PostHog is an open-source analytics platform designed for product analytics, session recording, feature flagging, and A/B testing. It is tailored for self-hosting to ensure users maintain control over their data while leveraging advanced analytics tools. The project is actively maintained on GitHub, showing a robust state with continuous improvements and a positive trajectory.
The PostHog project exhibits a strong commitment to enhancing its platform with a focus on both user experience and technical robustness. Recent activities suggest a proactive approach in addressing both new feature integrations and maintenance issues. However, challenges such as managing technical debt and ensuring feature stability need continued attention. Overall, the project is well-positioned for sustained growth and improvement.
Developer | Avatar | Branches | PRs | Commits | Files | Changes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Paul D'Ambra | ![]() |
1 | 21/20/0 | 20 | 56 | 16339 |
vs. last report | = | +8/+12/-1 | +10 | +23 | +12954 | |
David Newell | ![]() |
1 | 12/8/1 | 8 | 19 | 7022 |
vs. last report | = | -2/-8/= | -9 | -32 | +4817 | |
Michael Matloka | ![]() |
1 | 12/13/0 | 13 | 99 | 6418 |
vs. last report | -2 | -5/=/= | -7 | +25 | +2029 | |
Ben White | ![]() |
1 | 17/8/2 | 12 | 95 | 3751 |
vs. last report | = | =/-6/+2 | -5 | -29 | -10873 | |
Thomas Obermüller | ![]() |
1 | 9/6/1 | 6 | 43 | 3649 |
Robbie | ![]() |
1 | 10/8/1 | 8 | 32 | 3215 |
vs. last report | -1 | +6/+5/+1 | +3 | -14 | +2170 | |
Li Yi Yu | ![]() |
1 | 0/0/0 | 1 | 44 | 1842 |
Julian Bez | ![]() |
1 | 10/8/0 | 11 | 110 | 1667 |
vs. last report | = | =/=/= | +3 | -280 | -5463 | |
Marius Andra | ![]() |
1 | 9/9/0 | 10 | 75 | 1420 |
vs. last report | = | -4/-2/= | -1 | +9 | -205 | |
Tom Owers | ![]() |
1 | 16/11/1 | 13 | 37 | 1328 |
vs. last report | = | +8/+4/+1 | +6 | -16 | -785 | |
Sandy Spicer | ![]() |
3 | 9/6/2 | 13 | 40 | 1036 |
vs. last report | +2 | +8/+6/+2 | +4 | +30 | -911 | |
Eric Duong | ![]() |
1 | 10/8/0 | 8 | 15 | 1018 |
vs. last report | = | +2/-1/= | -2 | -12 | +200 | |
Neil Kakkar | ![]() |
1 | 1/1/0 | 2 | 7 | 552 |
vs. last report | = | -2/=/= | +1 | -6 | +181 | |
Bianca Yang | ![]() |
5 | 6/3/0 | 11 | 13 | 474 |
vs. last report | +4 | +3/=/= | +8 | +7 | +353 | |
Tomás Farías Santana | ![]() |
1 | 2/0/0 | 1 | 6 | 445 |
vs. last report | = | -4/-5/= | -5 | -6 | +104 | |
Nikita Vorobev | ![]() |
1 | 2/1/0 | 2 | 33 | 443 |
vs. last report | = | +1/+1/= | = | -4 | -9 | |
Zach Waterfield | ![]() |
1 | 2/3/0 | 4 | 37 | 419 |
vs. last report | = | -4/-2/= | -1 | +25 | +240 | |
Brett Hoerner | ![]() |
2 | 4/3/0 | 4 | 10 | 200 |
vs. last report | +1 | +1/-1/= | = | -7 | -460 | |
Joe Martin | ![]() |
1 | 1/1/0 | 2 | 6 | 152 |
vs. last report | = | =/=/= | +1 | +1 | +2 | |
PostHog Bot | ![]() |
1 | 3/3/0 | 3 | 2 | 129 |
vs. last report | = | -3/-1/= | -1 | = | +6 | |
Xavier Vello | ![]() |
1 | 2/2/0 | 2 | 7 | 126 |
vs. last report | = | =/+1/= | +1 | +5 | +117 | |
Phani Raj | ![]() |
1 | 4/3/1 | 3 | 6 | 81 |
Raquel Smith | ![]() |
1 | 4/2/1 | 2 | 5 | 81 |
vs. last report | = | +2/+1/+1 | +1 | +1 | +49 | |
Marcus Hof | ![]() |
1 | 1/1/0 | 1 | 4 | 31 |
vs. last report | = | =/=/= | -1 | -1 | -20 | |
Frank Hamand | ![]() |
1 | 2/3/0 | 3 | 2 | 24 |
vs. last report | = | -4/-3/= | -3 | = | -20 | |
Juraj Majerik | ![]() |
1 | 2/2/0 | 2 | 12 | 14 |
vs. last report | = | -2/-1/= | -1 | = | -444 | |
Tiina Turban | ![]() |
1 | 4/0/1 | 1 | 4 | 11 |
vs. last report | = | +3/-1/+1 | -2 | -25 | -582 | |
James Greenhill | ![]() |
1 | 1/1/0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
vs. last report | = | =/=/= | = | = | = | |
Vladislav Supalov | ![]() |
1 | 1/1/0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Cory Watilo | ![]() |
1 | 2/1/1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Peter Abordan (Pety99) | 0 | 1/0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Steven Shults (slshults) | 0 | 1/0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Aryan Rawlani (aryanrawlani28) | 0 | 1/0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
vs. last report | -1 | =/=/= | -1 | -5 | -139 | |
None (dependabot[bot]) | 0 | 3/0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
github-actions | ![]() |
3 | 0/0/0 | 9 | 34 | 0 |
vs. last report | = | =/=/= | +1 | +23 | -340 |
PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period
The PostHog development team has been actively enhancing the platform's features and addressing various issues. The project, hosted on GitHub, is an open-source analytics platform that provides product analytics, session recording, feature flagging, and A/B testing capabilities. It is designed for self-hosting, allowing users to maintain control over their data while using the platform's extensive analytics and optimization tools.
Active branches include:
allow-billing-tickets-on-free-tier
batch-export-delete
brett/lazy-persons
balance-frontend
brett/revert-depot
add-session-filters
billing-q2-auto-subscribe-new-users
brett/test
The PostHog development team continues to demonstrate a strong commitment to enhancing the platform's functionality and user experience. The recent activities indicate a balanced focus on both front-end improvements and back-end stability, ensuring that PostHog remains a robust solution for product analytics. The ongoing efforts in optimizing data handling and improving integration capabilities are particularly noteworthy, reflecting the team's proactive approach to addressing user needs and technological advancements.
Since the last report 5 days ago, there has been a significant amount of activity in the repository, including both the opening and closing of numerous issues. This indicates an active development cycle with ongoing discussions and updates on existing issues.
There is a continued focus on improving user experience through UI enhancements and fixing glitches. Enhancements in backend functionalities and data handling are evident, suggesting improvements in performance and usability. Rapid opening and closing of some issues indicate a dynamic and responsive development environment.
The recent activity in the repository suggests a healthy and active development cycle focused on both expanding features and maintaining the system's integrity. The project's responsiveness to issues, both in terms of introducing enhancements and resolving bugs, indicates a strong commitment to user satisfaction and continuous improvement.
This pull request (PR) addresses an issue with handling old network plugin data from a specific range of old posthog-js
versions. The problem was that the system did not handle the old data format well, causing errors for users with outdated versions. The solution implemented in this PR is to modify the error handling so that it gracefully handles these cases by providing an empty json
tab for network requests instead of throwing an error.
Error Handling Improvement: The PR improves the system's robustness by adding error handling for outdated data formats. This ensures that the application remains stable and functional even when encountering legacy data formats.
Code Comments and Clarity: The changes include comments explaining why certain code blocks are necessary, which helps in maintaining the code. For example, a comment explains the removal of an outdated comment, clarifying the current state of the code.
Minimal Changes: The changes are minimal and focused directly on the issue at hand, which is typically a good practice as it avoids introducing new bugs or side effects.
Snapshot Updates: The PR includes updates to UI snapshots to reflect changes in how network events are handled and displayed, ensuring that the UI remains consistent with the backend logic.
Review and Collaboration: The PR has been reviewed by another developer who suggested a minor improvement, indicating a collaborative approach to the code changes.
The PR effectively addresses a specific backward compatibility issue with handling network plugin data from older versions of posthog-js
. The changes improve error handling and user experience without altering core functionalities. Given the focused nature of the changes and the inclusion of snapshot updates to ensure UI consistency, the code quality appears to be solid. This PR should help enhance stability for users running older versions of related plugins or libraries.
Since the last analysis 5 days ago, there has been significant activity in the PostHog/posthog repository. Here's a detailed report of the changes:
The recent activity shows a focus on improving performance, handling edge cases, and enhancing user interface elements. Notably:
This level of activity suggests a healthy and active development cycle aimed at both expanding capabilities and ensuring the reliability of the platform.
This pull request reverts a previous change made in PR #22050, which aimed to make all queries cacheable. The revert indicates that there might have been issues or unintended consequences with the original changes.
Clarity and Readability: The changes in this PR are straightforward as they primarily involve reverting previous changes. The use of clear commit messages and comments helps in understanding the context of the revert.
Error Handling: The revert includes adjustments in error handling, particularly in how queries are processed when caching is involved. This suggests an attempt to simplify or correct the logic to prevent potential bugs.
Maintainability: Reverting changes can be a double-edged sword regarding maintainability. On one hand, it might resolve immediate issues caused by the previous changes; on the other, it could indicate challenges in evolving the codebase sustainably.
Performance Implications: The original changes were intended to enhance performance by making queries cacheable. Reverting these changes might have implications on performance, potentially negating improvements if those changes were effective.
Security Concerns: There are no direct indications of security impacts from the diff provided. However, any change in how data queries are handled should always be scrutinized for potential security implications.
Changes in query.py
show modifications in how queries are handled, particularly around caching and execution modes. This suggests that the original implementation might have introduced complexities or bugs that necessitated a revert.
The discussion and comments from bots about existing issues in related functions provide valuable insights into potential areas of concern that might have influenced the decision to revert.
The decision to revert a feature aimed at enhancing query cachability highlights challenges in implementing performance optimizations without introducing new issues. While reverting may solve immediate problems, it also points to the need for a robust testing and validation process before such changes are reintroduced. The quality of the code change itself is neutral, but the context implies careful consideration was given to the impact of maintaining the original changes versus reverting them.
Purpose: This file is part of the toolbar's debug menu, specifically for event debugging in the PostHog application.
Structure and Quality:
ToolbarMenu
component structured with a header, body, and footer. The logic is separated using the eventDebugMenuLogic
from Kea (a state management library), which is good practice.LemonCheckbox
, LemonInput
, and LemonSegmentedButton
, which suggests a consistent UI framework across the project.useState
, useValues
) is a good practice.Purpose: Manages the appearance settings of survey forms within the application.
Structure and Quality:
LemonSelect
for dropdowns, maintaining consistency in user interface design.Purpose: A reusable component to display code snippets with syntax highlighting across the application.
Structure and Quality:
react-syntax-highlighter
for syntax highlighting, supporting multiple programming languages which is a robust choice for such functionality.language
, wrap
, and compact
, making it highly reusable.Purpose: Configures how person-related data should be handled in event queries within project settings.
Structure and Quality:
teamLogic
.LemonButton
and LemonRadio
.Purpose: Contains snapshot tests for funnel queries, ensuring that changes in query logic do not break existing functionalities unexpectedly.
Structure and Quality:
The reviewed files demonstrate good software engineering practices with clear structure, separation of concerns, and consistent use of UI components. Enhancements such as increased use of type safety with TypeScript, better documentation for complex logic parts, and more detailed testing could further improve the quality and maintainability of the codebase.