‹ Reports
The Dispatch

GitHub Repo Analysis: microsoft/data-formulator


Executive Summary

The "Data Formulator" project by Microsoft is an AI-driven tool designed to streamline the creation of data visualizations using a blend of user interface interactions and natural language inputs. It leverages large language models to simplify data transformation tasks, enhancing user experience and efficiency. The project is actively maintained, with a strong community interest reflected in its GitHub stars. It is open-source under the MIT License, promoting community contributions.

Recent Activity

Team Members and Activities

  1. Dan Marshall (danmarshall)

    • Merged PRs for typo corrections in README.md and UI.
    • Worked on ESLint configurations for code quality.
  2. Ricardo Leal (ricardoleal20)

    • Fixed a typo in README.md.
  3. Steve (snkashis)

    • Corrected a typo in the API key entry UI.

Patterns and Themes

Risks

Of Note

Quantified Reports

Quantify issues



Recent GitHub Issues Activity

Timespan Opened Closed Comments Labeled Milestones
7 Days 1 0 0 1 1
30 Days 1 0 0 1 1
90 Days 1 0 0 1 1
All Time 13 6 - - -

Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.

Rate pull requests



Quantify commits



Quantified Commit Activity Over 14 Days

Developer Avatar Branches PRs Commits Files Changes
Dan Marshall 1 0/1/0 2 33 1457
Steve 1 1/1/0 1 1 2
Ricardo Leal 1 1/1/0 1 1 2

PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period

Quantify risks



Project Risk Ratings

Risk Level (1-5) Rationale
Delivery 4 The project faces significant delivery risks due to unresolved issues and minimal pull request activity. The lack of issue resolution, as seen with issues like #49 and #34, indicates a backlog that could hinder progress. The absence of merged pull requests over the past 90 days suggests a bottleneck in integrating changes, potentially delaying project milestones. Additionally, the dependency on external APIs, as highlighted in issues like #63, poses challenges that could complicate delivery timelines.
Velocity 4 The project's velocity is at risk due to several factors: minimal commit and pull request activity, reliance on a few key contributors, and unresolved issues. The low number of commits and branches suggests limited parallel development efforts, which can slow down progress. The heavy reliance on Dan Marshall for substantial changes poses a risk if he becomes unavailable. Furthermore, the lack of engagement in issue resolution and pull request reviews indicates a slow pace of development.
Dependency 3 The project has moderate dependency risks due to its reliance on external APIs and libraries. Issues like #63 and #49 highlight challenges with integrating third-party APIs such as Sambanova and LLMs, which could complicate maintenance if these APIs change. While there is proactive management of dependencies through tools like Dependabot, the reliance on automated updates without manual oversight could introduce instability.
Team 3 Team risks are present due to limited engagement from contributors other than Dan Marshall. The low number of commits from other team members suggests potential burnout or disengagement. The lack of collaborative review processes for pull requests further indicates possible communication or prioritization issues within the team.
Code Quality 2 The project demonstrates good code quality practices through the use of ESLint configurations and attention to detail in minor corrections. However, the rollback of refactoring changes related to 'const' usage suggests some ongoing challenges in implementing best practices. Overall, the focus on maintaining coding standards helps mitigate significant code quality risks.
Technical Debt 3 Technical debt is a concern due to the complexity of certain files like 'src/views/DataThread.tsx' and 'src/views/EncodingShelfThread.tsx', which could lead to increased maintenance challenges if not managed properly. The extensive list of disabled ESLint rules also suggests areas where code quality might be compromised. While there are efforts to address technical debt through linting and minor corrections, the lack of substantial feature development indicates potential accumulation of technical debt.
Test Coverage 4 Test coverage is a significant risk as there is a lack of automated testing mechanisms for critical components like 'src/views/ModelSelectionDialog.tsx' and 'src/views/ConceptCard.tsx'. The reliance on manual testing could result in undetected bugs or regressions, impacting overall software quality. The absence of explicit test coverage in files responsible for key functionalities highlights this risk.
Error Handling 3 Error handling presents moderate risks due to unresolved issues like #34 related to API key integration difficulties. While there are mechanisms for error feedback in UI components, the ongoing technical difficulties users face suggest that error handling might not be comprehensive enough to address all scenarios effectively.

Detailed Reports

Report On: Fetch issues



Recent Activity Analysis

Recent GitHub issue activity for the "Data Formulator" project shows a focus on enhancing flexibility and addressing technical challenges. Notably, issues #63 and #49 highlight a demand for support of third-party endpoints and models, indicating a community interest in expanding the tool's compatibility with various AI models. Issue #34 reveals ongoing difficulties with API key integration, suggesting potential usability or documentation gaps. The persistence of these issues suggests they may be critical to user experience and adoption. Additionally, there is a recurring theme of data handling challenges, as seen in issues #53 and #50, which involve data visualization and JSON import capabilities.

Issue Details

Most Recently Created Issue

  • #63: Allow custom OpenAI ENDPOINT & Model Names - e.g. Sambanova API Cloud
    • Priority: Not specified
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 1 day ago
    • Updated: Not updated since creation

Most Recently Updated Issue

  • #49: The Endpoint of OpenAI model is not allow to change, how should I add 3rd party LLMs?
    • Priority: Not specified
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 98 days ago
    • Updated: 1 day ago

Other Notable Issues

  • #34: Trouble adding the OpenAI API key

    • Priority: Not specified
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 118 days ago
    • Updated: Recently edited
  • #53: Data Visualization Challenge Discussion

    • Priority: Not specified
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 96 days ago
  • #51: add moving average

    • Priority: Not specified
    • Status: Open
    • Created: 98 days ago

These issues highlight ongoing efforts to improve the tool's flexibility and address technical hurdles related to data handling and model integration. The community's active engagement in discussions suggests a collaborative approach to resolving these challenges.

Report On: Fetch pull requests



Pull Request Analysis for Microsoft/Data-Formulator

Overview

The repository microsoft/data-formulator currently has no open pull requests and a total of 50 closed pull requests. The recent activity indicates a healthy pace of development with several PRs being merged or closed within the last few days.

Recent Closed Pull Requests

Notable Closed PRs

  1. #62: Fix typo in README.md

    • Status: Merged
    • Details: This PR corrected a minor typo in the README.md file, changing "formualtor" to "formulator". It was created and merged on the same day, indicating quick action on documentation fixes.
    • Significance: While minor, this reflects attention to detail in documentation, which is crucial for user understanding and project professionalism.
  2. #61: api key entry ui: correct (bank --> blank) typo

    • Status: Merged
    • Details: Fixed a typo in the UI placeholder text from "bank" to "blank". Quick turnaround with creation and merging happening on the same day.
    • Significance: UI text clarity is important for user experience, and this fix contributes to that.
  3. #60: Eslint

    • Status: Merged
    • Details: Introduced ESLint configurations to improve code quality by preferring let over var and ensuring React components have keys.
    • Significance: Enhances code maintainability and readability, aligning with best practices in JavaScript development.
  4. #59: Bump vite from 5.3.6 to 5.4.12

    • Status: Merged
    • Details: Updated the Vite dependency to address security advisories and improve performance.
    • Significance: Keeping dependencies up-to-date is critical for security and performance improvements.
  5. #58: Eslint initial

    • Status: Merged
    • Details: Initial setup of ESLint without modifying existing code.
    • Significance: Sets the foundation for future code quality improvements.
  6. #57: Fix a11y insights

    • Status: Merged
    • Details: Addressed accessibility issues across various components, improving UI accessibility.
    • Significance: Accessibility enhancements are crucial for inclusivity, ensuring the tool can be used by a wider audience.

PR Closed Without Merge

  1. #48: Add MIME type for JavaScript files in app.py
    • Status: Closed (Not Merged)
    • Details: Aimed to fix an issue related to MIME types but was not merged due to inability to reproduce the issue locally.
    • Significance: Highlights challenges in reproducing certain bugs; community assistance might be needed for further investigation.

General Observations

  • The project shows active maintenance with frequent updates, particularly around dependency management and code quality improvements.
  • There is a strong emphasis on maintaining clean and accessible code, as seen in multiple ESLint-related PRs and accessibility fixes.
  • Documentation is given importance, as evidenced by quick merges of documentation-related fixes.
  • The use of Dependabot for dependency updates indicates an automated approach to keeping the project secure and up-to-date.

Recommendations

  • Continue leveraging automated tools like Dependabot for dependency management while ensuring manual review for potential breaking changes.
  • Encourage community involvement, especially in reproducing complex issues like those seen in PR #48.
  • Maintain focus on accessibility improvements as they enhance user experience significantly.

Overall, microsoft/data-formulator appears to be a well-maintained project with a proactive approach towards code quality, security, and user experience enhancements.

Report On: Fetch Files For Assessment



Source Code Assessment

1. src/views/ModelSelectionDialog.tsx

  • Structure and Organization: The file is well-organized, with clear separation of imports, component definitions, and utility functions. The use of React hooks like useState and useSelector is consistent and appropriate for managing component state and accessing Redux store data.

  • Code Quality:

    • The component utilizes Material-UI components effectively to create a dialog interface for model selection.
    • There is a good use of TypeScript for type safety, although some areas could benefit from more explicit types instead of using any.
    • The logic for handling model status updates and testing models is encapsulated within the component, which might be better refactored into separate utility functions or custom hooks for reusability and cleaner code.
  • Potential Improvements:

    • Consider extracting repeated JSX elements into smaller components to improve readability.
    • Enhance error handling in network requests to provide more informative feedback to users.

2. src/views/DataThread.tsx

  • Structure and Organization: This file is quite large (495 lines), indicating potential complexity. It might benefit from breaking down into smaller components or files to enhance maintainability.

  • Code Quality:

    • The use of React hooks and Material-UI components is consistent throughout the file.
    • There are several inline styles and complex JSX structures that could be simplified by using styled-components or CSS modules.
    • Logic related to data processing and visualization rendering is intertwined with UI logic, which could be separated for better clarity.
  • Potential Improvements:

    • Refactor the component to separate concerns, such as moving data processing logic to utility functions or hooks.
    • Consider implementing memoization techniques (e.g., React.memo) to optimize rendering performance, especially if the component deals with large datasets.

3. src/views/EncodingShelfThread.tsx

  • Structure and Organization: Similar to DataThread.tsx, this file is also quite extensive (561 lines). It handles complex logic related to encoding shelves in visualizations.

  • Code Quality:

    • The component effectively uses React and Redux patterns but could benefit from further decomposition into smaller, more manageable components.
    • There is a mix of concerns within the component, such as UI rendering and data transformation logic, which could be separated.
  • Potential Improvements:

    • Extract repeated patterns into reusable components or custom hooks.
    • Improve type safety by replacing any types with more specific TypeScript interfaces where possible.

4. eslint.config.js

  • Structure and Organization: The configuration file is concise and well-organized, specifying language options, plugins, and rules clearly.

  • Code Quality:

    • The configuration uses modern ESLint features like flat configurations for React.
    • Several rules are turned off, which might lead to less strict linting. It's important to ensure that this aligns with the project's coding standards.
  • Potential Improvements:

    • Regularly review disabled rules to ensure they are still necessary. Enabling some rules might improve code quality across the project.

5. package.json

  • Structure and Organization: The file is structured according to standard conventions, listing dependencies, scripts, and other metadata clearly.

  • Code Quality:

    • Dependencies are up-to-date with specific versioning, which helps in maintaining consistency across environments.
    • Scripts for common tasks like linting and building are defined, promoting automation in development workflows.
  • Potential Improvements:

    • Regularly audit dependencies for security vulnerabilities using tools like npm audit.
    • Consider adding more scripts for testing or deployment if applicable.

6. src/app/App.tsx

  • Structure and Organization: This central application file integrates various components and manages global states effectively using Redux.

  • Code Quality:

    • The use of TypeScript enhances type safety across the application logic.
    • The component structure is clear, with a logical flow from imports to JSX rendering.
  • Potential Improvements:

    • Consider breaking down large sections of JSX into smaller components for better readability.
    • Ensure that all asynchronous operations have error handling mechanisms in place.

7. src/data/utils.ts

  • Structure and Organization: This utility file provides functions for data processing tasks like loading data from text or inferring types.

  • Code Quality:

    • Functions are well-defined with clear purposes, aiding in data manipulation tasks.
    • Type inference functions utilize TypeScript effectively to ensure correct data handling.
  • Potential Improvements:

    • Add more unit tests to cover edge cases in data processing functions.
    • Consider optimizing any computationally intensive operations if performance issues arise.

8. yarn.lock

  • Structure and Organization: As an auto-generated file by Yarn, it maintains a detailed record of exact dependency versions used in the project.

  • Code Quality:

    • Ensures consistent dependency resolution across different environments by locking versions precisely.
  • Potential Improvements:

    • Regularly update dependencies to incorporate security patches and new features while ensuring compatibility through testing.

Report On: Fetch commits



Development Team and Recent Activity

Team Members and Activities

  1. Dan Marshall (danmarshall)

    • Recent Activities:
    • Merged a pull request to fix a typo in the README.md.
    • Merged a pull request to correct a typo in the API key entry UI.
    • Worked on ESLint configuration changes, involving multiple files and significant line changes.
    • Reverted changes related to the use of const in code refactoring.
    • Collaborations:
    • Worked with Ricardo Leal and Steve on typo corrections.
    • Work in Progress:
    • No specific ongoing tasks are mentioned.
  2. Ricardo Leal (ricardoleal20)

    • Recent Activities:
    • Fixed a typo in the main README.md file.
    • Collaborations:
    • Worked with Dan Marshall on fixing the README.md typo.
    • Work in Progress:
    • No specific ongoing tasks are mentioned.
  3. Steve (snkashis)

    • Recent Activities:
    • Corrected a typo in the API key entry UI.
    • Collaborations:
    • Worked with Dan Marshall on correcting the API key entry UI typo.
    • Work in Progress:
    • No specific ongoing tasks are mentioned.

Patterns, Themes, and Conclusions

  • Focus on Typos and Minor Fixes: The recent activities primarily involve fixing typos in documentation and user interface components, indicating attention to detail and quality assurance.
  • ESLint Configuration: There is significant activity around ESLint configuration, suggesting an emphasis on maintaining code quality and consistency across the project.
  • Collaboration: There is evidence of collaboration among team members, particularly between Dan Marshall, Ricardo Leal, and Steve, highlighting teamwork in addressing minor issues.
  • Reversion of Changes: The reversion of refactoring changes suggests a reassessment or rollback of previous decisions, possibly due to unforeseen issues or reconsideration of best practices.

Overall, the recent activities reflect maintenance work focusing on documentation accuracy and code quality improvements.