except blocks for font loading is a good practice to handle potential errors gracefully.
  • Functionality: The primary functionality revolves around creating an animation video from images, with text overlays and progress bars.

Observations

  • Error Handling: There is basic error handling for font loading, but other parts of the code could benefit from additional error handling, especially file operations.
  • Performance: The use of loops to process frames could be optimized further, especially if dealing with large images or long animations.
  • Dependencies: Relies on external libraries like PIL and cv2, which are common in image processing tasks.

File: scripts/build_exo.py

Structure and Quality

  • Imports: Uses standard libraries such as site, subprocess, and os.
  • Functionality: The script is designed to build the project using Nuitka, with different configurations for macOS, Windows, and Linux.
  • Code Quality:
    • The script is straightforward and uses subprocess calls effectively.
    • Platform-specific configurations are handled using conditional statements.

Observations

  • Error Handling: There is a try-except block around the subprocess call to catch errors during the build process.
  • Platform Specifics: Handles different operating systems well but could benefit from more comments explaining each section's purpose.

File: exo/api/chatgpt_api.py

Structure and Quality

  • Imports: Extensive use of both standard and third-party libraries like aiohttp for asynchronous HTTP handling.
  • Classes and Functions: Contains several classes and functions related to handling chat requests, message parsing, and API endpoints.
  • Code Quality:
    • The code is modular with clear separation of concerns between different functionalities.
    • Asynchronous programming practices are used effectively with asyncio.

Observations

  • Complexity: The file is quite large (700 lines), which might make it harder to maintain. Consider breaking it into smaller modules.
  • Error Handling: Comprehensive error handling in place for web requests but could be improved in other areas like data parsing.

File: exo/helpers.py

Structure and Quality

  • Utilities: Provides various utility functions related to system information, networking, and asynchronous callbacks.
  • Code Quality:
    • Functions are concise and well-documented with docstrings where necessary.
    • Uses type hints extensively, which improves readability.

Observations

  • Reusability: Functions are generic enough to be reused across different parts of the project.
  • Performance: Some functions involving file I/O or subprocess calls might benefit from optimization or caching strategies.

File: exo/inference/inference_engine.py

Structure and Quality

  • Abstract Class: Defines an abstract base class for inference engines with several abstract methods that must be implemented by subclasses.
  • Code Quality:
    • Good use of abstraction to define a clear interface for inference engines.
    • Type hints are used consistently.

Observations

  • Extensibility: Well-designed for extension by other inference engine implementations.
  • Session Management: Includes basic session management functions which could be expanded with more robust state handling.

File: exo/networking/grpc/grpc_peer_handle.py

Structure and Quality

  • GRPC Integration: Implements peer-to-peer communication using GRPC, including methods for sending prompts, tensors, and checking health status.
  • Code Quality:
    • Code is well-organized into methods that encapsulate specific GRPC operations.
    • Uses async/await effectively for non-blocking operations.

Observations

  • Error Handling: While there is some error handling, it could be more comprehensive, especially around network operations which can fail unpredictably.
  • Logging: Consider adding more logging statements to help trace issues during runtime.

File: exo/topology/device_capabilities.py

Structure and Quality

  • Device Capability Models: Defines data models using Pydantic for device capabilities including FLOPS calculations.
  • Code Quality:
    • Uses Pydantic effectively to enforce data validation rules.
    • Code is cleanly organized with helper functions for different platforms.

Observations

  • Platform Specifics: Handles different platforms (macOS, Linux, Windows) well but could include more detailed comments on how each capability is determined.
  • Scalability: As new devices are added, maintaining the CHIP_FLOPS dictionary might become cumbersome. Consider automating this process if possible.

File: setup.py

Structure and Quality

  • Setup Configuration: Defines package requirements using setuptools with support for platform-specific dependencies.
  • Code Quality:
    • Clearly structured with separate sections for base requirements and extras_require for optional features.

Observations

  • Dependency Management: Uses subprocess calls to detect GPU hardware which might not work in all environments. Consider providing fallback options or clearer error messages if detection fails.

Report On: Fetch commits



Development Team and Recent Activity

Team Members and Their Activities

Alex Cheema (AlexCheema)

  • Commits: 13 commits in the last 14 days.
  • Recent Work:
    • Merged multiple pull requests, including animation fixes and backend image/text mode fixes.
    • Worked on cross-platform operability fixes and various bug fixes in scripts.
    • Contributed to the development of features like function calling tools compatible with ChatGPT API.
    • Engaged in formatting, code optimization, and improving network interface handling.
  • Collaborations: Frequently collaborated with Sami Khan and Sandesh Bharadwaj on several pull requests.

Sami Khan (samiamjidkhan)

  • Commits: 3 commits in the last 14 days.
  • Recent Work:
    • Worked on animation-related tasks, including directory setup for images and base images for animations.
    • Collaborated with Alex Cheema on animation fixes.

Sandesh Bharadwaj (tensorsofthewall)

  • Commits: 5 commits in the last 14 days.
  • Recent Work:
    • Focused on cross-platform operability improvements and formatting tasks.
    • Replaced outdated dependencies with newer ones like scapy.
  • Collaborations: Worked closely with Alex Cheema on cross-platform operability fixes.

Other Team Members

  • Carsen Klock (metaspartan): Modified the /v1/models API for OpenAI compatibility.
  • Pranav (pranav4501): No recent commits but has a merged pull request related to inference engine fixes.

Patterns, Themes, and Conclusions

  1. Frequent Collaborations: Alex Cheema is a central figure in the team, frequently merging pull requests and collaborating with other members like Sami Khan and Sandesh Bharadwaj.

  2. Focus on Cross-Platform Operability: Recent activities show a strong focus on ensuring the software runs smoothly across different platforms, as seen in the work by Sandesh Bharadwaj.

  3. Animation and Backend Improvements: There is an ongoing effort to enhance animations and backend functionalities, primarily driven by Sami Khan and Alex Cheema.

  4. API Enhancements: The team is actively working on making the software's API more compatible with existing standards like OpenAI's, as evidenced by Carsen Klock's contributions.

  5. Bug Fixes and Code Optimization: A significant portion of recent activities involves fixing bugs, optimizing code, and ensuring compatibility across different environments.

Overall, the development team is actively working on enhancing both frontend animations and backend functionalities while ensuring cross-platform compatibility and API improvements.