‹ Reports
The Dispatch

GitHub Repo Analysis: block/goose


Executive Summary

The "block/goose" project, managed by the organization "block," is an open-source, extensible AI agent implemented in Rust. It integrates with various language models to perform tasks beyond code suggestions, such as installation and testing. The project is actively developed, with a high level of community engagement and contributions. Its trajectory indicates ongoing enhancements and a focus on user experience improvements.

Recent Activity

Team Members and Their Contributions

  1. Milad Nazeri: Updated compatibility information in SupportedEnvironments.js.
  2. Yingjie He: Enhanced configuration processes and UI updates for Ollama host.
  3. Adewale Abati (acekyd): Extensive documentation contributions, including Windows usage guides.
  4. Alice Hau: Improved error handling across providers.
  5. Salman Mohammed: Implemented bug fixes and feature enhancements.
  6. Meenal C: Updated issue templates.
  7. Kalvin C: Added troubleshooting sections and installation improvements.
  8. Angie Jones: Contributed to documentation updates and meta descriptions.
  9. Alex Hancock: Worked on UI components and extension management.
  10. Bradley Axen: Focused on installation scripts and CLI updates.
  11. Nahiyan Khan: Updated UI styling for dark mode and landing pages.
  12. Ebony Louis: Addressed documentation feedback.
  13. Michael Neale: Workflow improvements and security notices.
  14. Marcelle (laanak08): Deep link handling updates.
  15. Lily Delalande (lily-de): UI updates for Ollama checks.
  16. Wendy Tang: Error handling improvements in providers.
  17. Max Novich (Kvadratni): Windows support in modules.

Recent Issues and PRs

Risks

Of Note

Quantified Reports

Quantify issues



Recent GitHub Issues Activity

Timespan Opened Closed Comments Labeled Milestones
7 Days 60 22 175 31 1
30 Days 62 22 175 33 1
90 Days 73 24 183 41 1
All Time 107 47 - - -

Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.

Rate pull requests



3/5
The pull request addresses specific issues with the o1 models by handling unsupported parameters and changing role definitions, which are necessary but not groundbreaking changes. It also removes support for o1-mini, aligning with current model capabilities. While these changes are useful, they are not particularly significant or complex, and the PR lacks thorough documentation or testing updates. The code changes are straightforward and do not introduce new features or improvements beyond fixing existing issues. Overall, it is an average PR that resolves some issues but does not stand out in terms of innovation or impact.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request corrects a minor but important error in the installation documentation by replacing 'google' with 'openai' in the API key export commands. This change ensures accuracy and prevents potential user confusion during setup. However, the update is relatively small, affecting only two lines of text, and does not introduce any new features or significant improvements to the project. Therefore, it is rated as average, reflecting its limited scope and impact.
[+] Read More
3/5
This pull request addresses a specific issue by clarifying installation instructions for Linux users, allowing them to install only the CLI version of Goose. The changes are primarily documentation updates, adding clarity and specificity to the installation process. While these updates are useful, they are not particularly significant or complex, involving minor text modifications and additions across two markdown files. The PR is straightforward and improves user experience but lacks depth or technical challenge, making it an average contribution.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request introduces a feature to substitute version numbers in the CLI and Desktop App during release. It involves changes to multiple workflow files, primarily focusing on automating version updates. The changes are well-structured and seem to function as intended, as evidenced by successful test releases. However, the PR lacks significant innovation or complexity, primarily involving modifications to existing scripts rather than introducing new functionality. The impact is moderate as it streamlines the release process but does not introduce substantial new capabilities or improvements. Overall, it is a solid contribution but not exceptional.
[+] Read More
3/5
The pull request introduces some useful helpers to the Justfile, aiding local development by adding a development build and run command, as well as an installation command for dependencies. The changes are functional and improve the workflow for developers. However, these changes are relatively minor in scope, affecting only the Justfile with a small number of lines added and removed. There is no indication of significant new functionality or major improvements to existing features. The PR is solid but not particularly noteworthy or complex, hence an average rating.
[+] Read More
4/5
The pull request introduces a useful feature by allowing users to skip the interactive configuration step during installation, which can enhance automation and streamline processes for advanced users. The changes are well-documented, with updates to the installation and quickstart guides, making it clear how to use the new option. Additionally, the code changes are clean and maintain consistency with existing code style. However, while beneficial, the feature is not groundbreaking or highly complex, which is why it doesn't merit a perfect score.
[+] Read More
4/5
The pull request addresses a specific issue (#894) by implementing a feature that allows external links to be opened in the default browser, enhancing user experience. The code is well-structured, with error handling for invalid links and failed attempts to open links. The use of Electron's shell module is appropriate for the task. However, the change is moderately significant and lacks extensive documentation or tests that might accompany a more exemplary PR. Overall, it is a solid improvement with clear utility.
[+] Read More
4/5
This pull request introduces a useful feature by configuring Electron to open links in a new browser window, enhancing user experience. The implementation is straightforward and well-contained, with a clear diff showing the addition of a window handler. However, it lacks documentation or tests that would ensure robustness and clarity for future maintenance. The change is moderately significant but not exemplary, thus earning a rating of 4.
[+] Read More
4/5
The pull request introduces a new feature by adding support for the Deepseek provider, which includes comprehensive changes across multiple files. It adds a new provider implementation with detailed configuration options, updates documentation, and includes tests to ensure functionality. The changes are well-organized and integrate seamlessly into the existing codebase. However, while the feature is significant, it lacks extensive documentation or examples on how to utilize the new provider effectively, which could enhance its usability.
[+] Read More
4/5
This pull request addresses a specific issue by improving the loading of the app shell on macOS, which is a significant functional enhancement. The PR includes multiple commits that demonstrate a thorough approach, such as adding unit tests and simplifying code. It also introduces new dependencies and configurations for testing with Vitest, indicating a focus on maintainability and reliability. However, the large number of changes in the package-lock.json file suggests that dependency management could have been more focused. Overall, it's a well-executed PR with minor room for improvement, particularly in dependency management.
[+] Read More

Quantify commits



Quantified Commit Activity Over 14 Days

Developer Avatar Branches PRs Commits Files Changes
Adewale Abati 5 16/16/0 26 421 137810
Bradley Axen 34 31/30/0 81 388 104241
Nahiyan Khan 12 9/7/1 28 112 43964
Alex Hancock 18 14/13/0 29 202 19119
marcelle 4 3/1/0 5 8 18832
lily-de 18 20/17/2 62 78 16395
Salman Mohammed 23 21/15/3 87 111 8888
Wendy Tang 12 7/4/1 35 81 6841
Angie Jones 5 17/17/0 37 124 3277
Max Novich (Kvadratni) 5 4/2/0 13 34 2530
Michael Neale 14 16/10/2 27 31 2388
Kalvin C 13 16/14/0 35 84 2284
Ebony Louis 5 8/7/1 11 78 856
Yingjie He 6 7/6/0 10 63 563
Yingjie He 1 0/0/0 1 14 284
Alice Hau 3 1/1/0 6 50 246
meenalc 2 1/1/0 2 1 68
None (dependabot[bot]) 1 1/0/0 1 2 11
Greg M 1 1/1/0 1 2 4
MiladNazeri 1 1/1/0 1 1 4
None (royv18) 0 1/0/0 0 0 0
None (0xflotus) 0 1/0/0 0 0 0
Finn (finn-block) 0 1/0/0 0 0 0
Prem Pillai (cloud-on-prem) 0 1/0/0 0 0 0
None (techknowlogick) 0 2/0/0 0 0 0

PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period

Quantify risks



Project Risk Ratings

Risk Level (1-5) Rationale
Delivery 4 The project faces significant delivery risks due to a backlog of unresolved issues, with 60 open issues and only 47 closed. High-priority issues like #910 (configuration error with OpenAI models) and #903 (context length problem) require immediate attention to prevent negative impacts on user experience and operational stability. Additionally, compatibility challenges (#855) and API integration errors (#699) pose further risks if not addressed promptly. The presence of multiple draft and long-standing pull requests also suggests potential delays in achieving delivery goals.
Velocity 4 The project's velocity is at risk due to a backlog of open pull requests (74) and unresolved issues accumulating faster than they are being closed. Despite strong individual contributions from key developers, the reliance on these individuals poses a dependency risk that could impact overall velocity if they become unavailable. The presence of multiple draft pull requests indicates potential delays in integrating changes, further affecting project momentum.
Dependency 3 The project shows dependency risks primarily due to reliance on key contributors like Bradley Axen and Salman Mohammed, who account for a significant portion of commits. Additionally, the use of specific external libraries such as tokio and serde_json in critical modules poses risks if these libraries face issues or deprecations. API integration errors with AWS Bedrock (#699) also highlight potential dependency challenges that need addressing.
Team 2 The team demonstrates strong collaboration and engagement across various areas, mitigating risks related to burnout or conflict. However, the concentration of work among a few key contributors could pose risks if these individuals become unavailable or overburdened. Overall, the team dynamic appears cohesive, with active contributions from multiple members supporting project goals.
Code Quality 3 Code quality is generally maintained through structured error handling and comprehensive testing in modules like crates/goose-mcp/src/developer/mod.rs. However, unresolved bugs such as issue #929 (developer__text_editor tool not updating files) indicate areas where code quality could be improved. The lack of thorough documentation or testing updates in some pull requests also suggests potential risks in maintaining high code quality standards.
Technical Debt 3 Technical debt is being managed through refactoring efforts and removal of deprecated dependencies, but the large number of active branches (480 total) could pose challenges in managing technical debt effectively. Unresolved bugs and enhancement requests also contribute to potential technical debt accumulation if not addressed promptly.
Test Coverage 2 The project demonstrates a focus on test coverage with the addition of unit tests for various modules, supporting code reliability and error handling improvements. However, the presence of multiple draft pull requests suggests that there might be delays in integrating these changes into the main codebase, potentially affecting overall test coverage effectiveness.
Error Handling 3 Error handling improvements are evident in recent commits focusing on propagating errors more effectively in provider modules. However, high-priority issues like #910 involving configuration errors with OpenAI models highlight ongoing challenges in error handling that need resolution to ensure robust system reliability.

Detailed Reports

Report On: Fetch issues



GitHub Issues Analysis

Recent Activity Analysis

Recent activity in the "block/goose" repository shows a high volume of issue creation and resolution, with 60 open issues and 47 closed ones. The issues cover a wide range of topics, including bug reports, feature requests, and installation problems. Notably, there is significant engagement from the community, with active discussions and contributions.

Several issues highlight critical bugs or enhancements that could impact user experience significantly. For instance, #910 discusses a configuration error with OpenAI models, which is labeled as a priority 0 (p0) bug, indicating its critical nature. Similarly, #903 addresses a context length issue that requires better handling to avoid session disruptions.

Themes among the issues include compatibility challenges with different operating systems (e.g., Windows support in #855), API integration errors (e.g., AWS Bedrock in #699), and usability improvements (e.g., GUI behavior in #909). There is also a focus on enhancing security and reliability through features like streaming output (#932) and handling API rate limits (#887).

Issue Details

Most Recently Created Issues

  • #933: Documentation issue regarding JetBrains tool usage. Created 0 days ago.
  • #932: Enhancement request for enabling streaming output. Created 0 days ago.
  • #929: Bug report about developer__text_editor tool not updating files. Created 0 days ago.

Most Recently Updated Issues

  • #930: Closed issue related to MCP server call failure. Updated 0 days ago.
  • #926: Closed issue about non-working download link. Updated 0 days ago.
  • #916: Closed issue regarding incorrect lockfile in example. Updated 1 day ago.

Important Issues

  • #910: Configuration error with OpenAI models causing a 400 Bad Request error. Labeled as p0.
  • #903: Context length exceeded error leading to session restarts. Labeled as p0.
  • #902: Request to bump version numbers in CLI and Desktop App for clarity. Labeled as p0.

The issues reflect ongoing efforts to improve the project's robustness and user experience by addressing critical bugs and enhancing functionality. The active community involvement and rapid issue resolution indicate a healthy development process focused on continuous improvement.

Report On: Fetch pull requests



Pull Request Analysis for "block/goose" Repository

Overview

The "block/goose" repository is an open-source project that functions as an extensible AI agent. It is actively developed and maintained, with a significant number of open pull requests (PRs) and recent activity. Below is a detailed analysis of the current state of PRs, highlighting notable issues and resolutions.

Notable Open Pull Requests

Recent and Significant PRs

  1. PR #935: Fix: Open Links Separately in External Browser (#894)

    • State: Open
    • Created by: royv18
    • Description: This PR addresses the issue of opening external links in the default browser. It is crucial for enhancing user experience by ensuring links open correctly outside the application.
    • Files Changed: ui/desktop/src/components/MarkdownContent.tsx (+52, -1)
    • Comments: None noted.
  2. PR #934: feat: cfg electron to open links in new window

    • State: Open
    • Created by: marcelle (laanak08)
    • Description: Configures Electron to open links in a new browser window, which aligns with user expectations for link behavior.
    • Files Changed: ui/desktop/src/main.ts (+10, -0)
    • Comments: None noted.
  3. PR #931: chore: updated installation docs

    • State: Open
    • Created by: 0xflotus
    • Description: Updates installation documentation to correct API key instructions, which is vital for new users setting up the project.
    • Files Changed: documentation/docs/getting-started/installation.md (+2, -2)
    • Comments: None noted.
  4. PR #927: fix: clarify linux cli install only

    • State: Open (Draft)
    • Created by: Wendy Tang (wendytang)
    • Description: Clarifies installation instructions for Linux CLI users, addressing issue #892.
    • Files Changed: documentation/docs/getting-started/installation.md, documentation/docs/quickstart.md
    • Comments: None noted.

Draft and Experimental PRs

  1. PR #922: fix: load app shell on macos from appropriate places

    • State: Open (Draft)
    • Created by: Michael Neale (michaelneale)
    • Description: Addresses loading issues on macOS, which could impact usability on this platform.
    • Files Changed: Multiple files including workflows and configuration files.
    • Comments: None noted.
  2. PR #914: fix: intel build (simpler)

    • State: Open (Draft)
    • Created by: Michael Neale (michaelneale)
    • Description: Simplifies Intel Mac build process, potentially improving developer experience on Intel Macs.
    • Files Changed: Workflow files.
    • Comments: None noted.

Long-standing and Potentially Stagnant PRs

  1. PR #757: goose freedom level

    • State: Open (Draft)
    • Created by: Max Novich (Kvadratni)
    • Description: Introduces security levels for Goose, which could be significant for enterprise use cases.
    • Comments: This PR has been open for several days without updates, indicating potential stagnation.
  2. PR #660: WYSIWYG Editor and Popover

    • State: Open (Draft)
    • Created by: Rizel Scarlett (blackgirlbytes)
    • Description: Adds a WYSIWYG editor feature, which could enhance user interaction with markdown content.
    • Comments: The draft status suggests ongoing development or need for further review.

Notable Closed Pull Requests

  1. PR #919: fix: improve configure process with error message

    • Merged successfully, this PR improves user feedback during configuration errors, enhancing the setup experience.
  2. PR #917 & #916

    • Addressed critical issues related to dependency management and configuration processes, ensuring smoother operation across environments.
  3. PR #900 & #888

    • These PRs addressed specific bugs and documentation inaccuracies that could hinder user onboarding or functionality.

Key Observations

  • The repository shows active development with frequent updates to both functionality and documentation.
  • Several PRs focus on improving user experience through better configuration processes and UI enhancements.
  • There are multiple draft PRs that may require attention to avoid stagnation or ensure timely integration into the main branch.
  • Closed PRs reflect a proactive approach to resolving issues quickly, maintaining project stability and usability.

Recommendations

  • Prioritize review and merging of recent PRs that address critical functionality or documentation updates.
  • Monitor draft PRs closely to ensure they progress towards completion or are closed if no longer relevant.
  • Continue enhancing documentation to support new users effectively, especially given the project's complexity and feature set.

Overall, the "block/goose" repository demonstrates robust activity and commitment to improving its AI agent capabilities through community collaboration and continuous development efforts.

Report On: Fetch Files For Assessment



Analysis of Source Code Files

1. SupportedEnvironments.js

  • Purpose: This React component provides information about the supported environments for the Goose CLI and desktop app.
  • Structure: The component uses an Admonition to display a message about supported operating systems and architectures.
  • Quality: The code is concise and well-structured. It uses semantic HTML elements and React best practices.
  • Improvements: None needed. The file is straightforward and serves its purpose effectively.

2. configure.rs

  • Purpose: Handles the configuration process for Goose CLI, including provider setup and error handling.
  • Structure: The file is extensive, with functions for configuring providers, managing extensions, and handling errors.
  • Quality: The code is well-organized with clear separation of concerns. Error handling is robust, covering various scenarios.
  • Improvements: Consider breaking down the file into smaller modules for better maintainability, given its length.

3. installation.md

  • Purpose: Provides installation instructions for Goose on different operating systems.
  • Structure: Uses tabs to separate instructions for macOS/Linux and Windows, enhancing readability.
  • Quality: The documentation is clear and comprehensive, with tips and troubleshooting advice.
  • Improvements: None needed. The use of tabs and detailed steps make it user-friendly.

4. databricks.rs

  • Purpose: Implements a provider for Databricks within the Goose framework, handling authentication and requests.
  • Structure: Defines structs and methods for managing Databricks authentication and API interactions.
  • Quality: The code is well-commented and follows Rust conventions. Error handling is thorough, especially for HTTP responses.
  • Improvements: Consider adding more unit tests to ensure reliability, particularly for error scenarios.

5. bug_report.md

  • Purpose: A GitHub issue template for reporting bugs in the Goose project.
  • Structure: Provides sections for bug description, reproduction steps, expected behavior, and additional context.
  • Quality: The template is comprehensive and guides users to provide necessary information for debugging.
  • Improvements: None needed. It covers all essential aspects of a bug report.

6. ProviderSetupModal.tsx

  • Purpose: A React component for setting up a provider in the Goose desktop app.
  • Structure: Includes form elements for inputting API keys, with secure storage indications.
  • Quality: The component is well-designed with clear separation of UI elements and logic. Accessibility considerations are present with proper input types.
  • Improvements: Consider extracting repeated styles into a CSS module or styled-components to enhance reusability.

7. troubleshooting.md

  • Purpose: Offers solutions for common issues encountered when using Goose.
  • Structure: Organized by problem type with clear headings and step-by-step solutions.
  • Quality: The guide is detailed and practical, addressing a wide range of potential issues users might face.
  • Improvements: None needed. It effectively serves as a comprehensive troubleshooting resource.

8. sse.rs

  • Purpose: An example demonstrating how to use SSE (Server-Sent Events) with the MCP client in Goose.
  • Structure: Sets up an SSE transport, initializes a client, and demonstrates tool invocation.
  • Quality: The example is concise and demonstrates key functionalities clearly. Logging setup enhances debuggability.
  • Improvements: Consider adding comments explaining each step to aid understanding for new users.

9. deploy-docs-and-extensions.yml

  • Purpose: A GitHub Actions workflow for deploying documentation and extensions site updates.
  • Structure: Defines jobs for checking out code, setting up Node.js, building projects, and deploying to GitHub Pages.
  • Quality: The workflow is well-defined with clear steps for building and deploying assets.
  • Improvements: Ensure secrets used in the workflow are securely managed to prevent unauthorized access.

Overall, the files demonstrate good coding practices with clear structures and thorough documentation where applicable. Some files could benefit from modularization due to their length or complexity to improve maintainability.

Report On: Fetch commits



Development Team and Recent Activity

Team Members and Their Activities

  1. Milad Nazeri

    • Updated SupportedEnvironments.js to clarify macOS app compatibility on x86 architecture.
    • Collaborated with Angie Jones.
  2. Yingjie He

    • Worked on improving the configuration process with error messages.
    • Added features for setting Ollama host and updated UI for Ollama host.
    • Made multiple contributions to various branches, including fixes and feature enhancements.
  3. Adewale Abati (acekyd)

    • Contributed extensively to documentation, including guides on using Goose on Windows via WSL and building custom extensions.
    • Published blog posts and updated documentation workflows.
    • Collaborated with Angie Jones on several documentation updates.
  4. Alice Hau

    • Improved handling of missing usage in provider responses.
    • Made graceful error handling improvements across multiple providers.
  5. Salman Mohammed

    • Implemented several fixes and features, including removing uv.lock, updating system prompts, and adding quick test inputs in workflows.
    • Worked on multiple branches, focusing on bug fixes and feature implementations.
  6. Meenal C

    • Updated issue templates for bug reports.
  7. Kalvin C

    • Added troubleshooting sections to documentation.
    • Worked on truncation calculations and added features for disabling Goose configuration steps during installation.
  8. Angie Jones

    • Made numerous contributions to documentation, including fixing blog headers and updating meta descriptions.
    • Collaborated with multiple team members across various branches.
  9. Alex Hancock

    • Worked on UI components, including link previews and markdown rendering.
    • Contributed to extension management improvements.
  10. Bradley Axen

    • Implemented several fixes related to installation scripts, Google provider, and system prompts.
    • Worked on CLI updates and configuration handling improvements.
  11. Nahiyan Khan

    • Focused on UI styling updates, including dark mode adjustments and landing page styles.
    • Collaborated with Angie Jones on documentation landing page styles.
  12. Ebony Louis

    • Addressed documentation feedback and made updates to guides and architecture documents.
  13. Michael Neale

    • Made contributions to workflow improvements and security notices.
    • Worked on shell loading simplifications.
  14. Marcelle (laanak08)

    • Made updates related to deep links opening in new windows.
    • Worked on specifying models for quick initialization.
  15. Lily Delalande (lily-de)

    • Contributed to UI updates for Ollama checks and settings designs.
    • Worked on confirmation dialogs for deep links.
  16. Wendy Tang

    • Made updates related to error handling in providers and installation documentation clarifications.
  17. Max Novich (Kvadratni)

    • Added Windows support in computer controller modules.
    • Worked on process spawning modifications for Electron apps.

Patterns, Themes, and Conclusions

  • The development team is actively engaged in both feature development and bug fixing across multiple areas of the project, indicating a dynamic development environment.
  • Documentation is a significant focus, with numerous team members contributing to guides, troubleshooting sections, and installation instructions, reflecting an emphasis on user support and onboarding.
  • There is a strong collaborative effort among team members, as evidenced by frequent co-authored commits and cross-branch contributions.
  • The team is addressing both backend improvements (e.g., error handling, configuration processes) and frontend enhancements (e.g., UI styling, link previews), demonstrating a balanced approach to development priorities.
  • Continuous integration practices are evident through workflow updates and testing enhancements, suggesting a commitment to maintaining code quality and stability.