‹ Reports
The Dispatch

GitHub Repo Analysis: browserbase/stagehand


Executive Summary

Stagehand is an AI-driven web browsing framework developed by Browserbase, designed to enhance browser automation by integrating with Playwright and introducing AI APIs for natural language-based actions. The project is in an active development phase, characterized by a strong community interest and comprehensive support resources. It shows a promising trajectory with ongoing feature expansions and performance optimizations.

Recent Activity

Team Members and Their Recent Activities:

  1. Sean McGuire (seanmcguire12)

    • Worked on evaluation functions, CI processes, and removing vision-related code.
    • Collaborated on branch merges and conflict resolutions.
  2. Sameel Arif (sameelarif)

    • Focused on API updates, method simplifications, and README improvements.
    • Merged changes from the main branch into feature branches.
  3. Miguel (miguelg719)

    • Added accessibility features and contributed to observeHandler.
    • Engaged in cleanup activities.
  4. Anirudh Kamath (kamath)

    • Updated CI configurations and handled concurrency in workflows.
    • Collaborated on branch merges.
  5. Paul Klein (pkiv)

    • Minor updates related to iframe support and documentation formatting.
  6. Ikko Eltociear Ashimine (eltociear)

    • Corrected a typo in OpenAIClient.ts file.

Patterns, Themes, and Conclusions:

Risks

Of Note

Quantified Reports

Quantify issues



Recent GitHub Issues Activity

Timespan Opened Closed Comments Labeled Milestones
7 Days 8 4 11 8 1
30 Days 28 17 50 27 1
90 Days 58 29 89 40 5
All Time 94 43 - - -

Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.

Rate pull requests



2/5
The pull request attempts to improve visibility of elements in DOM processing by removing the isTopElement check, but this change causes other evaluations to fail, notably the complex_peeler eval. The author acknowledges the issue but hasn't found a solution that satisfies both test cases. The changes are minimal and lack thorough testing or a clear resolution to the problem. The PR is still in draft state after 91 days, indicating it may be incomplete or not ready for merging. Overall, it introduces potential regressions without providing a robust fix.
[+] Read More
2/5
The pull request aims to simplify the Chrome startup process by removing the use of a persistent user data directory. However, it is marked as a work in progress (WIP) and lacks thorough testing, as indicated by the test plan mentioning evaluation timeouts. The changes are significant in terms of lines modified but may introduce instability or regressions due to insufficient testing. Additionally, the rationale for the change is not well articulated beyond feeling like 'overkill,' which does not justify the potential risks involved. Overall, the PR needs more work and validation before it can be considered ready for merging.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request introduces a useful feature for tracking token usage, which can aid in cost management and model selection. It modifies 12 files and includes tests and an example, indicating thoroughness. However, it has some notable issues: the implementation is not elegant as per review comments, and there is a suggestion to avoid using 'any', which indicates potential code quality concerns. Additionally, the PR lacks a changeset, which could affect versioning. Overall, it is a functional but unrefined contribution, meriting an average rating.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request introduces iframe support, which is a moderately significant feature, but the implementation has limitations due to browser-level restrictions on iframe access. The changes are extensive, involving multiple files and lines of code, indicating thoroughness. However, the need for further browser modifications to fully utilize the feature suggests incompleteness. Additionally, there are unresolved review comments and potential concerns about nested iframes and SDK updates. Overall, it is a good PR with nontrivial flaws and dependencies that prevent it from being rated higher.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request adds support for a new model 'o1' to the list of supported models, which is a straightforward and necessary enhancement. However, it lacks thorough documentation and explanation on why this change is significant or how it impacts the overall project. The testing strategy is also questionable as it places a non-deterministic test in a directory meant for deterministic tests, indicating a lack of attention to detail. While the code changes appear functional, they are not exemplary or particularly innovative.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request introduces a new feature for extracting accessibility trees, which is a significant addition to the project. However, it lacks completeness as it does not fully respect the hierarchy of the accessibility tree, leading to potential issues with certain table representations. The test plan is only partially completed, and there are pending tasks that suggest the implementation is not yet fully tested or integrated. Additionally, there are no changesets included, which could impact version tracking and release management. Overall, while the PR is a meaningful contribution, it has notable areas that need further work and refinement.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request removes the 'vision' feature from the project due to its ineffectiveness. It is a straightforward change with a clear rationale, as vision was not functioning well. The PR includes deprecations and updates to ensure backward compatibility, such as logging warnings when 'useVision' is set. However, the changes are not particularly innovative or complex, and the significance of the change is moderate. The removal of code is substantial, but it doesn't introduce new functionality or improvements beyond removing a non-functional feature. Therefore, it merits an average rating.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request introduces a variety of changes, including the addition of new flags and methods to improve the functionality of the StagehandPage and observeHandler components. The changes are substantial, with over 400 lines of code added, indicating a significant update. However, the PR is still in draft status, lacks a detailed description of what changed or a test plan, and has not addressed the absence of changesets, which are crucial for versioning and tracking changes. These factors prevent it from being rated higher than average.
[+] Read More
4/5
The pull request introduces a significant optimization by implementing semantic chunking, which allows for asynchronous parsing and prioritization of page elements based on relevance. This change is quite substantial, as it can lead to performance improvements in processing pages with many chunks. The PR includes comprehensive changes across multiple files, adding new functions and modifying existing ones to support the new feature. While the implementation seems thorough, the lack of a detailed test plan or evidence of testing might be a drawback. Overall, it's a well-thought-out enhancement but could benefit from more testing details.
[+] Read More
4/5
This pull request introduces a significant and requested feature by adding the ability to dump stagehand actions into various test frameworks, which is a valuable addition for users. The implementation includes a new ActionRecorder and a testCodeGenerator, demonstrating thoroughness in addressing the feature requirements. The PR also includes a comprehensive example and modifies several files to integrate the new functionality. However, it lacks documentation on how to use the new feature, and there are no changesets added, which could affect versioning. Overall, it's quite good but could be improved with better documentation and version management.
[+] Read More

Quantify commits



Quantified Commit Activity Over 14 Days

Developer Avatar Branches PRs Commits Files Changes
Miguel 4 3/2/0 26 81 7456
Sean McGuire 15 10/10/0 92 33 5699
Sameel 4 3/3/1 22 19 1086
Anirudh Kamath 3 3/3/1 7 97 674
github-actions[bot] 1 1/2/0 2 11 77
Paul Klein 1 0/0/0 1 3 23
Ikko Eltociear Ashimine 1 1/1/0 1 1 2
Nico (nicarq) 0 1/0/1 0 0 0
None (Aakashdeepcodes) 0 0/0/1 0 0 0
Arlen Vasconcelos (arlenvasconcelos) 0 1/0/1 0 0 0
Chris Wood (christopherhwood) 0 1/0/0 0 0 0

PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period

Quantify risks



Project Risk Ratings

Risk Level (1-5) Rationale
Delivery 4 The project faces significant delivery risks due to a backlog of unresolved issues, with 58 issues opened and only 29 closed in the last 90 days. This trend is consistent over shorter periods, indicating potential delays in meeting delivery timelines. The minimal use of milestones suggests a lack of clear short-term goals or challenges in achieving them, further exacerbating delivery risks.
Velocity 3 While there is active development with high commit activity from key contributors like Sean McGuire and Miguel, the presence of unmerged pull requests and a high number of branches indicate potential bottlenecks and integration challenges. The team's velocity is strong but requires careful management to maintain pace and avoid delays.
Dependency 4 The project relies heavily on external libraries like Playwright and AI models, posing significant dependency risks if these services become unavailable or change unexpectedly. Issues like #368 highlight the need to manage dependencies carefully to avoid disruptions.
Team 3 The team shows active engagement with a high number of comments on issues and positive dynamics as seen in PR discussions. However, the uneven distribution of workload among developers and the presence of unresolved PRs suggest potential coordination challenges that could impact team effectiveness.
Code Quality 3 While there are efforts to maintain code quality through structured logging and TypeScript usage, concerns arise from untyped sections and complex logic in files like actHandler.ts. Additionally, unresolved issues related to code quality in PRs indicate areas needing improvement.
Technical Debt 4 The accumulation of unresolved issues, complex code structures, and lack of thorough testing contribute to technical debt. Issues like #395 highlight caching inefficiencies that could degrade performance over time if not addressed.
Test Coverage 4 The absence of detailed test plans in several PRs poses significant risks to test coverage. Without adequate testing, there is an increased likelihood of bugs and regressions going unnoticed, impacting reliability.
Error Handling 4 Error handling practices show gaps, as evidenced by uncaught exceptions in issues like #400. While logging mechanisms exist, the complexity of processes like DOM manipulation increases the risk of errors not being adequately managed.

Detailed Reports

Report On: Fetch issues



Recent Activity Analysis

Recent GitHub issue activity for the Stagehand project has been vibrant, with numerous issues created and updated within the past few days. This indicates an active development phase and a responsive team addressing user feedback and bug reports.

Several issues exhibit notable anomalies or special significance:

  • Issue #434 highlights a user request for a warning system when approaching token limits, which is crucial for managing resource usage efficiently.
  • Issue #433 involves a feature request to specify custom browser launch options, reflecting user needs for more configurability.
  • Issue #432 discusses the potential addition of an autonomous browsing agent, indicating interest in expanding Stagehand's capabilities.
  • Issue #404 and Issue #395 both focus on caching improvements, suggesting performance optimization is a recurring theme.
  • Issue #400 reveals an uncaught exception during cache operations, pointing to potential stability issues that need addressing.
  • Issue #393 and Issue #391 discuss SDK support and browser compatibility, highlighting ongoing efforts to broaden Stagehand's usability.

Common themes include performance optimization (caching), increased configurability (custom launch options), and expanding functionality (autonomous agents, SDK support). The presence of multiple issues related to caching suggests it is a critical area for improvement.

Issue Details

Most Recently Created Issues

  1. #434: Warn on approaching token limit

    • Priority: High (resource management)
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 1 day ago
  2. #433: Support for Specifying Browser Launch Options

    • Priority: Medium (user configurability)
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 1 day ago
  3. #432: Autonomous browsing agent

    • Priority: Medium (feature expansion)
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 1 day ago

Most Recently Updated Issues

  1. #393: Is there python sdk for stagehand?

    • Priority: Medium (SDK support)
    • Status: Open
    • Updated: 1 day ago
  2. #391: Bring your own browser?

    • Priority: Medium (compatibility)
    • Status: Open
    • Updated: 2 days ago
  3. #400: [stagehand::base_cache] uncaught exception

    • Priority: High (stability issue)
    • Status: Open
    • Updated: 7 days ago

These issues reflect the project's focus on enhancing user experience through configurability and performance improvements while addressing critical stability concerns.

Report On: Fetch pull requests



Analysis of Pull Requests

Open Pull Requests

  1. #428: Remove vision

    • Summary: This PR aims to remove the vision functionality due to its ineffectiveness. It still allows useVision as a parameter but issues a warning if set to true.
    • Notable Points: The PR is marked as a minor change and includes a changeset for version bumping. The removal of vision from various handlers and types suggests a significant refactor.
    • Comments: There are some humorous exchanges between developers, indicating a collaborative and friendly team environment.
  2. #426: Observe perform candidates

    • Summary: This draft PR lacks detailed information on its purpose and changes. It seems to focus on observing performance candidates.
    • Concerns: The absence of a changeset indicates that this PR might not be ready for merging or lacks clarity on its impact.
  3. #419: Add playwright/cypress/puppeteer code dumping

    • Summary: Introduces support for dumping Stagehand actions as Playwright, Cypress, or Puppeteer code.
    • Notable Points: This feature is highly requested and could significantly enhance usability by allowing users to generate test scripts in different frameworks.
    • Concerns: No changeset found, which might delay its integration into the main branch.
  4. #376: Accessibility backbone v1

    • Summary: Implements an accessibility tree extraction method to improve context understanding and reduce inference costs.
    • Notable Points: This is an ongoing effort with plans for further improvements in hierarchy respect and integration with observe and act workflows.
  5. #340: Support iframes + better debugging dev ex in dom processing

    • Summary: Adds iframe support and improves debugging experience in DOM processing.
    • Notable Points: The PR includes changesets, indicating readiness for merging. It addresses a common challenge in web automation—handling iframes.
  6. #372: Add o1 to model

    • Summary: Adds support for the o1 model.
    • Concerns: The PR includes changesets but lacks detailed information on testing or potential impacts.
  7. #339: Token usage tracking (Issue #268)

    • Summary: Introduces token usage tracking for cost control and model selection.
    • Concerns: No changeset found, which might hinder its progress towards merging.
  8. #140: Remove user data dir from chrome startup (WIP)

    • Summary: Aims to simplify Chrome startup by removing the user data directory.
    • Concerns: Evals are timing out, indicating unresolved issues that need attention.
  9. #118: Improve visibility of elements in dom processing

    • Summary: Attempts to improve element visibility checks in DOM processing.
    • Concerns: Draft status with unresolved issues related to failing evals.
  10. #112: Use semantic chunking to speed up operations

    • Summary: Proposes semantic chunking to prioritize relevant page elements during actions or extractions.
    • Concerns: The PR is quite old (99 days) without recent updates, suggesting it might be stalled or abandoned.

Recently Closed Pull Requests

  1. #431 & #406 (Closed without Merge):

    • These PRs were closed without being merged, indicating potential issues or decisions to abandon these changes.
  2. #429 & #425 (Merged Quickly):

    • These PRs were merged within a day of creation, suggesting they were minor fixes or improvements that didn't require extensive review.
  3. #423 & #422 (Version Packages & Patch for Type Builds):

    • These indicate active maintenance and quick resolution of build issues, reflecting a responsive development team.
  4. #420 (Update README):

    • Documentation updates are crucial for user onboarding and understanding new features, highlighting the project's commitment to clear communication.
  5. #418 (Reference dist/ in examples and evals):

    • This change improves development practices by ensuring examples use publicly available types, preventing release issues related to type exports.

Summary

The Stagehand project shows active development with numerous open pull requests addressing significant features like accessibility improvements (#376), iframe support (#340), and code dumping capabilities (#419). However, several PRs lack changesets (#426, #419), which could delay their integration into the main branch. Additionally, some older PRs (#112) appear stalled, potentially needing reassessment or closure if no longer relevant.

The recently closed PRs demonstrate effective maintenance practices, with quick merges for minor updates and documentation improvements (#420). However, some closed without merging (#431) highlight potential challenges or shifts in project priorities.

Overall, Stagehand's development is characterized by active feature expansion and community engagement, supported by responsive maintenance efforts.

Report On: Fetch Files For Assessment



Source Code Assessment

File: evals/tasks/extract_repo_name.ts

Structure and Quality Analysis

  • Imports and Initialization: The file imports necessary modules and initializes a function extract_repo_name of type EvalFunction. It utilizes the initStagehand function to set up the environment.
  • Functionality: The core functionality involves navigating to a GitHub repository page and extracting the repository name using the stagehand.page.extract method. The extraction is logged, and the function returns success if the extracted name matches "react".
  • Error Handling: There is a try-catch block to handle errors during the extraction process, logging any errors encountered and ensuring stagehand is closed properly.
  • Logging: Uses a logger to record the extraction process and any errors, which aids in debugging and monitoring.
  • Code Quality: The code is concise and well-structured for its purpose. It follows asynchronous patterns correctly and handles resources (like closing stagehand) appropriately.

File: lib/handlers/actHandler.ts

Structure and Quality Analysis

  • Class Definition: The file defines a class StagehandActHandler that handles actions on web pages using Playwright.
  • Attributes: Contains private attributes for configuration, caching, logging, and action management.
  • Methods:
    • _recordAction, _verifyActionCompletion, _performPlaywrightMethod: These methods handle action recording, verification, and execution using Playwright's API.
    • Caching mechanisms are implemented to optimize repeated actions.
    • Error handling is robust with detailed logging for tracing issues.
    • Methods are modular, aiding readability and maintainability despite the file's length (1522 lines).
  • Code Complexity: Given its length, the file might benefit from further refactoring into smaller components or utility functions to enhance maintainability.

File: lib/StagehandPage.ts

Structure and Quality Analysis

  • Class Definition: Defines StagehandPage, which extends Playwright's page capabilities with AI-driven methods (act, extract, observe).
  • Initialization: Sets up handlers for different operations (act, extract, observe) based on provided LLM client configurations.
  • Methods:
    • Overrides Playwright methods like goto to include additional processing (_waitForSettledDom).
    • Provides public methods for AI-driven actions with error handling and logging.
    • Utilizes Proxy to intercept method calls on Playwright pages, adding custom behavior.
  • Code Quality: The file is well-organized with clear separation of concerns. Error handling is consistent across methods. The use of TypeScript types enhances reliability.

File: .github/workflows/ci.yml

Structure and Quality Analysis

  • CI Configuration: Defines a comprehensive CI workflow using GitHub Actions for linting, building, testing, and evaluating different categories (act, extract, etc.).
  • Jobs:
    • Includes steps for setting up Node.js environment, installing dependencies, running tests, and evaluating performance.
    • Conditional execution based on labels ensures efficient CI runs.
    • Uses environment variables for API keys securely via GitHub secrets.
  • Code Quality: The YAML file is well-commented and structured. It leverages GitHub Actions features effectively to streamline CI processes.

File: lib/dom/process.ts

Structure and Quality Analysis

  • Functions:
    • Various utility functions for DOM processing (processDom, processAllOfDom) that interact with web pages to extract elements or manipulate DOM state.
    • Implements caching (xpathCache) to optimize repeated operations.
    • Handles visibility checks and element interaction logic comprehensively.
  • Performance Considerations: Uses asynchronous operations where necessary but could benefit from further optimization in DOM traversal or element processing logic given its length (675 lines).
  • Code Quality: Functions are generally well-defined with clear responsibilities. However, some functions could be broken down further for clarity.

Overall, the Stagehand project demonstrates strong coding practices with a focus on modularity, error handling, and performance optimization. While some files are lengthy due to their complex functionality, they maintain readability through consistent structure and documentation.

Report On: Fetch commits



Development Team and Recent Activity

Team Members and Their Recent Activities:

  1. Sean McGuire (seanmcguire12)

    • Recent work includes maintenance on evaluation functions, reverting CI processes to sequential runs, and removing vision-related code from handlers.
    • Collaborated with Sameel Arif on merging branches and resolving conflicts.
    • Active in multiple branches, including main, rm_vision, CI/fix_cancelling_queued_jobs, and others.
  2. Sameel Arif (sameelarif)

    • Focused on updating API responses, simplifying method calls, and integrating system prompts into the initialization process.
    • Merged changes from the main branch into feature branches like sameel/stagehand-api-offloading.
    • Worked on improving README documentation and evaluation function names.
  3. Miguel (miguelg719)

    • Added accessibility features to the project, including an accessibility tree for evaluation tasks.
    • Made significant contributions to the observeHandler and related utilities.
    • Engaged in cleanup activities and resolving comments for review.
  4. Anirudh Kamath (kamath)

    • Worked on updating CI configurations, adding trending badges to README, and handling concurrency in CI workflows.
    • Collaborated with Sean McGuire on merging branches and resolving conflicts.
  5. Paul Klein (pkiv)

    • Minor updates related to unsafe iframe support and documentation formatting.
  6. Ikko Eltociear Ashimine (eltociear)

    • Made a small contribution by correcting a typo in the OpenAIClient.ts file.

Patterns, Themes, and Conclusions:

  • Collaboration: There is significant collaboration among team members, particularly in merging branches and resolving conflicts. This is evident in the frequent merges from the main branch into feature branches.

  • Focus Areas: The team is actively working on improving CI processes, enhancing accessibility features, refining API integrations, and maintaining evaluation functions. There is a clear emphasis on improving both functionality and developer experience.

  • Branch Activity: The project has a high number of active branches with ongoing development across various features. This suggests a dynamic development environment with multiple concurrent initiatives.

  • Documentation and Communication: Updates to documentation files like README.md indicate an ongoing effort to keep project information current and accessible for users and contributors.

Overall, the development team is engaged in a wide range of activities aimed at enhancing the Stagehand framework's capabilities while ensuring robust collaboration and communication practices.