Quantify issues

Recent GitHub Issues Activity

_{Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.}

Rate pull requests

PR#180 - added support for reka provideropen

3_/5

Riddhimaan-SenapatiCreated: 2025-01-20

The pull request adds support for the Reka provider, which is a moderately significant change. It includes new files and updates to existing ones, such as adding a new provider class, updating environment variables, and modifying dependency files. However, it introduces merge conflicts that need resolution, which indicates some lack of thoroughness. The changes are functional but not exemplary, and the need for manual conflict resolution detracts from its quality.

[+] Read More

PR#181 - Add Google Gemini API support to aisuiteopen

3_/5

Elias Judin (eliasjudin)Created: 2025-01-22

The pull request introduces a new provider for the Google Gemini API, which is a valuable addition to the `aisuite` project. It includes the implementation of necessary methods and updates to documentation, which are well-detailed. However, there are some issues noted in the review comments regarding class naming and API configuration that need addressing. The PR is functional and beneficial but requires some refinements and lacks exceptional innovation or complexity, thus warranting an average rating.

[+] Read More

PR#191 - Codebeaver/featherless provider 190open

3_/5

CodeBeaverAICreated: 2025-02-11

The pull request adds a single unit test for the Featherless Provider, which is a minor but useful contribution. The test coverage is improved by 7.69%, and all tests pass without any bugs detected. However, the addition of just one test and a configuration file is relatively insignificant in terms of overall impact on the project. The changes are well-executed but not substantial enough to warrant a higher rating.

[+] Read More

PR#192 - Adding new environment keys in .env.sampleopen

3_/5

Towsif Ahamed Labib (TowsifAhamed)Created: 2025-02-12

The pull request updates the .env.sample file to include additional environment variables for various LLM providers, which is a useful enhancement for developers configuring these services. However, the change is relatively minor and straightforward, involving only the addition of new keys without complex logic or significant code restructuring. While it ensures completeness in the configuration file, it doesn't introduce any groundbreaking features or improvements. Therefore, it is an average update that is important but not exceptionally significant.

[+] Read More

PR#108 - Added logging and distributed tracing with opentelemetryopen

4_/5

Abhiram Vadlapatla (abhiramvad)Created: 2024-11-29

The PR introduces significant improvements in observability and performance monitoring by integrating centralized logging and OpenTelemetry support. The addition of methods for consistent API and error logging, along with distributed tracing, enhances the robustness of the Provider class. However, it lacks extensive documentation or examples on how to utilize these new features, which could aid in adoption and understanding. Overall, it's a solid enhancement but could benefit from additional user guidance.

[+] Read More

PR#121 - Add Tongyi Provider Supportopen

4_/5

zhangshulin (NewToolAI)Created: 2024-12-01

The pull request introduces a new provider, Tongyi, into the existing Python package, which is a significant addition. It includes the implementation of the provider class, comprehensive test cases with mocks, and detailed usage instructions. The PR addresses previous feedback by integrating OpenAI package support and tool calling functionality. However, it lacks any groundbreaking innovation or complexity that would warrant a perfect score. Overall, it is a well-executed and valuable enhancement to the project.

[+] Read More

PR#184 - Add OpenAI support for structured outputsopen

4_/5

trevbeers-thriveCreated: 2025-01-31

This pull request introduces a significant enhancement by adding support for structured outputs in the OpenAI integration, which is a valuable feature. The implementation is clean, with minimal changes to existing code and comprehensive test coverage added. However, it lacks detailed documentation or examples in the main codebase, which could aid users in understanding and utilizing the new feature effectively. Overall, it's a well-executed improvement but could benefit from additional user guidance.

[+] Read More

PR#185 - Async version in aisuite.AsyncClient classopen

4_/5

Kapulkin Stanislav (kapulkin)Created: 2025-02-04

The pull request introduces an async client interface for handling LLM calls, which is a significant enhancement for parallel processing in Python applications. It supports multiple providers and includes comprehensive tests, demonstrating thoroughness and attention to detail. However, the changes are moderately significant as they primarily extend existing functionality rather than introducing groundbreaking features. The PR is well-structured, with clear documentation and adherence to coding standards, making it a valuable contribution to the project.

[+] Read More

PR#189 - Add support for Cerebras Cloud SDKopen

4_/5

kamilk-cerebrasCreated: 2025-02-10

This pull request introduces support for the Cerebras Cloud SDK, adding a significant new feature to the project. It includes comprehensive documentation and tests, which is commendable. The code changes are well-structured and integrate smoothly with the existing framework. However, while the addition is substantial, it primarily focuses on integrating an external SDK rather than introducing novel functionality or optimizations within the core project itself. Thus, it merits a rating of 4 for being quite good and thorough, but not exemplary.

[+] Read More

PR#190 - Add support for Featherless Provideropen

4_/5

DarinVerheijkeCreated: 2025-02-11

This pull request introduces a new provider integration with Featherless AI, addressing an open issue and expanding the framework's capabilities by adding support for over 3000 models. The implementation is thorough, including necessary configuration changes, a new provider class, usage examples, documentation, and unit tests. The code appears well-structured and follows good practices, such as environment variable management and error handling for missing API keys. However, the PR could be improved by providing more detailed comments within the code itself to enhance maintainability. Overall, it represents a significant and well-rounded contribution to the project.

[+] Read More

Quantify commits

Quantified Commit Activity Over 14 Days

Developer	Avatar	Branches	PRs	Commits	Files	Changes
Rohit Prasad		1	2/2/0	2	8	794
Ming Gong		1	1/1/0	1	2	9
Kevin Solorio		0	0/0/0	0	0	0
Kapulkin Stanislav (kapulkin)		0	1/0/1	0	0	0
CodeBeaverAI (CodeBeaverAI)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Towsif Ahamed Labib (TowsifAhamed)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
None (DarinVerheijke)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
None (kamilk-cerebras)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
None (trevbeers-thrive)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0

_{PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period}

Quantify risks

Project Risk Ratings

Report On: Fetch issues

Recent Activity Analysis

Recent GitHub issue activity for the aisuite project shows a mix of newly created issues and updates to existing ones. Notably, there are several issues related to provider support, configuration complexities, and feature requests for enhancements like streaming support and parameter normalization.

Notable Anomalies and Themes

• Provider Support Issues: Several issues (#194, #169, #156) highlight challenges with provider-specific configurations, particularly with Azure and AWS. These include incorrect URL constructions leading to 404 errors and access denial due to misconfigured credentials.
• Configuration Complexity: Issue #193 suggests the need for a configuration file to optimize parameters across different LLMs, indicating a common theme of configuration complexity.
• Feature Requests: There is a strong demand for new features such as asyncio support (#61), structured responses (#66), and streaming capabilities (#97). These requests suggest users are looking for more advanced functionalities to enhance integration with their applications.
• Dependency Management: Issue #172 discusses outdated dependencies causing conflicts, highlighting the need for regular updates to maintain compatibility with other packages in the ecosystem.
• Community Engagement: The presence of multiple comments on issues like #169 indicates active community engagement, although some users express frustration over delayed responses from maintainers.

Issue Details

Most Recently Created Issues

1. #194: Created 0 days ago - "Can't get this to work with Azure OpenAI gpt-4o model" (Priority: High, Status: Open)
2. #193: Created 0 days ago - "Config file for guidelines to set optimal additional parameters based on use cases" (Priority: Medium, Status: Open)

Most Recently Updated Issues

1. #169: Updated 2 days ago - "Azure Open AI request need a version query parameter" (Priority: High, Status: Open)
2. #132: Updated 3 days ago - "ImportError: Could not import module aisuite.providers.mistral_provider" (Priority: Medium, Status: Open)

These issues reflect ongoing challenges with provider integrations and the need for better configuration management. The high-priority issues related to Azure indicate critical areas that require immediate attention to ensure seamless functionality across supported providers.

Report On: Fetch pull requests

Analysis of Pull Requests for andrewyng/aisuite

Open Pull Requests

1. #192: Adding new environment keys in .env.sample

   • State: Open
   • Created: 0 days ago
   • Summary: This PR updates the .env.sample file to include all necessary environment variables for supported LLM providers. This ensures that each provider's configuration can be set from the environment.
   • Notable Aspects: This is a recent addition and seems crucial for improving configuration management across different environments.

2. #191: Codebeaver/featherless provider 190

   • State: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • Summary: Adds a unit test for the Featherless Provider, improving test coverage and ensuring no bugs are present in the changes.
   • Notable Aspects: The PR is linked to #190, indicating collaborative work on the Featherless Provider integration.

3. #190: Add support for Featherless Provider

   • State: Open
   • Created: 1 day ago
   • Summary: Integrates Featherless.ai, providing access to over 3000+ models on Hugging Face. Addresses issue #140.
   • Notable Aspects: Significant addition that expands the suite's capabilities by integrating a large number of models.

4. #189: Add support for Cerebras Cloud SDK

   • State: Open
   • Created: 2 days ago
   • Summary: Adds support for Cerebras SDK, including comprehensive documentation and tests.
   • Notable Aspects: Another major feature addition that enhances the suite's provider options.

5. #185: Async version in aisuite.AsyncClient class

   • State: Open
   • Created: 8 days ago
   • Summary: Introduces an async client interface with support for several providers, addressing request #61.
   • Notable Aspects: This PR is crucial for modernizing the library to support asynchronous operations, which are increasingly important in Python development.

6. #184: Add OpenAI support for structured outputs

   • State: Open
   • Created: 12 days ago
   • Summary: Allows structured responses in OpenAI responses using response_format.
   • Notable Aspects: Enhances the flexibility of response handling from OpenAI models.

7. #181: Add Google Gemini API support to aisuite

   • State: Open
   • Created: 21 days ago
   • Summary: Adds support for Google Gemini API with detailed documentation and examples.
   • Notable Aspects: Expands provider options and includes thorough documentation.

8. #121: Add Tongyi Provider Support

   • State: Open
   • Created: 73 days ago
   • Summary: Integrates Tongyi provider using the dashscope library.
   • Notable Aspects: Long-standing open PR that might need attention or closure if inactive.

9. Other PRs like #108, #180, #178, and others focus on adding new providers or improving existing functionalities but have been open for a while and may require review or closure if they are inactive.

Closed Pull Requests

1. #188: Release 0.1.9

   • State: Closed (Merged)
   • Summary: Increases the version number, indicating a new release with potentially new features or fixes.

2. #187: Add support for reasoning content

   • State: Closed (Merged)
   • Summary: Adds support for reasoning content, enhancing functionality related to DeepSeek.

3. Notably closed without merge:

   • #179: Async version of the client with corresponding providers support was closed without merging, possibly due to conflicts or alternative solutions being implemented.
   • Other PRs like #183 and #171 were also closed without merging, indicating potential issues or redundancies.

Observations

• The project is actively maintained with numerous recent contributions focusing on expanding provider support and improving existing functionalities.
• There are several open pull requests that have been pending for extended periods (e.g., #121), which may require attention to either progress or close them if they are no longer relevant.
• The introduction of async capabilities (#185) is a significant enhancement that aligns with modern Python practices and could greatly benefit users who require non-blocking operations.
• The project appears to be growing rapidly in terms of features and provider integrations, as evidenced by the numerous open PRs focused on adding new providers.

Recommendations

• Prioritize reviewing and merging recent PRs like #192 and #191 that address immediate improvements and bug fixes.
• Evaluate long-standing open PRs such as #121 to determine their relevance and either progress them or close them if they are outdated.
• Consider revisiting closed PRs like #179 to understand why they were not merged and if their proposed changes could be beneficial if reworked.
• Maintain regular communication with contributors to ensure active collaboration and timely progression of pull requests.

Report On: Fetch Files For Assessment

Source Code Assessment

poetry.lock

• Purpose: This file is auto-generated by Poetry to lock dependencies to specific versions, ensuring consistent environments across installations.
• Structure & Content:
  • Contains detailed information about each package, including version, description, Python version compatibility, and file hashes for verification.
  • Dependencies are grouped into categories like dev and main.
  • The file is extensive (7420 lines), indicating a large number of dependencies, which may impact the project's complexity and maintenance.
• Quality:
  • The file is well-structured and follows the standard format for a poetry.lock file.
  • It ensures reproducibility of the environment but should not be edited manually.

pyproject.toml

• Purpose: Defines project metadata, dependencies, and build system requirements using Poetry.
• Structure & Content:
  • Clearly specifies project details such as name, version, description, authors, and readme file.
  • Lists both main and optional dependencies with specific versions.
  • Includes development dependencies under [tool.poetry.group.dev.dependencies].
  • Uses extras to manage optional features and their dependencies.
• Quality:
  • The file is concise (70 lines) and well-organized.
  • It effectively uses Poetry's features to manage dependencies and configurations.

aisuite/client.py

• Purpose: Implements the core client functionality for interacting with different AI providers.
• Structure & Content:
  • Defines a Client class that initializes providers using a factory pattern (ProviderFactory).
  • Includes methods for configuring providers and accessing chat functionalities (Chat, Completions).
  • Uses docstrings to describe class methods clearly.
• Quality:
  • The code is well-structured with clear separation of concerns between client initialization and chat functionalities.
  • Error handling is present for invalid provider keys.
  • The use of properties (chat) enhances encapsulation.

aisuite/framework/choice.py

• Purpose: Defines a Choice class representing a choice in a chat completion response.
• Structure & Content:
  • Imports necessary modules and defines a simple class with attributes like finish_reason and message.
• Quality:
  • The code is minimalistic (14 lines) but effectively serves its purpose within the framework.
  • Type annotations improve code readability and maintainability.

aisuite/framework/message.py

• Purpose: Provides data models for handling API responses that do not conform to OpenAI's style.
• Structure & Content:
  • Uses Pydantic's BaseModel to define structured data models (Function, ChatCompletionMessageToolCall, Message).
• Quality:
  • The use of Pydantic ensures data validation and serialization capabilities.
  • Code is concise (23 lines) and leverages type annotations for clarity.

examples/DeepseekPost.ipynb

• Purpose: Demonstrates usage of the AISuite library in an interactive Jupyter Notebook format.
• Structure & Content:
  • Contains cells that import necessary libraries, set up the client, and create chat completions with different models.
• Quality:
  • Provides practical examples of using the library with clear outputs demonstrating functionality.
  • Could benefit from additional markdown cells explaining each step for better educational value.

tests/providers/test_azure_provider.py

• Purpose: Unit tests for Azure provider message conversion functionality.
• Structure & Content:
  • Utilizes Python's unittest framework to test request conversion and response handling by AzureMessageConverter.
• Quality:
  • Tests are well-defined with clear assertions checking expected outcomes.
  • Covers basic scenarios but could expand to include edge cases or error handling tests.

.env.sample

• Purpose: Provides a template for environment variable configuration required by the application.
• Structure & Content:
  • Lists placeholders for various API keys needed by different providers supported by AISuite.
• Quality:
  • Serves as a useful guide for setting up necessary environment variables.
  • Ensures sensitive information is not hard-coded into the application.

.pre-commit-config.yaml

• Purpose: Configures pre-commit hooks to maintain code quality and consistency across commits.
• Structure & Content:
  • Specifies usage of Black formatter via a pre-commit mirror repository with Python version configuration.
• Quality:
  • Ensures code style consistency using Black, which is widely regarded as a best practice in Python projects.

Report On: Fetch commits

Development Team and Recent Activity

Team Members and Activities

1. Rohit Prasad (rohitprasad15)

   • Recent commits include:
   • Released version 0.1.9, updated poetry.lock and pyproject.toml.
   • Added support for reasoning content in Deepseek, including a new notebook example.
   • Active branches: rcp/ToolCalling-P1, rcp/ToolsExperimental, rcp/UnifiedSearch.
   • Involved in tool calling support for various providers and ongoing refactorings.

2. Kevin Solorio (ksolo)

   • Recent activity includes merging pull requests related to Azure API version support and other minor updates.
   • No recent commits within the last 14 days.

3. Ming Gong (gongmingqm10)

   • Added Azure API-version query parameters.
   • Collaborated with Kevin Solorio on related pull requests.

4. Riddhimaan Senapati

   • Previously worked on Deepseek LLMs support and code formatting.

5. Akim Tsvigun (Aktsvigun)

   • Contributed to Nebius AI Studio integration and documentation.

6. Other Contributors

   • Various contributors have been involved in adding new providers, updating documentation, and fixing bugs.

Patterns, Themes, and Conclusions

• Active Development: The project shows active development with frequent updates, particularly by Rohit Prasad who is leading efforts on tool calling support and reasoning content extraction.
• Collaboration: There is a collaborative effort among team members, especially in merging pull requests and integrating new features.
• Focus Areas: Recent work has focused on expanding provider support (e.g., Deepseek, Azure), improving tooling capabilities, and enhancing documentation.
• Community Engagement: The project continues to attract contributions from various developers, indicating strong community involvement.
• Ongoing Work: Several branches indicate ongoing work related to tool calling support and experimental features.

Overall, the development team is actively enhancing the aisuite project by adding new features, supporting more AI providers, and refining existing functionalities.