‹ Reports
The Dispatch

The Dispatch Demo - promptfoo/promptfoo


promptfoo is an innovative tool designed to enhance the development and evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) by providing a comprehensive testing framework. Developed by the organization promptfoo, this open-source project aims to support a wide array of LLM APIs including but not limited to OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure, Google, and HuggingFace. It facilitates test-driven development for LLM applications through features such as side-by-side output comparison, automatic scoring based on predefined test cases, and integration with CI/CD pipelines. The project's GitHub repository indicates a healthy level of activity and community engagement, showcasing its importance and utility in the rapidly evolving domain of artificial intelligence and machine learning.

The recent activities within the promptfoo project reveal a concerted effort to expand its capabilities, address user-reported issues, and improve overall functionality. Contributions from both core team members and the community highlight a vibrant development environment characterized by collaborative efforts to enhance the tool's utility across various LLM platforms.

Team Members and Recent Activities

Analysis of Open Issues

The open issues within promptfoo cover a broad spectrum from feature requests to bug reports. Notable issues like #588 requesting more flexible assertion capabilities, #572 suggesting CLI enhancements for CSV data retrieval, and #559 discussing more granular reporting options indicate users' desire for more sophisticated testing functionalities. These issues underscore the need for continuous improvement in areas such as assertion flexibility, usability enhancements, and reporting granularity.

Analysis of Pull Requests

The analysis of open pull requests reveals ongoing efforts to integrate new features and fix bugs. PRs like #63 for Weights & Biases integration and #331 addressing scenario expansion issues highlight active development areas. However, some PRs have remained open for extended periods, suggesting potential challenges in integration or prioritization.

Recently closed PRs such as #591 adding CLI watch functionality and #590 fixing Gemini configuration issues demonstrate responsiveness to enhancing developer experience and maintaining compatibility with external APIs.

Conclusion

promptfoo is on a positive trajectory, with active development focused on expanding its capabilities, improving usability, and addressing community feedback. The project benefits from both core team contributions and community engagement, indicating its relevance and value in the LLM development ecosystem. However, challenges such as managing long-standing pull requests and addressing a wide range of open issues highlight areas for improvement in project management and prioritization. Overall, promptfoo stands out as a critical tool for developers working with LLMs, driving forward the test-driven development approach in AI applications.

Quantified Commit Activity Over 14 Days

Developer Avatar Branches Commits Files Changes
Ian Webster 3 50 114 6458
John Vert 1 1 3 77
Matt Hendrick 1 1 1 35
heartyguy 1 1 1 11
Stefan Streichsbier 1 1 2 8
dependabot[bot] 1 1 1 6
Romain 1 1 1 3

Detailed Reports

Report On: Fetch commits



Project Report: promptfoo

Overview

promptfoo is a comprehensive tool designed for testing and evaluating the output quality of Large Language Models (LLMs). Developed and maintained by the organization promptfoo, this open-source project aims to facilitate test-driven development for LLM applications. It supports a wide array of LLM APIs including OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure, Google, HuggingFace, and more, allowing users to systematically test prompts, models, and RAGs. With features like side-by-side output comparison, automatic scoring based on predefined test cases, and integration with CI/CD pipelines, promptfoo streamlines the process of improving prompt quality and catching regressions.

The project is hosted on GitHub with its documentation available at promptfoo.dev. It is licensed under the MIT License, emphasizing its open-source nature. The repository shows a healthy level of activity with 946 total commits, 30 open issues, and 129 forks. It has garnered significant attention with 2219 stars and 17 watchers.

Team Members and Recent Activities

Ian Webster (typpo)

  • Recent Commits: 50 commits across various files and branches.
  • Notable Contributions:
    • Added vertex parameters and safety settings example.
    • Fixed issues related to gemini generationConfig and safetySettings.
    • Implemented CLI watch for vars and providers.
    • Authored documentation updates.
  • Branch Activity: Active in gemini-fix, main, and azure-openai-tools.

dependabot[bot]

  • Recent Commits: 1 commit in the main branch updating webpack-dev-middleware from 5.3.3 to 5.3.4.

jvert

  • Recent Commits: Contributed to the main branch with improvements related to Mistral provider support.

romaintoub

  • Recent Commits: Fixed a typo in Python provider documentation in the main branch.

matt-hendrick

  • Recent Commits: Added display test suite description feature in the web UI.

heartyguy

  • Recent Commits: Introduced support for azure openai assistants in the main branch.

streichsbaer

  • Recent Commits: Added support for Claude 3 Haiku in the anthropic provider.

Analysis

The recent activities within the promptfoo project indicate a focused effort on enhancing functionality, fixing bugs, and expanding support for various LLM providers. The contributions from both core team members like Ian Webster and community contributors highlight a collaborative development environment. The introduction of new features such as CLI watch capabilities, support for additional LLM providers like Claude 3 Haiku, and improvements to existing functionalities like gemini configuration settings showcase the project's commitment to staying relevant and useful for its user base.

The active management of dependencies by dependabot[bot] also emphasizes an attention to maintaining a secure and up-to-date codebase. Furthermore, the engagement in documentation updates reflects an understanding of the importance of clear and accessible information for end-users.

Conclusion

promptfoo is a vibrant project with ongoing contributions aimed at refining its capabilities and extending its applicability across various LLM platforms. The development team's recent activities demonstrate a strong commitment to enhancing user experience, broadening the tool's utility, and fostering an open-source community around LLM testing and evaluation.

Quantified Commit Activity Over 14 Days

Developer Avatar Branches Commits Files Changes
Ian Webster 3 50 114 6458
John Vert 1 1 3 77
Matt Hendrick 1 1 1 35
heartyguy 1 1 1 11
Stefan Streichsbier 1 1 2 8
dependabot[bot] 1 1 1 6
Romain 1 1 1 3

Report On: Fetch issues



Analysis of Open Issues for promptfoo/promptfoo

Notable Problems and Uncertainties

  1. Assertion Flexibility: Issue #588 requests an option for contains: False in assertions to handle unexpected markup formatting in LLM responses. This highlights a need for more flexible assertion capabilities to accommodate various output expectations.

  2. CLI Enhancements: Issue #572 suggests adding a CLI command to retrieve results from the web UI in a CSV file format. This feature would significantly improve usability for users who prefer or require data in CSV format for further analysis or reporting.

  3. Report Generation: Issue #559 discusses generating separate reports or breakdown reports per test suite instead of a single combined report. This issue underscores the need for more granular reporting options to better analyze and understand the performance of different test suites.

  4. Variable Loading from Files: Issue #557 and #328 point out limitations and bugs related to loading variables from external files, especially when using wildcards or under scenarios / config. These issues indicate challenges in managing test data efficiently, which is crucial for scaling tests across multiple prompts and configurations.

  5. Integration with Testing Frameworks: Issue #16 requests Vitest integration, reflecting a broader need for compatibility with various testing frameworks to accommodate different development workflows.

  6. Prompt-Assertion Pairing: Issue #57 highlights a request for tighter coupling between prompts and assertions, particularly for text classification use cases. This suggests a need for more sophisticated test case definitions that can better reflect the dependencies between prompts and expected outputs.

  7. Self-Hosting and Server Features: Issues #99 and #578 express interest in self-hosting capabilities and server features such as history tracking, sharing, and eval regressions. These requests point towards a demand for more collaborative and persistent testing environments beyond local execution.

  8. Conversation History Handling: Issues #136, #384, and #385 discuss challenges with conversation history (_conversation) management across scenarios and parallel execution. These highlight complexities in testing conversational AI models where context continuity is essential.

  9. Custom Provider Configuration: Issue #518 touches on confusion around configuring providers via the command line, especially regarding passing options through provider config entries. This indicates potential usability improvements in how custom providers are configured and utilized.

  10. Web UI Enhancements: Several issues (e.g., #233, #244) mention limitations or bugs in the web UI, such as missing assertion types in dropdowns or variable ordering issues. These reflect areas for improvement in the web interface to enhance user experience.

Recent Closures Worth Noting

  • Issue #592 was closed recently, addressing error messaging when config files are not found. This improvement aids in troubleshooting configuration issues.
  • Issue #587 related to VertexAI 0.49 release causing issues was also closed recently, indicating responsiveness to provider-related problems.
  • Issue #584 about Nunjucks Custom Filters not working was addressed and closed, showcasing attention to template processing features.

Summary

The open issues within the promptfoo/promptfoo repository reveal a community actively engaging with the project's development, suggesting enhancements ranging from usability improvements in CLI commands and web UI to deeper technical features like assertion flexibility and conversation history management. The recent closures indicate an ongoing effort to address these concerns, though several notable areas for improvement remain, particularly around test data management, reporting granularity, self-hosting capabilities, and integration with broader testing frameworks.

Report On: Fetch pull requests



Analysis of Pull Requests for the promptfoo/promptfoo Project

Open Pull Requests

  1. PR #63: Weights & Biases integration

    • Issue: Integration with Weights & Biases for better tracking and visualization.
    • Notable: This PR has been open for a significant amount of time (258 days), indicating potential difficulties in integration or lack of attention. The edits made 13 days ago suggest recent activity, but it remains unmerged.
  2. PR #331: Fix for Scenarios with Variables

    • Issue: Addresses a bug where scenarios were not expanded before reading test files, related to issue #328.
    • Notable: The PR has been open for over 100 days. The changes involve significant code removal in evaluator.ts, which might require careful review to ensure no functionality is lost.
  3. PR #396: Enhancements including Seed for Azure and Cache for Repeats

    • Issue: Adds functionality and fixes, including a seed parameter for Azure and caching mechanism.
    • Notable: This contribution from an external user shows community engagement. However, it's been open for over 70 days, suggesting possible hesitations or complications with the changes.
  4. PR #482: DPO Download Button Feature

    • Issue: Adds a download button for DPO (Data Protection Officer) compliance, related to issue #449.
    • Notable: The PR includes UI changes and has been open for over a month. The visual addition could enhance user experience significantly.
  5. PR #521: Fix for Undefined prompt.id in conversationKey

    • Issue: Addresses a bug where prompt.id was undefined within conversationKey, affecting conversation tracking.
    • Notable: A relatively recent PR that fixes a specific bug, indicating active maintenance and bug fixing in the project.
  6. PR #527: Rename id to model

    • Issue: Refactoring effort to rename id to model across various configurations and documentation, related to issue #511.
    • Notable: This PR touches a large number of files (75) and lines of code (~1166 changes), indicating a significant refactor that could impact many areas of the project.

Recently Closed Pull Requests

  1. PR #591: CLI Watch for Vars and Providers

    • Action: Merged
    • Notable: Adds functionality to watch changes in providers and vars, enhancing developer experience by reducing the need for manual restarts during development.
  2. PR #590: Fix for Gemini Configuration in Vertex AI

    • Action: Merged
    • Notable: Addresses configuration issues with Gemini models on Vertex AI, showing ongoing support and compatibility efforts with external APIs.
  3. PR #589: Support Relative Paths for Custom Providers

    • Action: Merged
    • Notable: Improves usability of custom providers by supporting relative paths, indicating attention to developer convenience and flexibility.
  4. PR #586: Lazy Import of Azure Peer Dependency

    • Action: Merged
    • Notable: Optimizes dependency handling by lazily importing Azure peer dependency, potentially improving startup times and resource usage.
  5. PR #583: Load File Before Running Prompt Function

    • Action: Merged
    • Notable: Fixes an issue where files were not loaded before running prompt functions, indicating responsiveness to fixing bugs that affect core functionality.

Analysis Summary

  • The project shows signs of active development and maintenance, with both long-standing and recent pull requests addressing a range of issues from bug fixes to feature enhancements.
  • There is evidence of community engagement through contributions from external users.
  • Some PRs have remained open for extended periods, which could indicate challenges in integration, review bandwidth issues, or prioritization decisions.
  • Recent merges demonstrate ongoing efforts to enhance compatibility with external APIs, improve developer experience, and maintain robustness through bug fixes.
  • The refactor indicated by PR #527 suggests a significant internal change that could have broad implications for the project's future development direction.

Report On: Fetch PR 527 For Assessment



Analysis of Pull Request: "chore: rename id to model"

Summary of Changes

The pull request introduces a significant change by renaming the id property to model across various files, primarily within provider configurations and related functions. This change affects a wide range of files, including TypeScript source files, documentation, and configuration examples. The modification aims to standardize the terminology used within the project, making it clearer that this property refers to the model identifier rather than a generic ID. Additionally, the pull request includes updates to provider labels and adjustments to ensure backward compatibility.

Code Quality Assessment

  1. Clarity and Maintainability: The changes enhance clarity by using a more descriptive term (model) for what was previously referred to as id. This makes the codebase more intuitive, especially for new contributors or when integrating new models. The addition of comments and type annotations further improves readability and maintainability.

  2. Consistency: The pull request applies the changes consistently across the entire codebase, including source files, examples, and documentation. This consistency is crucial for avoiding confusion and ensuring that future additions or modifications adhere to the same standards.

  3. Backward Compatibility: The author has taken steps to maintain backward compatibility by allowing both id and model properties in certain contexts. While this approach is practical for a transitional period, it may introduce some complexity. Clear documentation on the deprecation of id and the preferred use of model will be essential for guiding users through this change.

  4. Documentation Updates: The pull request includes updates to documentation and comments, reflecting the changes in terminology and providing guidance on using the new model property. This proactive approach ensures that the documentation remains accurate and useful.

  5. Error Handling and Validation: The changes include checks and validation (e.g., using invariant function) to ensure that necessary properties are provided when configuring providers. This attention to error handling contributes to the robustness of the code.

  6. Performance Impact: The modifications are primarily related to configuration properties and do not introduce significant computational overhead or performance impact. The focus is on improving clarity and maintainability rather than altering functionality or performance characteristics.

  7. Test Coverage: While the pull request does not explicitly mention updates to test cases, it is crucial that existing tests are reviewed to ensure they reflect the changes made in this pull request. Additionally, new tests should be considered to cover any new logic or validation introduced.

Recommendations

  • Deprecation Strategy: Clearly document the deprecation of the id property in favor of model, including timelines and migration guides for users.
  • Test Coverage: Review and update existing tests to align with the changes made in this pull request. Consider adding new tests for any additional logic or validation introduced.
  • Future Refactoring: As the project evolves, consider removing backward compatibility layers for deprecated properties after a reasonable transition period.

Conclusion

This pull request makes thoughtful changes aimed at improving clarity and consistency within the codebase by renaming a key property from id to model. The approach taken respects backward compatibility while setting a clear path for future standardization. With attention to documentation, testing, and a clear deprecation strategy, these changes will enhance the project's maintainability and ease of use.

Report On: Fetch Files For Assessment



Analyzing the provided source code files and documentation updates from the promptfoo repository, we can derive insights into the structure, quality, and recent developments in the project. Here's a detailed analysis:

1. Vertex AI Integration (src/providers/vertex.ts)

Structure and Quality:

  • The vertex.ts file is well-structured, following a class-based approach to encapsulate functionality related to Google Vertex AI integration.
  • It defines a generic VertexGenericProvider class and a specific VertexChatProvider class for handling chat models like Gemini and Bison.
  • The use of TypeScript enhances type safety and code readability.
  • The code includes comprehensive error handling, especially around API key and project ID requirements, which improves usability and debuggability.
  • The integration with Google's authentication library (google-auth-library) is handled elegantly, with checks to ensure the library is installed as a peer dependency.

Recent Developments:

  • Recent fixes related to Gemini generationConfig and safetySettings indicate active development and responsiveness to API changes or integration issues.
  • Documentation updates adding vertex parameters and safetysettings examples demonstrate an effort to keep users informed on how to configure and use the Vertex provider effectively.

2. Azure OpenAI Integration (src/providers/azureopenai.ts)

Structure and Quality:

  • This file showcases an integration with Azure's OpenAI service, indicating the project's aim to support multiple AI providers.
  • The structure follows a similar pattern to the Vertex integration, suggesting consistency in design across different provider integrations.
  • Error handling and configuration options are well-managed, providing a robust interface for interacting with Azure OpenAI.

Recent Developments:

  • Introduction of support for tools in Azure OpenAI highlights ongoing enhancements to leverage new features offered by Azure's OpenAI service.

3. Mistral Provider Support (src/providers/mistral.ts)

Structure and Quality:

  • The Mistral provider support adds another AI model provider to promptfoo, broadening its utility.
  • The code is consistent with other provider implementations, maintaining a clean architecture across the project.
  • Adequate error handling and configuration options are present, similar to other integrations.

Recent Developments:

  • Addition of URL and API key environment variables indicates improvements in configurability and ease of use for Mistral models.

4. Hugging Face Token Classification (src/providers/huggingface.ts)

Structure and Quality:

  • This file extends promptfoo's functionality to include support for Hugging Face's token classification models.
  • The implementation is thorough, covering not just text generation but also classification, feature extraction, sentence similarity, and token extraction.
  • The modular approach taken for different functionalities within Hugging Face's offerings demonstrates good software engineering practices.

Recent Developments:

  • Support added for Hugging Face token classification shows an expansion in the types of AI models promptfoo can interact with.

5. Example Configurations

Structure and Quality:

Recent Developments:

  • New examples showcase practical applications of recent integrations (e.g., Hugging Face PII detection model, custom embeddings provider) and enhance the documentation ecosystem around promptfoo.

Conclusion

The promptfoo project exhibits a high level of code quality, thoughtful architecture, and active development focused on expanding its capabilities across various AI model providers. The consistent design across different integrations, combined with comprehensive documentation and examples, makes it a valuable tool for developers working with AI models.