The "openpi" repository, managed by the Physical Intelligence team, is an open-source initiative focused on Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models for robotics. It features the π₀ and π₀-FAST models, designed for specific robotic platforms, with provisions for extensive experimentation and customization. The project is in active development, with a strong community interest as evidenced by its GitHub metrics. Its trajectory suggests continued refinement and community engagement.
Ury Zhilinsky (uzhilinsky)
Ikko Eltociear Ashimine (eltociear)
simple_client/README.md
.Jimmy Tanner (jimmyt857)
Oier Mees (mees)
Recent activities show a focus on improving documentation, enhancing technical features, and ensuring infrastructure reliability. Collaboration among team members is evident, with Ury Zhilinsky playing a central role in recent updates.
Timespan | Opened | Closed | Comments | Labeled | Milestones |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7 Days | 11 | 7 | 26 | 11 | 1 |
14 Days | 11 | 7 | 26 | 11 | 1 |
30 Days | 11 | 7 | 26 | 11 | 1 |
All Time | 13 | 9 | - | - | - |
Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.
Developer | Avatar | Branches | PRs | Commits | Files | Changes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
uzhilinsky | ![]() |
2 | 35/35/1 | 6 | 121 | 16452 |
Jimmy Tanner | ![]() |
2 | 0/0/0 | 2 | 2 | 11 |
Ikko Eltociear Ashimine | ![]() |
1 | 1/1/0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Oier Mees | ![]() |
1 | 1/1/0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Haohuan Wang (haohuanw) | 0 | 10/6/4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Karl Pertsch (kpertsch) | 0 | 13/11/3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Sergey Levine (svlevine) | 0 | 2/2/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Jimmy Tanner | ![]() |
0 | 2/1/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Misha Lvovsky (mishmish66) | 0 | 1/0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Laura Smith (lauramsmith) | 0 | 4/3/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Michael Equi (Michael-Equi) | 0 | 3/2/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period
Risk | Level (1-5) | Rationale |
---|---|---|
Delivery | 3 | The project shows active management and engagement with issues, but the balance between opened and closed issues could be improved to enhance delivery timelines. The presence of performance bottlenecks in inference times (#271) and the lack of comprehensive testing in significant PRs like #274 pose risks to delivery if not addressed. Documentation improvements, such as those in PR #277, aid delivery by facilitating easier setup for users. |
Velocity | 3 | The disparity in commit activity among developers could affect project velocity, with significant contributions from a few key developers like Uzhilinsky. The high volume of changes suggests potential risks to code quality and technical debt if not thoroughly reviewed and tested. The ongoing development efforts, including feature enhancements and documentation updates, indicate active progress but also highlight areas where velocity could be impacted by unresolved issues or performance challenges. |
Dependency | 2 | The project demonstrates strong capabilities in managing remote file dependencies, as seen in src/openpi/shared/download.py . However, frequent updates to downloading mechanisms suggest potential instability if changes are not stable. The reliance on specific libraries like JAX and Flax introduces dependency risks if these libraries undergo significant changes or deprecations. |
Team | 3 | The disparity in commit activity among developers suggests potential risks related to team dynamics or uneven workload distribution. Key contributors like Uzhilinsky are heavily involved, while others show minimal activity. This imbalance could affect team cohesion and project velocity if key contributors face burnout or if knowledge is not adequately shared across the team. |
Code Quality | 3 | The presence of minor suggestions and nits from reviewers in PRs like #274 highlights areas where code clarity and completeness could be improved. The complexity of modules in files like src/openpi/models/gemma.py necessitates thorough testing to ensure reliability, posing risks to code quality if not adequately addressed. |
Technical Debt | 3 | The high volume of changes by a single developer (Uzhilinsky) suggests potential risks in maintaining code quality and managing technical debt. Performance inefficiencies highlighted in issues like #271 indicate areas where technical debt could accumulate if not resolved promptly. |
Test Coverage | 4 | Significant PRs like #274 lack thorough testing due to resource constraints, posing risks to test coverage. The need for more comprehensive testing is underscored by the complexity of modules in files like src/openpi/models/gemma_fast.py , which require careful validation to avoid errors. |
Error Handling | 4 | The lack of comprehensive testing in significant PRs like #274 poses risks to error handling, as potential bugs or integration issues may not be identified before deployment. The complexity of modules in files like src/openpi/models/gemma.py necessitates thorough testing to ensure robust error handling. |
Recent GitHub issue activity in the Physical-Intelligence/openpi repository has been quite dynamic, with multiple issues created and closed within the last few days. Notably, there are four open issues and nine recently closed ones, indicating active maintenance and community engagement.
Several issues stand out due to their complexity or significance. Issue #271 highlights a performance concern where inference takes over 10 seconds, consuming substantial GPU memory and causing CPU spikes. This is particularly significant as it impacts the usability of the model in real-time applications. The discussion around this issue suggests that JAX's just-in-time compilation and GPU memory preallocation are contributing factors, with suggestions provided for further investigation.
Issue #270 addresses minor friction points in running Docker for ALOHA simulations, pointing to potential documentation improvements needed for smoother user experience. This reflects a common theme of setup and configuration challenges, also seen in other issues like #262 and #261, which involve downloading models and running inference.
Another notable issue is #258, which discusses community engagement through platforms like Discord or WeChat. This indicates a demand for more interactive support channels beyond GitHub, reflecting a broader theme of community building around the project.
#273: Add LoRA FAST support
#271: Inference takes over 10 seconds to produce output
#270: Minor issue running docker for ALOHA sim
#258: Nice work! Will you open a Discord server for it or for physical intelligence? | 微信交流群
#269: https://github.com/Physical-Intelligence/openpi/blob/openpi/docs/remote_inference.md is missing
#268: Can't load pi0_libero ckpt
#263: Model License
#262: Downloading s3 models fails
#261: Run inference.ipynb and get "ValueError...
#260: Release original checkpoints on Hugging Face
#257: Model checkpoints finetuned on LIBERO dataset?
#144 & #141 (Older issues related to model loading and repository access)
These issues reflect a mix of technical challenges, performance concerns, community engagement efforts, and documentation improvements, all crucial for the project's success and user satisfaction.
docs/docker.md
with 8 additions and 1 deletion.examples/aloha_real/README.md
.pi0_libero
asset is re-downloaded, likely addressing a caching or versioning issue.src/openpi/shared/download.py
with 53 additions and 35 deletions.us-west-1
for S3 downloads.Active Development and Collaboration:
Focus on Documentation Improvements:
Technical Enhancements and Bug Fixes:
Unmerged PRs as Learning Points or Alternatives Considered:
Overall, the repository is actively maintained with a focus on both technical improvements and user experience enhancements through better documentation. The open pull requests suggest ongoing efforts to expand functionality (e.g., LoRA FAST support) while addressing critical setup issues (e.g., Docker instructions).
src/openpi/shared/download.py
URL: download.py
Analysis:
Functionality: This file is responsible for downloading files from remote sources, particularly S3, and caching them locally. It supports concurrent downloads and cache invalidation based on predefined expiration rules.
Structure & Organization:
_download_boto3
, _ensure_permissions
, etc.Quality:
_OPENPI_DATA_HOME
) adds flexibility.Concurrency: The use of concurrent.futures
and file locks (filelock.FileLock
) ensures safe concurrent access to resources.
Security:
Performance:
tqdm
) for download progress is user-friendly.src/openpi/training/data_loader.py
URL: data_loader.py
Analysis:
Functionality: This file defines data loading mechanisms for training models, including dataset transformations and batching using PyTorch's DataLoader.
Structure & Organization:
Dataset
, DataLoader
), promoting a clean architecture.TransformedDataset
class encapsulates dataset transformation logic, enhancing modularity.Quality:
Performance:
Flexibility & Extensibility:
create_data_loader
function, allowing customization of sharding, normalization, and batching.Dataset
protocol.examples/aloha_real/README.md
URL: README.md
Analysis:
Clarity & Completeness:
Usefulness:
Organization:
Accuracy & Relevance:
examples/simple_client/README.md
URL: README.md
Analysis:
Clarity & Simplicity:
Usefulness:
Completeness:
.github/workflows/test.yml
URL: test.yml
Analysis:
Functionality: Defines a CI/CD workflow triggered on pull requests to run tests using pytest.
Structure & Clarity:
Efficiency & Coverage:
openpi-verylarge
), which should be verified for availability across environments.Maintainability & Flexibility:
actions/checkout
, astral-sh/setup-uv
), which should be monitored for updates or deprecations.docs/docker.md
URL: docker.md
Analysis:
Clarity & Usefulness:
Completeness & Relevance:
Organization & Accessibility:
Overall, the files demonstrate a high level of quality in terms of structure, clarity, and functionality. They provide essential components for downloading data efficiently, loading datasets for training robustly, setting up environments using Docker effectively, and ensuring continuous integration through GitHub Actions workflows.
Ury Zhilinsky (uzhilinsky)
Ikko Eltociear Ashimine (eltociear)
simple_client/README.md
file, with a single commit involving 4 changes.Jimmy Tanner (jimmyt857)
Oier Mees (mees)
Documentation and Readability Improvements: Several recent commits focus on improving documentation, such as fixing typos and adding links to external resources. This indicates an effort to enhance the usability and accessibility of the repository for users.
Infrastructure and Configuration Updates: Changes to download scripts and GitHub workflows suggest ongoing efforts to streamline development processes and ensure reliable access to necessary resources.
Collaboration: Ury Zhilinsky appears to be the most active contributor, frequently collaborating with other team members like Jimmy Tanner. The presence of multiple contributors working on similar files indicates collaborative efforts in maintaining and improving the project.
Focus on Defaults and Usability: Setting defaults for data parallel sharding and download regions highlights a focus on making the software easier to use out of the box, which is crucial for user adoption.
Overall, the recent activities reflect a balanced focus on enhancing both the technical robustness and user-friendliness of the openpi project.