The "GenAI-Showcase" repository by MongoDB functions as a comprehensive resource for developers interested in integrating Generative AI technologies with MongoDB. It offers diverse examples and sample applications, including Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and AI Agents. The project is actively maintained and popular within the developer community, showcasing MongoDB's capabilities as a vector database and memory provider.
Timespan | Opened | Closed | Comments | Labeled | Milestones |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7 Days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
30 Days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
90 Days | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
All Time | 5 | 2 | - | - | - |
Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.
Developer | Avatar | Branches | PRs | Commits | Files | Changes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pavel Duchovny | ![]() |
1 | 1/2/0 | 2 | 87 | 14846 |
Apoorva Joshi | ![]() |
1 | 1/1/0 | 11 | 206 | 12388 |
Richmond Alake | ![]() |
1 | 2/2/0 | 6 | 12 | 415 |
Arturo Nereu (ArturoNereu) | 0 | 1/0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Utsav Talwar (utsavMongoDB) | 0 | 1/0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period
Risk | Level (1-5) | Rationale |
---|---|---|
Delivery | 4 | The project's delivery risk is high due to several unresolved issues and the uneven distribution of workload among team members. The lack of recent issue engagement, as seen in the minimal activity over the last 90 days, suggests potential delays in addressing critical problems (#61, #15). Additionally, the significant contributions by a few developers, such as Apoorva Joshi and Pavel Duchovny, indicate a risk of bottlenecks or quality issues if these changes are not properly reviewed. The presence of unresolved pull requests with conflicts (#64) further exacerbates this risk. |
Velocity | 3 | The velocity risk is moderate. While there is active development with substantial contributions from key developers like Apoorva Joshi and Richmond Alake, the lack of engagement from other team members and unresolved issues could slow down progress. The prolonged open status of critical issues (#61) and the need for conflict resolution in pull requests (#64) suggest potential hurdles in maintaining a steady pace. |
Dependency | 4 | Dependency risk is high due to reliance on external systems like MongoDB Atlas for full functionality (#15). The introduction of new submodules and external libraries in pull requests (#51) also increases dependency risks if these resources are not maintained or updated regularly. The absence of local development capabilities equivalent to production environments further complicates dependency management. |
Team | 3 | The team risk is moderate. There is evidence of active collaboration among some team members, but the uneven distribution of workload and lack of contributions from certain individuals could lead to burnout or disengagement. The presence of unresolved comments in pull requests suggests potential communication gaps that could affect team dynamics. |
Code Quality | 3 | Code quality risk is moderate. While there are significant contributions enhancing project functionality, the absence of detailed integration tests and reliance on automated testing tools for quality assurance pose risks to code robustness. The substantial changes introduced by a few developers need thorough review to ensure maintainability. |
Technical Debt | 4 | Technical debt risk is high due to the accumulation of changes without comprehensive testing or documentation updates. The lack of detailed integration tests for major additions (#51) and minimal README updates for new features highlight potential areas where technical debt could accumulate if not addressed promptly. |
Test Coverage | 4 | Test coverage risk is high due to the absence of detailed integration tests for significant changes and new features. Reliance on pre-commit checks without thorough validation steps indicates potential gaps in ensuring code reliability and robustness. |
Error Handling | 3 | Error handling risk is moderate. While there are structured logging mechanisms and try-catch blocks implemented across various components, the lack of explicit error handling during data preprocessing steps in notebooks suggests potential vulnerabilities that could affect system reliability. |
Recent GitHub issue activity in the "GenAI-Showcase" repository indicates a focus on technical challenges related to data loading, vector search indexing, and semantic caching. Notably, issues such as #61 and #15 highlight complications with data accessibility and MongoDB's support for vector search indexes, respectively. Issue #61 involves missing data files necessary for a notebook example, which is crucial for users attempting to replicate the showcased AI workflows. Issue #15 reveals a limitation in MongoDB's local instance capabilities compared to Atlas, affecting users transitioning from cloud to local environments. Common themes include integration challenges and feature limitations when using MongoDB in GenAI contexts.
#61: I may have missed it - but data won't load for the Factory Accident Agent example
#15: Error using nodejs to create vector search index on mongodb 7
createSearchIndexes
command in local MongoDB instance; only supported in Atlas.#10: Semantic cache issue on complex rag chain
PR #85: Update Pragmatic_LLM_Application_Introduction_From_RAG_to_Agents_with…
PR #82: Added [ MongoDB and OpenAI RAG ] under use-cases
PR #64: Updating notebook
PR #51: Added .NET AI Agent demo
PR #75: Add local ai bot
PR #73: Added Agentic RAG notebook
PR #57: Add agentic RAG notebook
PR #81
PRs Closed Without Merging
The repository is actively maintained with numerous contributions focusing on expanding use cases, tutorials, and application demos around GenAI technologies using MongoDB. The open pull requests generally require minor adjustments or conflict resolutions before they can be merged. The closed pull requests show a healthy pace of integration and resolution of issues, with some notable efforts in cleanup and security improvements. Coordination among contributors on overlapping submissions (e.g., agentic RAG notebooks) could enhance efficiency further.
apps/mongo-feed/app/api/agent-analysis/route.ts
apps/mongo-feed/app/api/analyze-feedback/route.ts
apps/mongo-feed/app/api/process-chat/route.ts
apps/RT-voice-ts-store-agent/app/api/products/route.ts
notebooks/rag/deepseek_r1_rag_pipeline_with_mongodb.ipynb
notebooks/rag/graphrag_with_mongodb_and_openai.ipynb
apps/local-rag-pdf/rag_module.py
apps/mongo-mp/app/api/auth/login/route.ts
apps/mongo-mp/app/api/playlists/[id]/add-song/route.ts
Overall, the source code across these files demonstrates a good level of quality in terms of structure, error handling, and security considerations. Performance optimizations and secure management of sensitive data (like API keys) should be prioritized in production environments.
mongo-feed
, RealtimeVoiceTS
, and cleanup
.