‹ Reports
The Dispatch

OSS Watchlist: px4/PX4-Autopilot


GitHub Logo GitHub Logo

Executive Summary

The PX4 Autopilot Software project, managed by the PX4 organization, is a sophisticated flight control system designed for drones and other unmanned vehicles. It supports a wide range of airframes and is compatible with multiple operating systems including Linux, NuttX, and MacOS. The project is under active development with contributions from a global community of developers focused on continuous improvement and feature expansion.

Recent Activity

Team Members and Contributions

Patterns and Collaborations

Risks

Plans

Conclusion

The PX4 Autopilot Software project is robustly maintained with a clear trajectory towards expanding its capabilities to new vehicle types and improving its core functionalities. Active issue resolution, collaborative development practices, and continuous documentation improvements contribute positively to the project's health and future prospects.

Quantified Commit Activity Over 6 Days

Developer Avatar Branches PRs Commits Files Changes
Per Frivik 1 0/0/0 2 32 1840
Julian Oes 3 2/2/0 5 28 411
vs. last report +2 +1/+2/= +4 +27 +409
Hamish Willee 4 4/0/1 5 5 101
vs. last report +3 +4/-1/+1 +4 +4 +99
Peter van der Perk 3 3/2/0 5 4 75
vs. last report +2 +2/=/= +4 +3 +18
Alex Klimaj 1 2/1/0 1 2 7
vs. last report = -3/-1/-2 -2 -2 -14
Benjamin Philipp Ketterer 1 1/1/0 1 1 2
Beat Küng (bkueng) 0 0/1/0 0 0 0
vs. last report -1 -1/-1/= -1 -2 -54
David Sidrane (davids5) 0 1/0/1 0 0 0
vs. last report -1 -1/-1/+1 -3 -25 -1807
murata,katsutoshi (muramura) 0 0/1/0 0 0 0
vs. last report = -3/+1/= = = =
CAI Dongcai (oneWayOut) 0 1/0/0 0 0 0
Hubert (Minderring) 0 1/0/0 0 0 0
Roman Bapst (RomanBapst) 0 0/1/0 0 0 0
vs. last report = -1/+1/= = = =
Pedro Roque (Pedro-Roque) 0 2/0/1 0 0 0
Andrew Brahim (dirksavage88) 0 2/0/0 0 0 0
None (slimonslimon) 0 1/0/0 0 0 0
None (jonas-eschmann) 0 1/0/0 0 0 0
Thomas Frans (flyingthingsintothings) 0 1/0/0 0 0 0

PRs: created by that dev and opened/merged/closed-unmerged during the period

Detailed Reports

Report On: Fetch commits



Analysis of Progress Since Last Report

Project Overview

The PX4 Autopilot Software project, managed by the PX4 organization, is a sophisticated flight control system designed for drones and other unmanned vehicles. It supports a wide range of airframes and is compatible with multiple operating systems including Linux, NuttX, and MacOS. The project is under active development with contributions from a global community of developers focused on continuous improvement and feature expansion.

Recent Developer Activities

Since the last report 6 days ago, there has been significant activity within the PX4 Autopilot Software project. Key developers such as Peter van der Perk, Julian Oes, Benjamin Philipp Ketterer, Alex Klimaj, and Hamish Willee have contributed to various aspects of the project. The changes include updates to I2C driver launchers, debug features for hardfault output, enhancements in GPS parameter handling, adjustments in uxrce-dds stack size, and documentation improvements for camera feedback modules.

Detailed Activity by Developer

Peter van der Perk

  • Commits: 5 commits with 75 changes across 4 files and 3 branches.
  • Features: Added I2C driver launcher and enabled debug features for more verbose hardfault output.
  • Files: Various files related to fmu-v6xrt configurations.
  • Collaborations: Co-authored changes with David Sidrane.

Julian Oes

  • Commits: 5 commits with 411 changes across 28 files and 3 branches.
  • Features: Updated bootloader functionalities including versioning and full erase options; improved px_uploader.py script.
  • Files: Various files across bootloader configurations and MAVLink communications.
  • Collaborations: Co-authored changes with other developers on MAVLink updates.

Benjamin Philipp Ketterer

Alex Klimaj

  • Commits: 1 commit focused on adding new hardware support.
  • Features: Added support for iis2mdc in ark septentrio GPS configurations.
  • Files: boards/ark/septentrio-gps/default.px4board and boards/ark/septentrio-gps/init/rc.board_sensors.
  • Collaborations: None specified.

Hamish Willee

  • Commits: 5 commits focused on documentation improvements.
  • Features: Improved module documentation for camera feedback and camera trigger drivers.
  • Files: Documentation files within the src/modules directory.
  • Collaborations: None specified.

Conclusions and Future Directions

The recent activities in the PX4 Autopilot Software project demonstrate a robust effort towards refining the software's capabilities, particularly in enhancing hardware support through new driver integrations, optimizing performance for different unmanned vehicle types, improving debugging functionalities for better fault diagnosis, and enhancing documentation for better developer engagement. Future efforts will likely continue to focus on these areas while also addressing any emerging needs based on community feedback and technological advancements.

Report On: Fetch issues



Summary of Recent Changes in PX4 Autopilot Project

Notable Open Issues

  1. Issue #23120: [Bug] __orb_trajectory_setpoint not declared in scope - This issue involves a compilation error related to the trajectory setpoint which does not occur in version 1.13 but appears in version 1.14, indicating a potential regression or change in how trajectory setpoints are handled.

  2. Issue #23119: Adding vehicle_acceleration and actuator_motors to logged topics for system identification - This issue proposes adding high-frequency logging for actuator_motors and vehicle_acceleration to aid in system identification, enhancing the utility of the sysid.tools utility for users.

  3. Issue #23118: fmu-v6xrt lpuart singlewire for RC telemetry - This issue involves updates to the IMXRT driver to support RC telemetry, with a dependency on an external pull request.

  4. Issue #23117: Spacecraft Support: adding modules for Space Robotics and Thruster Based platforms - This issue suggests adding new control modules specifically designed for spacecraft or other systems using thrusters as primary actuators, indicating a significant expansion in the types of vehicles PX4 can support.

  5. Issue #23115: Use target camera in image capture start/stop messages - This issue addresses a change in MAVLink commands to specify the target camera by component ID, enhancing the precision in multi-camera setups.

  6. Issue #23114: [Bug] WARN [health_and_arming_checks] Preflight Fail - This issue reports multiple preflight failures related to sensor checks, suggesting potential issues with sensor setup or calibration.

  7. Issue #23113: [Sponsored by Cubepilot] Cube ID via DroneCAN - This work-in-progress issue discusses adding support for Cubepilot's Cube ID modules via DroneCAN, aiming to enhance identification capabilities in UAV systems.

  8. Issue #23112: DroneCAN hardpoint support gripper hardpoint via RC channel - This issue proposes adding support for controlling a gripper (specifically the EPM v3) via DroneCAN and an RC channel, indicating an enhancement in payload handling capabilities.

  9. Issue #23111: BMI088 connected via I2C does not work right[Bug] - This issue discusses problems with the BMI088 I2C driver when used on platforms other than CrazyFlie, suggesting issues with data spikes and potential driver support problems.

  10. Issue #23110: Backports to release/1.15 - This issue discusses backporting several fixes to the 1.15 release, ensuring stability and functionality improvements are retained in older versions.

Recently Closed Issues

  • Issue #23116: CameraFeedback - Set correct ignore trigger - This recently closed issue corrected a problem where camera triggers were not being correctly filtered when camera capture feedback was enabled.
  • Issue #23108: Add I2C Launcher - Successfully closed, this issue added an I2C launcher functionality.
  • Issue #23107: Backports needed - This administrative task was closed after necessary backports were identified.
  • Issue #23105: fmu-v6xrt: Enable debug features for more verbose hardfault output - Closed after enhancing debugging capabilities for better fault diagnosis.
  • Issue #23101: boards: ark septentrio gps add iis2mdc - Closed following the successful addition of new GPS functionality.
  • Issue #23100: fmu-v6xrt: Add I2C driver launcher - Closed after integrating I2C driver launcher capabilities into the platform.

Summary

The recent activity highlights ongoing efforts to expand PX4's capabilities to new types of vehicles like spacecraft, enhance sensor handling and diagnostics, improve system identification tools, and refine MAVLink communication especially in multi-camera setups. The project continues to address both bugs and feature requests, showing active maintenance and incremental improvements across various modules of the system.

Report On: Fetch pull requests



Since the previous analysis was 6 days ago and the new data provided does not include any specific dates or times for recent activity, it appears that there has been no significant activity since the last report. Therefore, this update will focus on confirming that there has been little or no new activity in the PX4/PX4-Autopilot repository regarding pull requests since the previous analysis.

If you have specific updates or changes that occurred within the last 6 days and need analysis, please provide that data with exact timestamps or details. Otherwise, based on the information currently available, there has been no significant progress to report on open or recently closed pull requests in the repository.

Report On: Fetch PR 23119 For Assessment



PR #23119

Summary

This Pull Request (PR) proposes the addition of two new topics, vehicle_acceleration and actuator_motors, to the list of topics logged under the "Topics for system identification" option in the PX4 Autopilot software. This change is aimed at supporting a system identification utility that helps users accurately determine the dynamics parameters of their quadrotors using flight data.

Repository: PX4/PX4-Autopilot

  • Branch: main
  • From: jonas-eschmann:main

Proposed Changes

The changes are confined to the logged_topics.cpp file within the logger module:

  • Two lines have been added to include vehicle_acceleration and actuator_motors in the system identification logging profile.

Code Quality Assessment

  1. Clarity and Maintainability: The change is straightforward and clear. The code modifications are minimal, making them easy to maintain. The use of existing functions (add_topic) for adding topics ensures consistency with the rest of the codebase.

  2. Functionality: By logging these topics, users can perform more comprehensive system identification without needing to modify and recompile the PX4 firmware themselves. This enhances the utility of the PX4 system for research and development purposes.

  3. Impact: The change does not affect users who do not enable this specific logging profile, thus it is safe in terms of not impacting existing functionalities. For users who opt-in, it provides valuable data for system analysis.

  4. Documentation and Community Input: The PR description includes a detailed explanation of the purpose of the changes, links to relevant resources (a paper and a video), and an external tool that utilizes these logs. This is beneficial for reviewers and users who want to understand the context and utility of the changes.

Conclusion

The PR is well-prepared with a clear description, minimal and precise code changes, and it addresses a specific need without disrupting existing functionalities. It is a good example of how to extend system capabilities in a way that benefits a subset of users while maintaining general stability and performance for all users. The addition aligns with ongoing efforts to enhance system identification capabilities within the PX4 community.

Recommendation: Approve the PR after ensuring that all automated tests pass and after any necessary peer review discussions, particularly focusing on any potential long-term implications on logging performance when these topics are enabled.

Report On: Fetch Files For Assessment



Analysis of Source Code Files

1. boards/px4/fmu-v6xrt/default.px4board

Structure and Quality:
  • Configuration Style: The file is a configuration file, not actual source code. It uses key-value pairs to set various configuration options for the board, which is typical for embedded systems.
  • Readability: The file is well-organized with clear categorization of different types of configurations such as board specifications, driver configurations, and module configurations.
  • Maintainability: The use of clear, descriptive names for configuration keys aids in maintainability. However, the file could benefit from comments describing less obvious parameters.
  • Potential Risks: Without domain-specific knowledge, it's hard to evaluate the impact of these settings on system behavior. Incorrect settings could lead to system instability or performance issues.
Recent Changes:
  • Recent significant changes related to the I2C driver launcher and debug features for hardfault output indicate an improvement in debugging capabilities, which is crucial for diagnosing issues in embedded systems.

2. src/drivers/gps/params.c

Structure and Quality:
  • Code Organization: The file is structured around parameter definitions using macros. Each parameter is well-documented with comments explaining its purpose and possible values.
  • Readability and Documentation: The extensive use of comments enhances readability and makes the code accessible even to those unfamiliar with the specific GPS configurations.
  • Maintainability: The use of macros (PARAM_DEFINE_INT32, PARAM_DEFINE_FLOAT) for parameter definition standardizes the creation of configurable parameters and simplifies maintenance.
  • Potential Risks: The file seems to handle a wide range of GPS models and configurations, which could lead to complexity when debugging or adding new features. Ensuring compatibility across different GPS models might be challenging.
Recent Changes:
  • Notes added to GPS parameters likely improve the documentation and usability of these configurations, aiding both developers and users in understanding the implications of various settings.

3. src/modules/uxrce_dds_client/uxrce_dds_client.cpp

Structure and Quality:
  • Complexity: Given that this file is part of a module dealing with DDS (Data Distribution Service) clients, it can be inherently complex due to the nature of real-time data handling and network communication.
  • Code Organization: While the full content isn't visible, typically such files would include class definitions, method implementations, and possibly callback functions handling data distribution logic.
  • Readability: Assuming standard C++ practices are followed, readability would largely depend on naming conventions, code modularity, and internal documentation.
  • Maintainability: Effective handling of network events and errors would be crucial. The use of modern C++ features like smart pointers could potentially enhance maintainability by managing resource allocation more safely.
Recent Changes:
  • Increasing the stack size to prevent overflow is a critical update that suggests previous issues with stack overflows during runtime. This change likely enhances the reliability and stability of the DDS client module under heavier loads or more complex scenarios.

General Observations Across Files

  • Documentation: All files show a good level of internal documentation. This practice helps in maintaining code quality and ease of understanding for new developers or external contributors.
  • Consistency: Use of consistent naming conventions and configuration patterns across files helps in maintaining a uniform codebase.
  • Safety and Robustness: Changes like stack size adjustment indicate a focus on robustness and runtime safety, which are crucial in embedded systems like PX4 Autopilot that interact with real-world hardware.

Recommendations

  1. Enhanced Comments for Configuration Files: Especially for hardware configuration files, detailed comments can help developers understand the impact of each setting more clearly.
  2. Review Stack Usage Regularly: Given that stack size adjustments were necessary, regular reviews of memory usage could preempt similar issues in other modules or components.
  3. Modular Design Practices: As system complexity grows with features like multiple GPS models or advanced networking via DDS, keeping the design modular will aid maintainability and testing.

Overall, the source code files demonstrate a well-maintained and structured approach typical of mature embedded systems projects. Continuous improvements in documentation and configuration management are evident and contribute positively to the project's sustainability.

Aggregate for risks



Notable Risks

1. Regression in Trajectory Setpoint Handling

  • Summary: The issue #23120 reports a compilation error in version 1.14 that did not exist in version 1.13, indicating a regression in handling trajectory setpoints.
  • Risk Severity: High

  • Rationale: This regression affects core functionality of the PX4 Autopilot Software, potentially impacting all users relying on trajectory setpoints for their operations. The absence of this functionality can lead to failed missions or unsafe flight conditions.

  • Details: The error __orb_trajectory_setpoint not declared in scope suggests a significant oversight in code integration or testing processes. This type of error can prevent the software from compiling, thus blocking further development and use.
  • Next Steps: Immediate action is required to identify the changes introduced between versions 1.13 and 1.14 that led to this issue. A thorough review and testing of the trajectory setpoint feature should be conducted to ensure stability and functionality before any new releases.

2. Sensor Setup or Calibration Issues Leading to Preflight Failures

  • Summary: Multiple sensor-related preflight failures reported in issue #23114 suggest potential widespread issues with sensor setup or calibration.
  • Risk Severity: Medium

  • Rationale: While this issue may not affect all users, for those it does impact, it could prevent the use of the software for flight operations, leading to operational downtime and safety risks.

  • Details: The warning [health_and_arming_checks] Preflight Fail indicates problems in the preflight check process which is critical for ensuring the readiness and safety of the aircraft before flight.
  • Next Steps: It is crucial to investigate the specific sensors and configurations involved in these failures. Enhancements in diagnostic logging and error reporting during preflight checks could help identify and mitigate these issues more effectively.

3. BMI088 I2C Driver Compatibility Issues

  • Summary: Issue #23111 discusses problems with the BMI088 I2C driver on platforms other than CrazyFlie, including data spikes and potential driver support problems.
  • Risk Severity: Medium

  • Rationale: This issue highlights a compatibility problem that could affect users employing the BMI088 sensor on supported platforms, potentially leading to inaccurate sensor readings and unstable flight behavior.

  • Details: The specific mention of data spikes suggests that the driver may not be handling I2C communications correctly across different hardware setups.
  • Next Steps: A review of the BMI088 driver implementation across different platforms is necessary. Testing with a focus on I2C communication reliability and sensor data integrity should be prioritized to resolve these compatibility issues.

4. Inadequate Documentation for Configuration Parameters

  • Summary: The configuration file boards/px4/fmu-v6xrt/default.px4board lacks detailed comments for some parameters, which might lead to misconfiguration.
  • Risk Severity: Low

  • Rationale: While this risk primarily affects new developers or integrators who might misinterpret configuration settings, it is relatively minor as it does not directly impact end users or flight operations.

  • Details: The file sets various hardware-level configurations which are critical for the correct operation of the hardware but lacks comprehensive documentation that explains each parameter's impact.
  • Next Steps: Enhancing the comments within configuration files to provide clear guidance on the purpose and impact of each parameter would improve maintainability and ease of use for developers.

These identified risks underline the importance of robust testing, detailed documentation, and careful management of software changes to ensure reliability and safety in the PX4 Autopilot Software project.