Quantify issues

Recent GitHub Issues Activity

_{Like all software activity quantification, these numbers are imperfect but sometimes useful. Comments, Labels, and Milestones refer to those issues opened in the timespan in question.}

Rate pull requests

PR#36593 - Use resource identity in provider callsopen

2_/5

Daniel Schmidt (DanielMSchmidt)Created: 2025-02-27

The pull request introduces a significant amount of code changes, with 2070 lines added and 448 lines removed across multiple files. However, it is still in draft status, and there are failing tests that need investigation. The lack of a detailed description or linked issues reduces the clarity and significance of the changes. Additionally, the absence of a changelog entry indicates that these changes might not be user-facing or significant enough to warrant immediate attention. Overall, while the PR may contain important backend changes, its current state and presentation suggest it needs further work before it can be considered for merging.

[+] Read More

PR#36617 - set up resource page and reference areaopen

3_/5

trujillo-adamCreated: 2025-03-03

This pull request sets up a new resource page and reference area, adding significant documentation content with 578 lines in a new file. However, it is still in draft form and lacks a changelog entry, which is important for tracking changes in the targeted 1.12.x release. The changes are primarily documentation-related, which are generally rated as average unless they introduce critical information or improvements. While the PR appears to be thorough in its current state, it remains unremarkable due to its draft status and the absence of a clear link to resolved issues or enhancements.

[+] Read More

PR#36614 - Write leftover test state(s) to fileopen

3_/5

Samsondeen (dsa0x)Created: 2025-03-03

The pull request introduces a new feature to write leftover test states to a file, which is a functional enhancement. It includes substantial code changes across multiple files, indicating a significant effort. However, it lacks a changelog entry, which is important for tracking changes in user-facing releases. The PR also contains unresolved review comments suggesting improvements and potential issues that need addressing. While it is a good starting point, the presence of TODOs and pending tasks suggests it's not yet complete or exemplary, warranting an average rating.

[+] Read More

PR#36636 - Add Azure exampleopen

3_/5

Rose M Koron (rkoron007)Created: 2025-03-04

The pull request adds Azure examples to the documentation, which is a useful addition for users working with Azure. The changes are primarily documentation updates, adding 32 lines and modifying 2. While the changes are clear and enhance the existing documentation, they are not particularly significant or complex. The review comments suggest minor improvements in wording for clarity, indicating that the PR could benefit from slight refinements. Overall, this is a solid but unremarkable contribution, fitting the description of an average PR.

[+] Read More

PR#36625 - fix: bump aws-sdk-go-base/v2 from v2.0.0-beta.58 to v2.0.0-beta.62open

3_/5

Sebastian Marines (sebastianmarines)Created: 2025-03-04

The pull request primarily involves updating the version of the aws-sdk-go-base library from v2.0.0-beta.58 to v2.0.0-beta.62, which is a routine dependency update. While it addresses issue #36624 and includes changes across multiple files, the update itself is not particularly significant or complex. The PR does not introduce new features or major improvements, and there are no indications of critical bug fixes or security patches. It also lacks detailed documentation or testing updates that might elevate its importance. Therefore, it is rated as average, reflecting its routine nature without notable flaws or exceptional contributions.

[+] Read More

PR#36623 - Backend/azure: `subscription_id` infer from Azure CLI & a way to skip *unnecessary* management plane API callopen

3_/5

magodoCreated: 2025-03-04

The pull request introduces useful enhancements by inferring `subscription_id` from Azure CLI and optimizing management plane API calls, which are significant improvements. However, it also introduces potential breaking changes and complexity, as noted in the discussions. The PR lacks clarity in documentation and might require additional testing to ensure backward compatibility. The changes are beneficial but not groundbreaking, warranting an average rating.

[+] Read More

PR#36641 - docs: azurerm backend updates for 1.11 releaseopen

3_/5

Jared Holgate (jaredfholgate)Created: 2025-03-05

This pull request updates the AzureRM backend documentation for Terraform following the 1.11 release. While it provides necessary corrections and improvements, it primarily involves documentation changes, which are typically less significant than code changes. The PR addresses feedback from a reviewer and includes a refactor to enhance clarity. However, it doesn't introduce groundbreaking features or fixes, hence an average rating of 3 is appropriate. It is a solid contribution but not exemplary or highly significant.

[+] Read More

PR#36615 - Output resource identities in State JSON (TF-23753)open

4_/5

Daniel Banck (dbanck)Created: 2025-03-03

The pull request introduces a significant change by adding resource identity management to the Terraform state JSON, which is a valuable enhancement for tracking resource identities. The PR is well-structured with multiple commits detailing incremental changes and improvements. It includes thorough testing and validation, indicating a comprehensive approach to implementation. However, it is still in draft status and lacks a clear link to a resolved issue or changelog entry, which slightly detracts from its completeness. Overall, it is quite good but could benefit from finalization and documentation updates.

[+] Read More

PR#36643 - [communicator] add `proxy_command` support to connection blockopen

4_/5

Matt Kulka (mattlqx)Created: 2025-03-05

The pull request introduces a significant and useful enhancement by adding `proxy_command` support to the connection block in Terraform, which simplifies SSH connections through custom proxies like AWS EC2 Instance Connect. The implementation is thorough, with extensive modifications across multiple files, including tests and documentation updates. While the change is quite beneficial and well-executed, it lacks groundbreaking innovation or complexity that would warrant a perfect score. It addresses a specific use case effectively, making it a valuable addition to the project.

[+] Read More

PR#36646 - Set the initial state for a state files from a backend, allow the run that defines a backend to write state to the backendopen

4_/5

Sarah French (SarahFrench)Created: 2025-03-06

This pull request introduces a significant enhancement to the Terraform testing framework by allowing backend blocks to set initial state values and enabling state writes during the apply operation. The changes are well-structured, with comprehensive updates across multiple files to support this new functionality. The PR is quite good as it adds meaningful functionality, but it is still in draft form and lacks a changelog entry, which slightly detracts from its completeness.

[+] Read More

Quantify commits

Quantified Commit Activity Over 14 Days

Developer	Avatar	Branches	PRs	Commits	Files	Changes
Sarah French		6	13/9/3	24	66	14307
Daniel Banck		3	2/1/0	23	143	5586
Daniel Schmidt (DanielMSchmidt)		1	1/0/0	1	32	2518
Samsondeen		3	3/3/0	8	32	2447
Rose M Koron		4	5/4/0	11	11	825
None (github-actions[bot])		1	16/15/2	7	34	723
None (trujillo-adam)		1	1/0/0	1	2	608
Jared Baker		1	0/0/0	2	22	588
Sebastian Marines (sebastianmarines)		1	1/0/0	4	5	551
Radek Simko		1	3/2/2	2	17	369
None (hc-github-team-tf-core)		1	6/6/0	4	15	136
James Bardin		2	3/3/0	9	11	129
Liam Cervante		2	6/6/0	4	4	115
gofastasf		1	1/1/0	1	4	106
Bruno Schaatsbergen		1	1/1/0	12	3	93
Guilherme Faria de Souza		1	1/1/0	1	3	24
Craig Wright		1	1/1/0	1	1	2
Sahal Pathan		1	1/1/0	1	1	2
Pranit Raje		1	1/1/0	1	1	2
temp		2	0/0/0	2	0	0
magodo (magodo)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
Matt Kulka (mattlqx)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
He Guimin (xiaozhu36)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
None (petit-chat)		0	1/0/1	0	0	0
Vishv Deshwal (sheersagar)		0	1/0/1	0	0	0
None (craigharris98)		0	0/0/1	0	0	0
Jared Holgate (jaredfholgate)		0	1/0/0	0	0	0
None (ryanpodonnell1)		0	2/0/3	0	0	0

_{PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period}

Quantify risks

Project Risk Ratings

Report On: Fetch issues

GitHub Issues Analysis

Recent Activity Analysis

Recent activity in the Terraform GitHub repository shows a diverse range of issues, including bug reports, feature requests, and documentation improvements. The issues cover various aspects of Terraform's functionality, from core features like state management and provider interactions to enhancements in testing and configuration capabilities.

Notable Issues and Themes

1. Version Compatibility and Upgrades: Several issues (#36596, #36595) highlight problems encountered when upgrading to newer versions of Terraform, particularly with AzureRM backend configurations. Users report breaking changes that affect authentication and API interactions.

2. Backend Configuration Challenges: Issues like #36595 and #36596 indicate ongoing challenges with backend configurations, especially concerning AzureRM and S3. These issues often involve authentication mechanisms and compatibility with new Terraform versions.

3. Testing Enhancements: There is a strong focus on improving testing capabilities within Terraform. Issues such as #35755 and #35949 discuss the need for better test assertions and handling of sensitive outputs during tests.

4. Provider and Module Management: Several issues (#34981, #35022) request enhancements in managing providers and modules, including support for multiple provider versions and improved module sourcing from S3 endpoints.

5. State Management Concerns: State management remains a critical area, with issues like #35236 discussing challenges in handling data-only changes in Terraform Cloud workspaces, which prevent workspace deletion.

6. Documentation Improvements: Documentation-related issues (#35555, #35344) suggest the need for clearer guidance on using Terraform features, such as moved blocks and plugin caching behavior.

7. Performance Optimization: Performance concerns are raised in issues like #35822, where users experience slow startup times with large state files, indicating a need for optimization in handling extensive infrastructure states.

8. Security Considerations: Security-related enhancements are discussed in issues like #34860, which proposes minimizing secrets in state files to reduce exposure risks.

Issue Details

Most Recently Created Issues

• #36647: A bug regarding incorrect error messages related to delete_retention_policy in blob properties.

  • Priority: High
  • Status: New
  • Created: 0 days ago

• #36630: A bug affecting terraform plan with AzureRM backend due to malformed subscription identifiers.

  • Priority: High
  • Status: Edited recently
  • Created: 2 days ago

Most Recently Updated Issues

• #36647: Updated recently due to ongoing discussions about error message clarity.
• #36630: Updated with user comments linking similar issues and potential overlaps with other reported bugs.

Overall, the recent activity reflects ongoing efforts to enhance Terraform's robustness, usability, and documentation while addressing user-reported bugs and feature requests. The community actively contributes to identifying areas for improvement, particularly around version upgrades, backend configurations, and testing frameworks.

Report On: Fetch pull requests

Analysis of Terraform Pull Requests

Open Pull Requests

Notable Open PRs

1. PR #36646: This draft PR introduces the ability to set the initial state for state files from a backend and allows writing state to the backend. It is a significant enhancement targeting version 1.12.x. However, it is currently in draft status and has unresolved issues related to import cycles, which need addressing before it can progress.

2. PR #36643: This PR adds proxy_command support to the connection block, allowing SSH communication through an exec'd process. It targets version 1.12.x and includes a changelog entry, indicating its readiness for review and integration.

3. PR #36641: This documentation update for the azurerm backend is crucial for ensuring correctness following the 1.11 release. It has received detailed feedback, suggesting further refinement is needed before merging.

4. PR #36623: This PR proposes changes to infer subscription_id from Azure CLI and avoid unnecessary management plane calls, addressing breaking changes introduced in previous updates. It requires careful consideration due to its impact on existing users.

Concerns with Open PRs

• Draft Status: Several open PRs are still in draft status, indicating they are not ready for final review or merging.
• Import Cycles: PR #36646 faces issues with import cycles, which need resolution to prevent potential build failures.
• Documentation Clarity: Feedback on PR #36641 highlights the need for clearer documentation, especially regarding authentication methods and required attributes.

Recently Closed Pull Requests

Notable Closed PRs

1. PR #36642: This cleanup operation post-1.11.1 release ensures that versioning and changelog entries are up-to-date, maintaining repository hygiene.

2. PR #36591: The decision to always build on successful pushes rather than waiting for tests simplifies the CI/CD process, reducing potential delays in deployment pipelines.

3. PR #36579: This fix addresses duplicated warnings during terraform plan, improving user experience by reducing noise in output logs.

Concerns with Closed PRs

• Backporting Challenges: Several backport attempts (e.g., PR #36640) faced merge conflicts, indicating potential issues with maintaining consistency across branches.
• Unmerged Documentation Changes: Some documentation updates (e.g., PR #36587) were closed without merging, possibly leaving gaps in user-facing information.

General Observations

• Focus on Enhancements: Many open and recently closed PRs focus on enhancing functionality (e.g., proxy command support, write-only arguments), reflecting ongoing efforts to improve Terraform's capabilities.
• Attention to Documentation: There is a strong emphasis on updating documentation alongside code changes, ensuring users have access to accurate and comprehensive information.
• Community Engagement: The active participation of contributors in providing feedback and refining PRs demonstrates a healthy community engagement around Terraform's development.

Overall, while there are some challenges with managing open PRs (e.g., resolving draft statuses and addressing feedback), the project continues to make significant strides in enhancing its functionality and maintaining robust documentation practices.

Report On: Fetch Files For Assessment

Source Code Assessment

1. .changes/v1.12/BUG FIXES-20250226-171815.yaml

• Content: This YAML file documents a bug fix related to avoiding duplicate attribute-associated diagnostics.
• Structure: The file is well-structured with clear fields for kind, body, time, and custom metadata.
• Quality: The description is concise, indicating the specific issue addressed (Issue "36579"). It provides a clear understanding of the bug fix's purpose.

2. internal/backend/local/backend_plan.go

• Content: This Go source file implements the planning logic for the local backend in Terraform.
• Structure: The file is organized with functions handling different aspects of the planning process, such as configuration validation, plan execution, and result reporting.
• Quality:
  • The code includes detailed logging and error handling, which aids in debugging and understanding execution flow.
  • Use of context and goroutines indicates concurrency handling, which is crucial for responsive operations.
  • Deduplication of diagnostic warnings shows attention to reducing noise in user feedback.
  • Some comments could be more descriptive to enhance code readability.

3. internal/tfdiags/compare.go

• Content: This file provides a comparison utility for diagnostics using Google's go-cmp package.
• Structure: It defines a simple comparer function and exposes it as a cmp.Option.
• Quality:
  • The implementation is straightforward and leverages interfaces for flexibility (ComparableDiagnostic).
  • The example usage comment enhances understanding of how to integrate this comparer into other parts of the codebase.

4. internal/command/views/hook_ui.go

• Content: This file handles UI hooks for displaying resource operation progress and elapsed time during Terraform runs.
• Structure: It uses structured types and methods to encapsulate UI state and behavior.
• Quality:
  • The use of constants for operation types improves code clarity.
  • Synchronization primitives (sync.Mutex) are used to manage concurrent access to shared state, indicating good concurrency practices.
  • The code is verbose due to extensive handling of UI updates, which might benefit from further abstraction or modularization.

5. internal/command/test_test.go

• Content: This test file contains unit tests for various command scenarios in Terraform.
• Structure: It uses table-driven tests, which are effective for testing multiple scenarios with varying inputs and expected outcomes.
• Quality:
  • Comprehensive test coverage across different functionalities ensures robustness against regressions.
  • Use of helper functions like testCopyDir and testChdir indicates reusable test setup logic.
  • Some test cases have detailed descriptions, aiding in understanding the purpose of each test scenario.

6. website/docs/language/resources/ephemeral/write-only.mdx

• Content: Documentation on using write-only arguments in Terraform configurations.
• Structure: The document is well-organized with sections on background, requirements, usage examples, and versioning considerations.
• Quality:
  • Clear explanations and examples make it accessible to users with varying levels of expertise.
  • Use of highlighted code blocks enhances readability and comprehension of key concepts.

7. .github/workflows/build.yml

• Content: GitHub Actions workflow configuration for building Terraform on various platforms.
• Structure: The workflow is divided into multiple jobs with dependencies clearly defined using needs.
• Quality:
  • Supports multiple operating systems and architectures through matrix builds, demonstrating comprehensive CI/CD practices.
  • Use of caching strategies (actions/cache) optimizes build times by reusing dependencies across runs.

8. .changes/v1.11/BUG FIXES-20250303-144020.yaml

• Content: Documents a bug fix related to serialization issues with ephemeral and sensitive marks in planned changes.
• Structure & Quality: Similar to other change logs, it is concise with clear metadata fields.

9. .changes/v1.12/ENHANCEMENTS-20250303-151031.yaml

• Content: Describes an enhancement to improve elapsed time display in the UI Hook.
• Structure & Quality: Well-documented with specific details about the enhancement (Issue "36368").

10. .changes/v1.12/ENHANCEMENTS-20250220-120438.yaml

• Content: Details an enhancement for producing detailed diagnostic objects when assertions fail during test runs.
• Structure & Quality: Consistent with other change logs, providing clear information on improvements made (Issue "34428").

Overall, the files demonstrate a high level of organization and quality, reflecting mature development practices within the Terraform project.

Report On: Fetch commits

Development Team and Recent Activity

Team Members and Activities

1. Radek Simko (radeksimko)

   • Recent work includes fixing issues related to duplicated warnings and avoiding crashes due to null values in maps.
   • Collaborated with James Bardin and others on various bug fixes and enhancements.

2. Guilherme Faria de Souza (GuiiifSouza)

   • Enhanced the elapsed time display in the UI hook to show minutes and seconds.

3. Liam Cervante (liamcervante)

   • Added test cases to prevent regression of fixed crashes.
   • Worked on build processes, ensuring builds occur on successful pushes.
   • Addressed flaky tests and contributed to parallel test execution.

4. Rose M Koron (rkoron007)

   • Made multiple documentation updates, especially around ephemeral resources and write-only attributes.
   • Collaborated with Bruno Schaatsbergen on documentation improvements.

5. Craig Wright (crw)

   • Fixed typos in documentation titles.

6. Daniel Banck (dbanck)

   • Worked extensively on JSON state marshaling and resource identity handling.
   • Involved in renaming schema components for clarity.

7. James Bardin (jbardin)

   • Focused on filtering ephemeral marks from planned values and ensuring diagnostics do not contain URLs.
   • Contributed to write-only attribute validation.

8. Samsondeen (dsa0x)

   • Implemented changes to ensure all states are cleaned up after tests.
   • Worked on parallel execution of Terraform tests and improving test state handling.

9. Bruno Schaatsbergen (bschaatsbergen)

   • Improved examples for write-only attributes in documentation.
   • Merged several branches related to documentation updates.

10. Sarah French (SarahFrench)

    • Updated dependencies across multiple modules.
    • Made significant contributions to JUnit XML output for Terraform tests.
    • Worked on changelog automation and dependency upgrades.

11. Pranit Raje (pranit-hashi)

    • Corrected group IDs in import block documentation.

12. Gofastasf (Gofastasf)

    • Simplified file comparison logic by replacing custom inode-based logic with os.SameFile.

13. Sahal Pathan (Sahal56)

    • Made slight changes in version constraints documentation.

14. Jared Baker (jar-b)

    • Worked on syncing dependencies and backporting changelogs.

15. Sebastian Marines (sebastianmarines)

    • Bumped AWS SDK versions and added support for new S3 backend regions.

16. Daniel Schmidt (DanielMSchmidt)

    • Contributed to resource identity handling and validation processes.
    • Worked on changelog automation scripts.

17. Others: Various contributors worked on minor bug fixes, documentation updates, dependency upgrades, and backporting changes across different branches.

Patterns, Themes, and Conclusions

• The team is actively involved in both feature development and maintenance tasks such as bug fixes, documentation updates, and dependency management.
• There is a strong focus on improving test coverage, ensuring stability through regression tests, and enhancing user-facing features like UI displays.
• Collaboration among team members is evident in the form of co-authored commits, merged pull requests, and feedback incorporation.
• The project follows a structured approach to version control with frequent merges from feature branches into the main branch, indicating an organized development workflow.
• Documentation is continuously updated alongside code changes to ensure clarity and accuracy for users.
• The team is responsive to community feedback, as seen from quick typo fixes and enhancements based on user suggestions or reported issues.